Current Oncology Reports

, Volume 2, Issue 6, pp 495–501 | Cite as

Recent advances in reconstructive surgery for soft-tissue sarcomas

  • David W. Chang
  • Geoffrey L. Robb


The size and complexity of wounds following soft-tissue sarcoma resection have increased over the years. Many advances have been made in reconstructive surgery during the past 30 years. These advances have occurred because of refined knowledge of muscle, skin, and fascial blood flow and through the development of free tissue transfer techniques. In this review, current methods of reconstruction following sarcoma resection are discussed, and advances are highlighted.


Breast Reconstruction Free Flap Latissimus Dorsi Perforator Flap Free Tissue Transfer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Pisters PW: Combined modality treatment of extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Ann Surg Oncol 1998, 5:464–472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Koshima I, Soeda S: Inferior epigastric artery skin flap without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg 1989, 42:645–648.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blondeel PN, Van Landuyt KH, Monstrey SJ: Surgical-technical aspects of the free DIEP flap for breast reconstruction. Operative Techniques Plast Reconstr Surg 1999, 6:27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kroll SS: Free TRAM or DIEP flap: which to choose? Operative Techniques Plas Reconstr Surg 1999, 6:83–85. Good discussion of indications, advantages, and disadvantages of DIEP flap.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bostwick J: Endoscopic latissimus dorsi flap for partial breast reconstruction. Operative Techniques Plas Reconstr Surg 1999, 6:61–67. This article describes the indications for this procedure and the step-by-step technique for harvesting the latissimus dorsi with the endoscope through small incisions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoffman WY, Vasconez LO: Latissimus dorsi functional transfer to the arm.In Grabb’s Encyclopedia of Flaps, edn 2. Edited by Strauch B, Vasconez LO, Hall-Findlay EJ. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998:1248–1249.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hudson TW, Evans GRD, Schmidt CE: Engineering strategies for peripheral nerve repair. Clin Plast Surg 1999, 26:617–628.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tran NV, Evans GR, Kroll SS, et al.: The free fillet extremity flap: indications and options for reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000, 105:99–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Miles WK, Chang DW, Kroll SS, et al.: Reconstruction of large sacral defects following total sacrectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000,105:2387–2394.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kroll SS, Vasconez LO, Hall-Findlay EJ. Transpelvis rectus abdominis flap reconstruction of defects following abdominalperineal resection.Grabb’s Encyclopedia of Flaps, edn 2. Edited by Strauch B, Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998:1485–1487.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chang DW, Wang B, Robb GL, et al.: The effect of obesity on flap and donor site complications in free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000, 105:1640–1648.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chang DW, Reece GP, Wang B, et al.: Effect of smoking on complications in patients undergoing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000,105:2374–2380.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Langstein HN, Chang DW, Robb GL: Cranial base reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2000, in press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lutz BS, Wei FC, Ng SH, et al.: Routine donor leg angiography before vascularized free fibula transplantation is not necessary: a prospective study in 120 clinical cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999, 103:121–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katz AJ, Llull R, Hedrick MH, et al.: Emerging approaches to the tissue engineering of fat. Clin Plast Surg 1999, 26:587–604. Discussion of the emerging tissue-engineering strategies for fat, including the procurement of autologous cells, cell growth and differentiation, implantation and engraftment, polymer scaffolds, and implant integration and histogenesis.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boyan BD, Lohmann CH, Romero J, et al.: Bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Clin Plast Surg 1999, 26:629–646.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    DiEdwardo CA, Petrosko P, Acarturk TO, et al.: Muscle tissue engineering. Clin Plast Surg 1999, 26:647–656.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Science Inc 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • David W. Chang
    • 1
  • Geoffrey L. Robb
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TexasM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations