Current Heart Failure Reports

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 40–50 | Cite as

Surgical Approach to Mitral Regurgitation in Chronic Heart Failure: When Is It an Option?

Nonpharmacologic Therapy: Surgery, Ventricular Assist Devices, Biventricular Pacing, and Exercise (AK Hasan, Section Editor)

Abstract

Functional mitral regurgitation (MR) is common in patients with chronic heart failure and adversely affects survival and quality of life. Surgery is effective in improving symptoms and reverse remodeling of the ventricle. However, its effect on survival is unclear. Indications for surgery are challenging given the elevated surgical risk of these patients, lack of prospective randomized data, and uncertain long-term results in the historical series. A systematic approach to functional mitral regurgitation that addresses both the mitral insufficiency and the ventricular remodeling with careful patient selection can achieve reliable, reproducible, and lasting results. This article reviews the surgical procedures to treat functional mitral regurgitation and presents an algorithm for their application in patients with congestive heart failure.

Keywords

Mitral regurgitation Ischemic cardiomyopathy Nonischemic cardiomyopathy Congestive heart failure Mitral valve Mitral valve repair Mitral valve replacement Ischemic mitral regurgitation Surgery Nonpharmacologic therapy 

Notes

Disclosures

Dr. Crestanello has received research grants from Edwards LifeSciences and Medtronic.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Robbins JD, Maniar PB, Cotts W, et al. Prevalence and severity of mitral regurgitation in chronic systolic heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91(3):360–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Patel JB, Borgeson DD, Barnes ME, et al. Mitral regurgitation in patients with advanced systolic heart failure. J Card Fail. 2004;10(4):285–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Borger MA, Alam A, Murphy PM, et al. Chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation: repair, replace or rethink? Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(3):1153–61. Review.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    •• Lancellotti P, Marwick T, Pierard LA: How to manage ischaemic mitral regurgitation. Heart. 2008;94(11):1497–502. This is an excellent review on the management of ischemic MR. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bolling SF, Smolens IA, Pagani FD. Surgical alternatives for heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant. 200;20(7):729–33. Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    • Magne J, Sénéchal M, Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P: Ischemic mitral regurgitation: a complex multifaceted disease. Cardiology. 2009;112(4):244–59. Epub 2008 Aug 30. Review. This article reviews pathophysiology, treatment, and outcomes of ischemic MR. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levine RA, Hung J, Otsuji Y, et al. Mechanistic insights into functional mitral regurgitation. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2002;4(2):125–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bursi F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Jacobsen SJ, Roger VL. Mitral regurgitation after myocardial infarction: a review. Am J Med. 2006;119(2):103–12. review.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Romano MA, Bolling SF. Update on mitral repair in dilated cardiomyopathy. J Card Surg. 2004;19(5):396–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spoor MT, Geltz A, Bolling SF. Flexible versus nonflexible mitral valve rings for congestive heart failure: differential durability of repair. Circulation. 2006;114(1 Suppl):I67–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carabello BA. The management of functional mitral regurgitation. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2007;9(2):112–7. Review.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carabello BA. The current therapy for mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(5):319–26. Review.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bouma W, van der Horst IC, Wijdh-den Hamer IJ, et al. Chronic ischaemic mitral regurgitation. Current treatment results and new mechanism-based surgical approaches. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37(1):170–85. Epub 2009 Aug 27. PubMed PMID: 19716310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jones RH, Velazquez EJ, Michler RE, et al. STICH Hypothesis 2 Investigators. Coronary bypass surgery with or without surgical ventricular reconstruction. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(17):1705–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grigioni F, Detaint D, Avierinos JF, et al. Contribution of ischemic mitral regurgitation to congestive heart failure after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(2):260–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grigioni F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Zehr KJ, et al. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: long-term outcome and prognostic implications with quantitative Doppler assessment. Circulation. 2001;103(13):1759–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bursi F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Nkomo VT, et al. Heart failure and death after myocardial infarction in the community: the emerging role of mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2005;111(3):295–301. Epub 2005 Jan 17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lamas GA, Mitchell GF, Flaker GC, et al. Clinical significance of mitral regurgitation after acute myocardial infarction. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators. Circulation. 1997;96:827–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    • Agricola E, Stella S, Figini F, et al.: Non-ischemic dilated cardiopathy: prognostic value of functional mitral regurgitation. Int J Cardiol. 2011; 146(3):426–8. Epub 2010 Nov 20. PubMed PMID: 21094544. This study shows that as MR severity worsens, long-term survival also worsened. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trichon BH, O’Connor CM. Secondary mitral and tricuspid regurgitation accompanying left ventricular systolic dysfunction: is it important, and how is it treated? Am Heart J. 2002;144(3):373–6. Review.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Trichon BH, Felker GM, Shaw LK, et al. Relation of frequency and severity of mitral regurgitation to survival among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91(5):538–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    • Agricola E, Oppizzi M, Pisani M, et al.: Ischemic mitral regurgitation: mechanisms and echocardiographic classification. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008;9(2):207–21. This review describes patterns of ventricular remodeling, annular dilatation, and mitral regurgitation. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Watanabe N, Ogasawara Y, Yamaura Y, et al. Geometric differences of the mitral valve tenting between anterior and inferior myocardial infarction with significant ischemic mitral regurgitation: quantitation by novel software system with transthoracic real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006;19(1):71–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nagasaki M, Nishimura S, Ohtaki E, et al. The echocardiographic determinants of functional mitral regurgitation differ in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol. 2006;108(2):171–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kwan J, Shiota T, Agler DA, et al. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography study. Geometric differences of the mitral apparatus between ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy with significant mitral regurgitation: real-time three-dimensional echocardiography study. Circulation. 2003;107(8):1135–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Geidel S, Lass M, Krause K, et al. Early and late results of restrictive mitral valve annuloplasty in 121 patients with cardiomyopathy and chronic mitral regurgitation. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;56(5):262–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gummert JF, Rahmel A, Bucerius J, et al. Mitral valve repair in patients with end stage cardiomyopathy: who benefits? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;23(6):1017–22. discussion 1022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hueb AC, Jatene FB, Moreira LF, et al. Ventricular remodeling and mitral valve modifications in dilated cardiomyopathy: new insights from anatomic study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124(6):1216–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lorusso R, De Bonis M, De Cicco G, et al. Mitral insufficiency and its different aetiologies: old and new insights for appropriate surgical indications and treatment. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2007;8(2):108–13. Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Miura T, Eishi K, Yamachika S, et al. Isolated undersized mitral annuloplasty for functional mitral regurgitation in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: reconsideration of the relationship between preoperative coaptation depth and persistent mitral regurgitation. Circ J. 2008;72(11):1744–50. Epub 2008 Sep 18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Spoor MT, Bolling SF. Valve pathology in heart failure: which valves can be fixed? Heart Fail Clin. 2007;3(3):289–98. Review.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Daimon M, Fukuda S, Adams DH, et al. Mitral valve repair with Carpentier-McCarthy-Adams IMR ETlogix annuloplasty ring for ischemic mitral regurgitation: early echocardiographic results from a multi-center study. Circulation. 2006;114(1 Suppl):I588–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mosquera VX, Bouzas-Mosquera A, Estévez F, et al. Mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation using the Carpentier-McCarthy-Adams IMR ETlogix® ring: medium-term echocardiographic findings. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2010;63(10):1200–4. English, Spanish. PubMed PMID:20875361.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Votta E, Maisano F, Bolling SF, et al. The Geoform disease-specific annuloplasty system: a finite element study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(1):92–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mahmood F, Gorman 3rd JH, Subramaniam B, et al. Changes in mitral valve annular geometry after repair: saddle-shaped versus flat annuloplasty rings. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(4):1212–20. PubMed PMID: 20868816; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3021250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    McGee EC, Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, et al. Recurrent mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;128(6):916–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bax JJ, Braun J, Somer ST, et al. Restrictive annuloplasty and coronary revascularization in ischemic mitral regurgitation results in reverse left ventricular remodeling. Circulation. 2004;110(11 Suppl 1):II103–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kim YH, Czer LS, Soukiasian HJ, et al. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: revascularization alone versus revascularization and mitral valve repair. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79(6):1895–901.