Advertisement

Quality Measures and Quality Improvement Initiatives in Osteoporosis—an Update

  • S. French
  • S. Choden
  • Gabriela SchmajukEmail author
Quality of Care in Osteoporosis (S Silverman and J Curtis, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Quality of Care in Osteoporosis

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The aims of this review are to summarize current performance for osteoporosis quality measures used by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) for pay-for-performance programs and to describe recent quality improvement strategies around these measures.

Recent Findings

Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information (HEDIS) quality measures for the managed care population indicate gradual improvement in osteoporosis screening, osteoporosis identification and treatment following fragility fracture, and documentation of fall risk assessment and plan of care between 2006 and 2016. However, population-based studies suggest achievement for these process measures is lower where reporting is not mandated. Performance gaps remain, particularly for post-fracture care. Elderly patients with increased comorbidity are especially vulnerable to fractures, yet underperformance is documented in this population. Gender and racial disparities also exist. As has been shown for other areas of health care, education alone has a limited role as a quality improvement intervention. Multifactorial and systems-based interventions seem to be most successful in leading to measurable change for osteoporosis care and fall prevention.

Summary

Despite increasing recognition of evidence-based quality measures for osteoporosis and incentives to improve upon performance for these measures, persistent gaps in care exist that will require further investigation into sustainable and value-adding quality improvement interventions.

Keywords

Osteoporosis Falls Quality measure Quality improvement Medicare MACRA/MIPS 

Notes

Funding Information

Dr. French is supported by NIAMS T32 AR007304. Dr. Schmajuk is supported by the Russell/Engleman Rheumatology Research Center.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Sonam Choden and Sarah French declare no conflict of interest. Gabriela Schmajuk reports grants from Russell/Engleman Rheumatology Research Center, grants from American College of Rheumatology, grants from AHRQ, grants from Alpha Foundation, outside the submitted work.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Wright NC, Looker AC, Saag KG, Curtis JR, Delzell ES, Randall S, et al. The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(11):2520–6.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2269.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Office of the Surgeon G. Reports of the Surgeon general. Bone health and osteoporosis: a report of the surgeon general. Rockville: Office of the Surgeon General (US); 2004.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cummings SR, Melton LJ. Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet. 2002;359(9319):1761–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08657-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2007;22(3):465–75.  https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.061113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Briggs AM, Cross MJ, Hoy DG, Sanchez-Riera L, Blyth FM, Woolf AD, et al. Musculoskeletal Health conditions represent a global threat to healthy aging: a report for the 2015 World Health Organization World Report on Ageing and Health. The Gerontologist. 2016;56(Suppl 2):S243–55.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fischer S, Kapinos KA, Mulcahy A, Pinto L, Hayden O, Barron R. Estimating the long-term functional burden of osteoporosis-related fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(10):2843–51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4110-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Papadimitriou N, Tsilidis KK, Orfanos P, Benetou V, Ntzani EE, Soerjomataram I, et al. Burden of hip fracture using disability-adjusted life-years: a pooled analysis of prospective cohorts in the CHANCES consortium. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(5):e239–e46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(17)30046-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gold DT, Williams SA, Weiss RJ, Wang Y, Watkins C, Carroll J, et al. Quality of life in patients with osteoporosis: A US cross-sectional survey. Value Health. 2018;21:S199–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abrahamsen B, van Staa T, Ariely R, Olson M, Cooper C. Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review. Osteoporos Int. 2009;20(10):1633–50.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0920-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, Barry MJ, Caughey AB, Davidson KW, et al. Screening for osteoporosis to prevent fractures: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Jama. 2018;319(24):2521–31.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.7498.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, Lewiecki EM, Tanner B, Randall S, et al. Clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(10):2359–81.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N, Clarke BL, Harris ST, Hurley DL, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis - 2016—executiVE SUMMARY. Endocr Pract. 2016;22(9):1111–8.  https://doi.org/10.4158/ep161435.Esgl.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Owens DK, Barry MJ, Caughey AB, Davidson KW, et al. Interventions to Prevent falls in community-dwelling older adults: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Jama. 2018;319(16):1696–704.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.3097.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, Gillespie WJ, Sherrington C, Gates S, Clemson LM, et al. Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007146.pub3.
  15. 15.
    Panel on Prevention of Falls in Older Persons AGS, British Geriatrics S. Summary of the updated American Geriatrics Society/British Geriatrics Society Clinical Practice Guideline for Prevention of Falls in Older Persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(1):148–57.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03234.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tricco AC, Thomas SM, Veroniki AA, Hamid JS, Cogo E, Strifler L, et al. Comparisons of Interventions for preventing falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparisons of interventions for preventing falls in older adults. Jama. 2017;318(17):1687–99.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.15006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    NCQA. Osteoporosis Testing and managment in older women. 2017.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    National Quality Forum. Primary care and chronic illness, Sping 2018 Cycle: CDP Report. Technical Report. 2019.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kale MS, Bishop TF, Federman AD, Keyhani S. “Top 5” Lists Top $5 Billion. JAMA Intern Med. 2011;171(20):1858–9.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    National Quality Forum Measure Submission and Evaluation Worksheet 5.0. 2012.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    NCQA. Fall Risk Management. 2016.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Medicare Program; Merit-based incentive payment system (MIPS) and alternative payment model (APM) incentive under the physician fee schedule, and criteria for physician-focused payment models. Final rule with comment period. Federal register. 2016;81(214):77008-831.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    CMS. Quality payment program. 2019 Quality Measures.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Curtis JR, Carbone L, Cheng H, Hayes B, Laster A, Matthews R, et al. Longitudinal trends in use of bone mass measurement among older americans, 1999-2005. J Bone Miner Res. 2008;23(7):1061–7.  https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.080232.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    • Amarnath A, Franks P, Robbins J, Xing G, Fenton J. Underuse and overuse of osteoporosis screening in a regional health system: a retrospective cohort study. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(12):1733–40.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3349-8. This study provides evidence of suboptimal population screening practices for osteoporosis, including both underscreening and overscreening with DXA. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    •• Gillespie CW, Morin PE. Trends and disparities in osteoporosis screening among women in the United States, 2008-2014. Am J Med. 2017;130(3):306–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.10.018. Study of administrative claims data indicating low osteoporosis screening rates and racial disparities among women qualifying for screening according to USPTF guidelines. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lasser EC, Pfoh ER, Chang HY, Chan KS, Bailey JC, Kharrazi H, et al. Has Choosing wisely( R) affected rates of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry use? Osteoporos Int. 2016;27(7):2311–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3511-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Balasubramanian A, Tosi LL, Lane JM, Dirschl DR, Ho PR, O'Malley CD. Declining rates of osteoporosis management following fragility fractures in the U.S., 2000 through 2009. J Bone Joint Surg Series A. 2014;96(7):e52.1–e.8.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    •• Solomon DH, Johnston SS, Boytsov NN, McMorrow D, Lane JM, Krohn KD. Osteoporosis medication use after hip fracture in U.S. patients between 2002 and 2011. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(9):1929–37.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2202. Study of insurance claims data showing low osteoporosis medication use within 12 months of hip fracture and a significant decline in rates of use from 2002 to 2011. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wilk A, Sajjan S, Modi A, Fan CP, Mavros P. Post-fracture pharmacotherapy for women with osteoporotic fracture: analysis of a managed care population in the USA. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(12):2777–86.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2827-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kim SC, Kim MS, Sanfelix-Gimeno G, Song HJ, Liu J, Hurtado I, et al. Use of osteoporosis medications after hospitalization for hip fracture: a cross-national study. Am J Med. 2015;128(5):519–26.e1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.01.014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    •• Kim SC, Kim DH, Mogun H, Eddings W, Polinski JM, Franklin JM, et al. Impact of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Safety-Related Announcements on the Use of Bisphosphonates After Hip Fracture. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31(8):1536–40.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2832. This study provides evidence of a significant decline in bisphosphonate use after FDA safety announcements. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Munson JC, Bynum JP, Bell JE, Cantu R, McDonough C, Wang Q, et al. Patterns of prescription drug use before and after fragility fracture. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(10):1531–8.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.4814.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yang X, Sajjan S, Modi A. High rate of non-treatment among osteoporotic women enrolled in a US Medicare plan. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(11):1849–56.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2016.1211997.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yusuf AA, Matlon TJ, Grauer A, Barron R, Chandler D, Peng Y. Utilization of osteoporosis medication after a fragility fracture among elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Arch Osteoporos. 2016;11(1):31.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-016-0285-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    •• Gillespie CW, Morin PE. Osteoporosis-related health services utilization following first hip fracture among a cohort of privately-insured women in the United States, 2008-2014: An Observational Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(5):1052–61.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3079. Nationwide claims-based cohort demonstrating low utilzation of osteoporosis-related services following hip fracture, including a decline in initiation of osteoporosis drugs between 2008 and 2013. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Keshishian A, Boytsov N, Burge R, Krohn K, Lombard L, Zhang X, et al. Examining the treatment gap and risk of subsequent fractures among females with a fragility fracture in the US Medicare population. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(8):2485–94.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4072-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Barton DW, Behrend CJ, Carmouche JJ. Rates of osteoporosis screening and treatment following vertebral fracture. Spine J. 2019;19(3):411–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    • Qin Z, Baccaglini L. Distribution, determinants, and prevention of falls among the elderly in the 2011-2012 California Health Interview Survey. Public Health Rep (Washington, DC : 1974). 2016;131(2):331–9.  https://doi.org/10.1177/003335491613100217. Study of California Health Interview Survey showing that a minority of the elderly population with history of falls receive any medical recommendations for fall prevention. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wolfson D, Santa J, Slass L. Engaging physicians and consumers in conversations about treatment overuse and waste: a short history of the choosing wisely campaign. Acad Med. 2014;89(7):990–5.  https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000270.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Majumdar SR, McAlister FA, Johnson JA, Weir DL, Bellerose D, Hanley DA, et al. Critical impact of patient knowledge and bone density testing on starting osteoporosis treatment after fragility fracture: secondary analyses from two controlled trials. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(9):2173–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2728-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bergen G, Stevens MR, Burns ER. Falls and fall injuries among adults aged >/=65 years—United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(37):993–8.  https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6537a2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Stevens JA, Ballesteros MF, Mack KA, Rudd RA, DeCaro E, Adler G. Gender differences in seeking care for falls in the aged Medicare population. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(1):59–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.03.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tinetti ME, Gordon C, Sogolow E, Lapin P, Bradley EH. Fall-risk evaluation and management: challenges in adopting geriatric care practices. The Gerontologist. 2006;46(6):717–25.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/46.6.717.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hoffman GJ, Ha J, Alexander NB, Langa KM, Tinetti M, Min LC. Underreporting of fall injuries of older adults: implications for wellness visit fall risk screening. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(6):1195–200.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15360.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Warriner AH, Outman RC, Feldstein AC, Roblin DW, Allison JJ, Curtis JR, et al. Effect of self-referral on bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis treatment. Med Care. 2014;52(8):743–50.  https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000000170.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Heyworth L, Kleinman K, Oddleifson S, Bernstein L, Frampton J, Lehrer M, et al. Comparison of interactive voice response, patient mailing, and mailed registry to encourage screening for osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2014;25(5):1519–26.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-014-2629-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    • Tzortziou Brown V, Underwood M, Mohamed N, Westwood O, Morrissey D. Professional interventions for general practitioners on the management of musculoskeletal conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;5.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007495.pub2. Meta-analysis of professional interventions for osteoporosis indicating that multifactorial intervention targeting both the general practitioner and patient improve bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis medication use.
  49. 49.
    Kalisch Ellett LM, Pratt NL, Sluggett JK, Ramsay EN, Kerr M, LeBlanc VT, et al. Patient-specific prescriber feedback can increase the rate of osteoporosis screening and treatment: results from two national interventions. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12(1):17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0309-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    • Kastner M, Perrier L, Munce SEP, Adhihetty CC, Lau A, Hamid J, et al. Complex interventions can increase osteoporosis investigations and treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29(1):5–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4248-0. Systematic review and meta-analysis showing that complex implementation interventions incorporating education and feedback increase the quality of osteoporosis care. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Solomon DH, Finkelstein JS, Polinski JM, Arnold M, Licari A, Cabral D, et al. A randomized controlled trial of mailed osteoporosis education to older adults. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(5):760–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-005-0049-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Solomon DH, Iversen MD, Avorn J, Gleeson T, Brookhart MA, Patrick AR, et al. Osteoporosis telephonic intervention to improve medication regimen adherence: a large, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(6):477–83.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1977.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Liu LH, Choden S, Yazdany J. Quality improvement initiatives in rheumatology: an integrative review of the last 5 years. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2019;31(2):98–108.  https://doi.org/10.1097/bor.0000000000000586.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hofflich HL, Oh DK, Choe CH, Clay B, Tibble C, Kulasa KM, et al. Using a triggered endocrinology service consultation to improve the evaluation, management, and follow-up of osteoporosis in hip-fracture patients. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014;40(5):228–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    • Bunta AD, Edwards BJ, Macaulay WB Jr, Jeray KJ, Tosi LL, Jones CB, et al. Own the bone, a system-based intervention, improves osteoporosis care after fragility fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(24):e109.  https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.15.01494. Study showing successful implementation of a national secondary fracture prevention quality improvement program leading to increased bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Fojas MC, Southerland LT, Phieffer LS, Stephens JA, Srivastava T, Ing SW. Compliance to The joint commission proposed core measure set on osteoporosis-associated fracture: review of different secondary fracture prevention programs in an open medical system from 2010 to 2015. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12(1):16.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0307-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Merle B, Chapurlat R, Vignot E, Thomas T, Haesebaert J, Schott AM. Post-fracture care: do we need to educate patients rather than doctors? The PREVOST randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(5):1549–58.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-3953-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Anderson ME, McDevitt K, Cumbler E, Bennett H, Robison Z, Gomez B, et al. Geriatric hip fracture care: fixing a fragmented system. Perm J. 2017;21:16–104.  https://doi.org/10.7812/tpp/16-104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Beaton DE, Mamdani M, Zheng H, Jaglal S, Cadarette SM, Bogoch ER, et al. Improvements in osteoporosis testing and care are found following the wide scale implementation of the Ontario Fracture Clinic Screening Program: An interrupted time series analysis. Medicine. 2017;96(48):e9012.  https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000009012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Danila MI, Outman RC, Rahn EJ, Mudano AS, Redden DT, Li P, et al. Evaluation of a multimodal, direct-to-patient educational intervention targeting barriers to osteoporosis care: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(5):763–72.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3395.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Dunn P, Webb D, Olenginski TP. Geisinger high-risk osteoporosis clinic (HiROC): 2013-2015 FLS performance analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29(2):451–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4270-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    • Nayak S, Greenspan SL. How Can We Improve Osteoporosis Care? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of quality improvement strategies for osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33(9):1585–94.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3437.Systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrating that multifaceted interventions targeting providers and patients and fracture liason services improve osteoporosis management in patients with prior fracture.
  63. 63.
    Chami G, Jeys L, Freudmann M, Connor L, Siddiqi M. Are osteoporotic fractures being adequately investigated? A questionnaire of GP & orthopaedic surgeons. BMC Fam Pract. 2006;7:7.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-7-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Hawley S, Javaid MK, Prieto-Alhambra D, Lippett J, Sheard S, Arden NK, et al. Clinical effectiveness of orthogeriatric and fracture liaison service models of care for hip fracture patients: population-based longitudinal study. Age Ageing. 2016;45(2):236–42.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afv204.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Edwards BJ, Bunta AD, Anderson J, Bobb A, Hahr A, O'Leary KJ, et al. Development of an electronic medical record based intervention to improve medical care of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(10):2489–98.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1866-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Edwards BJ, Koval K, Bunta AD, Genuario K, Hahr A, Andruszyn L, et al. Addressing secondary prevention of osteoporosis in fracture care: follow-up to “own the bone”. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(15):e87.  https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.I.00540.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ganda K, Puech M, Chen JS, Speerin R, Bleasel J, Center JR, et al. Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(2):393–406.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-012-2090-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Akesson K, Marsh D, Mitchell PJ, McLellan AR, Stenmark J, Pierroz DD, et al. Capture the fracture: a best practice framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(8):2135–52.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2348-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Javaid MK, Kyer C, Mitchell PJ, Chana J, Moss C, Edwards MH, et al. Effective secondary fracture prevention: implementation of a global benchmarking of clinical quality using the IOF Capture the Fracture(R) Best Practice Framework tool. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26(11):2573–8.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3192-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Guirguis-Blake JM, Michael YL, Perdue LA, Coppola EL, Beil TL. Interventions to prevent falls in older adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. Jama. 2018;319(16):1705–16.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.21962.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Landis SE, Galvin SL. Implementation and assessment of a fall screening program in primary care practices. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(12):2408–14.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    • Ganz DA, Kim SB, Zingmond DS, Ramirez KD, Roth CP, Jennings LA, et al. Effect of a falls quality improvement program on serious fall-related injuries. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(1):63–70.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13154. A fall prevention quality improvement program shows no impact on episodes of care for fall-related injuries despite improvement in processes of care. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Parker EM. Making older adult fall prevention part of routine care in a large health system in New York state. The Gerontologist. 2015;55(Suppl_2):320.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv620.02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    • Casey CM, Parker EM, Winkler G, Liu X, Lambert GH, Eckstrom E. Lessons learned From implementing CDC’s STEADI falls prevention algorithm in primary care. The Gerontologist. 2016;57(4):787–96.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw074. Study of implementation of the CDC STEADI fall risk screening and prevention program at an academic primary care clinic, highlighting the importance of electronic health record tools and collaboration among multiple stakeholders for successful incorporation of workflow changes. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Eckstrom E, Neal MB, Cotrell V, Casey CM, McKenzie G, Morgove MW, et al. An interprofessional approach to reducing the risk of falls through enhanced collaborative practice. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(8):1701–7.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14178.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ritchey K, Olney A, Shofer J, Phelan EA, Matsumoto AM. Implementation of a fall screening program in a high risk of fracture population. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12(1):96.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0393-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Johnston YA, Bergen G, Bauer M, Parker EM, Wentworth L, McFadden M, et al. Implementation of the stopping elderly accidents, deaths, and injuries initiative in primary care: an outcome evaluation. The Gerontologist. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    • Stoeckle JJ, Cunningham A, Al-Hawarri D, Silverio A, Valko G. The effect of primary care team realignment on point-of-care screening. Popul Health Manag. 2019;22(2):108–12.  https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2018.0056. Study of successful implementation of fall screening program in primary care that emphasized use of ancillary staff in pre-visit workflow. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Stevens JA, Phelan EA. Development of STEADI: a fall prevention resource for health care providers. Health Promot Pract. 2013;14(5):706–14.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839912463576.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Ganz DA, Koretz BK, Bail JK, McCreath HE, Wenger NS, Roth CP, et al. Nurse practitioner comanagement for patients in an academic geriatric practice. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16(12):e343–55.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Wenger NS, Roth CP, Hall WJ, Ganz DA, Snow V, Byrkit J, et al. Practice redesign to improve care for falls and urinary incontinence: primary care intervention for older patients. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(19):1765–72.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2010.387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    • Lichtenstein BJ, Reuben DB, Karlamangla AS, Han W, Roth CP, Wenger NS. Effect of physician delegation to other healthcare providers on the quality of care for geriatric conditions. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(10):2164–70.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13654. Study of the ACOVE quality improvement model for geriatric care demonstrating that interdisciplinary care with delegation of screening tasks to non-physicians predicted greater success for outcome measures including falls. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Bodenheimer T, Ghorob A, Willard-Grace R, Grumbach K. The 10 building blocks of high-performing primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(2):166–71.  https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1616.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Faul M, Stevens JA, Sasser SM, Alee L, Deokar AJ, Kuhls DA, et al. Older adult falls seen by emergency medical service providers: a prevention opportunity. Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(6):719–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.12.011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Carpenter CR, Cameron A, Ganz DA, Liu S. Older adult falls in emergency medicine—a sentinel event. Clin Geriatr Med. 2018;34(3):355–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cger.2018.04.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Waldron N, Dey I, Nagree Y, Xiao J, Flicker L. A multi-faceted intervention to implement guideline care and improve quality of care for older people who present to the emergency department with falls. BMC Geriatr. 2011;11:6.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-11-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Mikolaizak AS, Lord SR, Tiedemann A, Simpson P, Caplan GA, Bendall J, et al. A multidisciplinary intervention to prevent subsequent falls and health service use following fall-related paramedic care: a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2017;46(2):200–7.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afw190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Snooks HA, Anthony R, Chatters R, Dale J, Fothergill R, Gaze S, et al. Support and assessment for fall emergency referrals (SAFER) 2: a cluster randomised trial and systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of new protocols for emergency ambulance paramedics to assess older people following a fall with referral to community-based care when appropriate. Health Technol Assess. 2017;21(13):1–218.  https://doi.org/10.3310/hta21130.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Forsetlund L, Bjorndal A, Rashidian A, Jamtvedt G, O'Brien MA, Wolf F, et al. Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(2):Cd003030.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003030.pub2.
  90. 90.
    Rubin KH, Rothmann MJ, Holmberg T, Hoiberg M, Moller S, Barkmann R, et al. Effectiveness of a two-step population-based osteoporosis screening program using FRAX: the randomized Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation (ROSE) study. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29(3):567–78.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4326-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Shepstone L, Lenaghan E, Cooper C, Clarke S, Fong-Soe-Khioe R, Fordham R, et al. Screening in the community to reduce fractures in older women (SCOOP): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2018;391(10122):741–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32640-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Cram P, Wolinsky FD, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Hall SF, Roblin DW, et al. Patient-activation and guideline-concordant pharmacological treatment after bone density testing: the PAADRN randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27(12):3513–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3681-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Sale JE, Beaton D, Posen J, Elliot-Gibson V, Bogoch E. Key outcomes are usually not reported in published fracture secondary prevention programs: results of a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(2):283–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1442-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Nakayama A, Major G, Holliday E, Attia J, Bogduk N. Evidence of effectiveness of a fracture liaison service to reduce the re-fracture rate. Osteoporos Int. 2016;27(3):873–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3443-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Tamang SR, Hernandez-Boussard T, Ross EG, Gaskin G, Patel MI, Shah NH. Enhanced quality measurement event detection: an application to physician reporting. EGEMS (Washington, DC). 2017;5(1):5.  https://doi.org/10.13063/2327-9214.1270.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Wright NC, Daigle SG, Melton ME, Delzell ES, Balasubramanian A, Curtis JR. The design and validation of a new algorithm to identify incident fractures in administrative claims data. J Bone Miner Res. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Zhu VJ, Walker TD, Warren RW, Jenny PB, Meystre S, Lenert LA. Identifying falls risk screenings not documented with administrative codes using natural language processing. AMIA Annual Symposium proceedings AMIA Symposium 2017;2017:1923-30.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Curtis JR, Sharma P, Arora T, Bharat A, Barnes I, Morrisey MA, et al. Physicians' explanations for apparent gaps in the quality of rheumatology care: results from the US Medicare Physician Quality Reporting System. Arthritis Care Res. 2013;65(2):235–43.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.21713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Schuster MA, Onorato SE, Meltzer DO. Measuring the cost of quality measurement: a missing link in quality strategymeasuring the cost of quality measurementmeasuring the cost of quality measurement. Jama. 2017;318(13):1219–20.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.11525.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Dell R. Fracture prevention in Kaiser Permanente Southern California. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(Suppl 3):457–60.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1712-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Newman ED. Perspectives on pre-fracture intervention strategies: the Geisinger Health System Osteoporosis Program. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(Suppl 3):451–5.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1695-x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    McLellan AR, Wolowacz SE, Zimovetz EA, Beard SM, Lock S, McCrink L, et al. Fracture liaison services for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture: a cost-effectiveness evaluation based on data collected over 8 years of service provision. Osteoporos Int. 2011;22(7):2083–98.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1534-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    •• Solomon DH, Patrick AR, Schousboe J, Losina E. The potential economic benefits of improved postfracture care: a cost-effectiveness analysis of a fracture liaison service in the US health-care system. J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29(7):1667–74.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2180. A cost-effectiveness study showing that fracture liason services that target post-hip fracture care likely result in cost savings and reduced fractures. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Rheumatology, Department of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of CaliforniaSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.Rheumatology Section, Medical Service, San Francisco VA HospitalSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations