Monitoring the Brain After Cardiac Arrest: a New Era
- 1.5k Downloads
Purpose of Review
Of the approximately 350,000 out-of-hospital, and 750,000 after in-hospital cardiac arrest (CA) events in the US annually approximately 5-9% and 20% respectively may achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after attempted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Up to 2/3 of these initial survivors may go on die in the subsequent 24-72 hours after ROSC due to a combination of (1) on-going cerebral injury, (2) myocardial dysfunction and (3) massive systemic inflammatory response. In order to successfully manage patients more effectively, monitoring methods are needed to aid clinicians in the detection and quantification of intra-cardiac arrest and post-resuscitation pathophysiological cerebral injury processes in the intensive care unit.
Over the last few years many modalities have been used for cerebral monitoring during and after CA, these include quantitative pupillometry, transcranial doppler sonography, optic nerve sheath diameter measurements, microdialysis, tissue oxygenation monitoring, intra-cranial pressure monitoring, and electroencephalography. Current studies indicate that these modalities may be used for the purpose of neurological monitoring during cardiac arrest resuscitation as well as in the post-resuscitation period.
Multiple overlapping processes, including alterations in cerebral blood flow (CBF), raised intracerebralpressure, disorders of metabolism, imbalanced oxygen delivery and reperfusion injury contribute to cell death during the post-resuscitation period has led to the birth of post-resuscitation management strategies in the 21st century. This review provides a succinct overview of currently available bedside invasive and non-invasive neuro-monitoring methods after CA.
KeywordsCardiac arrest Post-resuscitation Cerebral oximetry Cerebral perfusion Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) Cerebral blood flow
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 7.Neumar RW, et al. Post-cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication. A consensus statement from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, European Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Asia, and the Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa); the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee; the Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative, and Critical Care; the Council on Clinical Cardiology; and the Stroke Council. Circulation. 2008;118(23):2452–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.• Larson MD, Behrends M. Portable infrared pupillometry: a review. Anesth Analg. 2015;120(6):1242–53. Larson and Behrends review the anatomy, physiology and methodology to objectively measure PLR and PRD in health, anesthetized subjects, post-resuscitation care and after traumatic brain injury. They conclude that this study is still in its infancy, but it is convenient and accurate and objects a measure that is related to brainstem integrity that was earlier only a clinical impression.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Loewenfeld IE. The pupil: anatomy, physiology, and clinical applications. 2nd ed. Woburn: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1999.Google Scholar
- 17.•• Naqvi J, et al. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound: a review of the physical principles and major applications in critical care. Int J Vasc Med. 2013;2013:629378. This paper reviews the underlying physical principles of TCD, flow indices frequently used in clinical care, and critical care indications for TCD in adults and children. Naqvi et al. performed a literature search of English language articles of previous 10 years and consulted 11 articles in depth for this review. They conclude that though portability, repeatability, noninvasiveness, and high temporal resolution of TCD are useful in bedside monitoring of CBF in the critically ill, operator dependency is a significant limitation to its clinical utility. The authors conclude that the temporal resolution and convenience make it a vita lasset in critical care PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.Pierrakos C, et al. Transcranial doppler assessment of cerebral perfusion in critically ill septic patients: a pilot study. Ann Intensive Care. 2013;3:28–8.Google Scholar
- 38.Gjerris F, Brennum J. The cerebrospinal fluid, intracranial pressure and herniation of the brain. In: Gjerris F, Paulson OB, Sørensen PS, editors. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. Copenhagen: FADL’s Forlag Aktieselskab; 2004. p. 179–96.Google Scholar
- 42.Flynn LM, Rhodes J, Andrews PJ. Therapeutic hypothermia reduces intracranial pressure and partial brain oxygen tension in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: preliminary data from the Eurotherm3235 trial. Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag. 2015;5(3):143–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 43.• Naito H, et al. Intracranial pressure increases during rewarming period after mild therapeutic hypothermia in postcardiac arrest patients. Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag. 2016;6(4):189–93. Naito et al. observed the changes in ICP during mild TH and rewarming after CA in 11 patients who were successfully resuscitated after CA over a 25-month peiod after finding that all patients with ICP of >25 mmHg died. They also noted major ICP increments during rewarming period.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 50.• Chelly J, et al. The optic nerve sheath diameter as a useful tool for early prediction of outcome after cardiac arrest: a prospective pilot study. Resuscitation. 2016;103:7–13. Chelly et al. in a prospective study of 36 patients consecutively enrolled over a 22-month period measured OSND on days 1, 2, and 3 after ROSC. They conclude that this is a promising bedside tool to evaluate the severity of post-CA brain injuries and outcome in a multimodal neuroprognostication approach.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 54.•• Kirkman MA, Smith M. Brain oxygenation monitoring. Anesthesiol Clin. 2016;34(3):537–56. This review article describes the different methods of bedside cerebral oxygenation monitoring namely jugular bulb oximetry, NIRS and brain tissue oxygen monitoring, the indications and evidence base for their use, and limitations and future perspectives. The authors conclude that although there is evidence associating cerebral hypoxia with poor outcomes, it remains to be determined whether restoring cerebral oxygenation improves outcomes.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 55.•• Roh D, Park S. Brain multimodality monitoring: updated perspectives. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016;16(6):56. Roh and Park review the evidence behind the use of various devices targeted at continuously measuring physiologic endpoints as a part of multimodality monitoring (MMM) that contribute to secondary brain injury with the idea of early intervention before the process becomes irreversible.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 61.Pollard V, Prough DS. Cerebral oxygenation: near infrared spectroscopy. In: Tobin MJ, editor. Principles and practice of intensive care monitoring. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional; 1998. p. 1019–34.Google Scholar
- 64.•• Parnia S, et al. Cerebral oximetry during cardiac arrest: a multicenter study of neurologic outcomes and survival. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(9):1663–74. Parnia et al. studied intra arrest cerebral oximetry in a Multicenter prospective study of in-hospital cardiac arrest in 504 patientsand found higher mean oximetry in those who had ROSC versus those who did not and those who had favorable neurological outcomes (CPC 1–2) versus those who had unfavorab;e outcomes (CPC 3–5) at discharge.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 69.Dearden NM, Midgley S. Technical considerations in continuous jugular venous oxygen saturation measurement. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1993;59:91–7.Google Scholar
- 78.• van Putten MJ, Hofmeijer J. EEG monitoring in cerebral ischemia: basic concepts and clinical applications. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;33(3):203–10. In this invited review, van Putten and Hofmeijer review essentials of EEG generation and the effects of ischemia on the underlying neuronal processes. They discuss the differential sensitivity of various neuronal processes to energy limitations, including synaptic disturbance. They discuss the applications in introperative monitoring, acute ischemic stroke and after CA.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 80.Steriade M. Cellular substrates of brain rhythms. In: Niedermeyer E, Lopes da Silva FH, editors. Niedermeyer’s electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health; 2010. p. 33–64.Google Scholar
- 84.• Sadaka F, et al. Continuous electroencephalogram in comatose postcardiac arrest syndrome patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia: outcome prediction study. J Intensive Care Med. 2015;30(5):292–6. The authors reviewed retrospectively EEG data that were prospectively collected on post resuscitation patients admitted to their ICU (n− = 58). cEEG monitoring was performed per protocol for all pateints undergoing therapeutic hypothermia (TH). nonconvuslsive seizures (NCS) and burst suppression had a specificity of 100% for poor neurological outcome CPC 3–5 on discharge.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 85.•• Sandroni C, et al. Predictors of poor neurological outcome in adult comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Part 2: patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia. Resuscitation. 2013;84(10):1324–38. Sandorini et al conducted a metaanalysis of 37 studies (2403 patients): to systematically review the accuracy of early (≤7 days) predictors of poor outcomeby CPC score in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest treated with TH. They found that a bilaterally absent N20 SSEP wave anytime, a nonreactive EEG after rewarming or a combination of absent ocular reflexes and motor score ≤2 after rewarming predicted CPC 3–5 with 0% FPR and narrow 95% CIs, but with a high risk of bias.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 87.Le Roux P, et al. Consensus summary statement of the international multidisciplinary consensus conference on multimodality monitoring in neurocritical care: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(9):1189–209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar