The Intersection Between Colonization Resistance, Antimicrobial Stewardship, and Clostridium difficile
- 315 Downloads
Purpose of Review
Colonization resistance refers to the innate defense provided by the indigenous microbiota against colonization by pathogenic organisms. We aim to describe how this line of defense is deployed against Clostridium difficile and what the implications are for interventions directed by Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs.
The indigenous microbiota provides colonization resistance through depletion of nutrients, prevention of access to adherence sites within the gut mucosa, production of inhibitory substances, and stimulation of the host’s immune system. The ability to quantify colonization resistance could provide information regarding periods of maximal vulnerability to colonization with pathogens and also allow the identification of mechanisms of restoration of colonization resistance. Methods utilized to determine the composition of the gut microbiota include sequencing technologies and measurement of concentration of specific bacterial metabolites.
Use of innovations in the quantification of colonization resistance can expand the role of Antimicrobial Stewardship from prevention of disruption of the indigenous microbiota to restoration of colonization resistance.
KeywordsColonization resistance Clostridium difficile Antimicrobial stewardship
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Curtis J. Donskey has received grants from Pfizer, Merck, Gojo Industries, Clorox, and Ecolab and is on the advisory board of Synthetic biologics.
Silvia Munoz-Price and Rossana Rosa declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human subjects performed by any of the authors.
All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. What do we know about antibiotic use in hospitals. In: Antibiotic prescribing and use. 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/stewardship-report/hospital.html. Accessed 16 Dec 2017.
- 26.Theriot CM, Bowman AA, Young VB. Antibiotic-induced alterations of the gut microbiota alter secondary bile acid production and allow for clostridium difficile spore germination and outgrowth in the large intestine. mSphere. 2016;1.Google Scholar
- 30.Abujamel T, Cadnum JL, Jury LA, Sunkesula VC, Kundrapu S, Jump RL, et al. Defining the vulnerable period for re-establishment of Clostridium difficile colonization after treatment of C. difficile infection with oral vancomycin or metronidazole. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76269.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 33.• Jump RL, Polinkovsky A, Hurless K, Sitzlar B, Eckart K, Tomas M, et al. Metabolomics analysis identifies intestinal microbiota-derived biomarkers of colonization resistance in clindamycin-treated mice. PLoS One. 2014;9:e101267. Compounds in fecal specimens were identified as potential useful biomarkers indicating intact or disrupted colonization resistance. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 34.• Obrenovich ME, Tima M, Polinkovsky A, Zhang R, Emancipator SN, Donskey CJ. Targeted metabolomics analysis identifies intestinal microbiota-derived urinary biomarkers of colonization resistance in antibiotic-treated mice. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61 Urinary metabolites were identified as biomarkers indicating intact or disrupted colonization resistance. Google Scholar
- 38.• Kokai-Kun JF, Roberts T, Coughlin O, Sicard E, Rufiange M, Fedorak R, et al. The oral beta-lactamase SYN-004 (ribaxamase) degrades ceftriaxone excreted into the intestine in phase 2a clinical studies. 61 Phase 2a clinical study of ribaxamase, an oral beta-lactamase excreted into the small intestine. In vivo mechanism of action was confirmed. Google Scholar
- 40.Barlam TF, Cosgrove SE, Abbo LM, MacDougall C, Schuetz AN, Septimus EJ, et al. Implementing an antibiotic stewardship program: guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:e51–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 41.Baur D, Gladstone BP, Burkert F, Carrara E, Foschi F, Dobele S, et al. Effect of antibiotic stewardship on the incidence of infection and colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria and Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:990–1001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.• Donskey CJ. Colonization and its importance for the emergence of clinical resistance. In: Rice LB, editor. Antimicrobial stewardship, principles and practice. Wallingford: CAB International; 2017. p. 87–98. Comprehensive review on the topic of colonization resistance. Google Scholar
- 44.• Dingle KE, Didelot X, Quan TP, Eyre DW, Stoesser N, Golubchik T, et al. Effects of control interventions on Clostridium difficile infection in England: an observational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:411–21. Observational study which showed restriction in fluoroquinolone prescribing appeared to explain the decrease in incidence of C. difficile infections in the United Kingdom. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar