Advertisement

Current Heart Failure Reports

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 160–166 | Cite as

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for valvular heart disease

  • Angela MorelloEmail author
  • Eli V. Gelfand
Article

Abstract

Valvular heart disease (VHD) is a clinically important diagnosis, with significant associated morbidity and mortality. Multiple imaging modalities exist to characterize valvular and associated cardiac anatomy. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as a comprehensive noninvasive imaging modality for VHD. With use of well-established, standardized imaging sequences, CMR can accurately and precisely diagnose valvular structural abnormalities, assess severity of regurgitant and stenotic lesions, and potentially define patient prognosis. This article reviews the clinical applications of CMR in assessment of VHD.

Keywords

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Aortic Stenosis Mitral Regurgitation Aortic Regurgitation Valvular Heart Disease 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, et al.: Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 2006, 368:1005–1011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arai AE, Epstein FH, Bove KE, et al.: Visualization of aortic valve leaflets using black blood MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999, 10:771–777.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vogel-Claussen J, Pannu H, Spevak PJ, et al.: Cardiac valve assessment with MR imaging and 64-section multi-detector row CT. Radiographics 2006, 26:1769–1784.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chatzimavroudis GP, Oshinski JN, Franch RH, et al.: Evaluation of the precision of magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping for blood flow measurements. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2001, 3:11–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haimerl J, Freitag-Krikovic A, Rauch A, et al.: Quantification of aortic valve area and left ventricular muscle mass in healthy subjects and patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis by MRI. Z Kardiol 2005, 94:173–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Debl K, Djavidani B, Seitz J, et al.: Planimetry of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2005, 40:631–636.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Friedrich MG, Schulz-Menger J, Poetsch T, et al.: Quantification of valvular aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 2002, 144:329–334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thomas B, Freitas A, Ferreira R, et al.: The complementary role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of patients with aortic stenosis. Rev Port Cardiol 2005, 24:1117–1121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malyar NM, Schlosser T, Barkhausen J, et al.: Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography. Cardiology 2008, 109:126–134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reant P, Lederlin M, Lafitte S, et al.: Absolute assessment of aortic valve stenosis by planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterisation. Eur J Radiol 2006, 59:276–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kupfahl C, Honold M, Meinhardt G, et al.: Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques. Heart 2004, 90:893–901.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haghi D, Kaden JJ, Suselbeck T, et al.: Validation of the peak to mean pressure decrease ratio as a new method of assessing aortic stenosis using the Gorlin formula and the cardiovascular magnetic resonance-based hybrid method. Echocardiography 2007, 24:335–339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    John AS, Dill T, Brandt RR, et al.: Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards? J Am Coll Cardiol 2003, 42:519–526.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chun EJ, Choi SI, Lim C, et al.: Aortic stenosis: evaluation with multidetector CT angiography and MR imaging. Korean J Radiol 2008, 9:439–448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Caruthers SD, Lin SJ, Brown P, et al.: Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography. Circulation 2003, 108:2236–2243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eichenberger AC, Jenni R, von Schulthess GK: Aortic valve pressure gradients in patients with aortic valve stenosis: quantification with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993, 160:971–977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sondergaard L, Stahlberg F, Thomsen C: Magnetic resonance imaging of valvular heart disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999, 10:627–638.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tanaka K, Makaryus AN, Wolff SD: Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007, 9:799–805.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pouleur AC, le Polain de Waroux JB, Pasquet A, et al.: Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007, 26:1436–1443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JC, et al.: Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol 2002, 90:29–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nagel E, Stuber M, Burkhard B, et al.: Cardiac rotation and relaxation in patients with aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 2000, 21:582–589.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    van der Wall EE: Twisting, untwisting and diastolic function in aortic valve disease. Eur Heart J 2000, 21:512–513.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Debl K, Djavidani B, Buchner S, et al.: Delayed hyper-enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging of left ventricular hypertrophy caused by aortic stenosis and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: visualisation of focal fibrosis. Heart 2006, 92:1447–1451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    La Salvia EA, Gilkeson RC, Dahms BB, et al.: Delayed contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in congenital aortic stenosis. Pediatr Cardiol 2006, 27:388–390.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hein S, Arnon E, Kostin S, et al.: Progression from compensated hypertrophy to failure in the pressure-overloaded human heart: structural deterioration and compensatory mechanisms. Circulation 2003, 107:984–991.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lin SJ, Brown PA, Watkins MP, et al.: Quantification of stenotic mitral valve area with magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 44:133–137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Djavidani B, Debl K, Lenhart M, et al.: Planimetry of mitral valve stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 45:2048–2053.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Djavidani B, Debl K, Buchner S, et al.: MRI planimetry for diagnosis and follow-up of valve area in mitral stenosis treated with valvuloplasty. Rofo 2006, 178:781–786.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Acar J, Cormier B, Grimberg D, et al.: Diagnosis of left atrial thrombi in mitral stenosis-usefulness of ultrasound techniques compared with other methods. Eur Heart J 1991, 12(Suppl B):70–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ohyama H, Hosomi N, Takahashi T, et al.: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and transesophageal echocardiography in detection of thrombus in the left atrial appendage. Stroke 2003, 34:2436–2439.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nakatani S, Nagata S, Beppu S, et al.: Acute reduction of mitral valve area after percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty: assessment with Doppler continuity equation method. Am Heart J 1991, 121:770–775.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Park JH, Han MC, Im JG, et al.: Mitral stenosis: evaluation with MR imaging after percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty. Radiology 1990, 177:533–536.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kivelitz DE, Dohmen PM, Lembcke A, et al.: Visualization of the pulmonary valve using cine MR imaging. Acta Radiol 2003, 44:172–176.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schiebler M, Axel L, Reichek N, et al.: Correlation of cine MR imaging with two-dimensional pulsed Doppler echocardiography in valvular insufficiency. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987, 11:627–632.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sechtem U, Pflugfelder PW, Cassidy MM, et al.: Mitral or aortic regurgitation: quantification of regurgitant volumes with cine MR imaging. Radiology 1988, 167:425–430.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Underwood SR, Klipstein RH, Firmin DN, et al.: Magnetic resonance assessment of aortic and mitral regurgitation. Br Heart J 1986, 56:455–462.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Higgins CB, Wagner S, Kondo C, et al.: Evaluation of valvular heart disease with cine gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 1991, 84:I198–I207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Aurigemma G, Reichek N, Schiebler M, et al.: Evaluation of aortic regurgitation by cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging: planar analysis and comparison to Doppler echocardiography. Cardiology 1991, 78:340–347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cranney GB, Benjelloun H, Perry GJ, et al.: Rapid assessment of aortic regurgitation and left ventricular function using cine nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and the proximal convergence zone. Am J Cardiol 1993, 71:1074–1081.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tamai T, Konishi T, Okamoto S, et al.: Evaluation of aortic regurgitation using cine magnetic resonance imaging. Jpn Heart J 1993, 34:741–748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chatzimavroudis GP, Oshinski JN, Franch RH, et al.: Quantification of the aortic regurgitant volume with magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping: a clinical investigation of the importance of imaging slice location. J Heart Valve Dis 1998, 7:94–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kozerke S, Scheidegger MB, Pedersen EM, et al.: Heart motion adapted cine phase-contrast flow measurements through the aortic valve. Magn Reson Med 1999, 42:970–978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gelfand EV, Hughes S, Hauser TH, et al.: Severity of mitral and aortic regurgitation as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimizing correlation with Doppler echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2006, 8:503–507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wittlinger T, Dzemali O, Bakhtiary F, et al.: Hemodynamic evaluation of aortic regurgitation by magnetic resonance imaging. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2008, 16:278–283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Debl K, Djavidani B, Buchner S, et al.: Assessment of the anatomic regurgitant orifice in aortic regurgitation: a clinical magnetic resonance imaging study. Heart 2008, 94:e8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jensen H, Jensen MO, Ringgaard S, et al.: Geometric determinants of chronic functional ischemic mitral regurgitation: insights from three-dimensional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Heart Valve Dis 2008, 17:16–22; discussion 23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Han Y, Peters DC, Salton CJ, et al.: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance characterization of mitral valve prolapse. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008, 1:294–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nishimura T, Yamada N, Itoh A, et al.: Cine MR imaging in mitral regurgitation: comparison with color Doppler flow imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989, 153:721–724.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Glogar D, Globits S, Neuhold A, et al.: Assessment of mitral regurgitation by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1989, 7:611–617.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Fujita N, Chazouilleres AF, Hartiala JJ, et al.: Quantification of mitral regurgitation by velocity-encoded cine nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994, 23:951–958.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kon MW, Myerson SG, Moat NE, et al.: Quantification of regurgitant fraction in mitral regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of techniques. J Heart Valve Dis 2004, 13:600–607.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Young AA, Orr R, Smaill BH, Dell’Italia LJ: Three-dimensional changes in left and right ventricular geometry in chronic mitral regurgitation. Am J Physiol 1996, 271:H2689–H2700.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Haffajee JA HT, de la Torre R, Manning WJ, et al.: Long-term positive left ventricular remodeling after correction of severe organic mitral regurgitation: a pilot cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. Circulation 2007, 116:680.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Stollberger C, Kopsa W, Finsterer J: Non-compaction of the right atrium and left ventricle in Ebstein’s malformation. J Heart Valve Dis 2006, 15:719–720.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Shellock FG: Prosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings: assessment of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 Tesla. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2001, 3:317–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Edwards MB, Taylor KM, Shellock FG: Prosthetic heart valves: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000, 12:363–369.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Pflaumer A, Schwaiger M, Hess J, et al.: Quantification of periprosthetic valve leakage with multiple regurgitation jets by magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Cardiol 2005, 26:593–594.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Abdel-Aty H, Boye P, Bock P, et al.: Stenotic mitral valve prosthesis with left atrial thrombus. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2005, 7:421–423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Medicine Group, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cardiovascular Division, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations