Current Infectious Disease Reports

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 136–141

Nonculture laboratory methods for the diagnosis of infectious endocarditis

  • Pierre-Edouard Fournier
  • Didier Raoult
Article
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

Over the past few years new techniques have been developed to improve the diagnosis of infectious diseases. However, despite the various available culture systems, culture-negative endocarditis currently represents a challenge for physicians. In our laboratory, in an effort to reduce the rate of endocarditis of unknown etiology, we have used several recent histologic, serologic, and molecular tests. We review the latest technical developments for the diagnosis of infectious endocarditis, including those that we are currently using.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    von Reyn CF, Levy BS, Arbeit RD, et al.: Infective endocarditis: an analysis based on strict case definitions. Ann Intern Med 1981, 94:505–517.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Durack DT, Lukes AS, Bright DK: New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings. Am J Med 1994, 96:200–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benn M, Hagelskjaer LH, Tvede M: Infective endocarditis, 1984 through 1993: a clinical and microbiological survey. J Intern Med 1997, 242:15–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hogevik H, Olaison L, Andersson R, et al.: Epidemiologic aspects of infective endocarditis in an urban population. Medicine 1995, 74:324–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sandre RM, Shafran SD: Infective endocarditis: review of 135 cases over 9 years. Clin Infect Dis 1996, 22:276–286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Martin JM, Neches WH, Wald ER: Infective endocarditis: 35 years of experience at a children’s hospital. Clin Infect Dis 1997, 24:669–675.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoen B, Selton-Suty C, Lacassin F, et al.: Infective endocarditis in patients with negative blood cultures: analysis of 88 cases from a one-year nationwide survey in France. Clin Infect Dis 1995, 20:501–506.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berbari EF, Cockerill FR, Steckelberg JM: Infective endocarditis due to unusual or fastidious microorganisms. Mayo Clin Proc 1997, 72(6):532–542.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barnes PD, Crook DWM: Culture negative endocarditis. J Infect 1997, 35:209–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Scoy RE: Culture negative endocarditis. Mayo Clin Proc 1982, 57:149–154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cunha BA, Gill V, Lazar JM: Acute infective endocarditis. Diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Infect Dis Emerg 1996, 10:811–834.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Woods GL, Walker DH: Detection of infection or infectious agents by use of cytologic and histologic stains. Clin Microbiol Rev 1996, 9:382–404. An exhaustive review of histologic stains available for the detection of microorganisms in tissues.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eck M, Kreipe H, Harmsen D, Muller-Hermelink HK: Invasion and destruction of mucosal plasma cells by Tropheryma whippelii. Hum Pathol 1997, 28:1424–1428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Raoult D, Fournier PE, Drancourt M, et al.: Diagnosis of 22 new cases of Bartonella endocarditis. Ann Intern Med 1996, 125:646–652. The largest series to date and the first approach of epidemiologic factors associated with Bartonella endocarditis cases.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gimenez DF: Staining rickettsiae in yolk-sac cultures. Stain Technol 1964, 39:135–140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brouqui P, Dumler JS, Raoult D: Immunohistologic demonstration of Coxiella burnetii in the valves of patients with Q fever endocarditis. Am J Med 1994, 97:451–458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thiele D, Karo M, Krauss H: Monoclonal antibody based capture Elisa/Elifa for detection of Coxiella burnetii in clinical specimens. Eur J Epidemiol 1992, 8:568–574.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Muhlemann K, Matter L, Meyer B, Schopfer K: Isolation of coxiella burnetiii from heart valves of patients treated for Q fever endocarditis. J Clin Microbiol 1995, 33(2):428–431.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McCaul TF, Williams JC: Localization of DNA in Coxiella burnetii by post-embedding immunoelectron microscopy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1990, 590:136–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Raoult D, Laurent JC, Mutillod M: Monoclonal antibodies to Coxiella burnetii for antigenic detection in cell cultures and in paraffin embedded tissues. Am J Clin Pathol 1994, 101:318 320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Etienne J, Ory D, Thouvenot D, et al.: Chlamydial endocarditis: a report of 10 cases. Eur Heart J 1992, 13:1422–1426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Relman DA, Schmidt TM, MacDermott RP, Falkow S: Identification of the uncultured bacillus of Whipple’s disease. N Engl J Med 1992, 327:293–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Relman DA, Loutit JS, Schmidt TM, et al.: The agent of bacillary angiomatosis: an approach to the identification of uncultured pathogens. N Engl J Med 1990, 323:1573–1580.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goldenberger D, Kunzli A, Vogt P, et al.: Molecular diagnosis of bacterial endocarditis by broad-range PCR amplification and direct sequencing. J Clin Microbiol 1997, 35:2733–2739. This study confirms the interest of broad-range PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene followed by sequencing in the diagnosis of infectious endocarditis.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stein A, Raoult D: Detection of Coxiella burnetii by DNA amplification using polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1992, 30:2462–2466.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stein A, Raoult D: A simple method for amplification of DNA from paraffin-embedded tissues. Nucl Acids Res 1992, 20:5237–5238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fritz E, Thiele D, Willems H, Wittenbrink MM: Quantification of coxiella burnetii by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and a colorimetric microtiter plate hybridization assay (CMHA). Eur J Epidemiol 1995, 11:549–557.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hoover TA, Vodkin MH, Williams JC: A Coxiella burnetii repeated DNA element resembling a bacterial insertion sequence. J Bacteriol 1992, 174:5540–5548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Willems H, Thiele D, Frolich-Ritter R, Krauss H: Detection of Coxiella burnetii in cow’s milk using the polymerase chain reaction. J Vet Med B 1994, 41:580–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Roux V, Raoult D: The 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer region of Bartonella (Rochalimaea) species is longer than usually described in other bacteria. Gene 1995, 156:107–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Roux V, Raoult D: Inter-and intraspecies identification of Bartonella (Rochalimea) species. J Clin Microbiol 1995, 33:1573–1579.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Matar GM, Swaminathan B, Hunter SB, et al.: Polymerase chain reaction-based restriction fragment lenght polymorphism analysis of a fragment of the ribosomal operon from Rochalimaea species for subtyping. J Clin Microbiol 1993, 31:1730–1734.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Matar GM: Inter- and intraspecies identification of bartonella species by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of a fragment of the ribosomal operon. J Clin Microbiol 1995, 33(12):3370.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Drancourt M, Mainardi JL, Brouqui P, et al.: Bartonella (Rochalimaea) quintana endocarditis in three homeless men. N Engl J Med 1995, 332:419–423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Anderson B, Sims K, Regnery R: Detection of the rochalimaea henselae DNA in specimens from cat-scratch disease patients by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1994, 32:942–948.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ramzan NN, Loftus Jr E, Burgart LJ, et al.: Diagnosis and monitoring of Whipple disease by polymerase chain reaction. Ann Intern Med 1997, 126:520–527. A comprehensive experimental study emphasizing the interest of PCR for the diagnosis of T. whippelii-related infections.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Meijer A, Kwakkel GJ, de Vries A, et al.: Species identification of Chlamydia isolates by analyzing restriction fragment length polymorphism of the 16S-23S rRNA spacer region. J Clin Microbiol 1997, 35:1179–1183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Morata P, Queipo-Ortuno MI, de Dios Colmenero J: Strategy for optimizing DNA amplification in a peripheral blood PCR assay used for diagnosis of human brucellosis. J Clin Microbiol 1998, 36:2443–2446.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jaulhac B, Reyrolle M, Sodahlon YK, et al.: Comparison of sample preparation methods for detection of Legionella pneumophila in culture-positive bronchoalveolar lavage fluids by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 1998, 36:2120–2122.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ginesu F, Pirina P, Sechi LA, et al.: Microbiological diagnosis of tuberculosis: a comparison of old and new methods. J Chemother 1998, 10:295–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dorigo-Zetsma JW, Zaat SA, Wertheim-van Dillen PME, et al.:Comparison of PCR, culture, and serological tests for diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae respiratory tract infection. J Clin Microbiol 1999, 37:14–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Fournier PE, Marrie TJ, Raoult: Diagnosis of Q fever. J Clin Microbiol 1998, 36(7):1823–1834. An overview of the clinical and microbiologic diagnosis of Q fever, including the latest developments in laboratory tests.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Peacock MG, Philip RN, Williams JC, Faulkner RS: Serological evaluation of O fever in humans: enhanced phase I titers of immunoglobulins G and A are diagnostic for Q fever endocarditis. Infect Immun 1983, 41:1089–1098.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tissot-Dupont H, Thirion X, Raoult D: Q fever serology: cutoff determination for microimmunofluorescence. Clin Diag Lab Immunol 1994, 1:189–196.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fournier PE, Casalta JP, Habib G, et al.: Modification of the diagnostic criteria proposed by the duke endocarditis service to permit improved diagnosis of Q fever endocarditis. Am J Med 1996, 100:629–633.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Maurin M, Eb F, Etienne J, Raoult D: Serological cross-reactions between Bartonella and Chlamydia species: Implications for diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol 1997, 35(9):2283–2287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Drancourt M, Birtles RJ, Chaumentin G, et al.: New serotype of Bartonella henselae in endocarditis and cat-scratch disease. Lancet 1996, 347:441–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Amerein MP, De Briel D, Jaulhac B, et al.: Diagnostic value of the indirect immunofluorescence assay in cat scratch disease with Bartonella henselae and Afipia felis antigens. Clin Diag Lab Immunol 1996, 3:200–204.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ: 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991, 173:697–703.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Roux V, Raoult D: Body lice as tools for the diagnosis and surveillance of re-emerging diseases. J Clin Microbiol 1999, 37:596–599.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Science Inc 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierre-Edouard Fournier
    • 1
  • Didier Raoult
    • 1
  1. 1.Unité des rickettsies, CNRS: UPRESA 6020, Faculté de médecineUniversité de la MéditerranéeMarseille cedex 05France

Personalised recommendations