Abstract
In the aftermath of Michael Brown’s death in Ferguson, Missouri, confidence in police has weakened. Body-worn cameras (BWCs) are perceived to increase law enforcement transparency and accountability, and, by proxy, restore law enforcement legitimacy. Though the empirical status of BWCs has grown in recent years, missing from these accounts are the actual words and narratives of officers. Through a qualitative approach, the data and analysis within this paper overcome this issue and indicate that BWCs have had an impact on police–citizen interactions in one Southern American State. More specifically, citizen and officer accountability from BWCs was found to have positive and negative consequence. Officers articulated this supposition in a number of ways and the paper contextualizes these perspectives within the extant literature. The policy implications and areas of future research from these findings are discussed as they inform a non-positivist approach to research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
A Department of Justice (2015) report would later discredit many bystander claims after an investigation found that they did not view the incident firsthand or lied about being at the scene during the shooting.
Officers in Katz et al.’s (2014) study were less enthusiastic about the impact of BWCs on citizen behavior. Few believed it would lead to more cooperative (25.7%), respectful (28.6%), compliant (11.8%), and less aggressive (25.7%) citizens.
BWC evaluations on officer in-the-line-of-duty deaths have not been empirically explored due to their infrequency and the relatively low deployment rate of BWCs throughout the Nation.
Together these writings are discussed as the investigator’s field notes.
Saturation, in these analyses, was observed when responses became repetitive and no new information was forthcoming.
On one occasion, two officers opted to be interviewed simultaneous due to work-related restraints.
References
Ariel B, Farrar T, Sutherland A (2015) The effect of police body-worn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: a randomized controlled trial. J Quant Criminol 31(3):509–535
Ariel B, Sutherland A, Henstock D, Young J, Drover P, Sykes J, Henderson R (2016) Report: increases in police use of force in the presence of body-worn cameras are driven by officer discretion: a protocol-based subgroup analysis of ten randomized experiments. J Exp Criminol 12(3):453–463
Ariel B, Sutherland A, Henstock D, Young J, Sosincki G (2018) The deterrence spectrum: explaining why police body-worn cameras ‘work’ or ‘backfire’ in aggressive police–public encounters. Policing: J Policy Pract 12(1):6–26
Boivin R, Gendron A, Faubert C, Poulin B (2017) The body-worn camera perspective bias. J Exp Criminol 13(1):125–142
Braga A, Coldren J, Sousa W, Rodriguez D, & Alper O (2017) The Las Vegas body-worn camera experiment: research summary. University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Center for Crime and Justice Policy. Retrieved from https://www.cna.org/cna_files/pdf/LV-BWC-RIB-2017.pdf
Bryman A (2016) Social research methods, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bureau of Justice Statistics (2013) Law enforcement management and administrative statistics. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
Campbell B, Nix J, & Maguire E (2018; online first). Is the number of citizens fatally shot by police increasing in the post-Ferguson era? Crime & Delinquency
Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative research. Sage, London
Crow M, Snyder J, Crichlow V, Smykla J (2017) Community perceptions of police body-worn cameras: the impact of views on fairness, fear, performance, and privacy. Crim Justice Behav 10(5):1–22
Deuchar R (2013) Policing youth violence: transatlantic connections. IOE Press, London
Deuchar R, Fallik S, & Crichlow V (2018, online first). Despondent officer narratives and the ‘post-Ferguson’ effect: exploring law enforcement perspectives and strategies in a southern American State. Policing and Society: An International Journal of Research Policy. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2018.1480020
Department of Justice (2015 ) Department of Justice Report Regarding the Criminal Investigation into the Shooting Death of Michael Brown by Ferguson, Missouri Police Office Darren Wilson. Retrieved from: https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/pressreleases/attachments/2015/03/04/doj_report_on_shooting_of_michael_brown_1.pdf
Doleac J (2017) Do body-worn cameras improve police behavior? Brookings Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2017/10/25/do-body-worn-cameras-improve-police-behavior/
Emerson R, Fretz R, Shaw L (1995) Writing ethnographic field notes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Farrar T (2013) Self-awareness to being watched and socially-desirable behavior: a field experiment on the effect of body-worn cameras on police use-of-force. Police Foundation, Washington, D.C.
Gaub J, Todak N, & White M (2017) Beyond patrol exploring the perceptions of police body-worn cameras among officers in specialized units. Arizona State University Center for Violence Prevention and Community Safety. Retrieved from https://www.bja.gov/bwc/pdfs/specialty-unit-report-final-2-17.pdf
Geertz C (1973) The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books, New York
Gold R (1958) Roles in sociological filed observations. Social Forces 36(March 1):217–223
Hammersley M (2006) Ethnography: problems and prospects. Ethnogr Educ 1(1):3–14
Hammersley M, Atkins P (2007) Ethnography: principles in practice. Routledge, London
Hedberg E, Katz C, Choate D (2017) Body-worn cameras and citizen interactions with police officers: estimating plausible effects given varying compliance levels. Justice Q 34(4):627–651
Jennings W, Fridell L, Lynch M (2014) Cops and cameras: officer perceptions of the use of body-worn cameras in law enforcement. J Crim Just 42(1):549–556
Katz C, Choate D, Ready J, Nuňo L (2014) Evaluating the impact of officer-worn body cameras in the Phoenix police department. Arizona State University Center for Violence Prevention & Community Safety
Kurtenbach M, Katz C, Elliott V (2015) SPI case study: Phoenix, Arizona. Evaluating the impact of officer-worn body cameras. SMART Policing Initiative Quarterly Newsletter 15(Spring):2–3
La Vigne N, Fontaine J, & Dwivedi A (2017) How do people in high-crime, low-income communities view the police? Urban Institute. Retrieved from https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/88476/how_do_people_in_high-crime_view_the_police.pdf
Louis E. (2018). The elusive promise of police body cams. New York Daily News. Retrieved from http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/elusive-promise-police-body-cams-article-1.3772731
Mac Donald H (2016) War on cops: how the new attack on law and order makes everyone less safe. Encounter Books, New York
Maguire E, Nix J, Campbell B (2017) A war on cops? The effects of Ferguson on the number of US police officers murdered in the line of duty. Justice Q 34(5):739–758
Maskaly J, Donner C, Jennings W, Ariel B, Sutherland A (2017) The effects of body-worn cameras (BWCs) on police and citizen outcomes: a state-of-the-art review. Policing: Int J 40(4):672–688
McLaughlin, E. (2015). We’re not seeing more police shootings, just more news coverage. CNN. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2015/04/20/us/police-brutality-video-social-media-attitudes/index.html
Miles M, Huberman M, & Saldana J (2014) Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage Publications
Moriarty L (2017) Criminal justice technology in the 21st century, 3rd edn. Charles C. Thomas, New York
Neves T, Malafaia C (2016) You study people … that’s ugly!’ The implications of ethnographic deceptions for the ethnographer’s ethics. In: Bhopal K, Deuchar R (eds) Researching marginalized groups. Routledge, New York
Owens C, Mann D, McKenna R (2014) The Essex body worn video trial: the impact of body worn video on criminal justice outcomes of domestic abuse incidents. College of Policing, London
Pelfrey W, Keeners S (2016) Police body worn cameras: a mixed method approach assessing perceptions of efficacy. Policing: Int J 39(3):491–506
Pew Research Center (2017). Behind the badge: police views, public views. Social & Demographic Trends. Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2017/01/11/police-views-public-views/
President Barack Obama’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing (2015) Final report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Washington, D.C.: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services
Pyrooz D, Decker S, Wolfe S, Shjarback I (2016) Was there a Ferguson effect on crime rates in large US cities? J Crim Just 46:1–8
Ready J, Young J (2015) The impact of-officer video cameras on police-citizen contacts: findings from a controlled experiment in Mesa, AZ. J Exp Criminol 11(3):445–458
Rosenbaum D, Lurigio A, Davis R (1998) The prevention of crime: social and situational strategies. West/Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA
Smykla J, Crow M, Crichlow V, Snyder J (2016) Police body-worn cameras: perceptions of law enforcement leadership. Am J Crim Justice 41(3):424–443
Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
Strauss A & Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage
Sunshine J, Tyler T (2003) The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law Soc Rev 37(3):513–548
Tyler T (2005) Policing in black and white: ethnic group differences in trust and confidence in the police. Police Quarterly 8(3):322–342
Tyler T (2006) Why people obey the law. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
Van Maanen J (2011) Tales of the field: on writing ethnography, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Yokum D, Ravishankar A, Coppock A (2017) Evaluating the effects of police body-worn cameras: a randomized controlled trial. Office of the City Administrator, Executive Office of the Mayor, Washington, D.C.
Young J, Ready J (2015) Diffusion of ideas and technology: the role of networks in influencing the endorsement and use of on-officer video cameras. J Contemp Crim Justice (3, 3):243–261
Young J, Ready J (2018) A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between policy, technology preferences, and body-worn cameras activation among police officers. Policing: J Policy Pract 12(1):27–42
Weitzer R, Tuch S (2005) Determinants of public satisfaction with the police. Police Quarterly 8(3):279–297
White M, Gaub J, Todak N (2017) Exploring the potential for body-worn cameras to reduce violence in police-citizen encounters. Policing: J Policy Pract 12(1):66–76
Wolfe S, Nix J (2016) The alleged “Ferguson effect” and police willingness to engage in community partnership. Law Hum Behav 40:1–10
Funding
This study was funded, in part, by the Fulbright Scholar Program of the United States Department of State Bureau of Education and Cultural Affairs.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fallik, S.W., Deuchar, R. & Crichlow, V.J. Body-Worn Cameras in the Post-Ferguson Era: An Exploration of Law Enforcement Perspectives. J Police Crim Psych 35, 263–273 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-018-9300-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-018-9300-2