There is a myth in popular psychology, often echoed in police literature, but as yet untested, that specific eye movements pertain to lying and truth telling. According to this line of thought, eye movements to the sender’s right indicate lying, as the sender’s eyes are drawn to the side of his/her brain where their fabrication is being created. We have put this hypothesis, derived from ‘Neuro-Linguistic Programming’ to the test in two experiments. In Experiment 1, a total of 204 participants (all air passengers) were interviewed at an international airport about their forthcoming trip. All participants answered one question truthfully and one question deceptively. Some participants answered a third question truthfully, whereas others answered the same question deceptively. No conclusive evidence was found for a relationship between specific eye movements and deception. In Experiment 2, a total of 31 participants discussed their real occupation in one interview and a pretend occupation in another interview. Only three of the 31 participants revealed the eye movement pattern predicted by NLP. Reasons for the existence of the myth that liars display specific eye movements are discussed.
Neuro linguistic programming Deception detection Deceptive behaviour Eye movements Interviewing
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Anderson CA, Lepper MR, Ross L (1980) Perseverance of social theories: the role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. J Personal Soc Psychol 39:1037–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandler R, Grinder J (1979) Frogs into princes. Real People Press, Moab, UtahGoogle Scholar
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
Darley JM, Gross PH (1983) A hypothesis-confirming bias in labelling effects. J Personal Soc Psychol 44:20–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fugita SS, Wexley KN, Hillery JM (1974) Black-white differences in nonverbal behavior in an interview setting. J Appl Soc Psychol 4:343–351Google Scholar
Gordon NJ, Felisher WL, Weinberg CD (2002) Effective interviewing and interrogation techniques. Academic Press, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
Hess JE (1997) Interviewing and interrogation for law enforcement. Anderson Publishing Co., Cincinnati, OHGoogle Scholar
Ickes W (1984) Compositions in black and white: determinants of interaction in interracial dyads. J Personal Soc Psychol 47:330–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson MK (1988) Reality monitoring: an experimental phenomenological approach. J Exp Psychol Gen 117:390–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson RR (2006a) Confounding influences on police detection of suspiciousness. J Crim Just 34:435–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson RR (2006b) Race and police reliance on suspicious nonverbal cues. Policing Int J Police Strat Manag 30:277–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar