Management of fluid collections and necrosis in acute pancreatitis
- 78 Downloads
According to the Atlanta classification, the most widely accepted clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis, four pathologic entities of fluid collections and necrosis are recognized. Acute fluid collections occur early as an exudative reaction to the pancreatic inflammation, have no fibrous wall, and resolve spontaneously. Pancreatic necrosis, the most severe form of acute pancreatitis, is diagnosed on dynamic contrast-enhanced computerized tomography and requires early aggressive cardiorespiratory resuscitation, nutritional support, and appropriate systemic antibiotics to prevent superinfection. Development of infection (infected necrosis) is the indication for operative debridement, preferably as late in the course of the disease as possible. Acute pseudocysts are collections of pancreatic, enzyme-rich fluid caused by pancreatic ductal disruption that occur 3 to 6 weeks after onset of acute pancreatitis and have a well-defined, nonepithelial fibrous wall. If communication with the ductal system is present, internal enteric drainage (either operative or endoscopic) is more effective; if communication is not present, the pseudocysts are amenable to percutaneous drainage. A pancreatic abscess is an infected, circumscribed peripancreatic collection, associated with minimal or no parenchymal necrosis, that occurs late (4 to 6 weeks) after onset of severe pancreatitis and may represent an infected pseudocyst; percutaneous drainage is the treatment of choice.
KeywordsPancreatitis Acute Pancreatitis Acute Pancreatitis Pancreatic Necrosis Necrotizing Pancreatitis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References and Recommended Reading
- 3.Tsiotos GG, Luque-de Leon E, Söreide JA, et al.: Management of necrotizing pancreatitis by repeated operative necrosectomy using a zipper technique. Am J Surg 1998, 175:91–98. Includes critical analysis of the evolution of the various techniques of necrosectomy and management of the pancreatic bed. Also, the current understanding on the biphasic pattern of mortality and use of antibiotics is presented.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Grewe M, Luque-de Leon E, Tsiotos GG, Sarr MG: Fungal infection in acute necrotizing pancreatitis. J Am Col Surg, in press.Google Scholar
- 13.Mier J, Luque-de Leon E, Castillo A, et al.: Early versus late necrosectomy in severe necrotizing pancreatitis. Am J Surg 1997, 173:71–75. Very well-designed and executed prospective randomized trial that demonstrated for the first time the beneficial results of late necrosectomy. This article provided the data for the change of practice in many pancreatic centers.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Murr MM, Tsiotos GG, Sarr MG: Operative management of necrotizing pancreatitis. In Problems in General Surgery, vol 13. Edited by Sarr, MG, Soper NJ. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996:131–136.Google Scholar
- 20.van Sonnenberg E, Stabile BE, Varney RR, Christensen RR: Percutaneous drainage of infected and non-infected pseudocysts. Radiology 1989; 170:757–762Google Scholar
- 21.Freeny PC: Computed tomography. In Surgery of the Pancreas, edn 1. Edited by Trede M, Carter DC. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1993:61–72.Google Scholar
- 22.Palmer KR, Carter DC: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. In Surgery of the Pancreas, edn 2. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1997:99–118.Google Scholar