Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 374–380 | Cite as

Minding the Aging Brain: Technology-Enabled Cognitive Training for Healthy Elders

  • Joshua R. SteinermanEmail author


Cognitive training refers to theory-driven behavioral intervention, ideally supported by a strong conceptual framework and specified neurocognitive mechanisms. Within this field, neurotechnology promises many advantages, and a growing literature establishes technology-enabled cognitive training as a promising modality to promote positive cognition in consumer, research, clinical, and public health settings. Methodologic challenges remain, and specific cognitive training recommendations for healthy elders must be tentative in the context of an emerging evidence base.


Cognitive training Cognitive enhancement Cognitive enrichment Cognitive aging Enabling technology Neurotechnology Technology trials Brain Fitness Positive cognition Clinical trials Healthy aging Prevention Cognitive reserve Cognitive neuroscience Control processes Executive control Memory training Aging technology Behavioral interventions Aging 



No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    •• Hertzog C, Kramer A, Wilson R, Lindenberger U: Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2009, 9:1–65. This comprehensive monograph on the cognitive benefits of intellectual, physical, and social activities includes lifespan developmental approaches to plasticity, neurobiological correlates, and a thorough synthesis of contributions to the literature from multiple disciplines.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fernandez A: Preparing society for the cognitive age. Front Neurosci 2009, 3:128–129.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Willis SL, Schaie KW: Cognitive training and plasticity: theoretical perspective and methodological consequences. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2009, 27:375–389.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mowszowski L, Batchelor J, Naismith SL: Early intervention for cognitive decline: can cognitive training be used as a selective prevention technique? Int Psychogeriatr 2010, 22(4):537–548.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Belleville S: Cognitive training for persons with mild cognitive impairment. Int Psychogeriatr 2008, 20:57–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    • Papp KV, Walsh SJ, Snyder PJ: Immediate and delayed effects of cognitive interventions in healthy elderly: a review of current literature and future directions. Alzheimers Dement 2009, 5:50–60. This literature review and meta-analysis of cognitive training trials in healthy older adults includes traditional methods as well as technology-enabled protocols.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clare L, Woods B: Cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive training for early-stage Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003, CD003260.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Farah MJ, Illes J, Cook-Deegan R, et al.: Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do? Nat Rev Neurosci 2004, 5:421–425.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chatterjee A: Cosmetic neurology: the controversy over enhancing movement, mentation, and mood. Neurology 2004, 63:968–974.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McKanna JA, Jimison H, Pavel M: Divided attention in computer game play: analysis utilizing unobtrusive health monitoring. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009, 2009:6247–6250.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scarmeas N, Levy G, Tang MX, et al.: Influence of leisure activity on the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 2001, 57:2236–2242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Verghese J, Lipton RB, Katz MJ, et al.: Leisure activities and the risk of dementia in the elderly. N Engl J Med 2003, 348:2508–2516.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilson RS, Mendes De Leon CF, Barnes LL, et al.: Participation in cognitively stimulating activities and risk of incident Alzheimer disease. JAMA 2002, 287:742–748.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hall CB, Lipton RB, Sliwinski M, et al.: Cognitive activities delay onset of memory decline in persons who develop dementia. Neurology 2009, 73:356–361.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    • Stern Y: Cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:2015–2028. This conceptual overview and survey of the cognitive reserve literature proposes that mentally engaging activities mitigate against the clinical manifestation of accumulating brain pathology.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Salthouse T: Mental exercise and mental aging: evaluating the validity of the “use it or lose it” hypothesis. Perspect Psychol Sci 2006, 1:68–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schooler C: Use it—and keep it, longer, probably: a reply to Salthouse (2006). Perspect Psychol Sci 2007, 2:24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jobe JB, Smith DM, Ball K, et al.: ACTIVE: a cognitive intervention trial to promote independence in older adults. Control Clin Trials 2001, 22:453–479.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ball K, Berch DB, Helmers KF, et al.: Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002, 288:2271–2281.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    •• Willis SL, Tennstedt SL, Marsiske M, et al.: Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults. JAMA 2006, 296:2805–2814. The authors present 5-year results from the ACTIVE multicenter cognitive training trial, which demonstrate enduring domain-specific improvements with limited evidence of transfer to self-reported everyday function.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Myers RS, Ball KK, Kalina TD, et al.: Relation of useful field of view and other screening tests to on-road driving performance. Percept Mot Skills 2000, 91:279–290.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Owsley C, Ball K, McGwin G Jr, et al.: Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. JAMA 1998, 279:1083–1088.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Edwards JD, Myers C, Ross LA, et al.: The longitudinal impact of cognitive speed of processing training on driving mobility. Gerontologist 2009, 49:485–494.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Edwards JD, Wadley VG, Vance DE, et al.: The impact of speed of processing training on cognitive and everyday performance. Aging Ment Health 2005, 9:262–271.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Edwards JD, Ross LA, Ackerman ML, et al.: Longitudinal predictors of driving cessation among older adults from the ACTIVE clinical trial. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2008, 63:P6–P12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Edwards JD, Delahunt PB, Mahncke HW: Cognitive speed of processing training delays driving cessation. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2009, 64:1262–1267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wolinsky FD, Vander Weg MW, Martin R, et al.: Does cognitive training improve internal locus of control among older adults? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2009.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wolinsky FD, Mahncke H, Vander Weg MW, et al.: Speed of processing training protects self-rated health in older adults: enduring effects observed in the multi-site ACTIVE randomized controlled trial. Int Psychogeriatr 2010, 22(3):470–478.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wolinsky FD, Vander Weg MW, Martin R, et al.: The effect of speed-of-processing training on depressive symptoms in ACTIVE. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2009, 64:468–472.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wolinsky FD, Mahncke HW, Kosinski M, et al.: The ACTIVE cognitive training trial and predicted medical expenditures. BMC Health Serv Res 2009, 9:109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    •• Smith GE, Housen P, Yaffe K, et al.: A cognitive training program based on principles of brain plasticity: results from the Improvement in Memory with Plasticity-based Adaptive Cognitive Training (IMPACT) study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009, 57:594–603. The IMPACT trial demonstrated improved auditory memory and attention in older adults who trained on a neuroplasticity-based software package compared with an educational DVD control condition.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mahncke HW, Bronstone A, Merzenich MM: Brain plasticity and functional losses in the aged: scientific bases for a novel intervention. Prog Brain Res 2006, 157:81–109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mahncke HW, Connor BB, Appelman J, et al.: Memory enhancement in healthy older adults using a brain plasticity-based training program: a randomized, controlled study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:12523–12528.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Clark JE, Lanphear AK, Riddick CC: The effects of videogame playing on the response selection processing of elderly adults. J Gerontol 1987, 42:82–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dustman RE, Emmerson RY, Steinhaus LA, et al.: The effects of videogame playing on neuropsychological performance of elderly individuals. J Gerontol 1992, 47:P168–P171.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Goldstein J, Cajko L, Oosterbroek M, et al.: Video games and the elderly. Social Behav Personality 1997, 25:345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Erickson KI, Boot WR, Basak C, et al.: Striatal volume predicts level of video game skill acquisition. Cereb Cortex 2010 Jan 20 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Graybiel AM: Habits, rituals, and the evaluative brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 2008, 31:359–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dahlin E, Neely AS, Larsson A, et al.: Transfer of learning after updating training mediated by the striatum. Science 2008, 320:1510–1512.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mozolic JL, Long AB, Morgan AR, et al.: A cognitive training intervention improves modality-specific attention in a randomized controlled trial of healthy older adults. Neurobiol Aging 2009, May 8 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mozolic JL, Hayasaka S, Laurienti PJ: A cognitive training intervention increases resting cerebral blood flow in healthy older adults. Front Hum Neurosci 2010, 4:16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kramer A, Larish J, Strayer D: Training attentional control in dual-task settings: a comparison of young and old adults. J Exp Psychol Appl 1995, 1:50–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yechiam E, Erev I, Gopher D: On the potential value and limitations of emphasis change and other exploration-enhancing training methods. J Exp Psychol Appl 2001, 7:277–285.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gopher D, Weil M, Bareket T: Transfer of skill from a computer game trainer to flight. Hum Factors 1994, 36:387–405.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    • Basak C, Boot WR, Voss MW, Kramer AF: Can training in a real-time strategy video game attenuate cognitive decline in older adults? Psychol Aging 2008, 23:765–777. This cognitive training study using a complex off-the-shelf strategy-based video game demonstrated specificity of transfer effects associated with training executive control processes in older adults.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Green CS, Bavelier D: Exercising your brain: a review of human brain plasticity and training-induced learning. Psychol Aging 2008, 23:692–701.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sliwinski MJ: Measurement-burst designs for social health research. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 2008, 2:245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    McArdle JJ, Prindle JJ: A latent change score analysis of a randomized clinical trial in reasoning training. Psychol Aging 2008, 23:702–719.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tang YY, Posner MI: Attention training and attention state training. Trends Cogn Sci 2009, 13:222–227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    West SG, Duan N, Pequegnat W, et al.: Alternatives to the randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health 2008, 98:1359–1366.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Albert Einstein College of MedicineBronxUSA

Personalised recommendations