Behavioral aspects of male circumcision for the prevention of HIV infection
Male circumcision (MC) can prevent female-to-male HIV transmission and has the potential to significantly alter HIV epidemics. The ultimate impact of MC on HIV prevention will be determined, in part, by behavioral factors. In order to fully realize the protective benefits of MC, factors related to acceptability and sexual risk must be considered. Research shows that acceptability of MC among uncircumcised men is high, and suggests that free and safe circumcision may be taken up in places with high HIV prevalence. Perceptions of adverse effects of MC may, however, limit uptake. Furthermore, considerable risk reduction counseling provided by MC trials limits our ability to understand the impact MC may have on behavior. There is also no evidence that MC protects women with HIV-positive partners or that it offers protection during anal intercourse. Research is urgently needed to better understand and manage the behavioral implications of MC for HIV prevention.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References and Recommended Reading
- 5.Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, et al.: Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 trial. PLoS Med 2005, 11:1112–1122.Google Scholar
- 11.Sassan-Morokro M, Greenberg AE, Coulibaly IM, et al.: High rates of sexual contact with female sex workers, sexually transmitted diseases, and condom neglect among HIV-infected and uninfected men with tuberculosis in Abidjan, Cote d’Ivoire. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 1996, 11:183–187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Shaffer D, Bautista C, Sateren W, et al.: The protective effect of circumcision on HIV incidence in rural low-risk men circumcised predominantly by traditional circumcisers in Kenya: two-year follow-up of the Kericho Cohort Study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2007, 45:371–379.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.WHO/UNAIDS: New Data on Male Circumcision and HIV Prevention: Policy and Programme Implications. Montreux, Switzerland: WHO/UNAIDS Technical Consultation; 2007.Google Scholar
- 21.Siegfried N, Muller M, Volmink J, et al.: Male circumcision for prevention of heterosexual acquisition of HIV in men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003, CD003362.Google Scholar
- 34.Mattson CL, Campbell RT, Bailey RC, et al.: Risk compensation is not associated with male circumcision in Kisumu, Kenya: a multi-faceted assessment of men enrolled in a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2008, 6:1–9.Google Scholar
- 36.Bailey RC, Muga R, Poulussen R, Abicht H: The acceptability of male circumcision to reduce HIV infections in Nyanza Province, Kenya. AIDS Care 2002, 1:27–40.Google Scholar
- 39.Kalichman SC, Simbayi LC, Cain D, Jooste S: Heterosexual anal intercourse among community and clinical settings in Cape Town, South Africa. Sex Transm Infect 2009 May 7 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
- 45.Brooks R, Etzel M, Klosinski L, et al.: Male circumcision and HIV prevention: looking to the future. AIDS Behav 2009 Feb 11 (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar