Current HIV/AIDS Reports

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 142–151 | Cite as

Use of Antiretrovirals for HIV Prevention: What Do We Know and What Don’t We Know?

  • Jared M. BaetenEmail author
  • Robert Grant
The Global Epidemic (Q Abdool Karim, Section Editor)


Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), in which HIV uninfected persons with ongoing HIV risk use antiretroviral medications as chemoprophylaxis against sexual HIV acquisition, is a promising new HIV prevention strategy. Proof-of-concept that PrEP, as oral or vaginal topical tenofovir-based products, protects against sexual HIV acquisition has been demonstrated in clinical trials conducted among men who have sex with men and heterosexual men and women. The degree of HIV protection in these trials was strongly related to the level of adherence to PrEP. Many questions are yet unanswered – including how to motivate uptake of and sustain adherence to PrEP for HIV prevention, how much PrEP use is enough to achieve HIV protection, and the potential of “next-generation” PrEP agents to improve on this effective technology.


Antiretroviral medications Chemoprophylaxis Global epidemic HIV/AIDS HIV prevention Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) Sexual HIV transmission 



The authors acknowledge the funding support of US National Institutes of Health (R01 MH095507, R01 AI064002, R01 AI062333), the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (grants 47674 and 48162) and Gladstone Institutes.

The authors have conducted research studies related to pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention supported with grant funding from the US National Institutes of Health, the US Agency for International Development, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Gilead Sciences provided study medication for these studies but did not provide funding to the authors or their institutions.

Conflict of Interest

Jared Baeten declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Robert Grant declares that he has no conflict of interest.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Cohen MS, Gay C, Kashuba AD, Blower S, Paxton L. Narrative review: antiretroviral therapy to prevent the sexual transmission of HIV-1. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:591–601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baeten J, Celum C. Systemic and topical drugs for the prevention of HIV infection: antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis. Annu Rev Med. 2012;27:27.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    •• Cohen MS, Chen YQ, McCauley M, Gamble T, Hosseinipour MC, et al. Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:493–505. This randomized clinical trial provided definitive evidence that use of antiretroviral treatment by HIV-infected persons reduces the risk of HIV transmission to sexual partner. Use of antiretroviral medications for treatment of HIV infected persons to reduce infectiousness and PrEP for HIV uninfected persons to reduce susceptibility are complementary prevention strategies.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Donnell D, Baeten JM, Kiarie J, Thomas KK, Stevens W, et al. Heterosexual HIV-1 transmission after initiation of antiretroviral therapy: a prospective cohort analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:2092–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    •• Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, Mugo NR, Campbell JD, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:399–410. This randomized clinical trial demonstrated that oral PrEP using daily oral FTC/TDF and daily oral TDF alon, was efficacious for prevention of HIV acquisition in both heterosexual men and women who were in HIV serodiscordant partnerships.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    •• Grant RM, Lama JR, Anderson PL, McMahan V, Liu AY, et al. Preexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2587–99. This randomized clincal trial demonstrated that oral PrEP, using daily oral FTC/TDF, was efficacious for prevention of HIV acquisition in men who have sex with men.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    •• Thigpen MC, Kebaabetswe PM, Paxton LA, Smith DK, Rose CE, et al. Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:423–34. This randomized clinical trial provides additional evidence of the efficacy FTC/TDF PrEP for HIV prevention among heterosexuals.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    UNAIDS. World AIDS Day Report 2012.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    UNAIDS/WHO. AIDS Epidemic Update 2009.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pettifor AE, Rees HV, Kleinschmidt I, Steffenson AE, MacPhail C, et al. Young people's sexual health in South Africa: HIV prevalence and sexual behaviors from a nationally representative household survey. AIDS. 2005;19:1525–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dunkle KL, Stephenson R, Karita E, Chomba E, Kayitenkore K, et al. New heterosexually transmitted HIV infections in married or cohabitating couples in urban Zambia and Rwanda: an analysis of survey and clinical data. Lancet. 2008;371:2183–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Curran K, Baeten JM, Coates TJ, Kurth A, Mugo NR, Celum C. HIV-1 prevention for HIV-1 serodiscordant couples. Current HIV/AIDS Reports. 2012;9:160–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baral S, Sifakis F, Cleghorn F, Beyrer C. Elevated risk for HIV infection among men who have sex with men in low- and middle-income countries 2000–2006: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kumwenda NI, Hoover DR, Mofenson LM, Thigpen MC, Kafulafula G, et al. Extended antiretroviral prophylaxis to reduce breast-milk HIV-1 transmission. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:119–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mofenson LM. Protecting the next generation–eliminating perinatal HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2316–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Connor EM, Sperling RS, Gelber R, Kiselev P, Scott G, et al. Reduction of maternal-infant transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with zidovudine treatment. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 076 Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1173–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guay LA, Musoke P, Fleming T, Bagenda D, Allen M, et al. Intrapartum and neonatal single-dose nevirapine compared with zidovudine for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1 in Kampala, Uganda: HIVNET 012 randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:795–802.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garcia-Lerma JG, Otten RA, Qari SH, Jackson E, Cong ME, et al. Prevention of rectal SHIV transmission in macaques by daily or intermittent prophylaxis with emtricitabine and tenofovir. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tsai CC, Follis KE, Sabo A, Beck TW, Grant RF, et al. Prevention of SIV infection in macaques by (R)-9-(2-phosphonylmethoxypropyl)adenine. Science. 1995;270:1197–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garcia-Lerma JG, Cong ME, Mitchell J, Youngpairoj AS, Zheng Q, et al. Intermittent prophylaxis with oral truvada protects macaques from rectal SHIV infection. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:14ra4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parikh UM, Dobard C, Sharma S, Cong ME, Jia H, et al. Complete protection from repeated vaginal simian-human immunodeficiency virus exposures in macaques by a topical gel containing tenofovir alone or with emtricitabine. J Virol. 2009;83:10358–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Subbarao S, Otten RA, Ramos A, Kim C, Jackson E, et al. Chemoprophylaxis with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate provided partial protection against infection with simian human immunodeficiency virus in macaques given multiple virus challenges. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:904–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    • Hendrix CW. The clinical pharmacology of antiretrovirals for HIV prevention. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2012;7:498–504. This recent article comprehensively reviews the clinical pharmacology of PrEP for HIV prevention.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kashuba AD, Patterson KB, Dumond JB, Cohen MS. Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention: how to predict success. Lancet. 2011;6:6.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Patterson KB, Prince HA, Kraft E, Jenkins AJ, Shaheen NJ, et al. Penetration of tenofovir and emtricitabine in mucosal tissues: implications for prevention of HIV-1 transmission. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:112re4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    • Abdool Karim SS, Kashuba AD, Werner L, Abdool Karim QA. Drug concentrations after topical and oral antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis: implications for HIV prevention in women. Lancet. 2011;378:279–81. This report details the relationship between tenofovir exposure and HIV protection in the CAPRISA 004 study.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    •• Abdool Karim Q, Abdool Karim SS, Frohlich JA, Grobler AC, Baxter C, et al. Effectiveness and safety of tenofovir gel, an antiretroviral microbicide, for the prevention of HIV infection in women. Science. 2010;329:1168–74. This randomized clinical trial demonstrated that 1 % tenofovir vaginal gel, when used with coitus, reduced HIV risk in South African women.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stein ZA. HIV prevention: the need for methods women can use. Am J Public Health. 1990;80:460–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mujugira A, Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, Mugo NR, et al. Characteristics of HIV-1 serodiscordant couples enrolled in a clinical trial of antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-1 prevention. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25828.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    • Karim SS, Karim QA. Antiretroviral prophylaxis: a defining moment in HIV control. Lancet. 2011;378:e23–5. This commentary succinctly presents the importance of PrEP trials for HIV prevention.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    • van der Straten A, Van Damme L, Haberer JE, Bangsberg DR. Unraveling the divergent results of pre-exposure prophylaxis trials for HIV prevention. AIDS. 2012;26:F13–9. This review article summarizes possible hypotheses for divergent PrEP trial results.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    •• Van Damme L, Corneli A, Ahmed K, Agot K, Lombaard J, et al. Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:411–22. This randomized clinical trial among women from Kenya, South Africa, and Tanzania failed to demonstration HIV protection using emtricitabine/tenofovir oral PrEP, likely as a result of low PrEP use.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). NIH modifies ‘VOICE’ HIV prevention study in women. 2011.
  34. 34.
    National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). NIH discontinues tenofovir vaginal gel in 'Voice' HIV prevention study. 2011.
  35. 35.
    Martin M, Vanichseni S, Suntharasamai P, Sangkum U, Chuachoowong R, et al. Enrollment characteristics and risk behaviors of injection drug users participating in the Bangkok Tenofovir Study, Thailand. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    The IPERGAY Study. 2012.
  37. 37.
    • Anderson PL, Glidden DV, Liu A, Buchbinder S, Lama JR, et al. Emtricitabine-tenofovir concentrations and pre-exposure prophylaxis efficacy in men who have sex with men. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:151ra25. This recent article details the relationship between PrEP blood concentrations and HIV protection in the iPrEx study.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bangsberg D, Haberer J, Psaros C, Baeten J, Katabira E, et al. High adherence and high effectiveness observed in HIV discordant couples: Partners PrEP Study, adherence monitoring and counseling substudy. Proc. 19th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), Seattle, WA, 2012:Abstract 1067.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Donnell D, Baeten J, Hendrix C, Bumpus N, Bangsberg D, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate drug levels indicate PrEP use is strongly correlated with HIV-1 protective effects: Kenya and Uganda. Proc. 19th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), Seattle, WA, 2012:Abstract 30.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Liu A, Vittinghoff E, Irby R, Mulligan K, Sellmeyer D, et al. BMD loss in HIV– men participating in a TDF PrEP clinical trial in San Francisco. Proc. 18th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), Boston, MA, 2011:Abstract 93.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mugo N, Celum C, Donnell D, Campbell J, Bukusi E, et al. Pregnancy incidence and birth outcomes in a clinical trial of PrEP: Uganda and Kenya. Proc. 19th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Seattle, USA, 5–8 March 2012:Abstract 1060.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry Interim Report, 1 January 1989 through 31 July 2011.
  43. 43.
    Anderson P, Meditz A, Zheng J-H, Predhomme J, Klein B, et al. Cellular pharmacology of tenofovir and emtricitabine in blood, rectal, and cervical cells from HIV– volunteers. Proc. 19th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI), Seattle, WA, 2012:Abstract 587.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    • Amico KR. Adherence to preexposure chemoprophylaxis: the behavioral bridge from efficacy to effectiveness. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2012;7:542–8. This review article addresses key challenges in adherence to PrEP.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Matthews LT, Baeten JM, Celum C, Bangsberg DR. Periconception pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV transmission: benefits, risks, and challenges to implementation. AIDS. 2010;24:1975–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mutua G, Sanders E, Mugo P, Anzala O, Haberer JE, et al. Safety and adherence to intermittent pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV-1 in African men who have sex with men and female sex workers. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    HIV Prevention Trials Network. HPTN 067 - The ADAPT Study: A phase II, randomized, open-label, pharmacokinetic and behavioral study of the use of intermittent oral emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). 2011.
  48. 48.
    • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves first drug for reducing the risk of sexually acquired HIV infection. 2012. US FDA approval of a label indication for FTC/TDF as PrEP for HIV prevention.
  49. 49.
    • World Health Organization. Guidance on pre-exposure oral prophylaxis (PrEP) for serodiscordant couples, men and transgender women who have sex with men at high risk of HIV: recommendation for use in the context of demonstration projects, World Health Organization, Geneva. 2012. WHO guidance on next steps for implementing PrEP for HIV prevention.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    • Interim guidance for clinicians considering the use of preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in heterosexually active adults. MMWR. 2012;61:586–9. US CDC guidance on prescribing PrEP for HIV prevention in heterosexuals.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    • Interim guidance: preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection in men who have sex with men. MMWR. 2011;60:65–8. US CDC guidance on prescribing PrEP for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hallett TB, Baeten JM, Heffron R, Barnabas R, de Bruyn G, et al. Optimal uses of antiretrovirals for prevention in HIV-1 serodiscordant heterosexual couples in South Africa: a modelling study. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1001123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Juusola JL, Brandeau ML, Owens DK, Bendavid E. The cost-effectiveness of preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention in the United States in men who have sex with men. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:541–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Walensky RP, Park JE, Wood R, Freedberg KA, Scott CA, et al. The cost-effectiveness of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection in South African women. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:1504–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Karim SS, Kashuba AD, Werner L, Karim QA. Drug concentrations after topical and oral antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis: implications for HIV prevention in women. Lancet. 2011;378:279–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Follow on Africa Consortium for Tenofovir Studies. 2010. FACTS 001 -- Tenofovir Gel Study.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Global Health, Medicine, and EpidemiologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Gladstone InstitutesUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations