Quality Measures in Heart Failure: the Past, the Present, and the Future
- 256 Downloads
Purpose of Review
This paper reviews performance measure in health, their importance, and methodologic issues, focusing on metrics for health failure patients. Quality measures are instruments to assess structural aspects or processes of care aiming to guarantee that optimal patient outcomes are achieved. As heart failure is a chronic condition in which established therapies reduce mortality and hospital admissions, there are quite a lot of initiatives that aim to monitor for quality of care and to coordinate the disease management.
Several performance measures were validated for these patients, from process of care (left ventricular function assessment and use of ACEi/ARBs and beta-blockers) to health outcomes (hospital mortality and readmissions). In the early years, studies demonstrated a relationship between quality measurements and health outcomes. Nonetheless, more recent ones based on large databases of patients’ medical records have shown that traditional indicators explain only a small fraction of health and patient reported- and perceived outcomes. Public reporting of quality measures and payment conditioned to the quality of care provided were not able to show benefit in terms of hard outcomes. Data science and big data methods are promising in providing actionable knowledge for quality improvement, with real-time data that could support decision-making.
Heart failure is a chronic condition that has proven to be useful for measuring medical and healthcare quality. Evidence-based indicators have already reached high rates of adherence and are currently poorly correlated with outcomes. Using real-life data and based on the patient’s perspective can be useful tools to improve these indicators.
KeywordsQuality of care Health indicators Heart failure Outcome Readmission Big data
Compliance With Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). [Accessed March 27, 2014] Medicare Health Support. 2012. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-General-Information/CCIP/.
- 5.Smith PC, Mossialos E, Papanicolas I. Performance measurement for health system improvement: experiences, challenges and prospects. World Health Organization 2008 and World Health Organization, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. 2008. 18p.Google Scholar
- 6.• López-Sendón J, González-Juanate JR, Pinto F, et al. Quality markers in cardiology. Main markers to measure quality of results (outcomes) and quality measures related to better results in clinical practice (performance metrics). A SEC/SECTCV Consensus Position Paper. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2015;68(11):976–995.e10 This position paper provides an overview of quality indicators in cardiology for institutions in Spain. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Bonow RO, Ganiats TG, Beam CT, Blake K, Casey de Jr, Goodlin SJ, et al. ACCF/AHA/AMA-PCPI 2011 performance measures for adults with heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on performance measures and the American Medical Association–physician consortium for performance improvement. Circulation. 2012;125:2382–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.• Fischer C, Steyerberg FW, Fonarow GC, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between quality of hospital care and readmission rates in patients with heart failure. Am Heart J. 2015;170:1005–17 A comprehensive systematic review on the association between quality of hospital care and readmission rates in patients with heart failure.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Moertl D, Altenberger J, Bauer N, Berent R, Berger R, Boehmer A, et al. Disease management programs in chronic heart failure: position statement of the heart failure working group and the Working Group of the Cardiological Assistance and Care Personnel of the Austrian Society of Cardiology. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2017;129(23–24):869–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement. http://www.ichom.org/medical-conditions/heart-failure/. Accessed in 24 Sept 2018.
- 23.•• Meystre SM, Kim Y, Gobbel GT, et al. Congestive heart failure information extraction framework for automated treatment performance measures assessment. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(e1):e40–e6 A study describing automated extraction of healthcare indicators from medical record, a transition to use of bigdata in practice. Google Scholar