Personalized Therapy of Hypertension: the Past and the Future

  • Paolo Manunta
  • Mara Ferrandi
  • Daniele Cusi
  • Patrizia Ferrari
  • Jan Staessen
  • Giuseppe Bianchi
Novel Treatments for Hypertension (T Unger, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Novel Treatments for Hypertension

Abstract

During the past 20 years, the studies on genetics or pharmacogenomics of primary hypertension provided interesting results supporting the role of genetics, but no actionable finding ready to be translated into personalized medicine. Two types of approaches have been applied: a “hypothesis-driven” approach on the candidate genes, coding for proteins involved in the biochemical machinery underlying the regulation of BP, and an “unbiased hypothesis-free” approach with GWAS, based on the randomness principles of frequentist statistics. During the past 10–15 years, the application of the latter has overtaken the application of the former leading to an enlargement of the number of previously unknown candidate loci or genes but without any actionable result for the therapy of hypertension. In the present review, we summarize the results of our hypothesis-driven approach based on studies carried out in rats with genetic hypertension and in humans with essential hypertension at the pre-hypertensive and early hypertensive stages. These studies led to the identification of mutant adducin and endogenous ouabain as candidate genetic-molecular mechanisms in both species. Rostafuroxin has been developed for its ability to selectively correct Na+ pump abnormalities sustained by the two abovementioned mechanisms and to selectively reduce BP in rats and in humans carrying the gene variants underlying the mutant adducin and endogenous ouabain (EO) effects. A clinical trial is ongoing to substantiate these findings. Future studies should apply both the candidate gene and GWAS approaches to fully exploit the potential of genetics in optimizing the personalized therapy.

Keywords

Hypertension Genetics Candidate gene GWAS Personalized therapy Adducin Endogenous ouabain Rostafuroxin Pharmacogenomics Kidney cross-transplantation 

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Polanyi M. Science, faith, and society. London: Oxford University Press; 1946.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arwood MJ, Cavallari LH, Duarte JD. Pharmacogenomics of hypertension and heart disease. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015;17:586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fontana V, Luizon MR, Sandrim VC. An update on the pharmacogenetics of treating hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 2015;29:283–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    El Rouby N, Cooper-DeHoff RM. Genetics of resistant hypertension: a novel pharmacogenomics henotype. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015;17:583.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Franceschini N, Chasman DI, Cooper-DeHoff RM, Arnett DK. Genetics, ancestry, and hypertension: implications for targeted antihypertensive therapies. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2014;16:461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manunta P, Lavery G, Lanzani C, et al. Physiological interaction between alpha-adducin and WNK1-NEDD4L pathways on sodium-related blood pressure regulation. Hypertension. 2008;52:366–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kurtz TW. Genome-wide association studies will unlock the genetic basis of hypertension: con side of the argument. Hypertension. 2010;56:1021–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.••
    Ganesh SK, Chasman DI, Larson MG, et al. Effects of long-term averaging of quantitative blood pressure traits on the detection of genetic associations. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;95:49–65. An association with blood pressure is found for these loci in 49,626 individuals of European ancestry.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tragante V, Barnes MR, Ganesh SK, et al. Gene-centric meta-analysis in 87,736 individuals of European ancestry identifies multiple blood-pressure-related loci. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;94:349–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.••
    Natekar A, Olds RL, Lau MW, et al. Elevated blood pressure: our family’s fault? The genetics of essential hypertension. World J Cardiol. 2014;6:327–37. A comprehensive review on genetic factors associated to arterial hypertension.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.••
    Padmanabhan S, Caulfield M, Dominiczak AF. Genetic and molecular aspects of hypertension. Circ Res. 2015;116:937–59. The current status of genetic hypertension is reviewed and two targets (NOS and Uromodulin) to be successfully used for drug development are illustrated.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Doaei S, Gholamalizadeh M. The association of genetic variations with sensitivity of blood pressure to dietary salt: a narrative literature review. ARYA Atheroscler. 2014;10:169–74.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Manolio TA. Bringing genome-wide association findings into clinical use. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:549–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.••
    Aronson SJ, Rehm HL. Building the foundation for genomics in precision medicine. Nature. 2015;526:336–42. A thorough discussion on the various issues to be addressed to develop a precision medicine.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Joyner MJ, Paneth N. Seven questions for personalized medicine. JAMA. 2015;314:999–1000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.••
    Caro JJ, Salas M, Speckman JL, et al. Persistence with treatment for hypertension in actual practice. Can Med Assoc J. 1999;160:31–7. Withdrawal rate from hypertensive drugs is four times higher in newly discovered and never treated patients compared to the patients under therapy.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Barrett JC, Dunham I, Birney E. Using human genetics to make new medicines. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16:561–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.•
    Rodriguez R, Miller KM. Unraveling the genomic targets of small molecules using high-throughput sequencing. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:783–96. A comprehensive review on genomic target application in the search for drug development.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.••
    Frye SV, Arkin MR, Arrowsmith CH, et al. Tackling reproducibility in academic preclinical drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14:733–4. The problem related to the use of genetic targets discovered in Academic research applicable to drug development is discussed.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.•
    Noble D, Jablonka E, Joyner MJ, et al. Evolution evolves: physiology returns to centre stage. J Physiol. 2014;592:2237–44. The importance of considering physiological functions in discussing evolution is highlighted.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Milot E, Mayer FM, Nussey DH, et al. Evidence for evolution in response to natural selection in a contemporary human population. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:17040–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bianchi G, Fox U, Di Francesco GF, et al. Blood pressure changes produced by kidney cross-transplantation between spontaneously hypertensive rats and normotensive rats. Clin Sci Mol Med. 1974;47:435–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bianchi G, Fox U, Di Francesco GF, et al. The hypertensive role of the kidney in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Clin Sci Mol Med. 1973;45:135–9.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guidi E, Bianchi G, Dallosta V, et al. Influence of familial hypertension of the donor on the blood pressure and antihypertensive therapy of kidney graft recipients. Nephron. 1982;30:318–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Guidi E, Bianchi G, Rivolta E, et al. Hypertension in man with a kidney transplant: role of familial versus other factors. Nephron. 1985;41:14–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Guidi E, Menghetti D, Milani S, et al. Hypertension may be transplanted with the kidney in humans: a long-term historical prospective follow-up of recipients grafted with kidneys coming from donors with or without hypertension in the family. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996;7:1131–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dahl LK, Heine M. Primary role of renal homografts in setting chronic blood pressure levels in rats. Circ Res. 1975;36:692–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rettig R, Stauss H, Folberth C, et al. Hypertension transmitted by kidneys from stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol. 1989;257:F197–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bianchi G, Tenconi LT, Lucca R. Effect in the conscious dog of constriction of the renal artery to a sole remaining kidney on hemodynamics, sodium balance, body fluid volumes, plasma renin concentration and pressor responsiveness to angiotensin. Clin Sci. 1970;38:741–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bing RF, Russell GI, Swales JD, Thurston H. Effect of 12-hour infusions of saralasin or captopril on blood pressure in hypertensive conscious rats. Relationship to plasma renin, duration of hypertension, and effect of unclipping. J Lab Clin Med. 1981;98:302–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Watkins BE, Davis JO, Freeman RH, et al. Continuous angiotensin II blockade throughout the acute phase of one-kidney hypertension in the dog. Circ Res. 1978;42:813–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Freeman RH, Davis JO, Watkins BE, et al. Effects of continuous converting enzyme blockade on renovascular hypertension in the rat. Am J Physiol. 1979;236:F21–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Edmunds ME, Russell GI, Bing RF. Reversal of experimental renovascular hypertension. J Hypertens. 1991;9:289–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Davis JO. The pathogenesis of chronic renovascular hypertension. Circ Res. 1977;40:439–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bianchi G, Baer PG, Fox U, et al. Changes in renin, water balance, and sodium balance during development of high blood pressure in genetically hypertensive rats. Circ Res. 1975;36&37:153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Baer PG, Bianchi G. Micropuncture study of altered renal function in rats of the Milan hypertensive strain (MHS). Proceedings of: the Symposium on Spontaneous Genetic Hypertension in rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1976;3:41s-5s.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Baer PG, Bianchi G, Duzzi L. Renal micropuncture study of normotensive and Milan hypertensive rats before and after development of hypertension. Kidney Int. 1978;13:452–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ferrari P, Cusi D, Barber B, et al. Erythrocyte membrane and renal function in relation to hypertension in rats of the Milan hypertensive strain. Clin Sci. 1982;63:61–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Persson AE, Boberg U, Hahne B, et al. Interstitial pressure as a modulator of tubuloglomerular feedback control. Kidney Int. 1982;12:S122–8.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Persson AE, Bianchi G, Boberg U. Evidence of defective tubuloglomerular feedback control in rats of the Milan hypertensive strain (MHS). Acta Physiol Scand. 1984;122:217–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Persson AE, Bianchi G, Boberg U. Tubuloglomerular feedback in hypertensive rats of the Milan strain. Acta Physiol Scand. 1985;123:139–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Salvati P, Pinciroli GP, Bianchi G. Renal function of isolated perfused kidneys from hypertensive (MHS) and normotensive (MNS) rats of the Milan strain at different ages. J Hypertens. 1984;2:351–3.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Salvati P, Ferrario RG, Parenti P, Bianchi G. Renal function of isolated perfused kidneys from hypertensive (MHS) and normotensive (MNS) rats of the Milan strain: role of calcium. J Hypertens. 1987;5:31–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Capasso G, Rizzo M, Evangelista C, et al. Altered expression of renal apical plasma membrane Na + transporters in the early phase of genetic hypertension. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005;288:F1173–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Capasso G, Rizzo M, Garavaglia ML, et al. Upregulation of apical sodium-chloride cotransporter and basolateral chloride channels is responsible for the maintenance of salt-sensitive hypertension. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008;295:F556–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Douma S, Petidis K, Doumas M, et al. Prevalence of primary hyperaldosteronism in resistant hypertension: a retrospective observational study. Lancet. 2008;371:1921–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Young WF. Primary aldosteronism-one picture is not worth a thousand words. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:357–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Monticone S, Else T, Mulatero P, et al. Understanding primary aldosteronism: impact of next generation sequencing and expression profiling. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015;399:311–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Beretta-Piccoli C, Fischbacher A, Rothenbühler A, et al. Body sodium/blood volume state in normotensive members of normotensive and hypertensive families. J Hypertens. 1986;4:229–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bianchi G, Cusi D, Gatti M, et al. A renal abnormality as a possible cause of “essential” hypertension. Lancet. 1979;1:173–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bianchi G, Staessen JA, Ferrari P. Pharmacogenomics of primary hypertension-the lessons from the past to look toward the future. Pharmacogenomics. 2003;4:279–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Huan T, Esko T, Peters MJ, et al. A meta-analysis of gene expression signatures of blood pressure and hypertension. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005035.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Munroe PB, Tinker A. Genome-wide association studies and contribution to cardiovascular physiology. Physiol Genomics. 2015;47:365–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chakravarti A. Genomics is not enough. Science. 2011;334:15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ryan CJ, Cimermančič P, Szpiech ZA, et al. High-resolution network biology: connecting sequence with function. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:865–79.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Le Novère N. Quantitative and logic modeling of molecular and gene networks. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16:146–58.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mooney MA, Nigg JT, McWeeney SK, Wilmot B. Functional and genomic context in pathway analysis of GWAS data. Trends Genet. 2014;30:390–400.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ritchie MD, Holzinger ER, Li R, et al. Methods of integrating data to uncover genotype-phenotype interactions. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16:85–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sorrells TR, Johnson AD. Making sense of transcription networks. Cell. 2015;161:714–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Mazzocchi F. Could big data be the end of theory in science? A few remarks on the epistemology of data-driven science. EMBO Rep. 2015;16:1250–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ségalat L. System crash. EMBO Rep. 2010;11:86–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.••
    Baddeley M. Herding, social influences and behavioral bias in scientific research: simple awareness of the hidden pressures and beliefs that influence our thinking can help to preserve objectivity. EMBO Rep. 2015;16:902–5. Many non scientific factors influence the choice of research approaches.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    MacArthur DG, Manolio TA, Dimmock DP, et al. Guidelines for investigating causality of sequence variants in human disease. Nature. 2014;508:469–76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Marian AJ. Causality in genetics: the gradient of genetic effects and back to Koch’s postulates of causality. Circ Res. 2014;114:e18–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Williams SM, Haines JL, Moore JH. The use of animal models in the study of complex disease: all else is never equal or why do so many human studies fail to replicate animal findings? Bioessays. 2004;26:170–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Romiguier J, Gayral P, Ballenghien M, et al. Comparative population genomics in animals uncovers the determinants of genetic diversity. Nature. 2014;515:261–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Editorial. Of men, not mice. Nat Med. 2013;19:379.Google Scholar
  68. 68.••
    Bianchi G. Genetic variations of tubular sodium reabsorption leading to “primary” hypertension. Am J Physiol. 2005;289:R1536–49. In this review, the most peculiar aspects of our strategy have been indicated and discussed.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Bianchi G, Picotti GB, Bracchi G, et al. Familial hypertension and hormonal profile, renal haemodynamics and body fluids of young normotensive subjects. Clin Sci Mol Med. 1978;55:367–71.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Cusi D, Barlassina C, Ferrandi M, et al. Relationship between altered Na+-K+ cotransport and Na+-Li+ countertransport in the erythrocytes of “essential” hypertensive patients. Clin Sci. 1981;61:33s–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Cusi D, Barlassina C, Ferrandi M, et al. Erythrocyte membrane transport systems as possible markers for essential hypertension. Clin Sci. 1982;63:57–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Bianchi G, Cusi D, Guidi E. Renal hemodynamics in human subjects and in animals with genetic hypertension during the prehypertensive stage. Am J Nephrol. 1983;3:73–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Bianchi G, Cusi D, Barlassina C, et al. Renal dysfunction as a possible cause of essential hypertension in predisposed subjects. Kidney Int. 1983;23:870–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Beck F, Bianchi G, Dörge A, et al. Sodium and potassium concentrations of renal cortical cells in two animal models of primary arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 1983;1:38–9.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Thurau K, Beck F, Borst M, et al. Intracellular electrolyte composition in various experimental models of hypertension: an electron microprobe study. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984;6:28–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Bianchi G, Ferrari P, Salvati P, et al. Relationship between red blood cell function, kidney function and blood pressure in genetic hypertension. Klin Wochenschr. 1985;63:59–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Cusi D, Alberghini E, Pati P, et al. Pathogenetic mechanisms in essential hypertension. Analogies between a rat model and the human disease. Int J Cardiol. 1989;25:29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Bianchi G, Baldoli E, Lucca E, Barbin P. Pathogenesis of arterial hypertension after the constriction of the renal artery leaving the opposite kidney intact both in the anaesthetized and the conscious dog. Clin Sci. 1972;42:651–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Trizio D, Ferrari P, Ferrandi M, et al. Expression at the hemopoietic stem cell level of the genetically determined erythrocyte membrane defects in the Milan hypertensive rat strain (MHS). J Hypertens. 1983;1:S6–8.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Bianchi G, Ferrari P, Trizio D, et al. Red blood cell abnormalities and spontaneous hypertension in the rat: a genetically determined link. Hypertension. 1985;7:319–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Parenti P, Hanozet G, Bianchi G. Sodium and glucose transport across renal brush-border membranes of Milan hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1986;8:932–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Ferrari P, Torielli L, Ferrandi M, et al. Volumes and Na+ transports in intact red blood cells, resealed ghosts and inside-out vesicles of Milan hypertensive rats. J Hypertens. 1986;4:379–81.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Ferrari P, Ferrandi M, Torielli L, et al. Relationship between erythrocyte volume and sodium transport in the Milan hypertensive rat and age-dependent changes. J Hypertens. 1987;5:199–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Ferrandi M, Salardi S, Parenti P, et al. Na+/K+/Cl-cotransporter mediated Rb+ fluxes in membrane vesicles from kidneys of normotensive and hypertensive rats. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1990;1021:13–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Ferrari P, Torielli L, Cirillo M, et al. Sodium transport kinetics in erythrocytes and inside-out vesicles from Milan rats. J Hypertens. 1991;9:703–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Parenti P, Ferrari P, Ferrandi M, et al. Effect of amiloride analogues on sodium transport in renal brush border membrane vesicles from Milan hypertensive rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;183:55–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Ferrari P, Torielli L, Salardi S, et al. Na+/K+/Cl cotransport in resealed ghosts from erythrocytes of the Milan hypertensive rats. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992;1111:111–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Salardi S, Modica R, Ferrandi M, et al. Characterization of erythrocyte adducin from the Milan hypertensive strain of rats. J Hypertens. 1988;6:196s–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Salardi S, Saccardo B, Borsani G, et al. Erythrocyte adducin differential properties in normotensive and hypertensive rats of the Milan strain (characterization of spleen adducin m-RNA). Am J Hypertens. 1989;2:229–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Salardi S, Hofstede J, Op Den Camp JA. F, Bianchi G. Protein and lipid composition of erythrocytes from the Milan hypertensive strain rat. J Vasc Med Biol. 1989;1:262–8.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Tripodi MG, Piscone A, Borsani G, et al. Molecular cloning of an adducin-like protein: evidence of a polymorphism in the normotensive and hypertensive rats of the Milan strain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991;177:939–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Bianchi G, Tripodi MG, Casari G, et al. Two point mutations within the adducin genes are involved in blood pressure variation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1994;91:3999–4003.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Casari G, Barlassina C, Cusi D, et al. Association of the α-adducin locus with essential hypertension. Hypertension. 1995;25:320–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Tripodi MG, Casari G, Tisminetzky S, et al. Characterization and chromosomal localization of the rat α- and β-adducin-encoding genes. Gene. 1995;166:307–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Tisminetzky S, Devescovi G, Tripodi MG, et al. Genomic organisation and chromosomal localisation of the gene encoding human beta adducin. Gene. 1995;167:313–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Melzi ML, Bertorello A, Fukuda Y, et al. Na, K-ATPase activity in renal tubule cells from Milan hypertensive rats. Am J Hypertens. 1989;2:563–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Ferrandi M, Tripodi MG, Salardi S, et al. Renal Na, K-ATPase in genetic hypertension. Hypertension. 1996;28:1018–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Ferrandi M, Salardi S, Tripodi MG, et al. Evidence for an interaction between adducin and Na, K ATPase: relation to genetic hypertension. Am J Physiol. 1999;277:1338–49.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Ferrari P, Bianchi G. Pathophysiology of hypertension. Membrane ion transports in hypertension. Hypertension. 1997;17:935–74.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Ferrandi M, Molinari I, Torielli L, et al. Adducin- and ouabain-related gene variants predict the antihypertensive activity of rostafuroxin. Part 1: experimental studies. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:59ra86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Tripodi MG, Valtorta F, Torielli L, et al. Hypertension-associated point mutations in the adducin α and β subunits affect actin cytoskeleton and ion transport. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:2815–22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Cusi D, Barlassina C, Azzani T, et al. Polymorphisms of alpha-adducin and salt sensitivity in patients with essential hypertension. Lancet. 1997;349:1353–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Citterio L, Lanzani C, Manunta P, Bianchi G. Genetics of primary hypertension: the clinical impact of adducin polymorphisms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1802;2010:1285–98.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Liu K, Liu Y, Liu J, et al. Alpha-adducin Gly460Trp polymorphism and essential hypertension risk in Chinese: a meta-analysis. Hypertens Res. 2011;34:389–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Li YY. α-Adducin Gly460Trp gene mutation and essential hypertension in a Chinese population: a meta-analysis including 10,960 subjects. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e30214.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Schoner W, Scheiner-Bobis G. Endogenous and exogenous cardiac glycosides and their mechanisms of action. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2007;7:173–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Manunta P, Maillard M, Tantardini C, et al. Relationships among endogenous ouabain, alpha-adducin polymorphisms and renal sodium handling in primary hypertension. J Hypertens. 2008;26:914–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Manunta P, Ferrandi M, Bianchi G, Hamlyn JM. Endogenous ouabain in cardiovascular function and disease. J Hypertens. 2009;27:9–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Ferrandi M, Minotti E, Salardi S, et al. Ouabain-like factor in Milan hypertensive rats. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:F739–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Ferrandi M, Manunta P, Balzan S, et al. Ouabain-like factor quantification in human tissues and plasma: comparison of two independent assays. Hypertension. 1997;30:886–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Ferrandi M, Molinari I, Barassi P, et al. Organ hypertrophic signalling within caveolae membrane subdomains triggered by ouabain and antagonized by PST2238. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:33306–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Ferrari P, Torielli L, Ferrandi M, et al. PST2238: a new antihypertensive compound that antagonizes the long-term pressor effect of ouabain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998;285:83–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Efendiev R, Krmar RT, Ogimoto G, et al. Hypertension-linked mutation in the adducin alpha-subunit leads to higher AP2-mu2 phosphorylation and impaired Na, K-ATPase trafficking in response to GPCR signals and intracellular sodium. Circ Res. 2004;95:1100–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Bubien JK. Epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC), hormones, and hypertension. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:23527–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Manunta P, Hamilton BP, Hamlyn JM. Salt intake and depletion increase circulating levels of endogenous ouabain in normal men. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006;290:R553–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Manunta P, Messaggio E, Ballabeni C, et al. Salt sensitivity study group of the Italian Society of Hypertension. Plasma ouabain-like factor during acute and chronic changes in sodium balance in essential hypertension. Hypertension. 2001;38:198–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Zhang J, Lee MY, Cavalli M, et al. Sodium pump alpha2 subunits control myogenic tone and blood pressure in mice. J Physiol. 2005;569:243–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Kurtz TW, Dominiczak AF, DiCarlo SE, et al. Molecular-based mechanisms of mendelian forms of salt-dependent hypertension: questioning the prevailing theory. Hypertension. 2015;65:932–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Warnock DG, Kusche-Vihrog K, Tarjus A, et al. Blood pressure and amiloride-sensitive sodium channels in vascular and renal cells. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014;10:146–57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Liang M, Lee NH, Wang H, et al. Molecular networks in Dahl salt-sensitive hypertension based on transcriptome analysis of a panel of consomicrats. Physiol Genomics. 2008;34:54–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Davidson EH. Emerging properties of animal gene regulatory networks. Nature. 2010;468:911–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Erwin DH, Davidson EH. The evolution of hierarchical gene regulatory networks. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10:141–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Gu J, Xuan Z. Inferring the perturbed microRNA regulatory networks in cancer using hierarchical gene co-expression signatures. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e81032.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Ferrari P, Ferrandi M, Valentini G, Bianchi G. Rostafuroxin: an ouabain antagonist that corrects renal and vascular Na+–K+ATPase alterations in ouabain and adducin-dependent hypertension. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006;290:R529–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Ferrari P, Ferrandi M, Tripodi G, et al. PST2238: a new antihypertensive compound that modulates Na+–K+ ATPase in genetic hypertension. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;288:1074–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Heineke J, Molkentin JD. Regulation of cardiac hypertrophy by intracellular signaling pathways. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7:589–600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Muslin J. MAPK signaling in cardiovascular health and disease: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Clin Sci. 2008;115:203–18.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Staessen JA, Kuznetsova T, Acceto R, et al. OASIS-HT: design of a pharmacogenomic dose-finding study. Pharmacogenomics. 2005;6:755–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Lanzani C, Citterio L, Glorioso N, et al. Adducin- and ouabain-related gene variants predict the antihypertensive activity of rostafuroxin, part 2: clinical studies. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:59ra87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Staessen JA, Thijs L, Stolarz-Skrzypek K, et al. Main results of the ouabain and adducin for specific intervention on sodium in hypertension trial (OASIS-HT): a randomized placebo-controlled phase-2 dose-finding study of rostafuroxin. Trials. 2011;12:13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Wald DS, Law M, Morris JK, et al. Combination therapy versus monotherapy in reducing blood pressure: meta-analysis on 11,000 participants from 42 trials. Am J Med. 2009;122:290–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Finucane HK, Bulik-Sullivan B, Gusev A, et al. Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics. Nat Genet. 2015;47:1228–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Zhao B, Tan PH, Li SS, Pei D. Systematic characterization of the specificity of the SH2 domains of cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases. J Proteomics. 2013;81:56–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Ferrandi M, Molinari I, Rastaldi MP, et al. Rostafuroxin protects from podocyte injury and proteinuria induced by adducin genetic variants and ouabain. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2014;351:278–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Duboule D, Wilkins AS. The evolution of ‘bricolage’. Trends Genet. 1998;14:54–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Citterio L, Ferrandi M, Delli Carpini S, et al. cGMP-dependent protein kinase 1 polymorphisms underlie renal sodium handling impairment. Hypertension. 2013;62:1027–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Kuznetsova T, Citterio L, Zagato L, et al. Left ventricular radial function associated with genetic variation in the cGMP-dependent protein kinase. Hypertension. 2013;62:1034–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Kuznetsova T, Citterio L, Herbots L, et al. Effects of genetic variation in adducin on left ventricular diastolic function as assessed by tissue Doppler imaging in a Flemish population. J Hypertens. 2008;26:1229–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Partridge L, Gems D. Mechanisms of ageing: public or private? Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:165–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Hamlyn JM, Laredo J, Shah JR, et al. 11-hydroxylation in the biosynthesis of endogenous ouabain: multiple implications. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;986:685–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Pitzalis MV, Hamlyn JM, Messaggio E, et al. Independent and incremental prognostic value of endogenous ouabain in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2006;8:179–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Jacobs BE, Liu Y, Pulina MV, et al. Normal pregnancy: mechanisms underlying the paradox of a ouabain-resistant state with elevated endogenous ouabain, suppressed arterial sodium calcium exchange, and low blood pressure. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2012;302:H1317–29.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Robertson JI. Dietary salt and hypertension: a scientific issue or a matter of faith? J Eval Clin Pract. 2003;9:1–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.••
    Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Causation and causal inference in epidemiology. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:144s–50. This is a very thorough discussion on the difficulty to demonstrate causation of a given factor (either genetic or environmental) within the complex interactions among the various modifiers factors (either genetic or environmental).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Stolarz-Skrzypek K, Kuznetsova T, Thijs L, et al. Fatal and nonfatal outcomes, incidence of hypertension, and blood pressure changes in relation to urinary sodium excretion. JAMA. 2011;305:1777–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.••
    Nelson RM, Pettersson ME, Carlborg Ö. A century after fisher: time for a new paradigm in quantitative genetics. Trends Genet. 2013;29:669–76. The present analysis paradigms in genetics are at its limits in regards to unraveling complex traits with GWAS.Google Scholar
  147. 147.••
    Mackay TF. Epistatis and quantitative traits: using model organisms to study gene-gene interactions. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:22–33. Carrying out tests for about 18 million possible pairwise interactions remains a practical impossibility even in a tractable model system.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.••
    Wei WH, Hemani G, Haley CS. Detecting epistasis in human complex traits. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:722–33. Testing interactions with GWAS data based on SNPs that have been grouped into genes or functional modules can markedly reduce the multiple test burden, particular when one of this functional module has a very strong experimental and clinical support.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Manunta
    • 1
  • Mara Ferrandi
    • 2
  • Daniele Cusi
    • 3
  • Patrizia Ferrari
    • 2
  • Jan Staessen
    • 4
    • 5
  • Giuseppe Bianchi
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Università Vita Salute San Raffaele, Chair of Nephrology; IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Genomics of Renal Disease and Hypertension UnitMilanItaly
  2. 2.CVie Therapeutics LimitedTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.Italian National Centre of ResearchInstitute of Biomedical TechnologiesSegrateItaly
  4. 4.Research Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, Department of Cardiovascular SciencesUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  5. 5.R&D Group VitaKMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations