Current Hypertension Reports

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 13–18 | Cite as

Evolution of blood pressure regulation in humans

  • J. Hunter YoungEmail author


The human propensity for hypertension is a product, in part, of our evolutionary history. Adaptation to climate, first in Africa and then throughout the world, has driven our evolution and may have shaped current patterns of hypertension susceptibility. This article reviews human evolution and the impact of climatic adaptation on blood pressure physiology. Evidence suggests that genetic susceptibility to hypertension is ancestral and was magnified during early human evolution. Furthermore, differential susceptibility among human populations is due to differential selection during the out-of-Africa expansion 30,000 to 100,000 years ago. The most important selection pressure was climate, which produced a latitudinal cline in hypertension susceptibility. Therefore, the current epidemic of hypertension is likely due to new exposures of the modern period (eg, higher salt intake) interacting with ancestral susceptibility. Worldwide populations may differ in susceptibility to the new exposures, however, such that those from hot, arid environments are more susceptible to hypertension than populations from cold environments.


Cardiovascular Reactivity Differential Susceptibility Evaporative Heat Loss Latitudinal Cline Hominid Evolution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Vasan RS, Besier A, Seshadri S, et al.: Residual lifetime risk for developing hypertension in middle-aged women and men: the Framingham Heart Study. JAMA 2002, 287:1003–1010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Whelton PK, He J, Muntner P: Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in North America, North Africa and Asia. J Hum Hypertens 2004, 18:545–551.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cooper RS, Wolf-Maier K, Luke A, et al.: An international comparative study of blood pressure in populations of European vs. African descent. BMC Med 2005, 3:2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gleiberman L: Salt, hypertension, evolution. Psychosom Med 2001, 63:325–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stamler J: The INTERSALT study: background, methods, findings, and implications. Am J Clin Nutr 1997,65:626S–642S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Newman RW: Why man is such a sweaty and thirsty naked animal: a speculative review. Hum Biol 1970, 42:12–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sawka MN, Montain SJ, Latzka WA: Hydration effects on thermoregulation and performance in the heat. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 2001, 128:679–690.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Intersalt: an international study of electrolyte excretion and blood pressure. Results for 24 hour urinary sodium and potassium excretion. Intersalt Cooperative Research Group. BMJ 1988, 297:319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wood B, Richmond BG: Human evolution: taxonomy and paleobiology. J Anat 2000, 197(Pt 1):19–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Denton D, Weisinger R, Mundy NI, et al.: The effect of increased salt intake on blood pressure of chimpanzees. Nat Med 1995, 1:1009–1016.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Di Rienzo A, Hudson RR: An evolutionary framework for common diseases: the ancestral-susceptibility model. Trends Genet 2005, 21:596–601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neel JV: Diabetes mellitus: a thrifty genotype rendered detrimental by progress. Am J Hum Genet 1962, 14:353–362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Neel JV, Weder AB, Julius S: Type II diabetes, essential hypertension, and obesity as “syndromes of impaired genetic homeostasis”: the “thrifty genotype” hypothesis enters the 21st century. Perspect Biol Med 1998, 42:44–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    deMenocal PB: Plio-pleistocene African climate. Science 1995, 270:53–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Potts R: Environmental hypotheses of hominid evolution. Yearb Phys Anthropol. 1998, 41:93–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zachos J, Pagani M, Sloan L, et al.: Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present. Science 2001, 292:686–693.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ruff C: Climate and body shape in hominid evolution. J Hum Evol 1991, 21:81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pickford M: Palaeoenvironments and hominoid evolution. Z Morphol Anthropol 2002, 83:337–348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Semaw S, Simpson SW, Quade J, et al.: Early Pliocene hominids from Gona, Ethiopia. Nature 2005, 433:301–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wynn JG: Influence of Plio-Pleistocene aridification on human evolution: evidence from paleosols of the Turkana Basin, Kenya. Am J Phys Anthropol 2004, 123:106–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reed KE: Early hominid evolution and ecological change through the African Plio-Pleistocene. J Hum Evol 1997, 32:289–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bobe R, Behrensmeyer AK, Chapman RE: Faunal change, environmental variability and late Pliocene hominin evolution. J Hum Evol 2002, 42:475–497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wheeler PE: The influence of bipedalism on the energy and water budgets of early hominids. J Hum Evol 1991, 21:117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Taylor CR, Schmidt-Nielsen K, Raab JL: Scaling of energetic cost of running to body size in mammals. Am J Physiol 1970, 219:1104–1107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Carrier DR: The energetic paradox of human running and hominid evolution. Curr Anthropol 1984, 25:483–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ruff CB: Morphological adaptation to climate in modern and fossil hominids. Yearb Phys Anthrop 1994, 37:65–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chaplin G, Jablonski NG, Cable NT: Physiology, thermoregulation and bipedalism. J Hum Evol 1994, 27:497–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wheeler PE: The influence of stature and body form on hominid energy and water budgets: a comparison of australopithecus and early homo physiques. J Hum Evol 1993, 24:13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wheeler PE: The thermoregulatory advantages of hominid bipedalism in open equatorial environments: the contribution of increased convective heat-loss and cutaneous evaporative cooling. J Hum Evol 1991, 21:107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wheeler PE: The foraging times of bipedal and quadrupedal hominids in open equatorial environments: reply. J Hum Evol 1994, 27:511–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wheeler PE: The evolution of bipedality and loss of functional body hair in hominids. J Hum Evol 1984, 13:91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Folk GE Jr, Semken HA Jr: The evolution of sweat glands. Int J Biometeorol 1991, 35:180–186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wheeler PE: The influence of the loss of functional body hair on the water budgets of early hominids. J Hum Evol 1992, 23:379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    doAmaral LQ: Loss of body hair, bipedality and thermoregulation. Comments on recent papers in the Journal of Human Evolution. J Hum Evol 1996, 30:357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schwartz GG, Rosenblum LA: Allometry of primate hair density and the evolution of human hairlessness. Am J Phys Anthropol 1981, 55:9–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wheeler PE: The thermoregulatory advantages of heat-storage and shade-seeking behavior to hominids foraging in equatorial savanna environments. J Hum Evol 1994, 26:339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ladell WSS: Terrestrial animals in humid heat: man. In Handbook of Physiology, vol 4, edn 4. Edited by Dill DB. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1964:625–659.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Eichna LW, Ashe WF, Bean WB, Shelley WB: The upper limits of environmental heat and humidity tolerated by acclimatized men working in hot environments. J Ind Hyg Toxicol 1945, 27:59–84.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wenzel RR, Siffert W, Bruck H, et al.: Enhanced vasoconstriction to endothelin-1, angiotensin II and noradrenaline in carriers of the GNB3 825T allele in the skin microcirculation. Pharmacogenetics 2002, 12:489–495.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Baumgart D, Naber C, Haude M, et al.: G protein beta3 subunit 825T allele and enhanced coronary vasoconstriction on alpha(2)-adrenoceptor activation. Circ Res 1999, 85:965–969.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Meirhaeghe A, Bauters C, Helbecque N, et al.: The human G-protein beta3 subunit C825T polymorphism is associated with coronary artery vasoconstriction. Eur Heart J 2001, 22:845–848.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gabunia L, Vekua A, Lordkipanidze D, et al.: Earliest Pleistocene hominid cranial remains from Dmanisi, Republic of Georgia: taxonomy, geological setting, and age. Science 2000, 288:1019–1025.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Trinkaus E, Moldovan C, Milota T, et al.: An early modern human from the Pestera cu Oase, Romania. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003, 100:11231–11236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Holliday TW: Body proportions in late Pleistocene Europe and modern human origins. J Hum Evol 1997, 32:423–448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jacobs KH: Evolution in the postcranial skeleton of late glacial and early postglacial European hominids. Z Morphol Anthropol 1985, 75:307–326.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jacobs KH: Climate and the hominid postcranial skeleton in Wurm and early Holocene Europe. Curr Anthropol 1985, 26:512–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Katzmarzyk PT, Leonard WR: Climatic influences on human body size and proportions: ecological adaptations and secular trends. Am J Phys Anthropol 1998, 106:483–503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Roberts DF: Climate and Human Variability, edn 2. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin-Cummings; 1978.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Trinkaus E: Neanderthal limb proportions and cold adaptation. In Aspects of Human Evolution. Edited by Stringer CB. London: Taylor & Francis; 1981:187–224.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Newman MT: Body-weight, climate, and nutrition in New World aborigines. Am J Phys Anthropol 1960, 18:362.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Huey RB, Gilchrist GW, Carlson ML, et al.: Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. Science 2000, 287:308–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hellberg ME, Balch DP, Roy K: Climate-driven range expansion and morphological evolution in a marine gastropod. Science 2001, 292:1707–1710.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sezgin E, Duvernell DD, Matzkin LM, et al.: Single-locus latitudinal clines and their relationship to temperate adaptation in metabolic genes and derived alleles in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2004, 168:923–931.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ruiz-Pesini E, Mishmar D, Brandon M, et al.: Effects of purifying and adaptive selection on regional variation in human mtDNA. Science 2004, 303:223–226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lang CC, Stein CM, Brown RM, et al.: Attenuation of isoproterenol-mediated vasodilatation in blacks. N Engl J Med 1995, 333:155–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Stein CM, Lang CC, Singh I, et al.: Increased vascular adrenergic vasoconstriction and decreased vasodilation in blacks. Additive mechanisms leading to enhanced vascular reactivity. Hypertension 2000, 36:945–951.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Stein CM, Lang CC, Nelson R, et al.: Vasodilation in black Americans: attenuated nitric oxide-mediated responses. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1997, 62:436–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Cardillo C, Kilcoyne CM, Cannon RO III, Panza JA: Attenuation of cyclic nucleotide-mediated smooth muscle relaxation in blacks as a cause of racial differences in vasodilator function. Circulation 1999, 99:90–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Watkins LL, Dimsdale JE, Ziegler MG: Reduced beta 2-receptor mediated vasodilation in African Americans. Life Sci 1995, 57:1411–1416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Baker EH, Ireson NJ, Carney C, et al.: Transepithelial sodium absorption is increased in people of African origin. Hypertension 2001, 38:76–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Brier ME, Luft FC: Sodium kinetics in white and black normotensive subjects: possible relevance to salt-sensitive hypertension. Am J Med Sci 1994, 307(Suppl 1):S38–S42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Samueloff S: Thermoregulatory responses in genetically different ethnic groups. In Man in Stressful Environments: Thermal and Work Physiology. Edited by Shiraki K, Yousef MK. Springfield: Charles C Thomas; 1987:23–34.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Nakajima T, Wooding S, Sakagami T, et al.: Natural selection and population history in the human angiotensinogen gene (AGT): 736 complete AGT sequences in chromosomes from around the world. Am J Hum Genet 2004, 74:898–916.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Thompson EE, Kuttab-Boulos H, Witonsky D, et al.: CYP3A variation and the evolution of salt-sensitivity variants. Am J Hum Genet 2004, 75:1059–1069.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Young JH, Chang Y-P, Kim J-O, et al.: Differential susceptibility to hypertension is due to selection during the out-of-Africa expansion. PLoS Genet 2005, 1:730–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Medicine Group LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MedicineThe Johns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations