Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in 2020: A Look at the Past, Present, and Future

  • Large Intestine (R Chokshi, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of this Review

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the USA. Colonoscopy is considered the gold standard for colorectal cancer screening and can offer both diagnosis and therapy. The bowel preparation remains a significant barrier for patients who need to undergo colonoscopy and is often cited as the most dreaded aspect of the colonoscopy process. Inadequate bowel preparations still occur in 10–25% of colonoscopies, and this in turn can lead to increased procedural times, lower cecal intubation rates, and shorter interval between colonoscopies. From a quality standpoint, it is imperative that we do what we can to decrease the rate of inadequate bowel preparations. This review will focus on recent data regarding bowel preparation and offers a glimpse into what may be coming in the future.

Recent Findings

Recent advances in the field have been made to improve tolerability of bowel preparations and allow for more adequate colonoscopies. Newer, lower volume, flavored preparations, the use of adjuncts, and using split-dose preparations all can help with tolerability, compliance, and, in turn, preparation quality. Edible bowel preparations may become available in the near future. Early data on the use of artificial intelligence for assessment of preparation quality has been promising. Additionally, utilization of smartphone technology for education prior to the bowel preparation has also been shown to improve the adequacy of bowel preparations.

Conclusions

Ongoing efforts to improve the tolerability and palatability of colonoscopy bowel preparations are important from a quality improvement standpoint to ensure the adequacy of colonoscopy. Incorporating patient-specific factors and comorbidities is also an essential aspect of improving the quality of bowel preparation. Leveraging technology to better communicate with and educate patients on the bowel preparation process is likely to play a larger role in the coming years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. • Ketwaroo GA, Sawhney MS. Quality measures and quality improvements in colonoscopy. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2015;31(1):56–61 This review discusses quality measures in colonoscopy.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kastenberg D, Bertiger G, Brogadir S. Bowel preparation quality scales for colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(26):2833–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Park JH, Kim SJ, Hyun JH, Han KS, Kim BC, Hong CW, et al. Correlation between bowel preparation and the adenoma detection rate in screening colonoscopy. Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(3):93–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. •• Chokshi RV, et al. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(6):1197–203 This retrospective study originally highlighted the high percentage (25%) of patients who present for colonoscopies have inadequate bowel preparation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sawhney, M.S., Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: assessing and improving quality. Gastroenterology and Endoscopy News, March 2016.

  6. Leitao K, Grimstad T, Bretthauer M, Holme Ø, Paulsen V, Karlsen L, et al. Polyethylene glycol vs sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate for colonoscopy preparation. Endosc Int Open. 2014;2(4):E230–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharara AI, el Reda ZD, Harb AH, Abou Fadel CG, Sarkis FS, Chalhoub JM, et al. The burden of bowel preparations in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016;4(2):314–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. •• Bechtold ML, et al. Optimizing bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a guide to enhance quality of visualization. Ann Gastroenterol. 2016;29(2):137–46 This review highlighted bowel preparation recommendations for specific populations.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Parmar R, Martel M, Rostom A, Barkun AN. Validated scales for Colon cleansing: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(2):197–204 quiz 205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. • Zhou J, et al. A novel artificial intelligence system for the assessment of bowel preparation (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(2):428–435.e2 Study describing a new artifical intelligence software to assist with real time grading of bowel preparation.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. •• Harrison NM, Hjelkrem MC. Bowel cleansing before colonoscopy: Balancing efficacy, safety, cost and patient tolerance. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;8(1):4–12 This review highlighted the polyp and adenoma detections rate after using different bowel cleansing agents and the costs of these agents.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sweetser S, Baron TH. Optimizing bowel cleansing for colonoscopy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(4):520–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee YH, Jeong SY, Kim YS, Jung HJ, Kwon MJ, Kwak CH, et al. Randomized controlled trial of sodium phosphate tablets versus 2 L polyethylene glycol solution for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2015;65(1):27–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jung YS, et al. Randomized controlled trial of sodium phosphate tablets vs polyethylene glycol solution for colonoscopy bowel cleansing. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(42):15845–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. •• Burke DA, et al. Oral bowel lavage preparation for colonoscopy. Postgrad Med J. 1988;64(756):772–4 This was the first article to describe polyethylene glycol based bowel preparations.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Clark RE, Godfrey JD, Choudhary A, Ashraf I, Matteson ML, Bechtold ML. Low-volume polyethylene glycol and bisacodyl for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy: a meta-analysis. Ann Gastroenterol. 2013;26(4):319–24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Adamcewicz M, Bearelly D, Porat G, Friedenberg FK. Mechanism of action and toxicities of purgatives used for colonoscopy preparation. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2011;7(1):89–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ell C, Fischbach W, Bronisch HJ, Dertinger S, Layer P, Rünzi M, et al. Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG + electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(4):883–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tian X, et al. Comparative efficacy of 2 L polyethylene glycol alone or with ascorbic acid vs. 4 L polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019;6:182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Siddique S, Lopez KT, Hinds AM, Ahmad DS, Nguyen DL, Matteson-Kome ML, et al. Miralax with Gatorade for bowel preparation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(10):1566–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim HG, Huh KC, Koo HS, Kim SE, Kim JO, Kim TI, et al. Sodium Picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) plus laxative is a good alternative to conventional large volume polyethylene glycol in bowel preparation: a multicenter randomized single-blinded trial. Gut Liver. 2015;9(4):494–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Spadaccini M, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of high- vs low-volume split-dose bowel cleansing regimens for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019.

  23. Dang J, et al. Sodium phosphate is superior to polyethylene glycol in constipated patients undergoing colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. 2019;2:426–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. De Salvo L, et al. The bowel cleansing for colonoscopy. A randomized trial comparing three methods. Ann Ital Chir. 2006;77(2):143–6 discussion 147.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang HJ, Park SK, Kim JH, Im JP, Yeom DH, Seo GS, et al. Randomized trial comparing oral sulfate solution with 4-L polyethylene glycol administered in a split dose as preparation for colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;32(1):12–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kwak MS, Cha JM, Yang HJ, Park DI, Kim KO, Lee J, et al. Safety and efficacy of low-volume preparation in the elderly: oral sulfate solution on the day before and Split-dose regimens (SEE SAFE) study. Gut Liver. 2019;13(2):176–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hookey L, et al. Efficacy and safety of a ready-to-drink bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2019;12:1756284819851510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rostom A, Dube C, Bishay K, Antonova L, Heitman SJ, Hilsden R. A randomized clinical prospective trial comparing split-dose picosulfate/ magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0211136.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Seow-En I, Seow-Choen F. A prospective randomized trial on the use of Coca-Cola Zero(®) vs water for polyethylene glycol bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Color Dis. 2016;18(7):717–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharara AI, el-Halabi MM, Abou Fadel CG, Sarkis FS. Sugar-free menthol candy drops improve the palatability and bowel cleansing effect of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78(6):886–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. D, K., et al., Edible colon preparation shows excellent efficacy and tolerability in a phase 2, randomized trial. 2016.

  32. Loria K. Assisting patients with rising costs of prescription drugs. Medical Economics. 2019;96(20)).

  33. Kilgore TW, Abdinoor AA, Szary NM, Schowengerdt SW, Yust JB, Choudhary A, et al. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(6):1240–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bucci C, et al. Optimal bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: split the dose! A series of meta-analyses of controlled studies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80(4):566–576.e2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. •• Zawaly K, et al. The efficacy of split-dose bowel preparations for polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019;114(6):884–92 This is a systematic review and metanalysis of 28 randomized control trials which confirmed that split-dose bowel regimens increased detection of adenomas, and particularly sessile serrated polyps, compared to day before regimens.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Seo M, Gweon TG, Huh CW, Ji JS, Choi H. Comparison of bowel cleansing efficacy, safety, bowel movement kinetics, and patient tolerability of same-day and split-dose bowel preparation using 4 L of polyethylene glycol: a prospective randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62(12):1518–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Castro FJ, al-Khairi B, Singh H, Mohameden M, Tandon K, Lopez R. Randomized controlled trial: split-dose and same-day large volume bowel preparation for afternoon colonoscopy have similar quality of preparation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019;53(10):724–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Garber A, Sarvepalli S, Burke CA, Bhatt A, Ibrahim M, McMichael J, et al. Modifiable factors associated with quality of bowel preparation among hospitalized patients undergoing colonoscopy. J Hosp Med. 2019;14(5):278–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Martel M, Ménard C, Restellini S, Kherad O, Almadi M, Bouchard M, et al. Which patient-related factors determine optimal bowel preparation? Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2018;16(4):406–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. • Gimeno-García AZ, et al. Impact of a 1-day versus 3-day low-residue diet on bowel cleansing quality before colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2019;51(7):628–36 This randomized control trial of 390 patients showed that there was no difference in bowel cleansing in patients who were placed on 3 day low residue diet as compared to those who were placed on a 1 day low residue diet prior to colonoscopy.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Guo X, et al. Enhanced instructions improve the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(1):90–97.e6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mahmood S, Farooqui SM, Madhoun MF. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;30(8):819–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gallagher P, O'Mahony D. Constipation in old age. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2009;23(6):875–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Nguyen DL, et al. Low-residue versus clear liquid diet before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(3):499–507.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Leszczynski AM, MacArthur K, Nelson KP, Schueler SA, Quatromoni PA, Jacobson BC. The association among diet, dietary fiber, and bowel preparation at colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88(4):685–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Shieh TY, et al. Effect of physician-delivered patient education on the quality of bowel preparation for screening colonoscopy. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013;2013:570180.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Park JS, Kim MS, Kim H, Kim SI, Shin CH, Lee HJ, et al. A randomized controlled trial of an educational video to improve quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016;16(1):64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Pillai A, Menon R, Oustecky D, Ahmad A. Educational colonoscopy video enhances bowel preparation quality and comprehension in an inner city population. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018;52(6):515–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Parker S, Zipursky J, Ma H, Baumblatt GL, Siegel CA. A web-based multimedia program before colonoscopy increased knowledge and decreased anxiety, sedation requirement, and procedure time. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018;52(6):519–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. • Cho J, et al. The impact of patient education with a smartphone application on the quality of bowel preparation for screening colonoscopy. Clin Endosc. 2017;50(5):479–85 Small study of patients less than 50 years old which showed that a smartphone application for precolonoscopy education improves the quality of bowel preparation.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, 7200 Cambridge St., Suite 8B, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    Valentine Ongeri Millien & Nabil M. Mansour

Authors
  1. Valentine Ongeri Millien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nabil M. Mansour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nabil M. Mansour.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Large Intestine

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Millien, V.O., Mansour, N.M. Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy in 2020: A Look at the Past, Present, and Future. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 22, 28 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-020-00764-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-020-00764-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation