The Role of PCR in the Diagnosis of Candida Vulvovaginitis—a New Gold Standard?
PCR is recognized as a reliable technique for detection of all types of microorganisms. Being highly objective and reproducible also sensitive and specific, PCR is now widely used for sexually transmitted infection (STI) diagnosis. Potential, however, exists for detecting non-pathogens, and not identifying a pathogenic state decreases specificity or clinical significance. PCR Candida tests of vaginal specimens are now widely available and frequently used offering a modest to moderate increase in sensitivity and are likely to replace traditional culture and DNA homology testing. Nevertheless, there remain considerable gaps in our knowledge regarding the usefulness and applications of these expensive tests.
KeywordsDiagnosis Candida Vulvovaginitis PCR Vulvovaginal
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 3.Liu XP, Fan SR, Peng YT, Zhang HP. Species distribution and susceptibility of Candida isolates from patient with vulvovaginal candidiasis in Southern China from 2003 to 2012. J Med Mycol. 2014;24:106–11.Google Scholar
- 6.Zhang JY, Liu JH, Liu FD, Xia YH, Wang J, Liu X, Huang XT, et al. Vulvovaginal candidiasis: species distribution, fluconazole resistance and drug efflux pump gene overexpression. Mycoses. 2014;57:584-91.Google Scholar
- 11.Guzel AB, Ilkit M, Akar T, Burgut R, Demir SC. Evaluation of risk factors in patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis and the value of chromID Candida agar versus CHROMagar Candida for recovery and presumptive identification of vaginal yeast species. Med Mycol. 2011;49:16–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Chen YC, Eisner JD, Kattar MM, Rassoulian-Barrett SL, LaFe K, Yarfitz SL, et al. Identification of medically important yeasts using PCR-based detection of DNA sequence polymorphisms in the internal transcribed spacer 2 region of the rRNA genes. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:2302–10.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Posteraro B, Sanguinetti M, Masucci L, Romano L, Morace G, Fadda G. Reverse cross blot hybridization assay for rapid detection of PCR-amplified DNA from Candida species, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:1609–14.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.Weissenbacher T, Witkin SS, Ledger WJ, Tolbert V, Gingelmaier A, Scholz C, Mylonas I, et al. Relationship between clinical diagnosis of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis and detection of Candida species by culture and polymerase chain reaction. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;279:125–129.Google Scholar
- 38.•Cartwright CP, Lembke BD, Ramachandran K, Body BA, Nye MB, Rivers CA, et al. Comparison of nucleic acid amplification assays with BD Affirm VPIII for diagnosis of vaginitis in symptomatic women. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:3694–9. This large review compares PCR with the widely used BD Affirm VPIII test, finding the latter wanting.Google Scholar
- 40.Lopez-Monteon A, Gomez-Figueroa FS, Ramos-Poceros G, Guzman-Gomez D, & Ramos-Ligonio A. Codetection of Trichomonas vaginalis and Candida albicans by PCR in urine samples in a low-risk population attended in a clinic first level in central Veracruz, Mexico. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:281892.Google Scholar