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    •• Braun J, van de Veire NR, Klautz RJ, et al.: Restrictive mitral annuloplasty cures ischemic mitral regurgitation and heart failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(2):430–6. This article identifies a LVEDD less than 65 mm as predictor of reverse remodeling, repair durability, and improved survival.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mihaljevic T, Lam BK, Rajeswaran J, et al. Impact of mitral valve annuloplasty combined with revascularization in patients with functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(22):2191–201. Epub 2007 May 18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    • Acker MA, Jessup M, Bolling SF, et al.: Mitral valve repair in heart failure: Five-year follow-up from the mitral valve replacement stratum of the Acorn randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Jan 24. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 21269649. This study demonstrated a positive cumulative effect of adding a ventricular restrain procedure to mitral annuloplasty. Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Onorati F, Rubino AS, Marturano D, et al. Midterm clinical and echocardiographic results and predictors of mitral regurgitation recurrence following restrictive annuloplasty for ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138:654–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    De Bonis M, Lapenna E, Verzini A, et al. Recurrence of mitral regurgitation parallels the absence of left ventricular reverse remodeling after mitral repair in advanced dilated cardiomyopathy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(3):932–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gelsomino S, Lorusso R, Caciolli S, et al. Insights on left ventricular and valvular mechanisms of recurrent ischemic mitral regurgitation after restrictive annuloplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136(2):507–18. Epub 2008 May 2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kuwahara E, Otsuji Y, Iguro Y, et al. Mechanism of recurrent/persistent ischemic/functional mitral regurgitation in the chronic phase after surgical annuloplasty: importance of augmented posterior leaflet tethering. Circulation. 2006;114(1 Suppl):I529–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gelsomino S, Lorusso R, Capecchi I, et al. Left ventricular reverse remodeling after undersized mitral ring annuloplasty in patients with ischemic regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(4):1319–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Grossi EA, Goldberg JD, LaPietra A, et al. Ischemic mitral valve reconstruction and replacement: comparison of long-term survival and complications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122(6):1107–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gelsomino S, Lorusso R, De Cicco G, et al. Five-year echocardiographic results of combined undersized mitral ring annuloplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting for chronic ischaemic mitral regurgitation. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(2):231–40. Epub 2007 Nov 7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    • Calafiore AM, Iacò AL, Bivona A, et al.: Echocardiographically based treatment of chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 141(5):1150–6.e1. Epub 2010 Aug 14. PubMed PMID: 20709335. The authors describe a tailored approach to ischemic mitral regurgitation based on echocardiographic findings that predicts recurrence. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, Gallina S, et al. Mitral valve surgery for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1989–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Miller DC. Ischemic mitral regurgitation redux–to repair or to replace? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122(6):1059–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ciarka A, Braun J, Delgado V, et al. Predictors of mitral regurgitation recurrence in patients with heart failure undergoing mitral valve annuloplasty. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106(3):395–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kongsaerepong V, Shiota M, Gillinov AM, et al. Echocardiographic predictors of successful versus unsuccessful mitral valve repair in ischemic mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98(4):504–8. Epub 2006 Jun 21. PubMedPMID: 16893706.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Yamauchi T, Taniguchi K, Kuki S, et al. Evaluation of the mitral valve leaflet morphology after mitral valve reconstruction with a concept “coaptation length index”. J Card Surg. 2005;20:432–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Anyanwu AC, Adams DH. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: recent advances. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2008;10(6):529–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    •• Anyanwu AC, Adams DH: Why do mitral valve repairs fail? J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009; 22(11):1265–8. PubMed PMID: 19883875. This is an excellent review that examines the causes for recurrent mitral regurgitation. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Silberman S, Klutstein MW, Sabag T, et al. Repair of ischemic mitral regurgitation: comparison between flexible and rigid annuloplasty rings. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:1721–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Zhu F, Otsuji Y, Yotsumoto G, et al. Mechanism of persistent ischemic mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty: importance of augmented posterior mitral leaflet tethering. Circulation. 2005;112:I396–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hung J, Papakostas L, Tahta SA, et al. Mechanism of recurrent ischemic mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty: continued LV remodeling as a moving target. Circulation. 2004;110:II85–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Magne J, Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Sénéchal M. Continued global left ventricular remodeling is not the sole mechanism responsible for the late recurrence of ischemic mitral regurgitation after restrictive annuloplasty. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(11):1256–64. Epub 2009 Oct 7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tahta SA, Oury JH, Maxwell JM, et al. Outcome after mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002;11:11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Crabtree TD, Bailey MS, Moon MR, et al. Recurrent mitral regurgitation and risk factors for early and late mortality after mitral valve repair for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(5):1537–42. discussion 1542–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wu AH, Aaronson KD, Bolling SF, et al. Impact of mitral valve annuloplasty on mortality risk in patients with mitral regurgitation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(3):381–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Tolis Jr GA, Korkolis DP, Kopf GS, Elefteriades JA. Revascularization alone (without mitral valve repair) suffices in patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy and mild-to-moderate mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74(5):1476–80. discussion 1480–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    •• Fattouch K, Guccione F, Sampognaro R, et al.: POINT: Efficacy of adding mitral valve restrictive annuloplasty to coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with moderate ischemic mitral valve regurgitation: a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 138(2):278–85. Epub 2009 May 31. PubMed PMID: 19619766. This randomized prospective trial shows that mitral annuloplasty and CABG for cured moderate MR, reversed remodeling, but did not change survival. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Fattouch K, Sampognaro R, Speziale G, et al. Impact of moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90(4):1187–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Maisano F, Caldarola A, Blasio A, et al. Midterm results of edge-to-edge mitral valve repair without annuloplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:1987–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    De Bonis M, Lapenna E, La Canna G, et al. Mitral valve repair for functional mitral regurgitation in end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy: role of the “edge-to-edge” technique. Circulation. 2005;112(9 Suppl):I402–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Magne J, Girerd N, Sénéchal M, et al. Mitral repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation: comparison of short-term and long-term survival. Circulation. 2009;120(11 Suppl):S104–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    David TE. Papillary muscle-annular continuity: is it important? J Card Surg. 1994;9(2 Suppl):252–4. Review. PubMed PMID: 8186577.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Sarris GE, Miller DC. Valvular-ventricular interaction: the importance of the mitral chordae tendineae in terms of global left ventricular systolic function. J Card Surg. 1988;3(3):215–34. Review. PubMed PMID: 2980020.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Murphy MO, Rao C, Punjabi PP, Athanasiou T. In patients undergoing mitral surgery for ischaemic mitral regurgitation is it preferable to repair or replace the mitral valve? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12(2):218–27. Epub 2010 Nov 18. Review. PubMed PMID: 21088201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    • Vassileva CM, Boley T, Markwell S, Hazelrigg S: Meta-analysis of short-term and long-term survival following repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011; 39(3):295–303. Epub 2010 Aug 19. PubMed PMID: 20727782. This meta-analysis demonstrates worse early and late outcomes with mitral valve replacement. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Gillinov AM, Wierup PN, Blackstone EH, et al. Is repair preferable to replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122(6):1125–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Qiu Z, Chen X, Xu M, et al. Is mitral valve repair superior to replacement for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation with left ventricular dysfunction? J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;5:107. PubMed PMID: 21059216; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2987923.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Comparing the Effectiveness of a Mitral Valve Repair Procedure in Combination With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Versus CABG Alone in People With Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation. Available at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00806988?term=mitral+regurgitation+cabg&rank=3. Accessed on August 1,2011.
  77. 77.
    Allman KC, Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Udelson JE. Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1151–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Elefteriades JA, Tolis Jr G, Levi E, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting in severe left ventricular dysfunction: excellent survival with improved ejection fraction and functional state. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:1411–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2008 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease). Endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(13):e1–e142. PubMed PMID: 18848134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Bax JJ, Schinkel AF, Boersma E, et al. Extensive left ventricular remodeling does not allow viable myocardium to improve in left ventricular ejection fraction after revascularization and is associated with worse long-term prognosis. Circulation. 2004;110(11 Suppl 1):II18–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Weinsaft JW, Klem I, Judd RM. MRI for the assessment of myocardial viability. Cardiol Clin. 2007;25(1):35–56. v. Review. PubMed PMID: 17478239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Menicanti L, Di Donato M, Frigoiola A, et al. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: intraventricular papillary muscle imbrication without mitral ring during left ventricular restoration. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:1041–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Kron IL, Green GR, Cope JT. Surgical relocation of the posterior papillary muscle in chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:600–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Menicanti L, DiDonato M, Castelvecchio S, et al. Functional ischemic mitral regurgitation in anterior ventricular remodeling: results of surgical ventricular restoration with and without mitral repair. Heart Fail Rev. 2004;9(4):317–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Prucz RB, Weiss ES, Patel ND, et al. The impact of surgical ventricular restoration on mitral valve regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(3):726–34. discussion 726–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Borger MA, Murphy PM, Alam A, et al. Initial results of the chordal-cutting operation for ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(6):1483–92. Epub 2007 Apr27. PubMed PMID: 17532944.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Hung J, Guerrero JL, Handschumacher MD, et al. Reverse ventricular remodeling reduces ischemic mitral regurgitation: echo-guided device application in the beating heart. Circulation. 2002;106(20):2594–600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Solis J, Levine RA, Johnson B, et al. Polymer injection therapy to reverse remodel the papillary muscles: efficacy in reducing mitral regurgitation in a chronic ischemic model. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(5):499–505. Epub 2010 Aug 24. PubMed PMID: 20736444; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2972670.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Grossi EA, Patel N, Woo YJ, et al. RESTOR-MV Study Group. Outcomes of the RESTOR-MV Trial (Randomized Evaluation of a Surgical Treatment for Off-Pump Repair of the Mitral Valve). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(24):1984–93. PubMed PMID: 21126639.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Krishnaswamy A, Marc Gillinov A, Griffin BP. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Coron Artery Dis. 2011;22(5):359–70. PubMed PMID: 21572322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Feldman T, Foster E, Glower DD, et al. EVEREST II Investigators. Percutaneous repair or surgery for mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(15):1395–406. Epub 2011 Apr 4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Alfieri O, Denti P. Alfieri stitch and its impact on mitral clip. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39(6):807–8. Epub 2011 Feb 25. PubMed PMID: 21353584.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, et al. Task Force on the Management of Valvular Hearth Disease of the European Society of Cardiology; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: The Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(2):230–68. Epub 2007 Jan 26. PubMed PMID: 17259184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Yamano T, Gillinov AM, Takasaki K, et al. Is revascularization alone truly sufficient in patients with mild mitral regurgitation?: Echocardiographic follow-up of mild ischemic mitral regurgitation after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation. 2008;118(18):S699–9. Supplement: Suppl. 2.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Lam BK, Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, et al. Importance of moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79(2)):462–70. discussion 462–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Calafiore AM, Mazzei V, Iacò AL, et al. Impact of ischemic mitral regurgitation on long-term outcome of patients with ejection fraction above 0.30 undergoing first isolated myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86(2):458–64. discussion 464–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    •• Penicka M, Linkova H, Lang O, et al.: Predictors of improvement of unrepaired moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing elective isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation. 2009;120(15):1474–81. The authors suggest that moderate MR may be cured in selected patients with isolated CABG. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Comparing the Effectiveness of a Mitral Valve Repair Procedure in Combination With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Versus CABG Alone in People With Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation. Available online at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00806988?term=mitral+regurgitation+cabg&rank=3. Accessed on August 1, 2011.
  99. 99.
    Digiammarco G, Liberi R, Giancane M, et al. Recurrence of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy undergoing mitral valve repair: how to predict it. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007;6(3):340–4. Epub 2007 Mar 26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Calafiore AM, Gallina S, Di Mauro M, et al. Mitral valve procedure in dilated cardiomyopathy: repair or replacement? Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71(4):1146–52. discussion 1152–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Cardiac SurgeryThe Ohio State University Medical CenterColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations