Advertisement

Current Hepatology Reports

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 287–293 | Cite as

The Role of Liver Biopsy in Drug-Induced Liver Injury

  • David E. KleinerEmail author
Drug-Induced Liver Injury (P Hayashi, Section Editor)
  • 12 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This review presents the current understanding of the role played by liver biopsy in the diagnosis and management of drug-induced liver injury (DILI).

Recent Findings

While liver biopsy remains an optional procedure in the evaluation of DILI, it has the potential to provide detailed information about the state of the liver. Recent histological surveys of DILI provide a framework for categorizing the patterns of injury that may be seen. Pattern information can be used to distinguish DILI from other potential causes of injury, both other acute injuries as well as pre-existing injury. The pattern of injury is related to differential diagnosis and in some cases can suggest a mechanism of injury. The character and severity of the injury could potentially be used in clinical decision-making. Examples of the use of liver biopsy in the context of DILI encountered in clinical trials are provided which highlight these points.

Summary

Liver biopsy may be a useful tool in DILI evaluation, particularly in complex clinical situations and clinical trials with experimental therapies.

Keywords

Hepatotoxicity Acute hepatitis Cholestasis Checkpoint inhibitor Clinical trial 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Dr. Kleiner prepared the manuscript, including all figures and tables.

Funding Information

This review was financially supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

David E. Kleiner declares no potential conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Rockey DC, Caldwell SH, Goodman ZD, Nelson RC, Smith AD. American Association for the Study of Liver D. Liver biopsy. Hepatology. 2009;49(3):1017–44.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.22742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Suh N, Liapis H, Misdraji J, Brunt EM, Wang HL. Epstein-Barr virus hepatitis: diagnostic value of in situ hybridization, polymerase chain reaction, and immunohistochemistry on liver biopsy from immunocompetent patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(9):1403–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mullick FG, Ishak KG. Hepatic injury associated with diphenylhydantoin therapy. A clinicopathologic study of 20 cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1980;74(4):442–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Uetrecht J, Zahid N, Shear NH, Biggar WD. Metabolism of dapsone to a hydroxylamine by human neutrophils and mononuclear cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988;245(1):274–9.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Popper H, Rubin E, Cardiol D, Schaffner F, Paronetto F. Drug-induced liver disease: a penalty for progress. Arch Intern Med. 1965;115:128–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zimmerman HJ. Hepatotoxicity: the adverse effects of drugs and other chemicals on the liver. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 1999.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kleiner DE, Chalasani NP, Lee WM, Fontana RJ, Bonkovsky HL, Watkins PB, et al. Hepatic histological findings in suspected drug-induced liver injury: systematic evaluation and clinical associations. Hepatology. 2014;59(2):661–70.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.26709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    •• Wang T, Zhao X, Shao C, Ye L, Guo J, Peng N, et al. A proposed pathologic sub-classification of drug-induced liver injury. Hepatol Int. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-019-09940-9 Adds a new histologic classification system that may be better fitted for DILI cases from Asia .
  9. 9.
    Philips CA, Paramaguru R, Joy AK, Antony KL, Augustine P. Clinical outcomes, histopathological patterns, and chemical analysis of Ayurveda and herbal medicine associated with severe liver injury-a single-center experience from southern India. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2018;37(1):9–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-017-0815-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bjornsson E, Kalaitzakis E, Olsson R. The impact of eosinophilia and hepatic necrosis on prognosis in patients with drug-induced liver injury. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25(12):1411–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ndekwe P, Ghabril MS, Zang Y, Mann SA, Cummings OW, Lin J. Substantial hepatic necrosis is prognostic in fulminant liver failure. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(23):4303–10.  https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i23.4303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaur S, Siddiqui H, Bhat MH. Hepatic progenitor cells in action: liver regeneration or fibrosis? Am J Pathol. 2015;185(9):2342–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katoonizadeh A, Nevens F, Verslype C, Pirenne J, Roskams T. Liver regeneration in acute severe liver impairment: a clinicopathological correlation study. Liver Int. 2006;26(10):1225–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tandra S, Yeh MM, Brunt EM, Vuppalanchi R, Cummings OW, Unalp-Arida A, et al. Presence and significance of microvesicular steatosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2011;55(3):654–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2010.11.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ishak KG, Zimmerman HJ. Drug-induced and toxic granulomatous hepatitis. Baillieres Clin Gastroenterol. 1988;2(2):463–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    • Czeczok TW, Van Arnam JS, Wood LD, Torbenson MS, Mounajjed T. The almost-normal liver biopsy: presentation, clinical associations, and outcome. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41(9):1247–53.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000881 Careful examination of the etiological challenges presented by biopsies with minimal findings . CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dara L, Liu ZX, Kaplowitz N. Mechanisms of adaptation and progression in idiosyncratic drug induced liver injury, clinical implications. Liver Int. 2016;36(2):158–65.  https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.12988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fontana RJ, Hayashi PH, Barnhart H, Kleiner DE, Reddy KR, Chalasani N, et al. Persistent liver biochemistry abnormalities are more common in older patients and those with cholestatic drug induced liver injury. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(10):1450–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2015.283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    • Bonkovsky HL, Kleiner DE, Gu J, Odin JA, Russo MW, Navarro VM, et al. Clinical presentations and outcomes of bile duct loss caused by drugs and herbal and dietary supplements. Hepatology. 2017;65(4):1267–77.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28967 Detailed description of histology and clinical outcomes for vanishing bile duct syndrome due to DILI. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McKenzie R, Fried MW, Sallie R, Conjeevaram H, Di Bisceglie AM, Park Y, et al. Hepatic failure and lactic acidosis due to fialuridine (FIAU), an investigational nucleoside analogue for chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(17):1099–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kleiner DE, Gaffey MJ, Sallie R, Tsokos M, Nichols L, McKenzie R, et al. Histopathologic changes associated with fialuridine hepatotoxicity. Mod Pathol. 1997;10(3):192–9.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Freiman JP, Helfert KE, Hamrell MR, Stein DS. Hepatomegaly with severe steatosis in HIV-seropositive patients. Aids. 1993;7(3):379–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lai KK, Gang DL, Zawacki JK, Cooley TP. Fulminant hepatic failure associated with 2′,3′-dideoxyinosine (ddI). Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(4):283–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lewis W, Levine ES, Griniuviene B, Tankersley KO, Colacino JM, Sommadossi JP, et al. Fialuridine and its metabolites inhibit DNA polymerase gamma at sites of multiple adjacent analog incorporation, decrease mtDNA abundance, and cause mitochondrial structural defects in cultured hepatoblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(8):3592–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    • Palmieri DJ, Carlino MS. Immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicity. Curr Oncol Rep. 2018;20(9):72.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-018-0718-6 Comprehensive summary of systemic immune-related adverse events across the spectum of checkpoint inhibitors . CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Phan GQ, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Hwu P, Topalian SL, Schwartzentruber DJ, et al. Cancer regression and autoimmunity induced by cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(14):8372–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kleiner DE, Berman D. Pathologic changes in ipilimumab-related hepatitis in patients with metastatic melanoma. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57(8):2233–40.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2140-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Johncilla M, Misdraji J, Pratt DS, Agoston AT, Lauwers GY, Srivastava A, et al. Ipilimumab-associated hepatitis: clinicopathologic characterization in a series of 11 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39(8):1075–84.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Everett J, Srivastava A, Misdraji J. Fibrin ring granulomas in checkpoint inhibitor-induced hepatitis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41(1):134–7.  https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    •• Zen Y, Yeh MM. Hepatotoxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a histology study of seven cases in comparison with autoimmune hepatitis and idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury. Mod Pathol. 2018;31(6):965–73.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-018-0013-y Provides histologic description of a growing class of agents that can cause DILI felt to be immune mediated. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Aivazian K, Long GV, Sinclair EC, Kench JG, McKenzie CA. Histopathology of pembrolizumab-induced hepatitis: a case report. Pathology. 2017;49(7):789–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Guidelines for diagnosis of therapeutic drug-induced liver injury in liver biopsies. Lancet. 1974;1(7862):854–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of PathologyNational Cancer InstituteBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations