Advertisement

Visual Snow—Persistent Positive Visual Phenomenon Distinct from Migraine Aura

  • Christoph J. SchankinEmail author
  • Peter J. Goadsby
Uncommon and/or Unusual Headaches and Syndromes (J Ailani, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Uncommon and/or Unusual Headaches and Syndromes

Abstract

Patients with visual snow complain of uncountable flickering tiny dots in the entire visual field similar to the view of a badly tuned analogue TV channel (TV snow). The symptoms are often continuous and can persist over years. This condition is grouped among the persistent visual phenomena in migraine, although it clinically presents a unique entity distinct from persistent migraine aura or migraine aura status. Here, we review the recent literature leading to the identification of the visual snow syndrome. The additional visual and non-visual symptoms are described in detail, and criteria are presented for future studies. Using these criteria, the relationship to migraine and typical migraine aura was recently evaluated. Further, patients with visual snow differ from controls in respect of hypermetabolism in the supplementary visual cortex (lingual gyrus). This provides evidence that visual snow, despite being purely subjective in the individual patient, has a clear biological basis. The area of hypermetabolism overlaps with the functional correlates of photophobia in migraine supporting the close relationship of migraine and visual snow.

Keywords

Visual snow Migraine Aura FDG PET Persistent visual phenomena Headache 

Abbreviations

VS

Visual snow

[18F]-FDG

[18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose

PET

Positron emission tomography

Notes

Acknowledgments

CJS was supported by the German Research Foundation [SCHA 1676/1-1] and the Friedrich Baur Foundation of the University of Munich [58/14].

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Christoph J. Schankin: travel grant by Allergan and Boehringer Ingelheim and speaking honorarium by Boehringer Ingelheim and Novartis.

Peter J. Goadsby: Dr. Goadsby reports grants and personal fees from Allergan, grants and personal fees from eNeura, personal fees from Autonomic Technologies Inc, grants and personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, personal fees from AlderBio, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Zogenix, personal fees from Nevro Corp, personal fees from Impax, personal fees from Dr. Reddy, personal fees from Zosano, personal fees from CoLucid, personal fees from Eli Lilly, personal fees from Medtronic, personal fees from Avanir, personal fees from Gore, personal fees from Ethicon, personal fees from Heptares, personal fees from NuPathe, personal fees from Ajinomoto, personal fees from Teva, outside the submitted work.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.•
    Simpson JC, Goadsby PJ, Prabhakar P. Positive persistent visual symptoms (visual snow) presenting as a migraine variant in a 12-year-old girl. Pediatr Neurol. 2013;49(5):361–3. This is a very detailed description of a young girl with visual snow. It shows that even young children can be affected, and it illustrates clearly the high impact on quality of life.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders: 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013;33(9):629–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu GT, Schatz NJ, Galetta SL, Volpe NJ, Skobieranda F, Kosmorsky GS. Persistent positive visual phenomena in migraine. Neurology. 1995;45(4):664–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang YF, Fuh JL, Chen WT, Wang SJ. The visual aura rating scale as an outcome predictor for persistent visual aura without infarction. Cephalalgia. 2008;28(12):1298–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eriksen MK, Thomsen LL, Olesen J. The Visual Aura Rating Scale (VARS) for migraine aura diagnosis. Cephalalgia. 2005;25(10):801–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen WT, Lin YY, Fuh JL, Hamalainen MS, Ko YC, Wang SJ. Sustained visual cortex hyperexcitability in migraine with persistent visual aura. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 8):2387–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lashley KS. Patterns of cerebral integration indicated by the scotoma of migraine. Arch Neurol Psychiatr. 1941;42.Google Scholar
  8. 8.•
    Hansen JM, Baca SM, Vanvalkenburgh P, Charles A. Distinctive anatomical and physiological features of migraine aura revealed by 18 years of recording. Brain. 2013;136(Pt 12):3589–95. This work shows the variability of typical migraine aura in a sufferer who had experienced and recorded more than 1000 attacks of migraine aura. The attacks were all very similar and clearly different from visual snow.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leao AAP. Spreading depression of activity in cerebral cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1944;7:359–90.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hadjikhani N, Sanchez Del Rio M, Wu O, Schwartz D, Bakker D, Fischl B, et al. Mechanisms of migraine aura revealed by functional MRI in human visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;8:4687–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.••
    Schankin CJ, Maniyar FH, Digre KB, Goadsby PJ. ‘Visual snow’—a disorder distinct from persistent migraine aura. Brain. 2014;137(Pt 5):1419–28. This study presents in detail the so far largest number of patients with visual snow. In addition to describing the phenotype of the visual snow syndrome consisting of additional visual symptoms, this work shows that visual snow typically does not start with headache or typical migraine aura and thus is likely different from persistent migraine aura. Criteria for the visual snow syndrome are presented.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Critchley M. Types of visual perseveration: “palinopsia“ and “illusory visual spread”. Brain. 1951;74(3):267–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tyler CW. Some new entoptic phenomena. Vis Res. 1978;12:1633–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sinclair SH, Azar-Cavanagh M, Soper KA, Tuma RF, Mayrovitz HN. Investigation of the source of the blue field entoptic phenomenon. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989;30(4):668–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    von Helmholtz H. Verschiedene subjective Erscheinungen. Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik. 2nd ed. Hamburg: Verlag von Leopold Voss; 1896. p. 572.Google Scholar
  16. 16.••
    Schankin CJ, Maniyar FH, Sprenger T, Chou DE, Eller M, Goadsby PJ. The relation between migraine, typical migraine aura and “visual snow”. Headache. 2014;54(6):957–66. This work investigates the impact of migraine on visual snow. Having migraine results in a worsened visual snow syndrome by being associated with a higher frequency of additional visual symptoms. In contrast, typical migriane aura does not show a correlation suggesting some pathophysiological relevance. Using the criteria for the visual snow syndrome (see reference 11), hypermetabolism in the lingual gyrus could be demonstrated.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Afridi SK, Matharu MS, Lee L, Kaube H, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS, et al. A PET study exploring the laterality of brainstem activation in migraine using glyceryl trinitrate. Brain. 2005;128(Pt 4):932–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weiller C, May A, Limmroth V, Juptner M, Kaube H, Schayck RV, et al. Brain stem activation in spontaneous human migraine attacks. Nat Med. 1995;1(7):658–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vanagaite J, Pareja JA, Storen O, White LR, Sand T, Stovner LJ. Light-induced discomfort and pain in migraine. Cephalalgia. 1997;17(7):733–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boulloche N, Denuelle M, Payoux P, Fabre N, Trotter Y, Geraud G. Photophobia in migraine: an interictal PET study of cortical hyperexcitability and its modulation by pain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81(9):978–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.••
    Denuelle M, Boulloche N, Payoux P, Fabre N, Trotter Y, Geraud G. A PET study of photophobia during spontaneous migraine attacks. Neurology. 2011;76(3):213–8. The authors demonstrate that the lingual gyrus and cuneus might be associated with photophobia in migraine. The similarity to the distribution of hypermetabolism in visual snow supports the clinical and pathophysiological overlap of visual snow and migraine.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maniyar FH, Sprenger T, Schankin C, Goadsby PJ. Photic hypersensitivity in the premonitory phase of migraine—a positron emission tomography study. Eur J Neurol. 2014;21(9):1178–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brodmann K. Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Großhirnrinde : in ihren Prinzipien dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues. Johann Ambrosius Barth Verlag 1909.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurologyUniversity of Munich Hospital—GroßhadernMunichGermany
  2. 2.Headache Group, Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, NIHR-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research FacilityKing’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations