Advertisement

Secondary Stroke Prevention in Cryptogenic Stroke and Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (ESUS)

  • Hans-Christoph DienerEmail author
  • Richard Bernstein
  • Robert Hart
Stroke (H Diener, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Stroke

Abstract

Purpose of the Review

The purpose of the study was to review the literature on cryptogenic stroke and embolic stroke of undetermined stroke (ESUS). Cryptogenic stroke according to TOAST criteria is a stroke which is not due to cardiogenic embolism, small vessel disease with lacunes or large vessel disease of brain supplying arteries. In the context of secondary stroke prevention studies, cryptogenic stroke is not operationally defined.

Recent Findings

The new concept of “embolic stroke of undetermined source” (ESUS) provides an operational definition. ESUS is diagnosed as a non-lacunar stroke on cerebral imaging and exclusion of large vessel atherosclerosis by CTA, MRA or ultrasound. Cardiogenic embolism is made less likely by ECG monitoring and echocardiography. At present, aspirin is used for secondary stroke prevention in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Summary

Based on the construct that ESUS might be caused by undetected atrial fibrillation or other embolic mechanisms, ongoing randomised secondary stroke prevention trials are comparing non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with aspirin.

Keywords

Cryptogenic stroke Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) Secondary stroke prevention Antiplatelet therapy Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The editors would like to thank Dr. John Brust for taking the time to review this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Hans-Christoph Diener received honoraria for participation in clinical trials, contribution to advisory boards or oral presentations from: Abbott, Achelios, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Bayer Vital, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, CoAxia, Corimmun, Covidien, Daiichi-Sankyo, D-Pharm, Fresenius, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Johnson & Johnson, Knoll, Lilly, MSD, Medtronic, MindFrame, Neurobiological Technologies, Novartis, Novo-Nordisk, Paion, Parke-Davis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Schering-Plough, Servier, Solvay, St. Jude, Syngis, Talecris, Thrombogenics, WebMD Global, Wyeth and Yamanouchi. Financial support for research projects was provided by AstraZeneca, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lundbeck, Novartis, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi-Aventis, Syngis and Talecris. The Department of Neurology at the University Duisburg-Essen received research grants from the German Research Council (DFG), German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), European Union, NIH, Bertelsmann Foundation and Heinz-Nixdorf Foundation. Hans-Christoph Diener has no ownership interest and does not own stocks of any pharmaceutical company.

Within the past year, Hans-Christoph Diener served as editor of Aktuelle Neurologie, Arzneimitteltherapie, Kopfschmerznews, Stroke News, as co-editor of Cephalalgia and on the editorial board of Lancet Neurology, Stroke, European Neurology and Cerebrovascular Disorders. Hans-Christoph Diener chairs the Treatment Guidelines Committee of the German Society of Neurology and contributed to the EHRA and ESC guidelines for the treatment of AF.

Richard Bernstein has been compensated for speaking, consulting and research by Medtronic and Boehringer Ingelheim.

Robert Hart reports grants and personal fees from Bayer AG.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of org 10172 in acute stroke treatment. Stroke. 1993;24(1):35–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    •• Hart RG, Diener HC, Coutts SB, Easton JD, Granger CB, O’Donnell MJ, et al. Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(4):429–38. First publication of the new concept of ESUS. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ntaios G, Papavasileiou V, Milionis H, Makaritsis K, Manios E, Spengos K, et al. Embolic strokes of undetermined source in the Athens stroke registry: a descriptive analysis. Stroke. 2015;46(1):176–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Perera KS, Vanassche T, Bosch J, Giruparajah M, Swaminathan B, Mattina KR, et al. Embolic strokes of undetermined source: prevalence and patient features in the ESUS global registry. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(5):526–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hart RG, Catanese L, Perera KS, Ntaios G, Connolly SJ. Embolic stroke of undetermined source: a systematic review and clinical update. Stroke. 2017;48(4):867–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sposato LA, Cipriano LE, Saposnik G, Vargas ER, Riccio PM, Hachinski V. Diagnosis of atrial fibrillation after stroke and transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(4):377–87.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perera KS, Vanassche T, Bosch J, Swaminathan B, Mundl H, Giruparajah M, et al. Global survey of the frequency of atrial fibrillation-associated stroke: embolic stroke of undetermined source global registry. Stroke. 2016;47(9):2197–202.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Otite FO, Khandelwal P, Chaturvedi S, Romano JG, Sacco RL, Malik AM. Increasing atrial fibrillation prevalence in acute ischemic stroke and TIA. Neurology. 2016;87(19):2034–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lang C, Seyfang L, Ferrari J, Gattringer T, Greisenegger S, Willeit K, et al. Do women with atrial fibrillation experience more severe strokes? Results from the Austrian stroke unit registry. Stroke. 2017;48(3):778–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    • Gladstone DJ, Spring M, Dorian P, Panzov V, Thorpe KE, Hall J, et al. Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(26):2467–77. The EMBRACE study performed a 30-day ECG monitoring in cryptogenic stroke. Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    • Sanna T, Diener HC, Passman RS, Di Lazzaro V, Bernstein RA, Morillo CA, et al. Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(26):2478–86. The Crystal-AF study compared an implantable loop recorder versus standard ECG in patients with cryptogenic stroke. Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saver JL. CLINICAL PRACTICE. Cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(21):2065–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mas JL, Arquizan C, Lamy C, Zuber M, Cabanes L, Derumeaux G, et al. Recurrent cerebrovascular events associated with patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, or both. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(24):1740–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carroll JD, Saver JL, Thaler DE, Smalling RW, Berry S, MacDonald LA, et al. Closure of patent foramen ovale versus medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(12):1092–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meier B, Kalesan B, Mattle HP, Khattab AA, Hildick-Smith D, Dudek D, et al. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in cryptogenic embolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(12):1083–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Furlan AJ, Reisman M, Massaro J, Mauri L, Adams H, Albers GW, et al. Closure or medical therapy for cryptogenic stroke with patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(11):991–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kent DM, Dahabreh IJ, Ruthazer R, Furlan AJ, Reisman M, Carroll JD, et al. Device closure of patent foramen ovale after stroke: pooled analysis of completed randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(8):907–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mas J-L, et al. Closure of patent foramen ovale, oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet therapy to prevent stroke recurrence (CLOSE): a randomised clinical trial. ESO Congress, Prague, May 2017. 2017.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kassner SE, et al. PFO Closure in the GORE REDUCE clinical trial: primary results. ESO Stroke Conference, Prague. 2017;May.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Russo C, Jin Z, Rundek T, Homma S, Sacco RL, Di Tullio MR. Atherosclerotic disease of the proximal aorta and the risk of vascular events in a population-based cohort: the Aortic Plaques and Risk of Ischemic Stroke (APRIS) study. Stroke. 2009;40(7):2313–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Di Tullio MR, Russo C, Jin Z, Sacco RL, Mohr JP, Homma S. Aortic arch plaques and risk of recurrent stroke and death. Circulation. 2009;119(17):2376–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meissner I, Khandheria BK, Sheps SG, Schwartz GL, Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, et al. Atherosclerosis of the aorta: risk factor, risk marker, or innocent bystander? A prospective population-based transesophageal echocardiography study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(5):1018–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Capmany RP, Ibanez MO, Pesquer XJ. Complex atheromatosis of the aortic arch in cerebral infarction. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2010;6(3):184–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Amarenco P, Davis S, Jones EF, Cohen AA, Heiss WD, Kaste M, et al. Clopidogrel plus aspirin versus warfarin in patients with stroke and aortic arch plaques. Stroke. 2014;45(5):1248–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mohr JP, Thompson JL, Lazar RM, Levin B, Sacco RL, Furie KL, et al. A comparison of warfarin and aspirin for the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1444–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    De Schryver EL, Algra A, Kappelle LJ, van Gijn J, Koudstaal PJ. Vitamin K antagonists versus antiplatelet therapy after transient ischaemic attack or minor ischaemic stroke of presumed arterial origin. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9:CD001342.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    • Diener HC, Easton JD, Granger CB, Cronin L, Duffy C, Cotton D, et al. Design of randomized, double-blind, evaluation in secondary stroke prevention comparing the efficacy and safety of the oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate vs. acetylsalicylic acid in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (RE-SPECT ESUS). Int J Stroke. 2015; Randomised trial in patients with ESUS comparing dabigatran and aspirin in secondary stroke prevention. Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    • Hart RG, Sharma M, Mundl H, Shoamanesh A, Kasner SE, Berkowitz SD, et al. Rivaroxaban for secondary stroke prevention in patients with embolic strokes of undetermined source: design of the NAVIGATE ESUS randomized trial. European Stroke Journal. 2016; Randomised trial in patients with ESUS comparing rivaroxaban and aspirin in secondary stroke prevention. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans-Christoph Diener
    • 1
    Email author
  • Richard Bernstein
    • 2
  • Robert Hart
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyUniversity Hospital Essen and Medical Faculty of the University Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany
  2. 2.Davee Department of NeurologyNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoUSA
  3. 3.McMaster University/Population Health Research InstituteHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations