Alternative Donor Transplantation—“Mixing and Matching”: the Role of Combined Cord Blood and Haplo-Identical Donor Transplantation (Haplo-Cord SCT) as a Treatment Strategy for Patients Lacking Standard Donors?
- 337 Downloads
In the past decade, haplo-cord stem cell transplantation (SCT) using myeloablative or reduced intensive conditioning regimens has been shown to result in reliable and fast engraftment of neutrophils and platelets comparable to HLA-matched donors and much faster than after cord stem cell transplant. Haplo-cord SCT also has a low incidence of early non-relapse mortality, low incidences of acute and chronic graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), and excellent graft-vs-leukemia (GVL) effects. Favorable long-term outcomes for high-risk patients with hematologic malignancies have been reported, including older patients. Haplo-cord SCT will likely overcome the limitations of cell dose during cord stem cell selection and might significantly expand the use of cord stem cell transplant in the adult population. The comparable survival outcomes of matched related donor (MRD), matched unrelated donor (MUD), and haplo-cord stem cell transplant strongly argue that haplo-cord SCT should be considered as effective alternative stem cell transplant for high-risk patients lacking standard donors. Further improvement in supportive care and incorporation of a better understanding of the human fetal immune development into the haplo-cord SCT are required to further improve this strategy.
KeywordsHaplo-cord SCT Umbilical cord blood transplant Third-party donor cells Reduced intensity conditioning T cell depletion
Compliance with Ethics Guidelines
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Hongtao Liu is supported by grant from Cancer Research Foundation and K12 Paul Calabresi award.
Dr. Koen van Besien has research support from Miltenyi Biotec.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 2.Gupta V, Tallman MS, He W, Logan BR, Copelan E, Gale RP, et al. Comparable survival after HLA-well-matched unrelated or matched sibling donor transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission with unfavorable cytogenetics at diagnosis. Blood. 2010;116(11):1839–48.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Schlenk RF, Dohner K, Mack S, Stoppel M, Kiraly F, Gotze K, et al. Prospective evaluation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation from matched related and matched unrelated donors in younger adults with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia: German-Austrian trial AMLHD98A. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(30):4642–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Walter RB, Pagel JM, Gooley TA, Petersdorf EW, Sorror ML, Woolfrey AE. Comparison of matched unrelated and matched related donor myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation for adults with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. Leukemia. 2010;24:1276–82.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.••Gragert L, Eapen M, Williams E, Freeman J, Spellman S, Baitty R, et al. HLA match likelihoods for hematopoietic stem-cell grafts in the U.S. registry. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(4):339–48. Latest data on the likelihood to find a stem cell donor for different ethnicities from NMDP.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Luznik L, O’Donnell PV, Symons HJ, Chen AR, Leffell MS, Zahurak M, et al. HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies using nonmyeloablative conditioning and high-dose, posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14(6):641–50.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.••Wagner JE, Eapen M, Carter S, Wang Y, Schultz KR, Wall DA, et al. One-unit versus two-unit cord-blood transplantation for hematologic cancers. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(18):1685–94. Prospective randomized study to demonstate comparable outcomes after double cord and signle cord transplant in pediatric patients with hematologic cancers.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Ruggeri A, Sanz G, Bittencourt H, Sanz J, Rambaldi A, Volt F, et al. Comparison of outcomes after single or double cord blood transplantation in adults with acute leukemia using different types of myeloablative conditioning regimen, a retrospective study on behalf of Eurocord and the Acute Leukemia Working Party of EBMT. Leukemia. 2013;28(4):779–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.••Liu H, Rich ES, Godley L, Odenike O, Joseph L, Marino S, et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning with combined haploidentical and cord blood transplantation results in rapid engraftment, low GVHD, and durable remissions. Blood. 2011;118(24):6438–45. First publication of RIC haplo-cord SCT in patients with hematologic malignancies.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Jacobson CA, Turki AT, McDonough SM, Stevenson KE, Kim HT, Kao G, et al. Immune reconstitution after double umbilical cord blood stem cell transplantation: comparison with unrelated peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;18(4):565–74.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Majhail NS, Brunstein CG, Tomblyn M, Thomas AJ, Miller JS, Arora M, et al. Reduced-intensity allogeneic transplant in patients older than 55 years: unrelated umbilical cord blood is safe and effective for patients without a matched related donor. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008;14(3):282–9.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Brunstein CG, Fuchs EJ, Carter SL, Karanes C, Costa LJ, Wu J. Alternative donor transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning: results of parallel phase 2 trials using partially HLA-mismatched related bone marrow or unrelated double umbilical cord blood grafts. Blood. 2011;118:282–8.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Fernandez MN, Regidor C, Cabrera R, Garcia-Marco JA, Fores R, Sanjuan I, et al. Unrelated umbilical cord blood transplants in adults: early recovery of neutrophils by supportive co-transplantation of a low number of highly purified peripheral blood CD34+ cells from an HLA-haploidentical donor. Exp Hematol. 2003;31(6):535–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.••Kwon M, Bautista G, Balsalobre P, Sanchez-Ortega I, Serrano D, Anguita J, et al. Haplo-Cord Transplantation Using CD34 Cells from a Third-Party Donor to Speed Engraftment in High-Risk Patients with Hematologic Disorders. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014. The latest update of the outcomes of the largest so far cohort of 132 patients underwent myeloablative haplo-cord SCT in three Spanish institutions.Google Scholar
- 35.••Van Besien K, Liu H, Jain N, Stock W, Artz A. Umbilical cord blood transplantation supported by third-party donor cells: rationale, results, and applications. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19(5):682–91. Excellent review article on the halpo-cord SCT including deep discussion of the underlying fetal immune characteristics.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.•Kwon M, Martinez-Laperche C, Balsalobre P, Serrano D, Anguita J, Gayoso J, et al. Early peripheral blood and T-cell chimerism dynamics after umbilical cord blood transplantation supported with haploidentical cells. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49(2):212–8. Characteristics of chimerism dynamics after myeloablative haplo-cord SCT, and prediction of successful engraftment or graft failure using the early chimerism dynamics.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 43.Sebrango A, Vicuna I, de Laiglesia A, Millan I, Bautista G, Martin-Donaire T, et al. Haematopoietic transplants combining a single unrelated cord blood unit and mobilized haematopoietic stem cells from an adult HLA-mismatched third party donor. Comparable results to transplants from HLA-identical related donors in adults with acute leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2010;23(2):259–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 44.•Kwon M, Balsalobre P, Serrano D, PÃ©rez Corral A, BuÃ ± o I, Anguita J, et al. Single cord blood combined with HLA-mismatched third party donor cells: comparable results to matched unrelated donor transplantation in high-risk patients with hematologic disorders. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19(1):143–9. In this retrospective analysis with relatively small patient number, comparable clinical outcomes were found between haplo-cord SCT and MUD SCT in high risk patients with hematologic disorders.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.Rhodes J, van Besien K, Liu H, Gergis U, Tsai SB, Mayer S, et al. Haplo-Cord Transplantation Vs Unrelated Donor Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with AML/MDS Older Than 502,014 2014-12-06 00:00:00. 1235- p.Google Scholar
- 46.Van Besien K, Artz AS, Zhang MJ, Cushing M, Wickrema A, Korman S, et al. Haplo + cord transplantation: Neutrophil and platelet recovery and long-term survival compared to double umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation—a case-cohort analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:(5S,):abstr 7004.Google Scholar