Abstract
The human fibula responds to its mechanical environment differently from the tibia accordingly with foot usage. Fibula structure is unaffected by disuse, and is stronger concerning lateral bending in soccer players (who evert and rotate the foot) and weaker in long-distance runners (who jump while running) with respect to untrained controls, along the insertion region of peroneus muscles. These features, strikingly associated to the abilities of the fibulae of predator and prey quadrupeds to manage uneven surfaces and to store elastic energy to jump, respectively, suggest that bone mechanostat would control bone properties with high selective connotations beyond structural strength.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Frost HM, editor. The Utah paradigm of skeletal physiology. Athens: ISMNI; 2002.
Lanyon L. Strain-related control of bone (re)modeling: objectives, mechanisms and failures. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2008;8:298–300.
Cointry GR, Nocciolino L, Ireland A, Hall NM, Kriechbaumer A, Ferretti JL, et al. Structural differences in cortical shell properties between upper and lower fibula as described by pQCT serial scans. A biomechanical interpretation. Bone. 2016;90:185–94.
Schaffler MB, Burr DB, Jungers WL, Ruff CB. Structural and mechanical indicators of limb specialization in primates. Folia Primatol. 1985;45:61–75.
• Wang Q, Whittles M, Cunningham J, Kenwright J. Fibula and its ligaments in load transmission and ankle joint stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;330:261–70. This article described the substantial variance in the fibula’s contribution to shank loading dependent on ankle position and load magnitude.
Pecina M, Ruszkowsky I, Muftik O, Anticevic D. The fibula in clinical and experimental evaluation of the theory of functional adaptation. Coll Anthropol. 1982;6:197–206.
•• Capozza RF, Feldman S, Mortarino P, Reina PS, Schiessl H, Rittweger J, et al. Structural analysis of the human tibia by tomographic (pQCT) serial scans. J Anat. 2010;216:470–81. This article described the striking variation in cortical structure of the fibula along its length.
• Ireland A, Capozza RF, Cointry GR, Nocciolino L, Ferretti JL, Rittweger J. Meagre effects of disuse on the human fibula are not explained by bone size or geometry. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28:633–451. This article described similar bone mass throughout the fibula shaft of individuals with spinal cord injury and uninjured controls, in contrast to large deficits observed in the tibia of the same individuals.
Feldman S, Capozza RF, Mortarino P, Reina P, Ferretti JL, Rittweger J, et al. Site and sex effects on tibia structure in distance runners and untrained people. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44:1580–8.
Rittweger J, Goosey-Tolfrey VL, Cointry GR, Ferretti JL. Structural analysis of the human tibia in men with spinal cord injury by tomographic (pQCT) scans. Bone. 2010;47:511–8.
Timoshenko PS, Godier JN, editors. Theory of Elasticity. New York: McGraw Hill; 1982.
Nocciolino L, Lüscher S, Cointry G, Pisani L, Pilot N, Rittweger J, et al [Contrasting biomechanical response of mid-proximal fibula and tibia to the same mechanical environment] (abstract). Actual Osteol. 2017;13(Suppl 1):46–7.
Lüscher S, Nocciolino LM, Pilot N, Pisani L, Cointry GR, Rittweger J, et al. Description of cortical fibula structure in trained footballers using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), with dynamometric correlates. ECTS, Abstracts of the ECTS Congress (Abstract Nr P091), Valencia (Spain), 2018. Calcif Tissue Int. 2018;102:S1–S159.
Capozza RF, Rittweger J, Reina PS, Mortarino P, Nocciolino LM, Feldman S, et al. pQCT-assessed relationships between diaphyseal design and cortical bone mass and density of the tibiae of healthy sedentary and trained men and women. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2013;13:195–205.
Sherbondy PS, Sebastianelli WJ. Stress fractures of the medial malleolus and distal fibula. Clin Sports Med. 2006;25:129–37.
Howell AB, editor. Speed in animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1944.
McLean SP, Marzke M. Functional significance of the fibula: contrasts between humans and chipanzees. Folia Primatol. 1994;63:107–15.
Beumer A, Valstar ER, Garling EH, Niesing R, Ranstam J, Löfvenberg R, et al. Kinematics of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:337–43.
Barnett CH, Napier JR. The rotatory mobility of the fibula in eutherian mammals. J Anat. 1953;87:11–21.
Marchi D, Shaw CN. Variation on fibular robusticity reflects variation in mobility patterns. J Hum Evol. 2011;609:16.
Huiskes R. If bone is the answer, then what is the question? J Anat. 2000;197:145–56.
Pearson OM, Lieberman DE. The aging of Wolff’s “Law”: ontogeny and responses to mechanical loading in cortical bone. Yearb Phys Anthropol. 2004;47:63–99.
Vatsa A, Breuls RG, Semeins CM, Salmon PL, Smit TH, Klein-Nulend J. Osteocyte morphology in fibula and calvaria - is there a role for mechanosensing? Bone. 2008;43:452–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
J. Rittweger, A. Ireland, S. Lüscher, L.M. Noccioliono, N. Polit, L. Pisani, G.R. Cointry, J.L. Ferretti and R.F. Capozza declare no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rittweger, J., Ireland, A., Lüscher, S. et al. Fibula: The Forgotten Bone—May It Provide Some Insight On a Wider Scope for Bone Mechanostat Control?. Curr Osteoporos Rep 16, 775–778 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-018-0497-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-018-0497-x