The Contemporary Role of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer
- First Online:
- 266 Downloads
Open surgical resection via transhiatal or transthoracic, including McKeown, access is the most viable option for curing esophageal cancer; however, the extensive nature of open surgery in both the chest and abdomen results in significant rates of morbidity and mortality. A natural response was the introduction of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and, later, endoscopic resection. In the hands of experienced surgeons, MIE can achieve equivalent or better perioperative mortality, morbidity, and oncologic outcomes as compared to open surgery. This review starts with an overview of open esophagectomy before delving into the evolving body of evidence on MIE outcomes and practices.
KeywordsEsophageal cancer Esophagectomy Ivor-Lewis McKeown Transhiatal Transthoracic Minimally invasive Robotic surgery Outcomes Oncology Cancer Gastrointestinal cancer Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE)
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 1.NIH – Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results. SEER stat fact sheets: esophagus. (Accessed July 2013). Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/esoph.html. Accessed 8/21/13.
- 4.Casson AG, Fernando HC. Thoracic approaches to esophagectomy. Mastery of cardiothoracic surgery (2nd Ed). Edited by Kaiser LR et al. 2007;c18:1–17 (e-copy).Google Scholar
- 13.•Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):95–103. A landmark paper on MIE by the most experienced surgeon in the field.Google Scholar
- 16.•Decker G, Coosemans W, De Leyn P, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;35(1):13–20. A critical review of outcomes from studies prior to 2009. Google Scholar
- 18.•Nafteux P, Moons J, Coosemans W, et al. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: a valuable alternative to open oesophagectomy for the treatment of early oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40(6):1455–63. The most complete singe-institution study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy. Google Scholar
- 22.•Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9829):1887–92. The first completed RCT on minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy. Google Scholar
- 30.Sarkaria IS, Rizk NP, Finley DJ, et al. Combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy using a four-arm platform: experience, technique and cautions during early procedure development. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43(5):e107–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Markar SR, Arya S, Karthikesalingam A, Hanna GB. Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug 14.Google Scholar
- 45.•Jaffer A. Ajani (chair), et al. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology v2.2013. (Accessed August 2013). Available: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/esophageal.pdf. Expert consensus and evidence-based guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of esophageal cancer.
- 49.Hunt BM, Louie BE, Dunst CM, et al. Esophagectomy for failed endoscopic therapy in patients with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma. Dis Esophagus. 2013 Jun 24 (abstract).Google Scholar