Current HIV/AIDS Reports

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 336–352 | Cite as

Host Genetic Factors Predisposing to HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder

Open Access
Central Nervous System and Cognition (I Grant, Section Editor)

Abstract

The success of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) in transforming the lives of HIV-infected individuals with access to these drugs is tempered by the increasing threat of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) to their overall health and quality of life. Intensive investigations over the past two decades have underscored the role of host immune responses, inflammation, and monocyte-derived macrophages in HAND, but the precise pathogenic mechanisms underlying HAND remain only partially delineated. Complicating research efforts and therapeutic drug development are the sheer complexity of HAND phenotypes, diagnostic imprecision, and the growing intersection of chronic immune activation with aging-related comorbidities. Yet, genetic studies still offer a powerful means of advancing individualized care for HIV-infected individuals at risk. There is an urgent need for 1) longitudinal studies using consistent phenotypic definitions of HAND in HIV-infected subpopulations at very high risk of being adversely impacted, such as children, 2) tissue studies that correlate neuropathological changes in multiple brain regions with genomic markers in affected individuals and with changes at the RNA, epigenomic, and/or protein levels, and 3) genetic association studies using more sensitive subphenotypes of HAND. The NIH Brain Initiative and Human Connectome Project, coupled with rapidly evolving systems biology and machine learning approaches for analyzing high-throughput genetic, transcriptomic and epigenetic data, hold promise for identifying actionable biological processes and gene networks that underlie HAND. This review summarizes the current state of understanding of host genetic factors predisposing to HAND in light of past challenges and suggests some priorities for future research to advance the understanding and clinical management of HAND in the cART era.

Keywords

Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) Central nervous system CNS HIV HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders HAND 

Introduction

Modern combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has transformed the landscape of clinical complications associated with chronic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, particularly those involving the central nervous system (CNS). Severe and relentlessly progressive forms of HIV-associated dementia (HAD), linked in the pre-cART era to neuropathological findings such as HIV encephalitis and microglial nodules, are now rare, as are opportunistic CNS infections [1•, 2•, 3]. However, milder forms of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) such as asymptomatic neurocognitive disorder (ANI) and mild neurocognitive disorder (MND) [4] are increasingly prevalent, owing to the intersection of chronic immune activation, effects of aging, and antiretroviral drug toxicities [5•, 6•, 7, 8, 9, 10•]. HAND is diagnosed in 40-50 % of unselected, chronically HIV-infected individuals in the cART era who undergo formal neuropsychometric testing [1•, 11]. In contrast to HAND in the pre-cART era, cortical brain involvement, including impairment of learning, memory, and executive functions, often predominates over impairment of subcortical and motor functions in patients on cART, similar to non-HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders like Alzheimer’s dementia [1•]. While not as devastating as HAD, milder neurocognitive impairment (NCI) adversely impacts medication adherence (particularly in older HIV-infected persons), performance of cognitively demanding activities of daily living [1•, 12], employment, and overall quality of life [5•]. Increased risky decision-making and shorter survival among HIV-infected persons with HAND are also well documented [13•, 14, 15].

The neuropathogenesis of HAND remains incompletely understood; it may overlap that of other common neurodegenerative diseases in which genetics has a role and with which HAND shares certain similarities [16, 17•, 18•, 19, 20•]. Recognition of the critical importance of neuro-inflammation, reflected by elevated expression of inflammation or immune-activation biomarkers in the brain, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and in some cases, plasma in HAND [21, 22, 23], and the central role played by mononuclear phagocytes in these disorders, has provided a framework for studies of the role of host genetic variation in HAND to date [18•, 24•, 25•].

The purpose of this review is to summarize the current state of understanding of host genomic factors that predispose to HAND with an emphasis on recent studies and reasonable conclusions that may be drawn from this rapidly growing volume of data. We conclude with a discussion of some research priorities and suggestions for a way forward in this complex field.

Host Genomic Studies

Host genetic variation is likely to impact both adaptive and maladaptive host responses to HIV infection that play a role in neuropathogenesis, just as host genetics clearly impacts susceptibility to HIV infection and the rate of disease progression [26, 27, 28, 29, 30]. Many candidate-gene studies and a single genome-wide association study spanning the pre-cART and cART eras, primarily focusing on HAD with or without HIV encephalitis, have identified variants in immune-regulatory genes and other gene classes as potential risk-modifiers or protective factors, but very few of these genes have been replicated in subsequent studies (Table 1) [31•, 32•]. A number of factors that complicate the clinical definition, risk-stratification, and monitoring of HAND, have presented challenges to genetic studies aimed at better understanding susceptibility to these disorders: inherent fluctuations in individual neuropsychometric test scores over time, despite correction for practice effects, imprecision of diagnostic categories like ANI and MND, possible residual biases in testing protocols, and varying methods used to determine composite scores in prior published studies of NCI among HIV + persons. Distinguishing reversible NCI from the “legacy effect” of brain damage due to previously untreated HIV infection, and completely excluding confounding by comorbidities also remain difficult [6•, 7]. In contrast to the pre-cART era, many converging pathogenic mechanisms are likely to contribute to HAND at present [33, 34, 35•]. These challenges notwithstanding, recent genomic, transcriptomic, and epigenomic studies have highlighted metabolic pathways and physiologic processes that are disrupted in HAND (Table 2).
Table 1

Summary of published genetic associations (positive findings) in candidate-gene and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) (See text for references). Only genes associated with a HAND-related phenotype in at least one published study, and studies that included HIV + subjects, are listed

Genes/processes dysregulated in HAND

Clinical phenotype(s) evaluated1

Study design(s)

Replication status2

Nuclear genes

   

  APOE (E4 allele)

AIDS with ADC/HAD ± HIVE; non-AIDS with HAND ± neuropathologic features

Autopsy (mostly case-control; one survival study with autopsy component; 2 uncontrolled); cross-sectional; longitudinal cohort

R

  TNFA

HAD; HAD/ADC, or HIVE and/or HIV-LE

Autopsy case-control

NR

  MCP1/CCL2, CCR2

HAD ± HIVE or AIDS/ADC, OR change in executive functioning and processing speed between 2 consecutive visits up to 15 yrs apart; or NCI (clinical rating score ≥ 5); HAE (children)

Retrospective case-control; longitudinal cohort ± cross-sectional analysis

R (MCP1) NA (CCR2)

  MIP1A/CCL3

HAD; AIDS with HAD; OR change in executive functioning and processing speed between 2 consecutive visits up to 15 yrs apart; OR risk of NCI

Retrospective case-control; longitudinal cohort

R

  SDF1

Decline in NC test scores and/or brain growth failure in children; OR change in executive functioning and processing speed between 2 consecutive visits up to 15 yrs apart; OR prevalent NCI (adults); change in GDS or cross-sectionaL GDS in co-HCV+

Longitudinal cohort with cross-sectional component; retrospective case-control

NR

  MBL2

Changes in GDS or cross-sectional GDS in co-HCV+; OR change in executive functioning and processing speed between 2 consecutive visits up to 15 yrs apart; OR prevalent NCI (adults)

Longitudinal cohort with cross-sectional component

NR

  CCR5 (δ32 del)

HAD/ADC; AIDS ± HAD; decline in NC test scores and/or brain growth failure in children; NCI in children; GDS (change and cross-sectional)

Longitudinal cohort ± cross-sectional component; case-control

R prior to 1991 only; NR in cART era

  COMT

Executive functioning domain Deficit Scores ± stimulant abuse; HAND: standardized NP domain T-scores

Retrospective/Case-control

NR

  DRD2, DRD3

GDS ≥ 0.5 (NCI); Global and cognitive domain T-scores in population with prevalent substance dependence

Cross-sectional/Case-control

R (DRD3 in substance users)

  HLA:DR, DQB1, A24, B27

Time to CNS impairment (“deterioration in brain growth, psychological function and/or neurological status”)

Pre-cART cross-sectional study; cART era case-cohort study; longitudinal cohort

R (DR, B27) NA (DQB) NR (HLA A)

  APOBEC3G

Brain growth failure, with NCI defined differently based on age

Pre-cART pediatric cohort study

NA

  PKNOX1/PREP1

AIDS with dementia

Retrospective case-control

NA

  YWHAE

HAND

Cross-sectional study with HIV+/HIV- controls

NA

  Mitochondrial & nuclear DNA structural changes

   

  8-oxoG modification

HAND “screen”, International HIV Dementia Score ≤ 10

Autopsy case-control

NA

  Regulation of telomere length

Detailed NP test scores (global and ability domain scores) ± history of chronic psychological trauma (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire Short Form)

Cross-sectional with HIV+/HIV- controls

NA

1Diagnostic criteria used included one or a combination of the following: American Academy of Neurology 1991 criteria, Centers for Disease Control criteria, Frascati criteria, the Global Deficit Score (GDS), Domain Z-scores or Global Z-scores, the HIV Dementia Scale, neurocognitive impairment >1.5 SD below the normative mean in two domains on comprehensive test battery, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) III criteria for dementia, or unspecified.

2Replication status: R = Replicated in at least one other candidate-gene study; NR = Did not replicate in at least one study; NA = No published replication attempts. Importantly, no genes/SNPs previously associated with HAND replicated in the GWAS.

Abbreviations: ADC, AIDS dementia complex; HAD, HIV-associated dementia; HIVE, HIV encephalitis; HIV-LE, HIV leukoencephalopathy; HAND, HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder; HAE, HIV-associated encephalopathy; NP, neuropsychiatric; NC, neurocognitive; NCI, neurocognitive impairment; GDS, global deficit score; HCV, hepatitis C-virus. Gene names: APOE, apolipoprotein E; TNFA, tumor-necrosis factor-alpha; MCP1/CCL2, macrophage chemoattractant protein-1; CCR2, C-C chemokine receptor type 2; MIP1A/CCL3, macrophage inhibitory protein-1-alpha; SDF1, stromal derived factor 1; CCR5, C-C chemokine receptor type 5; del, deletion; MBL2, mannose-binding lectin 2 ; COMT, catechol-O-methyltransferase; DRD, dopamine receptor; CYP2D6, cytochrome P450 2D6; CYP2B6, cytochrome P450 2B6; HLA, human leukocyte antigen locus; APOBEC3G, apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing, enzyme-catalytic, polypeptide-like 3G; PKNOX1/PREP1, PBX knotted 1 homeobox 1; YWHAE, 14-3-3ε protein (Tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/Tryptophan 5-monooxygenase activation protein, epsilon isoform)

Table 2

Genes with significantly altered expression in transcriptomic and epigenetic studies and hence implicated in HAND pathogenesis

Gene categories and pathways dysregulated in HAND-related phenotypes

Source material/ phenotype(s)

Reference(s)

Monocytes

 Pathways:

Brain metabolite neuroimaging traits, e.g., N-acetylaspartate concentration in FWM, anterior cingulate

Pulliam et al. 2011 [100]; Borjabad, 2012 [17•]

 IFN response/activation

 Example genes: IP-10

 Pathways:

Neurocognitive impairment (GCR)

Levine et al. 2014 [31•]

 Mitotic cell cycle

 Translational elongation

 Oxidative stress

 Example genes: IL6R, casein kinase 1-alpha-1, hypoxia upregulated-1, LDL receptor-related protein 12, KEAP-1

Brain tissue/brain-derived cells

 Pathways:

SIV ± SIVE, HIV ± HIVE brains; also primary neurons in vitro

Eletto et al. 2008 [104]; Yelamanchili et al. 2010 [106]

 pre-synaptic proteins/general neuronal function

 Example genes: miR-128a, SNAP25, MEF2C, miR-142-3p, miR-142-5p, miR-21 (downregulation of target MEF2C in neurons)

 Pathways:

FWM from HIV-, HIV+/HIVE brains; immunohistochemistry; glutamate levels, brain neurotrophic factor levels

Noorbakhsh et al. 2010 [107]

 IFN response

 Neuroinflammation

Gene expression in primary astrocytes exposed to HIV Vpr protein in vitro vs. controls

 Nucleotide metabolism

 Cell cycle

Neurobehavioral abnormalities (locomotion) in transgenic mice with increased BG Vpr expression

 Mitochondrial function

 Apoptosis (astrocytes)

 Example genes: Caspase-6

 Pathways:

Acute and chronic SIV model ± SIVE

Reviewed in Winkler et al. 2012 [92•]

 Inflammation

 Immune and acute-phase response

 Ion transport

 Example genes: B2M, STAT1, IFI44, IFIT3, MX1

 Pathways:

HAND diagnosis (±cART), ±HIVE

Borjabad et al. 2012 [17•]

 Neurogenesis

 Synaptic transmission

 Antiviral/immune responses (including IFN responses, complement activation)

 Ion/Calcium transport

 Antigen presentation/processing

 Oxygen transport

 Signal transduction

 Cell cycle

 Oligodendrocytes/Myelination

 Microtubule-based movement

 Example genes (treated vs untreated HAND): CXCR2, CR1, HLA-DQB1, CXCL2, IFIT1, IFI44, STAT1, MOBP

 Pathways:

HAND ± HIVE vs. HIV+/HAND- vs. HIV- controls; neurocognitive impairment (GCR)

Gelman et al. 2012 [93•]; Levine et al. 2013 [94•]

 Synaptic transmission

 Neuroimmune function

 Endothelial markers

 

Gelman et al. 2012 [93•]; Levine et al. 2013 [94•]

 Neuronal function

 Glutamate signaling

 Axon guidance

 Clathrin-mediated endocytosis

 IFN response

 Antigen presentation/processing

 Inflammation/acute-phase response/toll-like receptors

 Oligodendrocyte function

 Mitochondrial function

 Cell signaling

 Protein ubiquitination

 Caveolin-mediated endocytosis

 Example genes: YWHAE/14-3-3 protein, GAD1, IFRGs, TFRC

 Pathways common between HAND and AD:

HAND ± HIVE brains vs. HIV+/HAND-, HIV+/HAND-; neurocognitive impairment (GCR) in HIV + vs. Mini-Mental Status Exam data in AD

Levine et al. 2013 [94•]

 Cytoplasm

 Mitochondrial function

 Tricarboxylic acid cycle

 Transit peptide

 Synaptic

 Cell Differentiation

 Activator

 Repeat

 Cell communication

 Regulation of transcription

 Phosphorylation

 Pathways differentiating HAND + vs.HIVE:

 

Levine et al. 2013 [94•]

 Gliosis

 Dopaminergic tone

 Inflammation

 Example genes: GRK6, CCL2, ID2

 Pathways:

HAND vs. HIV- controls

Lucas et al. 2014 [113•]

 Neuronal RNA splicing/gene transcription

 Example genes: RbFOX3

 Pathway:

Global and cognitive domain T-scores/GDS (all 7 domains)

Jacobs, 2013 [72•]; Gupta, 2011 [71]

 Dopaminergic response

 Example genes: DRD3

 Pathways:

Subsyndromic HAND/ANI, MND or HAD ± HIVE, vs. HIV- controls

Desplats et al. 2013 [117•]

 Chromatin modification

 Inflammation

 Example genes: BCLB11B (targets IL-6, TNFα, CXCR4)

Note: Studies that lacked correlation with at least one in vivo HAND-related phenotype are not listed.

Abbreviations: miRNA, microRNA; SIV/E, simian immunodeficiency virus/encephalitis; HIV/E, human immunodeficiency virus/encephalitis; FWM, frontal white matter; HAND, HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder; GCR, Global Clinical Rating; GDS, Global Deficit Scores; BG, Basal Ganglia; AD, Alzheimer’s Disease

Candidate-Gene and Genome-Wide Association Studies

Genes related to inflammation or immune regulation

Genes that have been inconsistently linked to HIV-associated neurocognitive phenotypes, including HAD with or without HIV encephalitis, include: apolipoprotein E (APOE) [29, 36•, 37•, 38, 39•, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45], tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) [31•, 32•, 42, 46, 47, 48, 49•, 50, 51], macrophage chemo-attractant protein-1 (MCP-1/CCL2) [21, 22, 32•, 48, 49•, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57•], macrophage inflammatory protein 1-α (MIP-1α/CCL3) [32•, 48, 49•, 57•], stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF1) [31•, 49•, 56, 58], HLA alleles [59, 60•, 61•], mannose-binding lectin 2 (MBL2) [49•, 56, 57•, 62, 63], and PKNOX1/PREP1, a transcriptional regulator of MCP-1 expression [32•, 49•]. Associations of C-C chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2), the co-receptor for MCP-1, with HAD or AIDS dementia complex, progression to NCI in adults, or NCI among children have been similarly inconsistent [32•, 54, 56, 57•, 58, 64]. While the Δ32 deletion variant of C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) [65] was protective against HAND in pre-cART populations [58, 64, 66], this association has not been replicated in individuals with HIV/AIDS diagnosed after 1991, possibly due to reduced impact on viral load in the cART era [32•, 54, 56]. Preliminary results from a recent cross-sectional study among CNS HIV Antiretroviral Therapy Effects Research (CHARTER) study subjects suggest that a polymorphism in the MBL2 promoter (rs7096206) may predict altered levels of brain metabolites in frontal white matter and basal ganglia, reflecting increased neuro-inflammation and energy dysmetabolism in the brain [67]. In the largest longitudinal study to date, drawing from pre-cART neurocognitive data from HIV + and seronegative participants in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS), Levine et al. [57•] did find evidence for a small effect of MIP-/CCL3 and MCP-1/CCL2 genotype on neurocognitive functioning over time among HIV + cases only, but the magnitude of this effect was small.

Interaction effects between MCP-1 and SNP rs2839619 in the PREP1 locus, which encodes a transcription factor that binds and activates the MCP-1 promoter, may explain inconsistencies in MCP-1 associations with HAND. PREP1 genotype (rs2839619) has been associated recently with HAD (p = 1.2 x 10-5), and there is extensive support for a role for MCP-1 protein in the etiology of HAD in particular [32•]. PREP1 did not replicate in the single published GWAS of HAND (largely HAD), however [49•].

Dopamine-related genes

Some genes involved in dopamine pathways have been also been variably associated with neurocognitive function in HIV + persons. The Met/Met genotype at the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) locus (rs4680) predicted improved executive functioning in HIV + subjects, an association that was attenuated by methamphetamine (meth) use [68]. No main effects on HAND, or interactive effects of COMT, dopamine transporter-1 (DAT1), or brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) with other measures of HIV disease severity (e.g., CD4+ T-cell count), were noted on specific domains of neurocognitive function in HIV-infected individuals in other studies, including the GWAS [49•, 69•]. The recent longitudinal study in the MACS did not detect any interactions between stimulant use, HIV status or dopamine-related genes (COMT, BDNF, dopamine beta-hydroxylase, and DRD2/ANKK1 genotypes) on neurocognitive functioning in HIV + subjects [57•]. Neurotrophin genotypes may assume greater importance in HAND among older individuals [70]. The dopamine receptor gene DRD3 (rs6280) was associated with NCI only among HIV + meth abusers [71], but significant main and interaction effects with substance use have also been seen for dopamine receptors 1 and 2 (DRD2) in the motor domain of neuropsychological performance among whites, and with nearly every neuropsychological domain among African-American subjects [72•]. The GWAS conducted in the longitudinal MACS found null associations with DRD2 or DRD3 but did not address interactions with substance/stimulant abuse.

Drug metabolism and transport genes

Genetic differences in meth metabolism have been proposed to be a factor in individual variation in risk of NCI among HIV-infected persons who abuse meth. Oxidative metabolism of meth requires the hepatic enzyme cytochrome P450, family 2, sub-family D, polypeptide 6 (CYP2D6). Extensive metabolizers based on polymorphisms in CYP2D6 were significantly more vulnerable to meth-associated NCI in a recent study that included no HIV + subjects, suggesting that CYP2D6 genotype might also be a risk factor for HAND among HIV + meth abusers [73].

Suppression of HIV replication in the CNS is a key component of any strategy to reduce risk of HAND, and there remains some evidence that better-penetrating antiretroviral regimens are helpful in preserving neurocognitive function [74, 75•]. Highly active antiretroviral drugs vary considerably in their ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Recent pharmacogenetic/pharmacokinetic studies were unable, however, to associate the common variant 3435C > T (rs1045642) in the drug efflux transporter gene, ATP-binding cassette transporter P-glycoprotein ABCB1, or 150 other polymorphisms in 16 membrane transporter genes, with CSF raltegravir levels in healthy HIV-negative subjects [76•]. As noted by the authors, this study was underpowered to detect associations for SNPs in many genes with low minor-allele frequencies in the sample. A similar study, also in seronegative individuals, evaluated the pharmacokinetics of efavirenz, which is metabolized by hepatic CYP2B6 [77] and associated with CNS toxicity, following a single oral dose (600 mg) of the drug. Polymorphic variants of CYP2B6 (516G > T, rs3745274) and 983 T > C (rs28399499), which classify subjects as, extensive, intermediate, or slow metabolizers and are known to impact efavirenz plasma area-under-the-curve, were not significantly associated with neurocognitive performance, although CYP2B6 genotype tended to correlate with non-dominant hand grooved pegboard at 4 and 6 hours after the dose [78•]. Since the CNS side effects of this drug generally wane with repeated use, it is unclear to what extent CYP2B6 genotype may impact NCI in treated subjects.

Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA damage

The role of oxidative damage to nuclear and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which can lead to neuronal apoptosis, in the pathogenesis of milder forms of HAND seen in the cART era is not clear. Neurotoxicity of HIV proteins such as Tat, gp120, and Vpr in the cART era is mediated by excitotoxic neurotoxins released by infected microglia and macrophages, activation of intracellular and mitochondrial calcium signaling pathways, and increased production of reactive oxygen species [79•]. One study compared levels of nuclear and mtDNA oxidative damage (8-oxoG modification) in postmortem frontal neocortex tissue of HIV + patients with AIDS with and without HAND and in seronegative controls. Nuclear DNA 8-oxoG damage was significantly higher in HIV + patients, particularly those with HAND, and a substantially higher frequency of noncoding D-loop mutations in mtDNA among HAND cases was noted as compared with either HIV + or seronegative controls. Possible confounding by age was not mentioned [79•, 80]. These results leave open the possibility that as long as a reservoir of virus exists in the brain, oxidative damage may continue to contribute to the development of HAND.

A more recent study of South African women examined the association of leukocyte telomere length (TL) with HAND and chronic psychological stress due to prior abuse and/or trauma [81•]. Telomeres are repetitive nucleotide sequences at the ends of chromosomes that shorten by 20-200 base-pairs with each mitotic division, due to the inability of DNA polymerase to complete DNA replication at the ends of each strand. Activity of the enzyme telomerase, which synthesizes telomeric DNA to prevent excessive shortening, is reduced by oxidative stress, and shorter TL has been reported under chronic psychological stress conditions. In analyses adjusted for age and education, TL in HIV + women was found to be significantly shorter relative to controls and was strongly correlated to severity of NCI, as determined by the International Neuropsychological Battery. A negative correlation of relative TL was also found with verbal fluency in HIV + women who had suffered psychological trauma. This was the first study to investigate the effects of TL on neurocognitive function in HIV-positive individuals. Very early but intriguing results of a retrospective study presented at the 2014 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections [82] reported strong positive associations between levels of cell-free mtDNA in CSF, another potential novel marker of neuronal injury, and severity of NCI among HIV-infected persons with HAND, as well as with biomarkers of CNS inflammation and immune activation (MCP-1 and interferon-gamma-inducible protein (IP-10), respectively).

Miscellaneous genes that have been linked in published reports to HIV-associated neurocognitive phenotypes, but for which studies attempting replication have not been published, include HLA DQ [60•] and APOBEC3G (in pre-cART pediatric populations) [83•], and YWHAE (among Hispanic-Latino populations) [84•, 85]. Several genes associated previously with HIV replication in monocyte-macrophages or with neurotoxic protein production in vitro have not been associated with HAND [32•, 86, 87•].

Transcriptomic and Epigenetic Studies

The advent of microarray technology has led to numerous studies investigating the effects of HIV infection on host gene expression in phenotypes that contribute to but are relatively distant from HAND, including viral replication, HIV persistence, apoptosis, and immune dysregulation in general. Those studies performed prior to 2007, have been reviewed extensively elsewhere [88] Subsequent functional genomics studies have yielded additional information on genes and pathways up- or down regulated in astrocytes, neurons, and glial cells, cell types intimately involved in HAND pathogenesis (Table 2) [31•, 89, 90, 91]. A number of genes show consistently altered expression across studies of human astrocytes in vitro, the human HIV-infected brain with or without HAD or HIVE, and the simian-immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-infected macaque model, pointing to their likely importance in HAND [31•, 90, 92•]. While many studies to date have focused on patterns of RNA expression changes specific to HIVE in frontal gray matter [92•], few have investigated differences in brain regions affected by HAND without HIVE. A microarray study by Gelman et al. [93•] using brain tissues from HIV-infected and seronegative individuals enrolled in the National NeuroAIDS Tissue Consortium (NNTC) Brain Bank, revealed two different transcriptome patterns in HAND + HIVE and HAND alone. HAND combined with HIVE was associated with high viral load, global upregulation of genes involved in interferon responses, and general immune activation, while specific neuronal transcripts in frontal neocortex were down-modulated. HAND without HIVE, however, was associated with low viral load, upregulated endothelial-type transcripts, and the conspicuous absence of gene-expression changes noted in HIVE. Weighted-gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA) of the same transcriptomic data, accounting for correlations amongst functionally related genes, also identified meta-networks of genes associated with global neurocognitive function; these included cancer-related genes and genes important in oligodendrocyte function [94•] in frontal neocortex, frontal white matter, and the basal ganglia. Dysregulation of genes involved in mitochondrial function, cancer, the immune response, synaptic transmission and cell-cell signaling has also been suggested in other studies of HAND [17•, 94•] (Table 2).

The role of antiretroviral drug toxicities in HAND remains controversial. The contribution of complex drug interactions, side effects when taking an increased number of drugs for advanced disease, and known mitochondrial effects of older dideoxynucleoside reverse-transcriptase-inhibitors such as stavudine and didanosine, to NCI is unknown [8, 95]. Transcriptomic studies evaluating the impact of cART on gene expression patterns in HAND in brain tissue reveal alterations in expression of about 100 immune-regulatory, cell-cycle, and myelin-pathway genes that are not correlated either with brain viral burden or to antiretroviral drug CNS penetration effectiveness (CPE) score, suggesting a possible explanation for the difficulty to date in correlating CPE scores to neurocognitive outcomes despite their association with reduced CSF viral load [8, 96•].

HIV-infected monocytes or monocytes from HIV-infected as compared to seronegative individuals have been the focus of many in vitro microarray-based studies to identify upstream biological mechanisms relevant to HAND, due to their key role in BBB injury. Genes and pathways that have been found to be significantly upregulated in such studies include: a large number of chemotaxis- and inflammation-related genes [97, 98] and genes involved in the interferon (IFN) response, as well as genes that promote antioxidant and anti-inflammatory responses [31•, 99, 100]. Expression of subsets of these genes have also been associated in some, but not all [99] studies, with mild NCI [31•, 100], with HAND in hepatitis C/HIV-co-infected subjects on cART [101•], and with metabolic neuroimaging traits such as N-acetyl-aspartate in frontal white matter [100]; however, monocyte transcriptome patterns have not always correlated with NCI in HIV + persons [99, 102].

A recent postmortem study examined changes in expression of ephrin (EPH) genes that mediate synapse formation and recruitment of glutamate receptors to synapses [103•]. Postmortem brain tissues from cognitively characterized HIV-infected subjects and seronegative controls from the Manhattan HIV Brain Bank were examined for levels of expression of a variety of genes, including EPHA4 and EFNB2 (an ephrin ligand). Transcript levels of both of these genes in the caudate, and of EPHB2 in the anterior cingulate were significantly lower in HIV-infected patients, and EPHB2 mRNA levels in the cingulate correlated with premortem neurocognitive function. The authors hypothesized that decreased expression of EPHB2 in the cingulate may represent a compensatory mechanism minimizing excitotoxic injury in the face of chronic inflammation.

The small number of published epigenetic studies of HAND have focused on expression of microRNA (miRNA), small non-coding RNA molecules that bind messenger RNA and regulate gene expression at the transcriptional or post-transcriptional levels. MicroRNA (miRNA) expression studies conducted in cortical neurons exposed to viral proteins such as Tat and Vpr [104, 105•], or in tissue from individuals with HIVE or SIV-infected macaques with encephalitis (SIVE) have implicated upregulation of the following classes of host miRNAs in HIVE and SIVE: 1) immune response and inflammation, 2) nucleotide metabolism, 3) cell cycle, 4) oncogenesis (e.g., miR-21, which targets a neuronal transcription factor), and 5) apoptosis (e.g., caspase-6). Downregulated miRNAs included those involved in: 1) inflammation, 2) neuronal monoamine oxidase activity (possibly explaining the reduced dopaminergic activity in HAND), 3) apoptosis (e.g., suppression of caspase-6 expression), 4) modulation of viral replication, 5) mitochondrial function, and 6) axonal guidance (Table 2) [105•, 106, 107, 108, 109•, 110•, 111•]. These studies have provided some useful leads and validated several neuropathogenic mechanisms in HAND, but sample sizes have been extremely small (five individuals or less in human studies). In general, these studies have not evaluated associations with neurocognitive phenotypes or accounted for multiple statistical tests or potential confounders in the analyses. Findings in SIV models also require replication in humans.

Consolidation of short-term memories into long-term memory requires synaptic plasticity, which is characterized by structural changes and altered gene expression at neuronal synapses [112•]. In keeping with the finding that synaptodendritic damage rather than neuronal loss is a neuropathological feature of milder forms of HAND [113•], a recent study found downregulation of many synaptic plasticity genes in HIV-infected astrocytes, and increased expression of pro-apoptotic genes, compared to uninfected controls [112•]. These findings translated into reduced dendritic spine density and altered dendritic morphology, which were most prominent in cells infected with clade B virus.

Finally, Lucas et al. [113•] have reported a highly abnormal distribution of the RNA splicing factor NeuN/Rbfox3 in postmortem brain tissue from 22 HIV-infected individuals with MND/HAD as compared to seronegative controls. Very few targets have been identified for this splicing factor, which is usually confined to the nucleus, where RNA splicing occurs. The authors posit that altered localization of RbFox3 in HAND may reflect downregulation of expression of neuronal genes relevant to HAND pathogenesis. This finding requires further study.

Relatively few studies have evaluated the role of histone modification and DNA methylation in the context of HAND. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) function in epigenetic regulation by deacetylating histones and other proteins involved in transcription and chromatin remodeling; histone hypoacetylation has been linked to many neurodegenerative diseases. Saiyed et al. [114•] showed that HIV-1 Tat protein upregulates HDAC2 expression in neuronal cells, leading to transcriptional repression of genes involved in synaptic plasticity and neuronal function and suggesting a potential therapeutic role for HDACs as a drug class in HAND [115, 116]. More recently, Desplats et al. conducted a case-control study among 32 deceased HIV + individuals from the HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center and California NeuroAIDS Tissue Network, 72 % of whom underwent neurocognitive testing within 1 year of death [117•]. The study compared epigenetic markers in postmortem brain tissue, such as B-cell CLL/lymphoma (BCL11B), a transcriptional silencer, among several patient groups: HIV + controls without detectable proviral DNA, RNA or p24 in the CNS, HIV + cases with high viral DNA but no HIV RNA or p24 (latent cases), and HIVE cases with high expression of viral DNA, RNA and p24. Up to half of HIV-infected subjects were on cART, and with the exception of HIVE cases, all HIV + subjects had mild to moderate NCI. Compared to HIV + controls, higher levels of BCL11B protein and other chromatin modifiers involved in transcriptional silencing of HIV-1 (including HDAC1) were observed in HIV + latent cases and were associated with dysregulation of pro-inflammatory genes like IL6, TNFA, and CXCR4. Latent cases also displayed more cognitive impairment than HIV + controls. These results suggest that even in the absence of detectable viral replication, significant dysregulation of pro-inflammatory genes may still occur and that these changes are associated with increased levels of epigenetic factors such as BCL11B. These findings are highly relevant to strategies for eradicating viral reservoirs which might include modulation of BCL11B.

Narasipura et al. [118•] examined the role of epigenetic regulation in maintaining latency of the virus in astrocytes in vitro. DNA CpG methylation and histone modifications (methylation and deacetylation) at the HIV-1 promoter region are specific hallmarks of HIV-1 latency, and HDAC inhibitors reactivate the virus in cell culture models and in HIV-infected CD4+ T cells [118•, 119•]. This study added to previous studies by demonstrating the role of epigenetic regulation in maintaining and reversing virus latency in astrocytes specifically, a process implicated in HAND [90]. Inhibitors of class I HDACs and histone methyltransferases which demethylate DNA are able to activate the HIV-1 promoter in latently infected astrocytes, thereby confirming that these cells may be clinically important reservoirs for HIV in the brain. Other in vitro studies have revealed epigenetic regulation of markers in T-regulatory cells, which normally maintain gut-mucosal immune tolerance via suppression of effector T-cell functions but are dysregulated in chronic HIV infection [120•], as well as dysregulation of HDAC1 and DNA methyltransferases in oral epithelial cells, potentially contributing to HAND via increased oral microbial disease and peripheral immune activation [121].

We know of only one unpublished study of DNA methylation in the context of HAND, the preliminary results of which were presented at the 19th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections in 2012 [82]. This study of 17 HIV + participants in a longitudinal cohort study showed many strong positive and negative correlations of methylation profiles at autosomal sites with changes in neurocognitive test performance (scaled scores corrected for practice effects) measured at two consecutive time points.

Other very preliminary findings deserving of further exploration and replication in studies of HAND include: 1) interactions between opioid-related genes such as OPRM1, substance abuse, and HAND [122•]; 2) mitochondrial DNA haplogroup effects on HAND risk within specific ethnic subpopulations [123]; 3) the impact of iron metabolism, which is essential for mitochondrial function as well as dopaminergic metabolism [124, 125•]; and 4) potential protection against HAND by promoter variants in the antioxidant response gene HMOX1 [126].

Summary

Many candidate-gene studies have identified genetic variants as risk or protective factors in HAND, but due to a combination of factors—study heterogeneity, application of different diagnostic methods, low power, changing epidemiology—few of these genes and variants have been reliably replicated; nor have any prior associations been replicated in the single, published genome-wide association study. Due to significant differences in study designs and methodologies, estimates of effect size and measures of significance are not very meaningful even for genes/SNPs that have been replicated at least once. A large number of genes and biological pathways have also been implicated in genome-wide transcriptome and epigenetic studies, some of which are consistently revealed across human, non-human primate (SIV) models, and murine models of HAND. Human studies have largely employed homogenized brain tissue reflecting multiple cell types, however, complicating the dissection of cell-specific processes that are dysregulated. Finally, not all of the genetic and transcriptomic studies in HAND have incorporated adjustments for multiple statistical comparisons, increasing the likelihood of false-positive findings amid true associations. In some cases, however, published and preliminary studies of two or more types— candidate-gene, GWAS, and transcriptomic—have yielded consistent evidence regarding mechanisms of HIV neuropathogenesis, as in the case of genes involved in inflammatory or immune regulation, synaptic plasticity and neuronal function, iron transport [e.g., transferrin receptor (TFRC)], and mitochondrial function [17•, 93•, 94•, 104, 123, 124, 127•, 128].

It is important to remember that HAND is an extremely complex phenotype, influenced by numerous environmental, psychological, lifestyle and endogenous host factors; it is likely to involve alterations in many brain regions that normally compensate for one another. Studies to date have mostly evaluated only changes in the frontal cortex, rather than white matter, hippocampus, and basal ganglia regions that also show abnormalities in HAND [129•, 130, 131•]. The focus has also been on severe HAND phenotypes such as HAD and HIVE, which probably no longer reflect the salient biological mechanisms that contribute to milder forms of HAND today [132]; individuals with HAND and postmortem HIVE have distinctly different transcriptomic profiles from those with HAND alone [93•]. It also seems likely that relatively little risk is attributable to individual genes, and that these small effect sizes are easily obscured by differences between studies and methodologies used. This poses a challenge even for meta-analyses that might be done in a consortium context with larger sample sizes.

Dysregulation of genes involved in synaptic plasticity, axonal guidance, and interferon response is also a relatively consistent theme. Perhaps the most important conclusions to be drawn from the impressive body of data derived from GWAS, candidate-gene, transcriptomic and epigenetic studies thus far are that: 1) APOE genotype may play a role in older HIV-infected persons [6•, 133•]; 2) genes involved in inflammation and immune regulation in the periphery and CNS, macrophage/monocyte responses to HIV infection, synaptic plasticity, axonal guidance, and mitochondrial function are fundamental in determining neuronal injury and ultimately, neurocognitive function in HIV + individuals; 3) specific gene modules and molecular pathways revealed to be dysregulated in HIV-infection and HAND may now be evaluated for individual variation and therapeutic potential; and 4) dopaminergic dysfunction is altered in HAND and may play a role in HAND pathogenesis among subsets of HIV-infected substance users [91, 134]. Many of these findings still require replication. The potential impact of host genetics on epigenetic modifications in HAND is also an unexplored area that may improve understanding of maladaptive host responses to HIV infection [135•].

Future Research Priorities in the Genomics of HAND

Study populations and design

There is an urgent need for longitudinal studies of HAND in which subjects serve as their own controls, minimizing the impact of confounding factors and optimizing power for detection of genetic effects. There has been a dearth of studies involving pediatric populations, in whom the long-term effects of HIV infection on the CNS may be particularly devastating, and in women, who may have less access to care in some settings and/or may be more vulnerable to the effects of substance dependence on some aspects of neurocognitive function [136, 137, 138].

It is currently unclear whether global indices of NCI, even when adjusted for population norms, form a sufficiently homogeneous phenotype for genomic studies. The use of domain-specific ratings, which may have greater test-retest reliability and are finer-grained than global composite measures of neurocognitive function, may be less subject to noise in the detection of genetic markers [31•, 139]. The predictive value of combinations of the most promising genetic biomarkers might be evaluated in longitudinal studies that incorporate consistent case definitions, corrections for practice effects, and the best available population norms. Finally, additional studies focused on milder forms of HAND, including ANI, in individuals with undetectable virus and which use consistent diagnostic criteria are essential [140, 141]. A recent substudy of the CHARTER cohort addressed the prognostic relevance of ANI, which has been much debated, confirming that subjects with ANI experience significantly higher rates of decline to symptomatic HAND than those who are neurocognitively normal at baseline [142•].

The rapid growth of bioinformatics and systems biology as disciplines, and the evolution of machine learning tools, has now made it possible to emphasize identification of an increasing number of biological processes that underlie HAND [31•, 143•, 144•]. Microarray gene-expression and epigenetic studies can and should be further exploited for this purpose, with the caveat that they are best designed to provide broad brushstrokes, not detailed mechanistic understanding. For example, recent epigenetics work has revealed regulatory miRNA pathways validating general mechanisms such as global mitochondrial dysfunction. The CREB gene and its targets, implicated in both histone-modification and miRNA studies of HAND [105•, 114•], have complex roles in cell growth, differentiation, and neuronal function.

Conventional statistical approaches often fail to identify weak single-gene and gene-gene (or gene-environment) interaction effects, which are actually likely to be the fundamental genetic drivers of complex phenotypes like HAND [31•]. Network methods have emerged as a more powerful way to detect such effects. In order to derive clinically meaningful understanding of HAND and highlight biological processes that can be targeted therapeutically, it will be helpful to utilize the latest tools for integrating data from multiple sources and of multiple types. Several computational tools have been developed in recent years to predict the impact of a nonsynonymous genetic variants on protein function and, hence, distinguish pathogenic from neutral variants [145•]. Techniques such as WGCNA [146] hold promise for more powerful delineation of disease-related co-expression modules that account for functional relatedness of genes, and which can be used to analyze data from a large variety of “omics” venues.

The internal consistency of microarray-based transcriptomic and epigenetic studies of HAND is difficult to know, as this has not been well studied; very small numbers of subjects (<5) are often evaluated, and rarely have subjects served as their own controls. Many potential confounding and modifying factors are also in play. Given small anticipated effect sizes and the inability to estimate power in most genome-wide studies conducted for discovery purposes, it is imperative that replicative studies now be performed in larger numbers of subjects with estimates of clinically meaningful effect sizes, measurement error, and potential confounders in mind. In addition, standardization of research protocols and assays going forward may be helpful for combining data across multiple cohorts in order to meet the stringent power requirements of GWAS and also to facilitate validation of true-positive findings. Whole-exome sequencing approaches, which have not been published in HAND, are another way to identify the functional genomic variation that is responsible for common complex diseases without the high costs associated with whole-genome sequencing, while maintaining high coverage and sequence depth [147]. Research in the area will also benefit from reporting of both corrected and uncorrected p-values, so that type I and type II error can be balanced in the ongoing process of replication. The biology of replicated genes and pathways will then require further exploration at the bench to determine which ones are therapeutically actionable.

Refinement of HAND subphenotypes or intermediate phenotypes

Due to the constraints of neuropsychometric tests and HAND definitions based only on these tests, alternative phenotypic measures of HAND that are less affected by confounders should be further explored, including structural and metabolic neuroimaging indices and new neuropathological correlates of HAND in the cART era, such as synaptodendritic simplification [148, 149]. Studies emerging the neuroimaging literature suggest that structural and metabolic subphenotypes of HAND may allow for more powerful analysis of genetic impacts on HAND [100, 129•, 150•, 151•]. Other noninvasive and low-cost biomarkers of NCI are also urgently needed to assist in monitoring patients over time, including in low-resource settings, because better characterization of longitudinal trajectories of neurocognitive performance will facilitate association of neurocognitive changes with host genomic factors. These biomarkers can then be applied in subpopulations with substantially different risk profiles, enhancing the generalizability and practical applicability of findings in this field. Continued refinement of practical tools for detecting mild HAND [141] may also make screening more acceptable and lower the cost of collection of much-needed longitudinal data. Tissue-based microarray studies evaluating multiple rather than single brain regions in affected individuals, with correlation of genetic, RNA, epigenetic, and protein expression data, are going to be essential to piece together complex patterns into coherent and therapeutically actionable mechanisms of pathogenesis using systems biology approaches.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the complexity of HAND and the lessons learned from genomic studies to date suggest that increased methodologic rigor in study design and an integrated analytical approach employing tools from systems biology and machine learning are needed to significantly advance individualized care for persons with HAND. The pathways delineated by all types of genomic studies in this area will also become particularly meaningful when combined with data emerging from the NIH Brain Initiative and the Human Connectome Project, which promise to provide a comprehensive picture of human neural networks.

Notes

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Asha R. Kallianpur and Andrew J. Levine declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.•
    Heaton RK, Franklin DR, Ellis RJ, et al. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders before and during the era of combination antiretroviral therapy: differences in rates, nature, and predictors. J Neurovirol. 2011;17:3–16. Review of the altered epidemiology and risk profile of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) in the cART era, including changes in patterns of neurocognitive impairment in specific domains.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.•
    Gelman BB, Lisinicchia JG, Morgello S, et al. Neurovirological correlation with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders and encephalitis in a HAART-era cohort. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;62:487–95. This article correlates neurovirological measures such as HIV RNA and DNA copies with HAND, HIV encephalitis, and other pathological findings in 148 brain specimens.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Valcour V, Sithinamsuwan P, Letendre S, Ances B. Pathogenesis of HIV in the central nervous system. Current HIV/AIDS reports. 2011;8:54–61.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Antinori A, Arendt G, Becker JT, et al. Updated research nosology for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. Neurology. 2007;69:1789–99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.•
    Mind Exchange Working Group. Assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder: a consensus report of the mind exchange program. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:1004–17. Summary of the consensus opinion of international experts regarding tools currently available for clinical diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of HAND; practical guidelines and pros and cons of various diagnostic tools are provided.Google Scholar
  6. 6.•
    Clifford DB, Ances BM. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:976–86. This review discusses diagnostic challenges and potential mechanisms of pathogenesis of HAND in the cART era and summarizes key take-home points.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heaton RK, Clifford DB, Franklin Jr DR, et al. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders persist in the era of potent antiretroviral therapy: CHARTER Study. Neurology. 2010;75:2087–96.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marra CM, Zhao Y, Clifford DB, et al. Impact of combination antiretroviral therapy on cerebrospinal fluid HIV RNA and neurocognitive performance. AIDS. 2009;23:1359–66.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robertson K, Liner J, Meeker RB. Antiretroviral neurotoxicity. J Neurovirol. 2012;18:388–99.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.•
    Rodriguez-Penney AT, Iudicello JE, Riggs PK, et al. Co-morbidities in persons infected with HIV: increased burden with older age and negative effects on health-related quality of life. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2013;27:5–16. A study of individuals grouped by age and HIV serostatus, highlighting the impact of comorbidities, including neurocognitive impairment on health-related quality of life, particularly in older HIV+ individuals.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McArthur JC, Brew BJ. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: is there a hidden epidemic? AIDS. 2010;24:1367–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cattie JE, Doyle K, Weber E, Grant I, Woods SP, Group HIVNRP. Planning deficits in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: component processes, cognitive correlates, and implications for everyday functioning. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012;34:906–18.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.•
    Iudicello JE, Woods SP, Cattie JE, Doyle K, Grant I, Group HIVNRP. Risky decision-making in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;27:256–75. This study of HIV+ subjects with and without HAND and HIV-seronegative controls evaluated the impact of HAND diagnosis on decision-making skills and risk-taking during a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ellis RJ, Deutsch R, Heaton RK, et al. Neurocognitive impairment is an independent risk factor for death in HIV infection. San Diego HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center Group. Arch Neurol. 1997;54:416–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sevigny JJ, Albert SM, McDermott MP, et al. An evaluation of neurocognitive status and markers of immune activation as predictors of time to death in advanced HIV infection. Arch Neurol. 2007;64:97–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Checkoway H, Lundin JI, Kelada SN. Neurodegenerative diseases. IARC scientific publications.407-419, 2011Google Scholar
  17. 17.•
    Borjabad A, Volsky DJ. Common transcriptional signatures in brain tissue from patients with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders, Alzheimer's disease, and Multiple Sclerosis. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2012;7:914–26. A comparative meta-analysis of publicly available microarray datasets from brain tissues of patients with HAND, Alzheimer's disease, and multiple sclerosis, which identified shared processes/pathways that are dysregulated.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.•
    Zhou L, Saksena NK. HIV Associated Neurocognitive Disorders. Infect Dis Rep. 2013;5:e8. Another quite comprehensive review of HAND neuropathogenesis in the cART era.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Levine AJ, Singer EJ, Shapshak P. The role of host genetics in the susceptibility for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. AIDS Behav. 2009;13:118–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.•
    Pozniak A, Rackstraw S, Deayton J, et al. HIV-associated neurocognitive disease: case studies and suggestions for diagnosis and management in different patient subgroups. Antivir Ther. 2014;19:1–13. This recent review discusses a series of case studies that illustrate the challenges presented by diagnosis and management of HAND in different types of patients in the cART era.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Conant K, Garzino-Demo A, Nath A, et al. Induction of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in HIV-1 Tat-stimulated astrocytes and elevation in AIDS dementia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:3117–21.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kelder W, McArthur JC, Nance-Sproson T, McClernon D, Griffin DE. Beta-chemokines MCP-1 and RANTES are selectively increased in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with human immunodeficiency virus-associated dementia. Ann Neurol. 1998;44:831–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wesselingh SL, Takahashi K, Glass JD, McArthur JC, Griffin JW, Griffin DE. Cellular localization of tumor necrosis factor mRNA in neurological tissue from HIV-infected patients by combined reverse transcriptase/polymerase chain reaction in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. J Neuroimmunol. 1997;74:1–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.•
    Burdo TH, Lackner A, Williams KC. Monocyte/macrophages and their role in HIV neuropathogenesis. Immunol Rev. 2013;254:102–13. This paper reviews the important role of monocyte-macrophage-lineage cells in HIV and SIV neuropathogenesis.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.•
    Kusao I, Shiramizu B, Liang CY, et al. Cognitive performance related to HIV-1-infected monocytes. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012;24:71–80. This study associated high HIV DNA copy numbers within activated monocytes with neurocognitive impairment over time in the Hawaii Aging with HIV Cohort, even among subjects with undetectable HIV RNA levels on therapy. PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bashirova AA, Martin-Gayo E, Jones DC, et al. LILRB2 interaction with HLA class I correlates with control of HIV-1 infection. Plos Genet. 2014;10:e1004196.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guergnon J, Dalmasso C, Broet P, et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphism-defined class I and class III major histocompatibility complex genetic subregions contribute to natural long-term nonprogression in HIV infection. J Infect Dis. 2012;205:718–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Naicker DD, Wang B, Losina E, et al. Association of IL-10-promoter genetic variants with the rate of CD4 T-cell loss, IL-10 plasma levels, and breadth of cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte response during chronic HIV-1 infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:294–302.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Burt TD, Agan BK, Marconi VC, et al. Apolipoprotein (apo) E4 enhances HIV-1 cell entry in vitro, and the APOE epsilon4/epsilon4 genotype accelerates HIV disease progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:8718–23.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rappaport J, Berger JR. Genetic testing and HIV dementia: teasing out the molecular mechanisms of disease. AIDS. 2010;24:1585–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.•
    Levine AJ, Panos SE, Horvath S. Genetic, transcriptomic, and epigenetic studies of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;65:481–503. A detailed and comprehensive article review of genetic, transcriptomic, and epigenetic studies of HAND prior to November 2013, which also discusses phenotypic challenges and available analytical tools from systems biology.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.•
    Bol SM, Booiman T, van Manen D, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism in gene encoding transcription factor Prep1 is associated with HIV-1-associated dementia. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30990. This case-control study consisting of HAD cases and non-HAD subjects with AIDS (controls) evaluated the role of 7 candidate-gene polymorphisms, identifying a cohort effect for the CCR5 δ32 SNP and a strong association of PREP1, a transcription factor, with HAD.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Becker JT, Kingsley L, Mullen J, et al. Vascular risk factors, HIV serostatus, and cognitive dysfunction in gay and bisexual men. Neurology. 2009;73:1292–9.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wright EJ, Grund B, Robertson K, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors associated with lower baseline cognitive performance in HIV-positive persons. Neurology. 2010;75:864–73.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.•
    Spudich S. CROI 2014: Neurologic complications of HIV infection. Topics Antiviral Med. 2014;22:594–601. This synopsis of the 2014 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), summarizes the state of understanding of mechanisms of CNS injury and persistent immune activation in HIV + individuals, the impact of aging and cART exposure, novel mechanisms of HIV neuropathogenesis, and preventive strategies in light of state-of-the-art research.Google Scholar
  36. 36.•
    Morgan EE, Woods SP, Letendre SL, et al. Apolipoprotein E4 genotype does not increase risk of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. J Neurovirol. 2013;19:150–6. This cross-sectional study of the CNS HIV Antiretroviral Therapy Effects Research cohort tested the hypothesis that APOE4 genotype increases risk for HAND, capitalizing on the phenotypic strengths of CHARTER for studying CNS complications in HIV infection.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.•
    Andres MA, Feger U, Nath A, Munsaka S, Jiang CS, Chang L. APOE epsilon 4 allele and CSF APOE on cognition in HIV-infected subjects. J NeuroImmune Pharmacol. 2011;6:389–98. This study reported on the association of CSF levels of APOE protein on cognitive performance in individual neurocognitive domains, performance using the HIV Dementia Scale, and Global Cognitive Scores.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Panos SE, Del Re AC, Thames AD, et al. The impact of neurobehavioral features on medication adherence in HIV: evidence from longitudinal models. AIDS Care. 2014;26:79–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.•
    Hoare J, Westgarth-Taylor J, Fouche JP, et al. Relationship between apolipoprotein E4 genotype and white matter integrity in HIV-positive young adults in South Africa. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2013;263:189–95. This study reported the association of APOE genotype on neuropsychological test measures as well as white matter integrity on diffusion tensor neuroimaging in 45 HIV + subjects, supporting the value of exploiting subphenotypes in genetic/genomic studies of HAND.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Valcour V, Shikuma C, Shiramizu B, et al. Age, apolipoprotein E4, and the risk of HIV dementia: the Hawaii Aging with HIV Cohort. J Neuroimmunol. 2004;157:197–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pomara N, Belzer KD, Silva R, Cooper TB, Sidtis JJ. The apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele and memory performance in HIV-1 seropositive subjects: differences at baseline but not after acute oral lorazepam challenge. Psychopharmacology. 2008;201:125–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pemberton LA, Stone E, Price P, van Bockxmeer F, Brew BJ. The relationship between ApoE, TNFA, IL1a, IL1b and IL12b genes and HIV-1-associated dementia. HIV Med. 2008;9:677–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Joska JA, Combrinck M, Valcour VG, et al. Association between apolipoprotein E4 genotype and human immunodeficiency virus-associated dementia in younger adults starting antiretroviral therapy in South Africa. J Neurovirol. 2010;16:377–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dunlop O, Goplen AK, Liestol K, et al. HIV dementia and apolipoprotein E. Acta Neurol Scand. 1997;95:315–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Corder EH, Robertson K, Lannfelt L, et al. HIV-infected subjects with the E4 allele for APOE have excess dementia and peripheral neuropathy. Nat Med. 1998;4:1182–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Quasney MW, Zhang Q, Sargent S, Mynatt M, Glass J, McArthur J. Increased frequency of the tumor necrosis factor-alpha-308 A allele in adults with human immunodeficiency virus dementia. Ann Neurol. 2001;50:157–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Brabers NA, Nottet HS. Role of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-alpha and IL-1beta in HIV-associated dementia. Eur J Clin Investig. 2006;36:447–58.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Levine AJ, Singer EJ, Sinsheimer JS, et al. CCL3 genotype and current depression increase risk of HIV-associated dementia. Neurobehav HIV Med. 2009;1:1–7.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.•
    Levine AJ, Service S, Miller EN, et al. Genome-wide association study of neurocognitive impairment and dementia in HIV-infected adults. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2012;159B:669–83. The only published genome-wide association study of HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment and dementia, conducted in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, which found no novel or replicated genetic susceptibility loci for HAND but was limited by small sample size and less robust phenotypes.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sato-Matsumura KC, Berger J, Hainfellner JA, Mazal P, Budka H. Development of HIV encephalitis in AIDS and TNF-alpha regulatory elements. J Neuroimmunol. 1998;91:89–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Diaz-Arrastia R, Gong Y, Kelly CJ, Gelman BB. Host genetic polymorphisms in human immunodeficiency virus-related neurologic disease. J Neurovirol. 2004;10(1):67–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Letendre S, Marquie-Beck J, Singh KK, et al. The monocyte chemotactic protein-1–2578G allele is associated with elevated MCP-1 concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid. J Neuroimmunol. 2004;157:193–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gonzalez E, Rovin BH, Sen L, et al. HIV-1 infection and AIDS dementia are influenced by a mutant MCP-1 allele linked to increased monocyte infiltration of tissues and MCP-1 levels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:13795–800.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Singh KK, Ellis RJ, Marquie-Beck J, et al. CCR2 polymorphisms affect neuropsychological impairment in HIV-1-infected adults. J Neuroimmunol. 2004;157:185–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Eugenin EA, Osiecki K, Lopez L, Goldstein H, Calderon TM, Berman JW. CCL2/monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 mediates enhanced transmigration of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected leukocytes across the blood-brain barrier: a potential mechanism of HIV-CNS invasion and NeuroAIDS. J Neurosci. 2006;26:1098–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Spector SA, Singh KK, Gupta S, et al. APOE epsilon4 and MBL-2 O/O genotypes are associated with neurocognitive impairment in HIV-infected plasma donors. AIDS. 2010;24:1471–9.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.•
    Levine AJ, Reynolds S, Cox C, et al. The longitudinal and interactive effects of HIV status, stimulant use, and host genotype upon neurocognitive functioning. J Neurovirol. 2014;20:243–57. This 10-year longitudinal study in over 950 subjects from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study was the first to report interactive effects of SNPs previously linked to HAND with HIV serostatus, time since first cognitive test administration, and stimulant use on risk of HAND.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Singh KK, Barroga CF, Hughes MD, et al. Genetic influence of CCR5, CCR2, and SDF1 variants on human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1)-related disease progression and neurological impairment, in children with symptomatic HIV-1 infection. J Infect Dis. 2003;188:1461–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Schrier R, Gnann Jr JW, Landes R, Lockshin C, Richman D, et al. T cell recognition of HIV synthetic peptides in a natural infection. J Immunol. 1989;142:1166–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.•
    Schrier RD, Gupta S, Riggs P, et al. The influence of HLA on HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment in Anhui. China PloS One. 2012;7:e32303. This study performed in China identified the HLA locus as a significant modifier of neurocognitive impairment in HIV infection and replicated HLA Class I alleles and HLA DR previously linked to HAND.Google Scholar
  61. 61.•
    Singh KK, Gray PK, Wang Y, Fenton T, Trout RN, Spector SA. HLA alleles are associated with altered risk for disease progression and central nervous system impairment of HIV-infected children. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2011;57:32–9. One of the few large studies of genetic risk factors in HIV-infected children, this case-cohort analysis evaluated HIV disease progression-free survival and time to CNS impairment as a function of HLA genotype and linked specific alleles to increased or decreased progression.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Garred P, Madsen HO, Balslev U, et al. Susceptibility to HIV infection and progression of AIDS in relation to variant alleles of mannose-binding lectin. Lancet. 1997;349:236–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Singh KK, Lieser A, Ruan PK, Fenton T, Spector SA. An age-dependent association of mannose-binding lectin-2 genetic variants on HIV-1-related disease in children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;122:173–80.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    van Rij RP, Portegies P, Hallaby T, et al. Reduced prevalence of the CCR5 delta32 heterozygous genotype in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals with AIDS dementia complex. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:854–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Samson M, Libert F, Doranz BJ, et al. Resistance to HIV-1 infection in caucasian individuals bearing mutant alleles of the CCR-5 chemokine receptor gene. Nature. 1996;382:722–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Boven LA, van der Bruggen T, van Asbeck BS, Marx JJ, Nottet HS. Potential role of CCR5 polymorphism in the development of AIDS dementia complex. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1999;26:243–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Singh KK DQ, Fennema-Notestine C, Vaida F, Ellis RJ, Letendre SL, Franklin D, Rosario D, Heaton RK, Grant I and CHARTER Group.: MBL2 promoter polymorphism rs7096206 predicts brain metabolite anomalies in HIV-infected adults. Abstract#466, 21st Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; March 5-8, Boston, MA, USA, 2014.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bousman CA, Cherner M, Atkinson JH, et al. COMT Val158Met Polymorphism, Executive Dysfunction, and Sexual Risk Behavior in the Context of HIV Infection and Methamphetamine Dependence. Interdisciplinary Perspectives Infect Dis. 2010;678648:2010.Google Scholar
  69. 69.•
    Levine AJ, Sinsheimer JS, Bilder R, Shapshak P, Singer EJ. Functional polymorphisms in dopamine-related genes: effect on neurocognitive functioning in HIV + adults. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2012;34:78–91. A study of 184 HIV-infected adults which did not find evidence to support direct or interactive effects of dopamine-related genes and HIV disease severity on neurocognitive functioning.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Fields J, Dumaop W, Langford TD, Rockenstein E, Masliah E. Role of Neurotrophic Factor Alterations in the Neurodegenerative Process in HIV Associated Neurocognitive Disorders. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2014;9:102–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Gupta S, Bousman CA, Chana G, et al. Dopamine receptor D3 genetic polymorphism (rs6280TC) is associated with rates of cognitive impairment in methamphetamine-dependent men with HIV: preliminary findings. J Neurovirol. 2011;17:239–47.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.•
    Jacobs MM, Murray J, Byrd DA, Hurd YL, Morgello S. HIV-related cognitive impairment shows bi-directional association with dopamine receptor DRD1 and DRD2 polymorphisms in substance-dependent and substance-independent populations. J Neurovirol. 2013;19:495–504. This study in persons with advanced HIV disease and prevalent substance abuse found substantial interaction effects of opiate or cocaine dependence with dopamine receptor variants on neuropsychological performance.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Cherner M, Bousman C, Everall I, et al. Cytochrome P450-2D6 extensive metabolizers are more vulnerable to methamphetamine-associated neurocognitive impairment: preliminary findings. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010;16:890–901.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Smurzynski M, Wu K, Letendre S, et al. Effects of central nervous system antiretroviral penetration on cognitive functioning in the ALLRT cohort. AIDS. 2011;25:357–65.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.•
    Ellis RJ, Letendre S, Vaida F, et al. Randomized trial of central nervous system-targeted antiretrovirals for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:1015–22. This report of the results of a randomized clinical trial of CNS-targeted antiretrovirals for HAND found no evidence of neurocognitive benefit to this strategy, but the study was terminated early due to slow enrollment, and small benefits were not excluded.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.•
    Johnson DH, Sutherland D, Acosta EP, Erdem H, Richardson D, Haas DW. Genetic and non-genetic determinants of raltegravir penetration into cerebrospinal fluid: a single arm pharmacokinetic study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e82672. This pharmacokinetic study in HIV-negative adults evaluated the influence of efflux transporter gene ABCB1 variants and variants in other membrane transporter genes on plasma and CSF levels of the integrase inhibitor raltegravir.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Ward BA, Gorski JC, Jones DR, Hall SD, Flockhart DA, Desta Z. The cytochrome P450 2B6 (CYP2B6) is the main catalyst of efavirenz primary and secondary metabolism: implication for HIV/AIDS therapy and utility of efavirenz as a substrate marker of CYP2B6 catalytic activity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;306:287–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.•
    Johnson DH, Gebretsadik T, Shintani A, et al. Neuropsychometric correlates of efavirenz pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenetics following a single oral dose. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;75:997–1006. This study examined effects of a single dose of efavirenz on neuropsychometric (NP) test performance prior to and at several time points up to 6 hours post-dose, and it also evaluated the CYP2B6 genotype as a modifier of efavirenz effects on NP measures.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.•
    Zhang Y, Wang M, Li H, et al. Accumulation of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA damage in the frontal cortex cells of patients with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. Brain Res. 2012;1458:1–11. The first study to report accumulated oxidative modification of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and mtDNA depletion in brain tissue in neuro-AIDS patients.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Radak Z, Bori Z, Koltai E, et al. Age-dependent changes in 8-oxoguanine-DNA glycosylase activity are modulated by adaptive responses to physical exercise in human skeletal muscle. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;51:417–23.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.•
    Malan-Muller S, Hemmings SM, Spies G, Kidd M, Fennema-Notestine C, Seedat S. Shorter telomere length - A potential susceptibility factor for HIV-associated neurocognitive impairments in South African women [corrected]. PLoS One. 2013;8:e58351. This study demonstrated an association of telomere length in blood leukocytes with neurocognitive impairment and its subdomains in HIV + women in South Africa with a high prevalence of chronic stress/childhood trauma.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Perez-Santiago J, Mehta SR, Gianella S, Schrier RD, Cherner M, Var SR, Tyler RC Day, Ramirez-Gaona M, Smith DM, Letendre SL.: Mitochondrial DNA is associated with inflammation and neurocognitive deficits in HIV infection. Abstract#446, 21st Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; Boston, MA, USA, 2014.Google Scholar
  83. 83.•
    Singh KK, Wang Y, Gray KP, et al. Genetic variants in the host restriction factor APOBEC3G are associated with HIV-1-related disease progression and central nervous system impairment in children. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;62:197–203. This study investigated the effects of APOBEC3G genetic variants on HIV-1-related disease in children enrolled in Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocols and showed significant genetic associations with rates of disease progression and CNS impairment.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.•
    Morales D, Hechavarria R, Wojna V, Acevedo SF. YWHAE/14-3-3 epsilon: a potential novel genetic risk factor and CSF biomarker for HIV neurocognitive impairment. J Neurovirol. 2013;19:471–8. This study identified variants in the YWHAE (14-3-3) gene and protein levels in CSF as a risk factor and possible biomarker, respectively, for neurocognitive impairment in HIV-infection in a cohort of Hispanic-Latino women.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Roberts TK, Eugenin EA, Morgello S, Clements JE, Zink MC, Berman JW. PrPC, the cellular isoform of the human prion protein, is a novel biomarker of HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment and mediates neuroinflammation. Am J Pathol. 2010;177:1848–60.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Bol SM, Booiman T, Bunnik EM, et al. Polymorphism in HIV-1 dependency factor PDE8A affects mRNA level and HIV-1 replication in primary macrophages. Virology. 2011;420:32–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.•
    Bol SM, Moerland PD, Limou S, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies single nucleotide polymorphism in DYRK1A associated with replication of HIV-1 in monocyte-derived macrophages. PLoS One. 2011;6:e17190. A genome-wide study evaluating SNP associations with HIV-1 replication in monocyte-derived macrophages from HIV-infected individuals found a strong independent association with DYRK1A that replicated in several unrelated samples in vitro and in vivo.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Giri MS, Nebozhyn M, Showe L, Montaner LJ. Microarray data on gene modulation by HIV-1 in immune cells: 2000-2006. J Leukoc Biol. 2006;80:1031–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Kim SY, Li J, Bentsman G, Brooks AI, Volsky DJ. Microarray analysis of changes in cellular gene expression induced by productive infection of primary human astrocytes: implications for HAD. J Neuroimmunol. 2004;157:17–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Borjabad A, Brooks AI, Volsky DJ. Gene expression profiles of HIV-1-infected glia and brain: toward better understanding of the role of astrocytes in HIV-1-associated neurocognitive disorders. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2010;5:44–62.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Reddy PV, Gandhi N, Samikkannu T, et al. HIV-1 gp120 induces antioxidant response element-mediated expression in primary astrocytes: role in HIV associated neurocognitive disorder. Neurochem Int. 2012;61:807–14.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.•
    Winkler JM, Chaudhuri AD, Fox HS. Translating the brain transcriptome in neuroAIDS: from non-human primates to humans. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2012;7:372–9. This article reviews, compares and contrasts transcriptomic studies in HIV-infected humans and in a non-human primate model of neuroAIDS (SIV-infected monkeys); shared sets of genes dysregulated in the brains of both humans and monkeys with neuroAIDS are discussed.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.•
    Gelman BB, Chen T, Lisinicchia JG, et al. The National NeuroAIDS Tissue Consortium brain gene array: two types of HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46178. A study of the National NeuroAIDS Tissue Consortium that evaluated brain gene expression in homogenized brain tissue from 3 brain regions in association with pre-mortem neurocognitive function; it identified two distinct patterns of gene dysregulation in HAND with or without HIVE.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.•
    Levine AJ, Miller JA, Shapshak P, et al. Systems analysis of human brain gene expression: mechanisms for HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment and common pathways with Alzheimer's disease. BMC Med Genet. 2013;6:4. Re-analysis of National NeuroAIDS Tissue Consortium transcriptome data comparing differentially expressed sets of genes in the brains of patients with HAND with those of HIV-negative individuals with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and identifying sets of dysregulated genes shared between HAND and AD.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Kallianpur AR, Hulgan T. Pharmacogenetics of nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor-associated peripheral neuropathy. Pharmacogenomics. 2009;10:623–37.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.•
    Kahouadji Y, Dumurgier J, Sellier P, et al. Cognitive function after several years of antiretroviral therapy with stable central nervous system penetration score. HIV Med. 2013;14:311–5. This study addressed potential effects of cART central nervous system toxicity by examining relationships between CNS penetration effectiveness (CPE) score on neurocognitive function in HIV + individuals and suggested that stably high CPE scores may influence cognitive performance.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Buckner CM, Calderon TM, Willams DW, Belbin TJ, Berman JW. Characterization of monocyte maturation/differentiation that facilitates their transmigration across the blood-brain barrier and infection by HIV: implications for NeuroAIDS. Cell Immunol. 2011;267:109–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Pulliam L, Sun B, Rempel H. Invasive chronic inflammatory monocyte phenotype in subjects with high HIV-1 viral load. J Neuroimmunol. 2004;157:93–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Sun B, Abadjian L, Rempel H, Calosing C, Rothlind J, Pulliam L. Peripheral biomarkers do not correlate with cognitive impairment in highly active antiretroviral therapy-treated subjects with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J Neurovirol. 2010;16:115–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Pulliam L, Rempel H, Sun B, Abadjian L, Calosing C, Meyerhoff DJ. A peripheral monocyte interferon phenotype in HIV infection correlates with a decrease in magnetic resonance spectroscopy metabolite concentrations. AIDS. 2011;25:1721–6. A cross-sectional study evaluating relationships between monocyte gene expression, cognitive status, and brain metabolite concentrations in HIV + and HIV- adults, which found associations between chronic peripheral immune activation and neuronal injury in frontal white matter and anterior cingulate.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.•
    Rempel H, Sun B, Calosing C, Abadjian L, Monto A, Pulliam L. Monocyte activation in HIV/HCV coinfection correlates with cognitive impairment. PLoS One. 2013;8:e55776. This study correlated gene expression profiles in CD14+ monocytes in HIV + and HIV+/hepatitis C-coinfected patients with neurocognitive function.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Burdo TH, Weiffenbach A, Woods SP, Letendre S, Ellis RJ, Williams KC. Elevated sCD163 in plasma but not cerebrospinal fluid is a marker of neurocognitive impairment in HIV infection. AIDS. 2013;27:1387–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.•
    Yuferov V, Ho A, Morgello S, Yang Y, Ott J, Kreek MJ. Expression of ephrin receptors and ligands in postmortem brains of HIV-infected subjects with and without cognitive impairment. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2013;8:333–44. These authors examined expression of ephrin (EPH) genes important in synapse formation and glutamine metabolism in relation to HIV serostatus, immune function, and premortem neurocognitive function using brain tissues from the Manhattan HIV Brain Bank.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Eletto D, Russo G, Passiatore G, et al. Inhibition of SNAP25 expression by HIV-1 Tat involves the activity of mir-128a. J Cell Physiol. 2008;216:764–70.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.•
    Mukerjee R, Chang JR, Del Valle L, et al. Deregulation of microRNAs by HIV-1 Vpr protein leads to the development of neurocognitive disorders. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:34976–85. This study, which documented expression of Vpr in brain tissues from patients with HIV encephalitis, used primary neuronal cultures or cell lines and microRNA and gene-expression assays to link viral protein R (Vpr) exposure to dysregulation of multiple cellular pathways and their target genes that likely play significant roles in HAND.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Yelamanchili SV, Chaudhuri AD, Chen LN, Xiong H, Fox HS 2010 MicroRNA-21 dysregulates the expression of MEF2C in neurons in monkey and human SIV/HIV neurological disease. Cell Death Dis. 1:e77Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Noorbakhsh F, Ramachandran R, Barsby N, et al. MicroRNA profiling reveals new aspects of HIV neurodegeneration: caspase-6 regulates astrocyte survival. FASEB J. 2010;24:1799–812.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Liu J, Sisk JM, Gama L, Clements JE, Witwer KW. Tristetraprolin expression and microRNA-mediated regulation during simian immunodeficiency virus infection of the central nervous system. Mol Brain. 2013;6:40.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.•
    Chaudhuri AD, Yelamanchili SV, Fox HS. MicroRNA-142 reduces monoamine oxidase A expression and activity in neuronal cells by downregulating SIRT1. PLoS One. 2013;8:e79579. These authors investigated downstream effects of miR-142 upregulation in neurons in vitro, which is observed in HAND, revealing its possible contribution to dopaminergic dysfunction in HAND.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.•
    Sisk JM, Witwer KW, Tarwater PM, Clements JE. SIV replication is directly downregulated by four antiviral miRNAs. Retrovirology. 2013;10:95. An epigenetic study that demonstrated the role of host microRNAs in regulating replication of SIV in macrophage-lineage cells in vitro, suggesting a potential therapeutic strategy.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.•
    Zhou L, Pupo GM, Gupta P, et al. A parallel genome-wide mRNA and microRNA profiling of the frontal cortex of HIV patients with and without HIV-associated dementia shows the role of axon guidance and downstream pathways in HIV-mediated neurodegeneration. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:677. Another comprehensive review of HAND which discusses numerous mechanisms of neuropathogenesis of HIV-1 proteins, the impact of reservoirs, and the application of microarray technologies to the study of HIV-associated dementia.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.•
    Atluri VS, Kanthikeel SP, Reddy PV, Yndart A, Nair MP. Human synaptic plasticity gene expression profile and dendritic spine density changes in HIV-infected human CNS cells: role in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). PLoS One. 2013;8:e61399. This study investigated the differential expression of genes involved in synaptic plasticity in clade B- and clade C-infected primary human astrocytes by microarray analysis; down-regulation of these genes, with decreased dendritic spine density and induction of apoptosis were reported, with important differences noted by clade of virus.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.•
    Lucas CH, Calvez M, Babu R, Brown A. Altered subcellular localization of the NeuN/Rbfox3 RNA splicing factor in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). Neurosci Lett. 2014;558:97–102. This neuropathological study identified distinctly abnormal nuclear localization of a previously uncharacterized RNA splicing factor in HIV + individuals with HAND as compared to those without HAND.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.•
    Saiyed ZM, Gandhi N, Agudelo M, et al. HIV-1 Tat upregulates expression of histone deacetylase-2 (HDAC2) in human neurons: implication for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). Neurochem Int. 2011;58:656–64. The first study to examine histone deacetylation in the context of HAND neuropathogenesis, which showed that HIV Tat protein dysregulates HDAC2 expression in neuronal cells, with downstream effects on synaptic plasticity and genes involved in neuronal function such as CREB.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Kazantsev AG, Thompson LM. Therapeutic application of histone deacetylase inhibitors for central nervous system disorders. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7:854–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Wiech NL, Fisher JF, Helquist P, Wiest O. Inhibition of histone deacetylases: a pharmacological approach to the treatment of non-cancer disorders. Curr Top Med Chem. 2009;9:257–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.•
    Desplats P, Dumaop W, Smith D, et al. Molecular and pathologic insights from latent HIV-1 infection in the human brain. Neurology. 2013;80:1415–23. A case-control study of epigenetic markers in relation to HIV latency, neurocognitive function, clinical and neuropathologic features, which revealed increased expression of "silencing" chromatin modifiers in latent cases; latent cases also had more cognitive impairment than HIV + controls with undetectable HIV DNA, RNA or p24 protein in brain.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.•
    Narasipura SD, Kim S, Al-Harthi L. Epigenetic regulation of HIV-1 latency in astrocytes. J Virol. 2014;88:3031–8. This study showed that class I histone deacetylases (HDACs) and a lysine-specific histone methyltransferase play a significant role in silencing HIV transcription in astrocytes and supports the role of astrocytes as virus reservoirs.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.•
    Hakre S, Chavez L, Shirakawa K, Verdin E. Epigenetic regulation of HIV latency. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2011;6:19–24. This article reviews how histone modifications and chromatin remodeling affect transcriptional activity of the HIV promoter in the context of HIV latency. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.•
    Abdel-Hameed EA, Ji H, Sherman KE, Shata MT. Epigenetic modification of FOXP3 in patients with chronic HIV infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014;65:19–26. This study presents evidence suggesting that altered methylation of FOXP3 predisposes to higher T(reg) frequency in gut mucosa of HIV-infected patients, which impacts chronic immune activation, one of several factors involved in HAND.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Ghosh SK, McCormick TS, Eapen BL, Yohannes E, Chance MR, Weinberg A. Comparison of epigenetic profiles of human oral epithelial cells from HIV-positive (on HAART) and HIV-negative subjects. Epigenetics. 2013;8:703–9.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.•
    Regan PM, Dave RS, Datta PK, Khalili K. Epigenetics of micro-opioid receptors: intersection with HIV-1 infection of the central nervous system. J Cell Physiol. 2012;227:2832–41. Review of what is known about epigenetic regulation of μ-opioid receptor (MOR) expression, (epigenetic and transcriptional regulation as well as alternative splicing), which discusses how differential regulation of newly identified MOR isoforms by opioids and HIV-1 may impact HAND.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Hulgan T SD, Bush W, Ellis R, Letendre S, Straub P, Murdock D, Franklin D, Grant I, and Kallianpur A for the CHARTER Group.: Mitochondrial DNA haplogroups and neurocognitive impairment in the CHARTER Cohort. Abstract#465, 21st Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; March 5-8, Boston, MA, USA, 2014.Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Kallianpur AR CJ, Coe CC, Gelman BB: Brain iron transport is associated with neurocognitive performance in HIV/AIDS. Abstract#458, 21st Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; March 5-8, Boston, MA, USA, 2014.Google Scholar
  125. 125.•
    Pitcher J, Abt A, Myers J, et al. Neuronal ferritin heavy chain and drug abuse affect HIV-associated cognitive dysfunction. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:656–69. This study makes potentially important links between iron metabolism in the brain, regulation of chemokines involved in neuronal function, and opiate-induced dendritic injury in humans with HAND and confirmed these findings in the non-human primate model of neuroAIDS.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Gill AJ, Ambegaokar SS, Kovacsics CE, Cross SA, Gelman BB, Kolson DL. Heme oxygenase-1 polymorphisms and protein deficiency associated with neurological disease in HIV, 21st Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; March 5-8. Boston: MA, USA; 2014.Google Scholar
  127. 127.•
    Holzinger ER, Hulgan T, Ellis RJ, et al. Mitochondrial DNA variation and HIV-associated sensory neuropathy in CHARTER. J Neurovirol. 2012;18:511–20. This mitochondrial genome-wide study supports the concept that mitochondrial DNA variants can modulate HIV neuropathogenesis, although peripheral neuropathy, not HAND, was studied.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Kallianpur AR, Hulgan T, Canter JA, et al. Hemochromatosis (HFE) gene mutations and peripheral neuropathy during antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2006;20:1503–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.•
    Granziera C, Daducci A, Simioni S, et al. Micro-structural brain alterations in aviremic HIV+ patients with minor neurocognitive disorders: a multi-contrast study at high field. PLoS One. 2013;8:e72547. This study, involving HIV+ subjects with and without mild neurocognitive disorder (MND) whose viral load was undetectable, showed micro-structural brain tissue alterations in MND+ patients on effective cART and suggested the value of multi-contrast, high-field MRI in discriminating between HIV+ patients on cART with and without mild HAND.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Morales D, Acevedo SF, Skolasky RL, et al. Translational spatial task and its relationship to HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders and apolipoprotein E in HIV-seropositive women. J Neurovirol. 2012;18:488–502.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.•
    Steinbrink F, Evers S, Buerke B, et al. Cognitive impairment in HIV infection is associated with MRI and CSF pattern of neurodegeneration. Eur J Neurol. 2013;20:420–8. This MRI and CSF study in 94 HIV-infected patients without opportunistic infections confirmed correlations between patterns of brain damage, CSF levels of total tau protein, and HAND as distinct from Alzheimer's disease.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Everall I, Vaida F, Khanlou N, et al. Cliniconeuropathologic correlates of human immunodeficiency virus in the era of antiretroviral therapy. J Neurovirol. 2009;15:360–70.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.•
    Soontornniyomkij V, Moore DJ, Gouaux B, et al. Cerebral beta-amyloid deposition predicts HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders in APOE epsilon4 carriers. AIDS. 2012;26:2327–35. This clinicopathological study of brain specimens from the National neuroAIDS Tissue Consortium modeled beta-amyloid deposition in subjects with and without HAND on APOE epsilon-4 genotype, older age, and other predictors.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Weber E, Morgan EE, Iudicello JE, et al. Substance use is a risk factor for neurocognitive deficits and neuropsychiatric distress in acute and early HIV infection. J Neurovirol. 2013;19:65–74.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.•
    Huidobro C, Fernandez AF, Fraga MF. The role of genetics in the establishment and maintenance of the epigenome. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70:1543–73. This article reviews the evidence for genetic regulation of epigenetic modifications and discusses their contribution to human genetic diseases.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Crowell CS, Malee KM, Yogev R, Muller WJ. Neurologic disease in HIV-infected children and the impact of combination antiretroviral therapy. Rev Med Virol. 2014. doi:10.1002/rmv.1793.
  137. 137.
    Hestad KA, Menon JA, Silalukey-Ngoma M, et al. Sex differences in neuropsychological performance as an effect of human immunodeficiency virus infection: a pilot study in Zambia. Africa J Nerv Ment Dis. 2012;200:336–42.Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Martin E. Substance dependence and NeuroAIDS. Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2005;19:559–60.Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Blackstone K, Moore DJ, Franklin DR, et al. Defining neurocognitive impairment in HIV: deficit scores versus clinical ratings. Clin Neuropsychol. 2012;26:894–908.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Tarr PE, Telenti A. Genetic screening for metabolic and age-related complications in HIV-infected persons. F1000 medicine reports. 2010;2:83.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Valcour VG. Evaluating cognitive impairment in the clinical setting: practical screening and assessment tools. Topics Antiviral Medicine. 2011;19:175–80.Google Scholar
  142. 142.•
    Grant I, Franklin DR, Jr., Deutsch R, et al. Asymptomatic HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment increases risk for symptomatic decline. Neurology. 2014 May 9. [Epub ahead of print]. Very recent longitudinal study in a subset of intensively phenotyped participants from the CHARTER cohort that definitively addresses clinical relevance of ANI: rates of decline to symptomatic HAND were much higher in subjects with ANI versus normal neurocognitive function at baseline. Google Scholar
  143. 143.•
    Cassol E, Misra V, Morgello S, Gabuzda D. Applications and limitations of inflammatory biomarkers for studies on neurocognitive impairment in HIV infection. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2013;8:1087–97. This paper reviews promising biomarkers for HAND and introduces a systems-analysis pipeline to reduce common sources of noise and more easily identify relevant biomarkers.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.•
    Holman AG, Gabuzda D. A machine learning approach for identifying amino acid signatures in the HIV env gene predictive of dementia. PLoS One. 2012;7:e49538. This paper discusses the use of machine learning tools for analyzing “omics” data, to identify and validate signatures predictive of HAND.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.•
    Foo JN, Liu JJ, Tan EK. Whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing in neurological diseases. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012;8:508–17. This paper discusses the challenges of identifying rare and common variants that play a role in complex neurodegenerative diseases and the use of massively parallel, whole-genomic and whole-exomic sequencing technologies to further personalized medicine in this area.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:559.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Choi M, Scholl UI, Ji WZ, et al. Genetic diagnosis by whole exome capture and massively parallel DNA sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:19096–101.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Moore DJ, Masliah E, Rippeth JD, et al. Cortical and subcortical neurodegeneration is associated with HIV neurocognitive impairment. AIDS. 2006;20:879–87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Bertrand SJ, Mactutus CF, Aksenova MV, Espensen-Sturges TD, Booze RM. Synaptodendritic recovery following HIV Tat exposure: neurorestoration by phytoestrogens. J Neurochem. 2014;128:140–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.•
    Jahanshad N, Rajagopalan P, Thompson PM. Neuroimaging, nutrition, and iron-related genes. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70:4449–61. This study reviews the role of neuroimaging as a means of identifying associations between genetic variations in highly regulated processes such as iron metabolism, brain structural integrity, and cognition.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.•
    Chang L, Jiang C, Cunningham E, et al. Effects of APOE epsilon4, age, and HIV on glial metabolites and cognitive deficits. Neurology. 2014;82:2213–22. A cross-sectional study investigating the joint effects of HIV and APOE ε4 genotype on glial metabolite levels and neurocognitive function in HIV-infected individuals.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Genomic Medicine Institute, Lerner Research InstituteCleveland Clinic FoundationClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Molecular MedicineCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA
  3. 3.Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations