Immunotherapy in Breast Cancer: the Emerging Role of PD-1 and PD-L1
Purpose of Review
The purpose of the review is to summarize the data regarding PD-L1 expression in breast cancer and the results of first clinical trials with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
PD-L1 expression is heterogeneous across primary breast cancers, and is generally associated with the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and the presence of poor-prognosis features such as high grade, and aggressive molecular subtypes (triple-negative (TN), basal, HER2-enriched). Early phase clinical trials using PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors alone or in combination have shown objective tumor responses and durable long-term disease control, in heavily pre-treated patients, notably in the TN subtype.
Blockade of PD-1 or PD-L1 shows impressive antitumor activity in some subsets of breast cancer patients. Many clinical trials are ongoing in the metastatic and neoadjuvant setting, alone and in combination with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, and/or other immune therapy. The identification of biomarkers predictive for a clinical benefit is warranted.
KeywordsBreast cancer Expression Immune response Monoclonal antibodies PD-1 PD-L1
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
François Bertucci declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Anthony Gonçalves has received research support through grants from Novartis, Roche, and Eisai; has received compensation from Roche and Eisai for service as a consultant; and has received non-financial support from Novartis, Roche, Eisai, Amgen, and Pfizer.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Cimino-Mathews A, Foote JB, Emens LA. Immune targeting in breast cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2015;29(5):375–85.Google Scholar
- 5.Salgado R, Denkert C, Demaria S, Sirtaine N, Klauschen F, Pruneri G, et al. Harmonization of the evaluation of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an international TILs-working group 2014. Ann Oncol. 2014; doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu450.
- 8.Loi S, Michiels S, Salgado R, Sirtaine N, Jose V, Fumagalli D, et al. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are prognostic in triple negative breast cancer and predictive for trastuzumab benefit in early breast cancer: results from the FinHER trial. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(8):1544–50. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.• Ali HR, Chlon L, Pharoah PD, Markowetz F, Caldas C. Patterns of immune infiltration in breast cancer and their clinical implications: a gene-expression-based retrospective study. PLoS Med. 2016;13(12):e1002194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002194. Computational approach (CIBERSORT) applied to bulk gene expression profiles of almost 11,000 tumours to infer the proportions of 22 subsets of immune cells. Shows large differences in the cellular composition of the immune infiltrate in breast tumours, and correlations with both prognosis and response to treatment. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.• Bense RD, Sotiriou C, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Haanen JB, van Vugt MA, de Vries EG et al. Relevance of tumor-infiltrating immune cell composition and functionality for disease outcome in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109(1). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw192. In silico analyses (CIBERSORT) of gene expression profiles of 7,270 non-metastatic breast cancer samples showing the fraction of 22 immune cell types and their relations with pathological complete response, disease-free survival, and overall survival .
- 16.Dieci MV, Criscitiello C, Goubar A, Viale G, Conte P, Guarneri V, et al. Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes on residual disease after primary chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: a retrospective multicenter study. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(3):611–8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt556.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.Vincent J, Mignot G, Chalmin F, Ladoire S, Bruchard M, Chevriaux A, et al. 5-Fluorouracil selectively kills tumor-associated myeloid-derived suppressor cells resulting in enhanced T cell-dependent antitumor immunity. Cancer Res. 2010;70(8):3052–61. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3690.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Ahmadzadeh M, Johnson LA, Heemskerk B, Wunderlich JR, Dudley ME, White DE, et al. Tumor antigen-specific CD8 T cells infiltrating the tumor express high levels of PD-1 and are functionally impaired. Blood. 2009;114(8):1537–44. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-195792.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 32.•• Ansell SM, Lesokhin AM, Borrello I, Halwani A, Scott EC, Gutierrez M, et al. PD-1 blockade with nivolumab in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(4):311–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411087. Clinical trial showing strong efficacy of Nivolumab (87% objective response rate) in 23 patients with previously heavily treated relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.•• Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready NE, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(17):1627–39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507643. Randomized phase 3 study showing longer overall survival with nivolumab than with docetaxel in 582 patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC that had progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy . CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.•• Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, Crino L, Eberhardt WE, Poddubskaya E, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(2):123–35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504627. Randomized phase 3 study showing longer overall survival with nivolumab than with docetaxel in 272 patients with advanced squamous NSCLC that had progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 35.Chow LQ, Haddad R, Gupta S, Mahipal A, Mehra R, Tahara M, et al. Antitumor activity of pembrolizumab in biomarker-unselected patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: results from the phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 expansion cohort. J Clin Oncol. 2016; doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.1478.
- 36.•• Garon EB, Rizvi NA, Hui R, Leighl N, Balmanoukian AS, Eder JP, et al. Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(21):2018–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1501824. Phase 1 study showing anti-tumor activity of pembrolizumab in 495 patients with advanced NSCLC. PD-L1 expression in at least 50% of tumor cells correlated with improved efficacy. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.•• Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, et al. Nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(19):1803–13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510665. Randomized phase 3 study showing longer overall survival with nivolumab than with everolimus in 821 pre-treated patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 38.•• Reck M, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG, Hui R, Csoszi T, Fulop A, et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for pd-l1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1823–33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606774. Randomized phase 3 study showing longer progression-free and overall survival with pembrolizumab than with platinum-based chemotherapy in 305 previously untreated patients with advanced squamous NSCLC with PD-L1 expression on at least 50% of tumor cells and no sensitizing EGFR mutation or ALK translocation . CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.•• Robert C, Long GV, Brady B, Dutriaux C, Maio M, Mortier L, et al. Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(4):320–30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412082. Randomized phase 3 study showing longer progression-free and overall survival with nivolumab than with dacarbazine in 418 previously untreated patients with advanced melanoma without BRAF mutation . CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.•• Robert C, Schachter J, Long GV, Arance A, Grob JJ, Mortier L, et al. Pembrolizumab versus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2521–32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503093. Randomized phase 3 study showing longer progression-free and overall survival with nivolumab than with ipilimumab in 834 previously untreated patients with advanced melanoma . CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.•• Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, Felip E, Perez-Gracia JL, Han JY, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1540–50. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01281-7. Randomized phase 2/3 study showing longer overall survival with pembrolizumab than with docetaxel in 1,034 previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC with PD-L1-positive tumor. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.•• Kaufman HL, Russell J, Hamid O, Bhatia S, Terheyden P, D'Angelo SP, et al. Avelumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: a multicentre, single-group, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(10):1374–85. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30364-3. Phase 2 study showing durable anti-tumor activity (31.8% objective response rate) of avelumab in 88 previously treated patients with stage IV Merkel cell carcinoma . CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 43.•• Massard C, Gordon MS, Sharma S, Rafii S, Wainberg ZA, Luke J, et al. Safety and efficacy of durvalumab (MEDI4736), an anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, in patients with advanced urothelial bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(26):3119–25. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.9761. Phase 1/2 study showing anti-tumor activity (31% objective response rate) of durvalumab in 61 previously treated patients with advanced urothelial bladder cancer. PD-L1 expression in at least 25% of tumor cells correlated with activity. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 44.Taube JM, Klein A, Brahmer JR, Xu H, Pan X, Kim JH, et al. Association of PD-1, PD-1 ligands, and other features of the tumor immune microenvironment with response to anti-PD-1 therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(19):5064–74. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3271.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 47.Ghebeh H, Mohammed S, Al-Omair A, Qattan A, Lehe C, Al-Qudaihi G, et al. The B7-H1 (PD-L1) T lymphocyte-inhibitory molecule is expressed in breast cancer patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma: correlation with important high-risk prognostic factors. Neoplasia. 2006;8(3):190–8. doi: 10.1593/neo.05733.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 49.•• Sabatier R, Finetti P, Mamessier E, Adelaide J, Chaffanet M, Ali HR, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of PDL1 expression in breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6(7):5449–64. Largest retrospective study analysing the mRNA expression of PD-L1 in 5,454 primary breast cancer samples and showing PD-L1 upregulation is more frequent in basal breast cancers and is associated with increased T-cell cytotoxic immune response. In the basal or TN subtype, upregulation is associated with better survival and pathological response to chemotherapy. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 53.•• Ali HR, Glont SE, Blows FM, Provenzano E, Dawson SJ, Liu B, et al. PD-L1 protein expression in breast cancer is rare, enriched in basal-like tumours and associated with infiltrating lymphocytes. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(7):1488–93. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv192. Largest retrospective study analysing the protein expression of PD-L1 in 3,916 primary breast cancer samples and showing PD-L1 upregulation is rare in breast cancers, markedly enriched in basal-like tumours and is correlated with infiltrating lymphocytes. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 54.Bae SB, Cho HD, Oh MH, Lee JH, Jang SH, Hong SA, et al. Expression of programmed death receptor ligand 1 with high tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is associated with better prognosis in breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2016;19(3):242–51. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.3.242.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 56.Gatalica Z, Snyder C, Maney T, Ghazalpour A, Holterman DA, Xiao N, et al. Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) in common cancers and their correlation with molecular cancer type. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2014; doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0654.
- 59.•• Wimberly H, Brown JR, Schalper K, Haack H, Silver MR, Nixon C, et al. PD-L1 expression correlates with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3(4):326–32. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0133. Retrospective study analysing the protein expression of PD-L1 in pre-treatment biopsies from 105 patients with breast cancer ftreated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and showing PD-L1 expression is associated with higher pCR rate. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 60.Beckers RK, Selinger CI, Vilain R, Madore J, Wilmott JS, Harvey K, et al. Programmed death ligand 1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer is associated with tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and improved outcome. Histopathology. 2016;69(1):25–34. doi: 10.1111/his.12904.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 61.Botti G, Collina F, Scognamiglio G, Rao F, Peluso V, De Cecio R et al. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor expression is associated with a better prognosis and diabetic disease in triple negative breast cancer patients. International journal of molecular sciences. 2017;18(2). doi: 10.3390/ijms18020459.
- 62.Dill EA, Gru AA, Atkins KA, Friedman LA, Moore ME, Bullock TN, et al. PD-L1 expression and Intratumoral heterogeneity across breast cancer subtypes and stages: an assessment of 245 primary and 40 metastatic tumors. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41(3):334–42. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000780.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 64.Mori H, Kubo M, Yamaguchi R, Nishimura R, Osako T, Arima N, et al. The combination of PD-L1 expression and decreased tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes is associated with a poor prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(9):15584–92. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14698.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 67.• Bertucci F, Finetti P, Colpaert C, Mamessier E, Parizel M, Dirix L, et al. PDL1 expression in inflammatory breast cancer is frequent and predicts for the pathological response to chemotherapy. Oncotarget. 2015;6(15):13506–19. First retrospective study analysing the mRNA expression of PD-L1 in 112 pre-treatment inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) samples and showing PD-L1 upregulation is more frequent in IBC than in non-IBC and is correlated with higher pCR rate to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 68.Loi S, Sirtaine N, Piette F, Salgado R, Viale G, Van Eenoo F, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in a phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trial in node-positive breast cancer comparing the addition of docetaxel to doxorubicin with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy: BIG 02-98. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(7):860–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.0902.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 72.• Mazel M, Jacot W, Pantel K, Bartkowiak K, Topart D, Cayrefourcq L, et al. Frequent expression of PD-L1 on circulating breast cancer cells. Molecular oncology. 2015;9(9):1773–82. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.05.009. First report showing evidence that PD-L1 is frequently expressed on metastatic cells circulating in the blood of hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 82.Saada-Bouzid E, Defaucheux C, Karabajakian A, Palomar Coloma V, Servois V, Paoletti X, et al. Hyperprogression during anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2017; doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx178.
- 83.Kato S, Goodman AM, Walavalkar V, Barkauskas DA, Sharabi A, Kurzrock R. Hyper-progressors after immunotherapy: analysis of genomic alterations associated with accelerated growth rate. Clin Cancer Res. 2017; doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3133.
- 84.Weber JS, D'Angelo SP, Minor D, Hodi FS, Gutzmer R, Neyns B, et al. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(4):375–84. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70076-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 90.Sholl LM, Aisner DL, Allen TC, Beasley MB, Borczuk AC, Cagle PT, et al. Programmed death ligand-1 immunohistochemistry—a new challenge for pathologists: a perspective from members of the pulmonary pathology society. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140(4):341–4. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0506-SA.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 92.•• Rizvi NA, Hellmann MD, Snyder A, Kvistborg P, Makarov V, Havel JJ, et al. Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science. 2015;348(6230):124–8. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1348. Retrospective study of whole-exome sequencing of non-small cell lung cancers treated with pembrolizumab showing that higher non-synonymous mutation burden in tumors is associated with improved objective response, durable clinical benefit, and progression-free survival . CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 93.Campesato LF, Barroso-Sousa R, Jimenez L, Correa BR, Sabbaga J, Hoff PM, et al. Comprehensive cancer-gene panels can be used to estimate mutational load and predict clinical benefit to PD-1 blockade in clinical practice. Oncotarget. 2015;6(33):34221–7. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5950.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 95.•• Le DT UJN, Wang H, Bartlett BR, Kemberling H, Eyring AD, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(26):2509–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500596. Phase 2 prospective study testing the clinical activity of pembrolizumab in 41 patients with progressive metastatic carcinoma with or without mismatch-repair deficiency: patients with mismatch-repair deficiency (colo-rectal and non-colo-rectal) show higher OR rate and longer PFS than patients without mismatch-repair deficie ncy (colo-rectal). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 96.Chen PL, Roh W, Reuben A, Cooper ZA, Spencer CN, Prieto PA, et al. Analysis of immune signatures in longitudinal tumor samples yields insight into biomarkers of response and mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. Cancer discovery. 2016;6(8):827–37. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 97.•• Hugo W, Zaretsky JM, Sun L, Song C, Moreno BH, Hu-Lieskovan S, et al. Genomic and transcriptomic features of response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma. Cell. 2016;165(1):35–44. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.065. Retrospective analysis of somatic mutanomes and transcriptomes of pre-treatment melanoma biopsies from patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 98.•• Huang AC, Postow MA, Orlowski RJ, Mick R, Bengsch B, Manne S, et al. T-cell invigoration to tumour burden ratio associated with anti-PD-1 response. Nature. 2017; doi: 10.1038/nature22079. Retrospective immune profiling of peripheral blood from patients with stage IV melanoma before and after pembrolizumab and identification of pharmacodynamic changes in circulating exhausted-phenotype CD8 T-cells (Tex cells). Clinical failure in many patients was not solely due to an inability to induce immune reinvigoration, but rather resulted from an imbalance between T-cell reinvigoration and tumour burden. The magnitude of reinvigoration of circulating Tex cells determined in relation to pretreatment tumour burden correlated with clinical response .
- 99.•• Nanda R, Chow LQ, Dees EC, Berger R, Gupta S, Geva R, et al. Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer: phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(21):2460–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.8931. First study showing anti-tumor activity (18.5% objective response rate) of pembrolizumab in 111 previously treated patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 100.•• Emens LA, Braiteh FS, Cassier PA, Delord JP, Eder JP, Fasso M et al. Inhibition of PD-L1 by MPDL3280A leads to clinical activity in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Cancer Res. 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract PD1–6. Phase 1a study showing anti-tumor activity (33% 24-week PFS rate and 24% OR rate) of atezolizumab in 21 previously treated patients with advanced PD-L1-positive triple-negative breast cancer . Google Scholar
- 101.•• Dirix LY, Takacs I, Nikolinakos P, Jerusalem G, Arkenau HT, Hamilton EP et al. Avelumab (MSB0010718C), an anti-PD-L1 antibody, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a phase Ib JAVELIN solid tumor trial. Cancer Res. 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract S1–04. Phase 1b study of avelumab in 168 previously treated patients with advanced breast cancer. In the 57 TNBC patients, the response rate was 8.8%, lower than observed in atezolizumab and pembrolizumab studies (in which patients had PD-L1 positive tumors). In the 9 TNBC patients with “hot spot” of PD-L1-positive immune cells within the tumor, the response rate was higher (44%). Google Scholar
- 102.•• Adams S, Diamond J, Hamilton E, Pohlmann P, Tolaney S, Molinero L et al. Safety and clinical activity of atezolizumab (anti-PDL1) in combination with nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract P2–11-06. One arm of a multicenter, multi-arm Phase Ib study evaluating atezolizumab in combination with weekly nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic TNBC: overall, the response rate was 41.7%, but reached nearly 90% for patients treated in the first-line setting. Responses were seen both in PD-L1-positive and -negative tumors . Google Scholar
- 104.Rugo HS, Delord JP, Im SA, Ott PA, Piha-Paul SA, L. BP et al. Preliminary efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in patients with PD-L1–positive, estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer enrolled in KEYNOTE-028. Cancer Res. 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract S5–07.Google Scholar
- 107.Hendrickx W, Simeone I, Anjum S, Mokrab Y, Bertucci F, Finetti P, et al. Identification of genetic determinants of breast cancer immune phenotypes by integrative genome-scale analysis. Oncoimmunology. n6(2):e1253654. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2016.1253654.