Can We Identify Bad Cops Based on History? Base Rates of Historical Markers in Law Enforcement Pre-employment Evaluations
While psychometric police selection processes have progressively evolved, the efficacy of simple background information has not been extensively evaluated. This study examined the utility of base rate information to predict job performance among law enforcement officers. Pre-employment historical markers from bad hires were compared to good hires from a large sample of 1536 officers. Of this sample, 205 officers were categorized as bad hires if they were arrested, had greater than five misconduct episodes, or were terminated for cause within 5 years following hire. Base rates of 40 pre-employment history variables were compared for good and bad hires. Analysis of markers showed that bad hires had a significantly higher frequency of markers across family factors, mental health variables, conduct problems, and criminal justice outcomes compared to good hires. Among the largest differences were history of multiple physical altercations, outpatient psychiatric treatment, and events related to previous law enforcement employment such as employer reprimands, suspensions, or fitness for duty evaluations. Many other intuitive markers occurred too infrequently to analyze or showed no significant difference between good hires and bad hires in law enforcement settings. Base rates in addition to psychological test data are necessary aspects of the police pre-employment evaluation.
KeywordsBase rate Police psychology Decision making Personnel selection
This study was not financially supported.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Aamodt MG (2004) Special issue on using the MMPI-2 special scale configurations in law enforcement selection: introduction and meta-analysis. Applied H.R.M. Research 9:41–52Google Scholar
- American Academy of Police and Public Safety Psychology (2014) Core Scientific Knowledge for Specialists in Police and Public Safety Psychology. Retrieved December 13, 2016, from https://www.abpp.org/files/Page-specific/3606%20Police%20%26%20Public %20Safety/Core%20Scientific%20Knowledge-Assessment%20051015.pdf
- Cortina JM, Doherty ML, Schmitt N, Kaufman G, Smith RG (1992) The “big five” personality factors in the IPI and MMPI: predictors of police performance. Pers Psychol 45:119–140 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00847.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Coutts LM (1990) Police hiring and promotion: methods and outcomes. Canadian Police College Journal 14:98–122Google Scholar
- Davis RD, Rostow CD (2002) The M-PULSE: Matrix-psychological uniform law enforcement selection evaluation. The Forensic Examiner 11:19–24Google Scholar
- Davis RD, Rostow CD (2008) Matrix-predictive uniform law enforcement selection evaluation (MPULSE) inventory: technical manual. Multi-Health Systems, TorontoGoogle Scholar
- Gouvier WD (1999) Base rates and clinical decision making in neuropsychology. In: Sweet JJ (ed) Forensic Neuropsychology: Fundamentals and Practice. Psychology Press, New York, pp 27–37Google Scholar
- Guller, M (2003) Predicting Performance of Law Enforcement Personnel using the Candidate and Officer Personnel Survey and other Psychological Measures (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJGoogle Scholar
- Hibler NS, Kurke MI (1995) Ensuring personal reliability through selection and training. In: Kurke MI, Scrivner EM (eds) Police psychology into the 21st century. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 57–91Google Scholar
- Langworthy RH, Hughes T, Sanders B (1995) Law enforcement recruitment, selection and training: A survey of major police departments in the U.S. Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Highland HeightsGoogle Scholar
- McCoy-Arballo TJ (2016) A Correlational Study of the Empirical Scales on the M-PULSE Inventory and the Inwald Personality Inventory-2 (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest dissertations and theses (accession order no. 2016-26518-029)Google Scholar
- McMahon HA (2012) An Exploration of the Construct Validity of the Empirical Scales on the M-PULSE Inventory Using the MMPI-2 Clinical Scales (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest dissertations and theses (accession order no. 2013-99120-082)Google Scholar
- Meier RD, Farmer RE, Maxwell D (1987) Psychological screening of police candidates. J Police Sci Adm 15:210–215Google Scholar
- Mistridis P, Egli SC, Iverson GL, Berres M, Willmes K, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Monsch AU (2015) Considering the base rates of low performance in cognitively healthy older adults improves the accuracy to identify neurocognitive impairment with the consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease-neuropsychological assessment battery (CERAD-NAB). Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 265:407–417 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-014-0571-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Ones DS, Viswesvaran C, Dilchert S (2004) Personality and police officer work performance: A construct-based, comprehensive meta-analysis and implications for pre-offer screening and psychological evaluations. In: Spilberg S (ed) California Commission on POST pre-employment psychological evaluation guidelines for entry-level peace officers, revision project update. Symposium conducted at the annual conference of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
- Saxe-Clifford S (2015) Pre-Employment Psychological Evaluation Guidelines: Ratified by the ICAP Police Psychological Services Selection Orlando, Florida, 2014. Retrieved from http://www.policepsych.com/screening.php
- Shusman EJ, Inwald RE, Knatz HF (1987) A cross-validation study of police recruit performance as predicted by the IPI and MMPI. J Police Sci Adm 15:162–169Google Scholar
- Super JT (1999) Forensic psychology and law enforcement. In: Hess A, Weiner I (eds) The handbook of forensic psychology, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 409–439Google Scholar
- Topp BW, Kardash CA (1986) Personality, achievement, and attrition: validation in a multiple-jurisdiction police academy. J Police Sci Adm 14:234–241Google Scholar
- Wilson JM (2014) Strategies for police recruitment: a review of trends, contemporary issues, and existing approaches. Law Enforcement Executive Forum 14:78–97Google Scholar