Ion Channels and Osteoarthritic Pain: Potential for Novel Analgesics

Pain Aspects of Arthritis (A Mobasheri, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Pain Aspects of Arthritis

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a debilitating chronic condition widely prevalent in ageing populations. Because the pathology of the disease includes cartilage erosion and joint remodelling, OA patients experience a great deal of pain. Despite numerous studies, details of OA are frequently inseparable from other types of chronic pain, and its causes are unknown. In most circumstances in OA, the cartilage lacks afferent innervation, although other joint tissues contain nociceptive neurones. In addition to physical joint damage, there is a strong element of joint inflammation. Genetic studies have identified several associations between ion channels and OA pain, including NaV1.7, P2X7, and TRPV1, but several other channels have also been implicated. Many ion channels involved with OA pain are common to those seen in inflammatory pain. This review considers causes of OA pain and discusses three possible pain-reducing strategies involving ion channel modulation: chondroprotection, innate afferent nerve inhibition, and inhibition of inflammatory hyperalgesia. Future targets for OA pain analgesia could involve a number of ion channels.

Keywords

Osteoarthritis Chondrocytes Cannabinoids Ion channels Dorsal root ganglia Chronic pain Gabapentin 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has received partial funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n° 305815.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Conaghan P. Osteoarthritis: national clinical guideline for care and management in adults. Publisher: Royal College of Physicians. (2008). http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/cg59niceguideline.pdf.
  2. 2.
    Kidd BL, Urban LA. Mechanisms of inflammatory pain. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87(1):3–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dray A, Read SJ. Arthritis and pain. Future targets to control osteoarthritis pain. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9(3):212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang RX, Ren K, Dubner R. Osteoarthritis pain mechanisms: basic studies in animal models. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013;21(9):1308–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marshall KW, Theriault E, Homonko DA. Distribution of substance P and calcitonin gene related peptide immunoreactivity in the normal feline knee. J Rheumatol. 1994;21(5):883–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schaible H-G et al. Joint pain. Exp Brain Res. 2009;196(1):153–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oliva F, Tarantino U, Maffulli N. Immunohistochemical localization of calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P in the rat knee cartilage at birth. Physiol Res. 2005;54(5):549–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suri S et al. Neurovascular invasion at the osteochondral junction and in osteophytes in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(11):1423–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mapp PI, Walsh DA. Mechanisms and targets of angiogenesis and nerve growth in osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8(7):390–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    • Hunter DJ et al. Structural correlates of pain in joints with osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013;21(9):1170–8. This paper highlights that there is a correlation between OA pain and the degree of joint damage.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cotofana S et al. Relationship between knee pain and the presence, location, size and phenotype of femorotibial denuded areas of subchondral bone as visualized by MRI. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013;21(9):1214–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    • Konttinen YT et al. Osteoarthritis as an autoinflammatory disease caused by chondrocyte-mediated inflammatory responses. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(3):613–6. This paper explores the links between biomechanical and inflammatory effects of OA.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mobasheri A. Role of chondrocyte death and hypocellularity in ageing human articular cartilage and the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Med Hypotheses. 2002;58(3):193–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Verbruggen G. Chondroprotective drugs in degenerative joint diseases. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006;45(2):129–38.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goldring MB, Goldring SR. Osteoarthritis. J Cell Physiol. 2007;213(3):626–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hunter DJ, Felson DT. Osteoarthritis. Br Med J. 2006;332(7542):639–42.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cawston TE, Wilson AJ. Understanding the role of tissue degrading enzymes and their inhibitors in development and disease. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006;20(5):983–1002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reynard LN and Loughlin J. Insights from human genetic studies into the pathways involved in osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.121
  19. 19.
    Chen R, Brady E, McIntyre TM. Human TMEM30a promotes uptake of antitumor and bioactive choline phospholipids into mammalian cells. J Immunol. 2011;186(5):3215–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    •• Brines ML, Ling Z, Broadus AE. Parathyroid hormone-related protein protects against kainic acid excitotoxicity in rat cerebellar granule cells by regulating L-type channel calcium flux. Neurosci Lett. 1999;274(1):13–6. This paper showed that only five genes were associated with OA pain.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bond SR et al. Pannexin 3 is a novel target for Runx2, expressed by osteoblasts and mature growth plate chondrocytes. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26(12):2911–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    • Uchiyama Y et al. SMAD3 functions as a transcriptional repressor of acid-sensing ion channel 3 (ASIC3) in nucleus pulposus cells of the intervertebral disc. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23(10):1619–28. This paper summarises all the ion channels changed in OA as identified by bioinformatics studies.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thakur M, Dawes JM, McMahon SB. Genomics of pain in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013;21(9):1374–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen CT et al. Chondrocyte necrosis and apoptosis in impact damaged articular cartilage. J Orthop Res. 2001;19(4):703–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lewis R, Feetham C, Barrett-Jolley R. Cell volume control in chondrocytes. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2011;28(6):1111–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kumagai K et al. 17β-Estradiol inhibits the doxorubicin-induced apoptosis via block of volume-sensitive Cl− current in rabbit articular chondrocytes. Br J Pharmacol. 2012;166(2):702–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mobasheri A et al. Characterization of a stretch-activated potassium channel in chondrocytes. J Cell Physiol. 2010;223(2):511–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lewis R et al. Chondrocyte channel transcriptomics: Do microarray data fit with expression and functional data? Channels. 2013;7(6).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mobasheri A et al. Evidence for functional ATP-sensitive (K(ATP)) potassium channels in human and equine articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2007;15(1):1–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rufino AT et al. Expression and function of K(ATP) channels in normal and osteoarthritic human chondrocytes: possible role in glucose sensing. J Cell Biochem. 2013;114(8):1879–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mobasheri A et al. Potassium channels in articular chondrocytes. Channels. 2012;6(6):416–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Barrett-Jolley R. et al. The emerging chondrocyte channelome. Front Membr Physiol Biophys. 2010;1(135). doi: 10.3389/fphys.2010.00135
  33. 33.
    Lewis R et al. Benzamil sensitive ion channels contribute to volume regulation in canine chondrocytes. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;168(7):1584–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Docherty RJ et al. TRPA1 insensitivity of human sural nerve axons after exposure to lidocaine. Pain. 2013;154(9):1569–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lofstrom B. Aspects of the pharmacology of local anaesthetic agents. Br J Anaesth. 1970;42(3):194–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Creamer P, Hunt M, Dieppe P. Pain mechanisms in osteoarthritis of the knee: effect of intraarticular anesthetic. J Rheumatol. 1996;23(6):1031–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Crawford RW et al. Diagnostic value of intra-articular anaesthetic in primary osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(2):279–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fernandes L, Goodwill CJ, Wright MG. Local anaesthetic nerve block in the treatment of intractable pain from osteoarthritis of the hip. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1978;17(4):249–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hennig GS et al. Evaluation of chondrocyte death in canine osteochondral explants exposed to a 0.5% solution of bupivacaine. Am J Vet Res. 2010;71(8):875–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Malfait AM, Little CB, McDougall JJ. A commentary on modelling osteoarthritis pain in small animals. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013;21(9):1316–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Just S, Leipold-Buttner C, Heppelmann B. Histological demonstration of voltage dependent calcium channels on calcitonin gene-related peptide-immunoreactive nerve fibres in the mouse knee joint. Neurosci Lett. 2001;312(3):133–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ichikawa H et al. VR1-, VRL-1- and P2X3 receptor-immunoreactive innervation of the rat temporomandibular joint. Brain Res. 2004;1008(1):131–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Baker CL, McDougall JJ. The cannabinomimetic arachidonyl-2-chloroethylamide (ACEA) acts on capsaicin-sensitive TRPV1 receptors but not cannabinoid receptors in rat joints. Br J Pharmacol. 2004;142(8):1361–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fernihough J et al. Regulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide and TRPV1 in a rat model of osteoarthritis. Neurosci Lett. 2005;388(2):75–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lewis R et al. The role of the membrane potential in chondrocyte volume regulation. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226(11):2979–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Heppelmann B, McDougall JJ. Inhibitory effect of amiloride and gadolinium on fine afferent nerves in the rat knee: evidence of mechanogated ion channels in joints. Exp Brain Res. 2005;167(1):114–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Denadai-Souza A et al. Role of transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 in rat joint inflammation. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(6):1848–58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Guilak F, Leddy HA, and Liedtke W. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1192:404–9.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pena Ede L et al. Elastoviscous substances with analgesic effects on joint pain reduce stretch-activated ion channel activity in vitro. Pain. 2002;99(3):501–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schuelert N, McDougall JJ. Involvement of Nav 1.8 sodium ion channels in the transduction of mechanical pain in a rodent model of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14(1):R5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Efe T et al. Penetration of topical diclofenac sodium 4 % spray gel into the synovial tissue and synovial fluid of the knee: a randomised clinical trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;1–6.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kang KS, Bulstrode C. Accelerated progression of osteoarthritis after hip block: a retrospective matched control study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1991;73(2):124–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Pelletier JP et al. Chondrocyte death in experimental osteoarthritis is mediated by MEK 1/2 and p38 pathways: role of cyclooxygenase-2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(11):2509–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pelletier J-P, Martel-Pelletier J, Abramson SB. Osteoarthritis, an inflammatory disease: Potential implication for the selection of new therapeutic targets. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44(6):1237–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Grunke M, Schulze-Koops H. Successful treatment of inflammatory knee osteoarthritis with tumour necrosis factor blockade. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(4):555–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Czeschik JC et al. TNF-alpha differentially modulates ion channels of nociceptive neurons. Neurosci Lett. 2008;434(3):293–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Faber CG et al. Gain-of-function Nav1.8 mutations in painful neuropathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(47):19444–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Matsushita Y et al. HDAC inhibitors restore C-fiber sensitivity in experimental neuropathic pain model. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;170:991–998Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    •• Natura G et al. Neuronal prostaglandin E2 receptor subtype EP3 mediates antinociception during inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110:13648–53. This paper shows for the first time that the GIRK channel is central to peripheral neuronal cell processing, and importantly, that this channel is absent in mice but not in humans or rats. Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Jarvis MF et al. A-803467, a potent and selective Nav1.8 sodium channel blocker, attenuates neuropathic and inflammatory pain in the rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(20):8520–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Xie W et al. Knockdown of sodium channel NaV1.6 blocks mechanical pain and abnormal bursting activity of afferent neurons in inflamed sensory ganglia. Pain. 2013;154(8):1170–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Strickland IT et al. Changes in the expression of NaV1.7, NaV1.8 and NaV1.9 in a distinct population of dorsal root ganglia innervating the rat knee joint in a model of chronic inflammatory joint pain. Eur J Pain. 2008;12(5):564–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kolker SJ et al. Acid-sensing ion channel 3 expressed in type B synoviocytes and chondrocytes modulates hyaluronan expression and release. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(5):903–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Yuan F-L et al. Inhibition of acid-sensing ion channels in articular chondrocytes by amiloride attenuates articular cartilage destruction in rats with adjuvant arthritis. Inflamm Res. 2010;59(11):939–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Izumi M et al. Local ASIC3 modulates pain and disease progression in a rat model of osteoarthritis. J Biomed Sci. 2012;19:77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ikeuchi M et al. Role of ASIC3 in the primary and secondary hyperalgesia produced by joint inflammation in mice. Pain. 2008;137(3):662–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Dube GR et al. Electrophysiological and in vivo characterization of A-317567, a novel blocker of acid sensing ion channels. Pain. 2005;117(1–2):88–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Zhang P, Canessa CM. Single Channel Properties of Rat Acid–sensitive Ion Channel-1α, -2a, and -3 Expressed in Xenopus Oocytes. J Gen Physiol. 2002;120(4):553–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wickenden AD. K+ channels as therapeutic drug targets. Pharmacol Ther. 2002;94(1–2):157–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Zöllner C, Stein C. Opioids. In: Stein C, editor. Analgesia. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Berlin; 2007. p. 31–63.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Nockemann D et al. The K + channel GIRK2 is both necessary and sufficient for peripheral opioid-mediated analgesia. EMBO Mol Med. 2013;5(8):1263–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Dray A, Perkins M. Bradykinin and inflammatory pain. Trends Neurosci. 1993;16(3):99–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Liu B et al. The acute nociceptive signals induced by bradykinin in rat sensory neurons are mediated by inhibition of M-type K+ channels and activation of Ca2+ -activated Cl- channels. J Clin Investig. 2010;120(4):1240–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Green PG, Levine JD. δ- and κ-opioid agonists inhibit plasma extravasation induced by bradykinin in the knee joint of the rat. Neuroscience. 1992;49(1):129–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Meini S, Maggi CA. Knee osteoarthritis: a role for bradykinin? Inflamm Res. 2008;57(8):351–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Meini S et al. Bradykinin and B(2) receptor antagonism in rat and human articular chondrocytes. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;162(3):611–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    von Banchet GS et al. Monoarticular antigen-induced arthritis leads to pronounced bilateral upregulation of the expression of neurokinin 1 and bradykinin 2 receptors in dorsal root ganglion neurons of rats. Arthritis Res. 2000;2(5):424–7.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Gomis A et al. Blockade of nociceptive sensory afferent activity of the rat knee joint by the bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist fasitibant. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2013;21(9):1346–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Neugebauer V, Schaible HG, Schmidt RF. Sensitization of articular afferents to mechanical stimuli by bradykinin. Pflugers Arch. 1989;415(3):330–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Cialdai C et al. Effect of Intra-articular 4-(S)-amino-5-(4-{4-[2,4-dichloro-3-(2,4-dimethyl-8-quinolyloxymethyl)phenylsulfo namido]-tetrahydro-2H-4-pyranylcarbonyl} piperazino)-5-oxopentyl](trimethyl)ammonium chloride hydrochloride (MEN16132), a kinin B2 receptor antagonist, on nociceptive response in monosodium iodoacetate-induced experimental osteoarthritis in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009;331(3):1025–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Alexander SP, Mathie A, Peters JA. Guide to Receptors and Channels (GRAC), 5th edition. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164:1–2.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Hatch RJ, Jennings EA, Ivanusic JJ. Peripheral hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels contribute to inflammation-induced hypersensitivity of the rat temporomandibular joint. Eur J Pain. 2013;17(7):972–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Voets T et al. Sensing with TRP channels. Nat Chem Biol. 2005;1(2):85–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Cesare P, McNaughton P. A novel heat-activated current in nociceptive neurons and its sensitization by bradykinin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(26):15435–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Huang J, Zhang X, McNaughton PA. Inflammatory pain: the cellular basis of heat hyperalgesia. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2006;4(3):197–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Fan HC, Zhang X, McNaughton PA. Activation of the TRPV4 ion channel is enhanced by phosphorylation. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(41):27884–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Bandell M et al. Noxious cold ion channel TRPA1 is activated by pungent compounds and bradykinin. Neuron. 2004;41(6):849–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Helyes Z et al. Involvement of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 receptors in protease-activated receptor-2-induced joint inflammation and nociception. Eur J Pain. 2010;14(4):351–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Caterina MJ et al. Impaired nociception and pain sensation in mice lacking the capsaicin receptor. Science. 2000;288(5464):306–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Cho WG, Valtschanoff JG. Vanilloid receptor TRPV1-positive sensory afferents in the mouse ankle and knee joints. Brain Res. 2008;1219:59–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Valdes AM et al. The Ile585Val TRPV1 variant is involved in risk of painful knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(9):1556–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Brederson JD et al. TRPV1 antagonist, A-889425, inhibits mechanotransmission in a subclass of rat primary afferent neurons following peripheral inflammation. Synapse. 2012;66(3):187–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Okun A et al. Afferent drive elicits ongoing pain in a model of advanced osteoarthritis. Pain. 2012;153(4):924–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Katsura H et al. Antisense knock down of TRPA1, but not TRPM8, alleviates cold hyperalgesia after spinal nerve ligation in rats. Exp Neurol. 2006;200(1):112–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    McGaraughty S et al. TRPA1 modulation of spontaneous and mechanically evoked firing of spinal neurons in uninjured, osteoarthritic, and inflamed rats. Mol Pain. 2010;6:14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Schuelert N et al. Local application of the endocannabinoid hydrolysis inhibitor URB597 reduces nociception in spontaneous and chemically induced models of osteoarthritis. Pain. 2011;152(5):975–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Ahn K et al. Mechanistic and pharmacological characterization of PF-04457845: a highly potent and selective fatty acid amide hydrolase inhibitor that reduces inflammatory and noninflammatory pain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2011;338(1):114–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Huggins JP et al. An efficient randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial with the irreversible fatty acid amide hydrolase-1 inhibitor PF-04457845, which modulates endocannabinoids but fails to induce effective analgesia in patients with pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee. Pain. 2012;153(9):1837–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Schuelert N et al. Paradoxical effects of the cannabinoid CB2 receptor agonist GW405833 on rat osteoarthritic knee joint pain. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2010;18(11):1536–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Vriens J et al. TRPM3 is a nociceptor channel involved in the detection of noxious heat. Neuron. 2011;70(3):482–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Todorovic S, Jevtovic-Todorovic V. Neuropathic pain: role for presynaptic T-type channels in nociceptive signaling. Pflugers Arch - Eur J Physiol. 2013;465(7):921–7.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Rahman W et al. Descending serotonergic facilitation and the antinociceptive effects of pregabalin in a rat model of osteoarthritic pain. Mol Pain. 2009;5:45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Vonsy JL, Ghandehari J, Dickenson AH. Differential analgesic effects of morphine and gabapentin on behavioural measures of pain and disability in a model of osteoarthritis pain in rats. Eur J Pain. 2009;13(8):786–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Caudill-Slosberg MA, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Office visits and analgesic prescriptions for musculoskeletal pain in US 1980 vs. 2000. Pain. 2004;109(3):514–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Gao R et al. Potent analgesic effects of a store-operated calcium channel inhibitor. Pain. 2013;154(10):2034–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Knight MM et al. Articular chondrocytes express connexin 43 hemichannels and P2 receptors - a putative mechanoreceptor complex involving the primary cilium? J Anat. 2009;214(2):275–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Varani K et al. Pharmacological characterization of P2X1 and P2X3 purinergic receptors in bovine chondrocytes. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2008;16(11):1421–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Millward-Sadler SJ et al. ATP in the mechanotransduction pathway of normal human chondrocytes. Biorheology. 2004;41(3–4):567–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Verkhratsky A, Steinhauser C. Ion channels in glial cells. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2000;32(2–3):380–412.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Sagar DR et al. The contribution of spinal glial cells to chronic pain behaviour in the monosodium iodoacetate model of osteoarthritic pain. Mol Pain. 2011;7:88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    North RA, Jarvis MF. P2X receptors as drug targets. Mol Pharmacol. 2013;83(4):759–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Bhattacharya A et al. Pharmacological characterization of a novel centrally permeable P2X7 receptor antagonist: JNJ-47965567. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;170:624–40.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Jenkins TW. Functional mammalian neuroanatomy, with emphasis on dog and cat, including an atlas of dog central nervous system, vol. xvii. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1972. 419 p.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Craig Jr AD. Spinocervical tract cells in cat and dog, labeled by the retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase. Neurosci Lett. 1976;3(4):173–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Iannone F et al. Increased expression of nerve growth factor (NGF) and high affinity NGF receptor (p140 TrkA) in human osteoarthritic chondrocytes. Rheumatology. 2002;41(12):1413–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. A. Staunton
    • 1
  • R. Lewis
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. Barrett-Jolley
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Musculoskeletal Biology, Institute of Ageing and Chronic DiseaseUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.D-BOARD European Consortium for Biomarker DiscoveryUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations