Urinary Tract Infections in Patients with Spinal Injuries

  • Lindsay E. Nicolle
Genitourinary Infections (J Sobel, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Genitourinary Infections


Urinary tract infection remains an important problem for patients with spinal cord injury. Interventions used to promote bladder emptying and maintain low-pressure voiding have variable risks for urinary tract infection. Asymptomatic bacteriuria is common in this population and should not be treated. However, identification of symptomatic infection is compromised by difficulties in ascertainment of symptoms. Use of hydrophilic coated catheters for intermittent catheterization does not influence the frequency of symptomatic urinary tract infection. Botulinum toxin injection in the detrusor muscle or the urethral sphincter improves bladder emptying and does not influence the frequency of urinary infection. Asymptomatic bacteriuria is a common finding in pregnant women with spinal cord injury, but optimal management is not clear. Other research needs include further development and evaluation of interventions to decrease the frequency of infection, improve diagnostic precision, and limit the emergence of resistant organisms.


Urinary infection Bacteriuria Asymptomatic bacteriuria Spinal cord injury Botulinum toxin Intermittent catheter Hydrophilic catheter 


Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Lindsay E. Nicolle has no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the author.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    D’Hondt F, Everaert K. Urinary tract infections in patients with spinal cord injuries. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2011;13:544–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.•
    DeJong G, Tian W, Hsieh C-H, et al. Rehospitalization in the first year of traumatic spinal cord injury after discharge from medical rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(4 Suppl 2):S87–97. Urinary tract infection is the most common cause of rehospitalization within 1 year following spinal cord injury..PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nicolle LE, Bradley S, Colgan, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:643–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.•
    Jamison J, Maquire S, McCann J. Catheter policies for management of long term voiding problems in adults with neurogenic bladder disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; Issue 12 Art. No CD 004375. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD0043 75.pub3. There were no studies identified that prospectively compared different voiding strategies for spinal cord injured patients.
  5. 5.
    Afsar SI, Yemisci OU, Cosar SNS, et al. Compliance with clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injury patients: a long-term follow-up study. Spinal Cord. 2013;1–5.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shen I, Zheng X, Zhang C, et al. Influence of different urination methods on the urinary systems of patients with spinal cord injury. J Int Med Res. 2012;40:1949–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ryu KH, Kim YB, Yang SO, et al. Results of urine culture and antimicrobial sensitivity tests according to the voiding method over 10 years in patients with spinal cord injury. Korean J Urol. 2011;52:345–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.••
    Wyndaele J-J, Bauner A, Geerlings SE, et al. Clean intermittent catheterization and urinary tract infection; review and guide for future research. BJUI Int. 2012;110:E910–7. Urinary infection remains an important problem for patients using intermittent catheterization. Specific research questions that need to be addressed include the impact of different catheter materials, definitions for symptomatic infection, and potential nonantimicrobial approaches..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.•
    Gobeaux N, Yates DR, Denys P, et al. Supratrigonal cystectomy with Hautmann pouch as treatment for neurogenic bladder in spinal cord injury patients: long-term functional results. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012;31:672–6. The frequency of urinary tract infections may be decreased in patients following a bladder augmentation procedure..PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van der Merwe A, Baalbergen E, Shrosbree R, et al. Outcome of dual flange metallic urethral stents in the treatment of neuropathic bladder dysfunction after spinal cord injury. J Endourol. 2012;26:1210–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Welk B, Fuller A, Razvi H, et al. Renal stone disease in spinal-cord-injured patients. J Endourol. 2012;26(8):954–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martins CF, Bronzatto E, Neto JM, et al. Urinary tract infection analysis in a spinal cord injured population undergoing rehabilitation – how to treat? Spinal Cord. 2013;51:193–1965.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cremet L, Bemer P, Rome J, et al. Outbreak caused by Proteus mirabilis isolates producing weakly expressed TEM-derived extended-spectrum β-lactamase in spinal cord injury patients with recurrent bacteriuria. Scand J Infect Dis. 2011;43:957–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Al Taweed W, Alkhayal A. Neurogenic bladder evaluation and management after spinal cord injury: Current practice among urologists working in Saudi Arabia. Urol Ann. 2011;3:24–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.•
    Cameron AP, Rodriguez GM, Schomer KG. Systematic review of urological followup after spinal cord injury. J Urol. 2012;187:391–7. There is no current accepted standard approach for urologic follow-up to prevent urinary tract infection after spinal cord injury..PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bothig R, Fiebag K, Thietje R, et al. Morbidity of urinary tract infection after urodynamic examination of hospitalized SCI patients: the impact of bladder management. Spinal Cord. 2013;51:70–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.••
    Bermingham SL, Hodgkinson S, Wright S, Hayter E, Spinks J, Pellowe C. Intermittent self catheterization with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 2013;345:e8639 dol: 10,1136. This systematic review of different types of catheters for intermittent catheterization included a meta-analysis of relevant trials. There were no differences in hydrophilic, as compared with uncoated, catheters for outcomes of symptomatic urinary tract infection. Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li L, Ye W, Ruan H, et al. Impact of hydrophilic catheters on urinary tract infections in people with spinal cord injury: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:782–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chartier-Kastler E, Denys P. Intermittent catheterization with hydrophilic catheters as a treatment of chronic neurogenic urinary retention. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:21–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.••
    Cardenas DD, Moore KN, Dannels-McClure A, et al. Intermittent catheterization with a hydrophilic-coated catheter delays urinary tract infections in acute spinal cord injury: A prospective randomized, multicenter trial. Am Acad Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;3:408–17. This study reported a significant delay in time to first symptomatic infection with use of hydrophilic, as compared with uncoated, catheters. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of symptomatic infection during the full study period..Google Scholar
  21. 21.•
    Goessaert A-S OM, Evaraert KCMM. Onabotulinum toxin A for the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity due to spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev Neurother. 2012;12(7):763–75. Use of botulinum toxin A for detrusor overactivity results in increased postvoid residual volumes for some patients but no change in frequency of urinary tract infection..PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.••
    Mehta S, Hill D, Foley N, et al. A meta-analysis of botulinum toxin sphincteric injections in the treatment of incomplete voiding after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93. Botulinum toxin sphincter injections are used to improve voiding for selected patients with spinal cord injury. This meta-analysis reported a decrease in incidence of febrile urinary tract infection following this intervention. Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wefer B, Ehlken B, Bremer J, et al. Treatment outcomes and resource use of patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity receiving botulinum toxin A (BOTOX®) therapy in Germany. World J Urol. 2010;28:385–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Herschorn S, Gajewski J, Ethans K, et al. Efficacy of botulinum toxin A injection for neurogenic detrusor overactivity and urinary incontinence: a randomized, double-blind trial. J Urol. 2011;185:2229–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cruz F, Herschorn S, Aliotta P, et al. Efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxina in patients with urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Assoc Urinary. 2011;60:742–50.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ginsberg D, Gousse A, Keppenne V, et al. Phase 3 efficacy and tolerability study of OnabotulinumtoxinA for urinary incontinence from neurogenic detrusor overactivity. J Urol. 2012;187:2131–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jia C, Liao L-M, Chen G, et al. Detrusor botulinum toxin A injection significantly decreased urinary tract infection in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2013;51:487–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Apostolidis A, Thompson C, Yan X, et al. An exploratory, placebo-controlled, dose-response study of the efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA in spinal cord injury patients with urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity. World J Urol. 2012. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0984-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.•
    Signore C, Spong CY, Krotoski D, et al. Pregnancy in women with physical disabilities. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(4):935–47. There is limited evidence describing the frequency or characteristics of urinary tract infection in pregnant women with spinal cord injury..PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.••
    Pannek J, Bertschy S. Mission impossible? Urological management of patients with spinal cord injury during pregnancy: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:1028–31. Women with spinal cord injury frequently have symptomatic urinary infection and asymptomatic bacteriuria. The optimal management to prevent complications associated with urinary infection in pregnancy requires further investigation..PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.•
    Sterling L, Keunen J, Wigdor E, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with spinal cord lesion. JOGC. 2013;35:39–43. In a small group of pregnant spinal cord injured patients, recurrent urinary tract infection was a frequent complication. A high proportion of women required long-term antimicrobial therapy, but the pregnancy outcomes were generally satisfactory..PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Health Sciences CentreUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations