Impact of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guidelines on the Next Blood Pressure Guidelines in Asia
- 32 Downloads
Purpose of Review
To estimate the impact of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for high blood pressure (BP) on the next hypertension guidelines in Asia.
The 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines for high BP in adults changed the diagnostic threshold and the management goal of BP from 140/90 to 130/80 mmHg. Another characteristic of the new guideline is its focus on a practical approach for the effective management of hypertension by using home and ambulatory BP monitoring; this point is also recommended in the 2014 Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension.
In Japan, the guidelines for hypertension management are currently under revision and will be released in the spring of 2019. The core concept of the 2019 Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension, i.e., early and tight BP control over 24 h, will contribute to target-organ protection and cardiovascular disease prevention for Asians.
KeywordsAmbulatory blood pressure monitoring Blood pressure Ethnic differences Guideline Hypertension Paradox
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
- 3.Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71(6):e13–e115. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYP.0000000000000065.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Kario K, Saito I, Kushiro T, Teramukai S, Ishikawa Y, Mori Y, et al. Home blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in patients during antihypertensive therapy: primary results of HONEST, a large-scale prospective, real-world observational study. Hypertension. 2014;64(5):989–96. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04262.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Nakano M, Eguchi K, Sato T, Onoguchi A, Hoshide S, Kario K. Effect of intensive salt-restriction education on clinic, home, and ambulatory blood pressure levels in treated hypertensive patients during a 3-month education period. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016;18(5):385–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.12770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Kario K, Tomitani N, Kanegae H, Yasui N, Nishizawa M, Fujiwara T, et al. Development of a new ICT-based multisensor blood pressure monitoring system for use in hemodynamic biomarker-initiated anticipation medicine for cardiovascular disease: the national IMPACT program project. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2017;60(3):435–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2017.10.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Omboni S, Aristizabal D, De la Sierra A, Dolan E, Head G, Kahan T, et al. Hypertension types defined by clinic and ambulatory blood pressure in 14 143 patients referred to hypertension clinics worldwide. Data from the ARTEMIS study. J Hypertens. 2016;34(11):2187–98. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000001074.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Hoshide S, Kario K, de la Sierra A, Bilo G, Schillaci G, Banegas JR, et al. Ethnic differences in the degree of morning blood pressure surge and in its determinants between Japanese and European hypertensive subjects: data from the ARTEMIS study. Hypertension. 2015;66(4):750–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05958.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar