Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 15–25 | Cite as

Criminal Social Identity of Recidivistic Prisoners: The Role of Self-Esteem, Family and Criminal Friends

  • Daniel Boduszek
  • Gary Adamson
  • Mark Shevlin
  • John Mallett
  • Philip Hyland


The aim of this paper is to focus on the factors that can significantly contribute to the presence of criminal social identity within a sample of recidivistic prisoners (N = 312) using structural equation modelling. Six latent variables were identified: criminal associations with close friends, positive self-esteem, negative self-esteem, cognitive centrality, in-group affect, and in-group ties. Results suggest that criminal social identity is characterized by various internal and external factors including the direct effects of associations with criminal friends, which is influenced by insufficient or absent parental supervision at an early stage of development. It was also found that early peer rejection is not a sufficient predictor of associations with criminal friends and the criminal social identity. This study also provides further support for Social Identity Theory with regards to the role of self-esteem in the development of criminal social identification.


Criminal social identity Criminal friends Self-esteem Prisoners Structural equation modelling 



Special thanks to the Polish Prison Service for providing the venue for this study, particularly to Warden of Nowogard High Security Prison Mr Jerzy Dudzik and Mr Jacek Pedziszczak for assistance in survey application.


  1. Abrams D, Hogg MA (1988) Comments on the motivational status of self esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. Eur J Soc Psychol 18:317–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 19(6):716–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumeister RF, Stillwell AM, Heatherton TF (1994) Guilt: an interpersonal approach. Psychol Bull 115:243–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentler PM (1990) Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychol Bull 107:238–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boduszek D, Hyland P (2011) The theoretical model of criminal social identity: psycho-social perspective. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory 4(1):604–615Google Scholar
  6. Boduszek D, Adamson G, Shevlin M, Hyland P (2012) Development and validation of a measure of criminal social identity within a sample of polish recidivistic prisoners. Crim Behav Ment Health. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1827
  7. Breakwell GM (1986) Coping with threatened identities. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Brewer MB (1991) The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17:475-482Google Scholar
  9. Browne MW, Cudeck R (1989) Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behav Res 24:445–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cameron JE (1999) Social identity and the pursuit of possible selves: Implications for the psychological well-being of university students. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 3:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cameron J (2004) A three factor model of social identity. Self Ident 3(3):239–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cameron J, Lalonde R (2001) Social identification and gender related ideology in women and men. Br J Soc Psychol 40:59–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen J, Cohen P (1983) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for thebehavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  14. Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3):297–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Downs WR, Rose SR (1991) The relationship of adolescent peer groups to the incidence of psychosocial problems. Adolescence 26(102):473–492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellemers N, Kortekaas P, Ouwerkerk J (1999) Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. Eur J Soc Psychol 29:371–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer BJ, Bersani CA (1979) Self-esteem and institutionalized delinquent offenders: the role of background characteristics. Adolescence 14:197–214PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Higgins ET (1987) Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychol Rev 94:319–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hinkle S, Taylor L, Fox-Cardamone D, Crook K (1989) Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation: a multicomponent approach. Br J Soc Psychol 28:305–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hirschi T (1969) Causes of delinquency. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  21. Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6:1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ingram JR, Patchin JW, Huebner BM, McCluskey JD, Bynum TS (2007) Parents, friends, and serious delinquency: an examination of direct and indirect effects among at-risk early adolescents. Crim Justice Rev 32(4):380–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jackson J (2002) Intergroup attitudes as a function of different dimensions of group identificatioon and percieved intergroup conflict. Self Ident 1:11–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jackson J, Smith E (1999) Conceptualizing social identity: a new framework and evidence for the impact of different dimensions. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 25:120–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Juvonen J (1991) Deviance, perceived responsibility, and negative peer reactions. Dev Psychol 27:672–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaplan HB (1978) Deviant behaviour and self-enhancement in adolescence. J Youth Adolesc 7:253–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaufman P, Rasinski KA, Lee R, West J (1991) National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988. Quality of the responses of eighth-grade students in NELS88. U.S. Department of Education, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  28. Kline P (2005) An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Matza D (1964) Delinquency and drift. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. McCallum RC, Austin JT (2000) Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annu Rev Psychol 51:201–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCarthy JD, Hoge DR (1984) The dynamics of self-esteem and delinquency. Am J Sociol 90:396–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McGarty C, Turner JC, Oakes PJ, Haslam SA (1993) The creation of uncertainty in the influence process: the roles of stimulus information and disagreement with similar others. Eur J Soc Psychol 23:17–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mikami AY, Boucher MA, Humphreys K (2005) Prevention of peer rejection through a classroom-level intervention in middle school. J Prim Prev 26:5–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mills JF, Kroner DG (1999) Measures of criminal attitudes and associates. Unpublished User GuideGoogle Scholar
  35. Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus – statistical analysis with latent variables. user’s guide (6th Ed). Muthen and Muthen, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  36. Obst P, White KM (2005) Three-dimensional strength of identification across group memberships: a confirmatory factor analysis. Self Ident 4:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parker JG, Asher SR (1987) Peer relations and later personal adjustment: are low-accepted children at risk? Psychol Bull 102:357–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosenberg M (1989) Society and the adolescent self-image. (Rev. Ed.). Wesleyan University Press, MiddeltownGoogle Scholar
  39. Salovey P, Rodin J (1984) Some antecedents and consequences of social-comparison jealousy. J Pers Soc Psychol 47:780–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shaw JM, Scott WA (1991) Influence of parent discipline style on delinquent behaviour: the mediating role of control orientation. Aust J Psychol 43:61–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shevlin M, Bunting BP, Lewis CA (1995) Confirmatory factor analysis of the rosenberg self-esteem scale. Psychol Rep 76:707–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Simons RL, Whitbeck LB, Conger RD, Conger K (1991) Parenting factors, social skills, and value commitments as precursors to school failure, involvement with deviant peers and delinquent behaviour. J Youth Adolesc 20:645–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Steiger JH (1990) Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behav Res 25:173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sykes GM, Matza D (1957) Techniques of neutralization: a theory of delinquency. Am Sociol Rev 22:664–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tajfel H (1978) Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  46. Tajfel H, Turner J (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin W, Worchel S (eds) The social psychology of intergroup relations. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, pp 33–47Google Scholar
  47. Tanaka JS (1987) “How big is big enough?” Sample size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent variables. Child Development 58:134–146Google Scholar
  48. Thornberry T, Krohn M, Lizotte A, Chard-Wierschem D (1993) The role of juvenile gangs in facilitating delinquent behavior. J Res Crime Delinquen 30:55–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tucker LR, Lewis C (1973) The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Turjeman H, Mesch G, Fishman G (2008) Social identity, identity formation, and delinquency. Int J Comp Sociol 49:111–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Turner JC (1982) Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In: Tajfel H (ed) Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS (1987) Rediscovering the social groups: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  53. Vandenberg RJ (2002) Toward a further understanding of an improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organ Res Meth 5(2):139–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Boduszek
    • 1
  • Gary Adamson
    • 1
  • Mark Shevlin
    • 1
  • John Mallett
    • 1
  • Philip Hyland
    • 1
  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of UlsterLondonderryUK

Personalised recommendations