Mediating the Peer Influence Effect with Facets of Criminal Thought Process and Content in a Group of Early Adolescents: Replication and Extension
Prior research indicates that criminal thought content and criminal thought process mediate the peer influence effect (peer delinquency → participant delinquency). This study sought to model the temporal order of these two categories of antisocial cognition in mediating peer influence. Responses provided by 1,795 (847 male, 948 female) members of the Gang Resistance Education and Training study (mean age = 12.11 years) on measures of criminal thought content (negative attitude toward the police) and criminal thought process (proactive criminal thinking in the form of neutralizing techniques) were analyzed. Only the “content before process” model achieved significance, however. Thus, while peer associations may stimulate criminal thought content and criminal thought process, the effect on criminal thought content may be more proximal and the effect on criminal thought process may be mediated by criminal thought content.
KeywordsPeer influence effect Criminal thought content and process Proactive criminal thinking Negative attitude toward the police
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that there is no conflicts of interest.
Study approved by the Kutztown University Institutional Review Board.
This is a secondary data analysis, but the authors of the original GREAT study did obtain informed consent from parents and informed assent from participating children.
- Akers RL (1998) Social learning and social structure: a general theory of crime and deviance. Northeastern University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Allison PD (2012) Handling missing data by maximum likelihood. SAS Global Forum 2012 (Paper 312-2012). SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
- Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
- Berger J (2008) Identity signaling, social influence, and social contagion. In: Prinstein MJ, Dodge KA (eds) Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. Guilford, New York, pp 181–199Google Scholar
- Esbensen F-A (2002) National evaluation of the Gang Resistance Education and Training (G.R.E.A.T.) program: final report (94-IJ-CX-0058). U.S. Department of Justice, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Gelfert A (2015) Inner speech, natural language, and the modularity of the mind. J Philos Sci 14:7–29Google Scholar
- Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T (1990) A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
- Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Kenny, D. A. (2013). Mediation: sensitivity analysis [webinar]. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/webinars/Mediation/Sensitivity/Sensitivity.html.
- Kroner DG, Morgan RD (2014) An overview of strategies for the assessment and treatment of criminal thinking. In: Tafrate RC, Mitchell D (eds) Forensic CBT: a handbook for clinical practice. Wiley, Chichester, pp 87–103Google Scholar
- Muthén B, Muthén L (2017) Mplus user’s guide, 8th edn. Muthén and Muthén, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
- Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Sutherland EH (1947) Principles of criminology, 4th edn. J.B. Lippincott, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Trzepacz PT, Baker RW (1993) The Psychiatric Mental Status Examination. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Vygotsky L (1994) The development of thinking and concept formation in adolescence. In: van der Veer R, Valsiner J (eds) The Vygotsky reader. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 185–265Google Scholar