Advertisement

Management of Pancreatic Duct Stones

  • Kaveh SharzehiEmail author
Pancreas and Biliary Tract (O Haluszka, Section Editor)
  • 21 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Pancreas and Biliary Tract

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Pancreatic duct stones are sequela of chronic pancreatitis. They can cause pancreatic duct obstruction which is the most important cause of pain in chronic pancreatitis. Stone resolution has shown to improve pain. The goal of this review is to highlight recent endoscopic and surgical advancements in treatment of pancreatic duct stones.

Recent Findings

Stone fragmentation by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy has become first line and the mainstay of treatment for majority of patients with pancreatic duct stones. Introduction of digital video pancreatoscopy in the last few years with the capability of guided lithotripsy has provided a robust therapeutic option where extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is unsuccessful or unavailable. Historically, surgery has been considered a more reliable and durable option when feasible. However, it had not been compared with more effective endoscopic therapy.

Summary

Lithotripsy (extracorporeal and pancreatoscopy guided) is evolving as a strong treatment modality for pancreatic stones.

Keywords

Pancreatic stones Chronic pancreatitis Pancreatoscopy Pancreatic lithotripsy Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Majumder S, Chari ST. Chronic pancreatitis. Lancet (Lond, Engl). 2016;387(10031):1957–66.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pham A, Forsmark C. Chronic pancreatitis: review and update of etiology, risk factors, and management. F1000Research. 2018;7.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Etemad B, Whitcomb DC. Chronic pancreatitis: diagnosis, classification, and new genetic developments. Gastroenterology. 2001;120(3):682–707.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fasanella KE, Davis B, Lyons J, et al. Pain in chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2007;36(2):335–64 ix.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Forsmark CE. Management of chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(6):1282–1291.e1283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tandan M, Talukdar R, Reddy DN. Management of pancreatic calculi: an update. Gut Liver. 2016;10(6):873–80.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Friess H, Shrikhande S, Shrikhande M, et al. Neural alterations in surgical stage chronic pancreatitis are independent of the underlying aetiology. Gut. 2002;50(5):682–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rosch T, Daniel S, Scholz M, et al. Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis: a multicenter study of 1000 patients with long-term follow-up. Endoscopy. 2002;34(10):765–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tandan M, Reddy DN, Talukdar R, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in painful chronic calcific pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78(5):726–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ammann RW, Akovbiantz A, Largiader F, Schueler G. Course and outcome of chronic pancreatitis. Longitudinal study of a mixed medical-surgical series of 245 patients. Gastroenterology. 1984;86(5 Pt 1):820–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lehman GA. Role of ERCP and other endoscopic modalities in chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(6 Suppl):S237–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farnbacher MJ, Schoen C, Rabenstein T, Benninger J, Hahn EG, Schneider HT. Pancreatic duct stones in chronic pancreatitis: criteria for treatment intensity and success. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(4):501–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Suzuki Y, Sugiyama M, Inui K, et al. Management for pancreatolithiasis: a Japanese multicenter study. Pancreas. 2013;42(4):584–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Inui K, Masamune A, Igarashi Y, et al. Management of pancreatolithiasis: a nationwide survey in Japan. Pancreas. 2018;47(6):708–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sherman S, Lehman GA, Hawes RH, et al. Pancreatic ductal stones: frequency of successful endoscopic removal and improvement in symptoms. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37(5):511–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thomas M, Howell DA, Carr-Locke D, et al. Mechanical lithotripsy of pancreatic and biliary stones: complications and available treatment options collected from expert centers. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(9):1896–902.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chaussy C, Schmiedt E, Jocham D, Brendel W, Forssmann B, Walther V. First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol. 1982;127(3):417–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sauerbruch T, Stern M. Fragmentation of bile duct stones by extracorporeal shock waves. A new approach to biliary calculi after failure of routine endoscopic measures. Gastroenterology. 1989;96(1):146–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dumonceau JM, Delhaye M, Tringali A, et al. Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Updated August 2018. Endoscopy. 2019;51(2):179–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tandan M, Reddy DN. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic and large common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(39):4365–71.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dumonceau JM, Costamagna G, Tringali A, et al. Treatment for painful calcified chronic pancreatitis: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus endoscopic treatment: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2007;56(4):545–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Seza K, Yamaguchi T, Ishihara T, et al. A long-term controlled trial of endoscopic pancreatic stenting for treatment of main pancreatic duct stricture in chronic pancreatitis. Hepato-gastroenterology. 2011;58(112):2128–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    •• Moole H, Jaeger A, Bechtold ML, Forcione D, Taneja D, Puli SR. Success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in chronic calcific pancreatitis management: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Pancreas. 2016;45(5):651–8 ESWL is an effective and safe management option in patients with chronic calcific pancreatitis patients with main pancreatic duct stone size greater than 5 mm who did not get adequate pain relief with conservative management.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nguyen-Tang T, Dumonceau JM. Endoscopic treatment in chronic pancreatitis, timing, duration and type of intervention. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;24(3):281–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hu LH, Ye B, Yang YG, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for Chinese patients with pancreatic stones: a prospective study of 214 cases. Pancreas. 2016;45(2):298–305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    • Vaysse T, Boytchev I, Antoni G, et al. Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for chronic pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51(11):1380–5 This study shows that the ESWL alone is a safe and effective treatment for patients with chronic pancreatitis and obstructive stones. Therapeutic ERCP appears to provide no additional benefit.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kondo H, Naitoh I, Ohara H, et al. Efficacy of pancreatic stenting prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for pancreatic stones. Dig Liver Dis. 2014;46(7):639–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brand B, Kahl M, Sidhu S, et al. Prospective evaluation of morphology, function, and quality of life after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and endoscopic treatment of chronic calcific pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(12):3428–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Adamek HE, Jakobs R, Buttmann A, Adamek MU, Schneider AR, Riemann JF. Long term follow up of patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic stones treated with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Gut. 1999;45(3):402–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ohyama H, Mikata R, Ishihara T, et al. Efficacy of stone density on noncontrast computed tomography in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for patients with pancreatic stones. Pancreas. 2015;44(3):422–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Choi EK, McHenry L, Watkins JL, et al. Use of intravenous secretin during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy to facilitate endoscopic clearance of pancreatic duct stones. Pancreatology. 2012;12(3):272–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Merrill JT, Mullady DK, Early DS, Azar RR, Edmundowicz SA, Jonnalagadda SS. Timing of endoscopy after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2011;40(7):1087–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li BR, Liao Z, Du TT, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is a safe and effective treatment for pancreatic stones coexisting with pancreatic pseudocysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84(1):69–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Li BR, Liao Z, Du TT, et al. Risk factors for complications of pancreatic extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Endoscopy. 2014;46(12):1092–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Howell DA, Dy RM, Hanson BL, Nezhad SF, Broaddus SB. Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic duct stones using a 10F pancreatoscope and electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50(6):829–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    • Beyna T, Neuhaus H, Gerges C. Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic duct stones under direct vision: revolution or resignation? Systematic review. Dig Endosc Off J Jpn Gastroenterol Endosc Soc. 2018;30(1):29–37 Results from peroral pancreatoscopy are promising in terms of ductal clearance and pain relief compared to standard endoscopic techniques and ESWL as the current gold standard for lithotripsy.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Koch H, Stolte M, Walz V. Endoscopic lithotripsy in the common bile duct. Endoscopy. 1977;9(2):95–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ell C, Lux G, Hochberger J, Muller D, Demling L. Laserlithotripsy of common bile duct stones. Gut. 1988;29(6):746–51.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vassar GJ, Chan KF, Teichman JM, et al. Holmium: YAG lithotripsy: photothermal mechanism. J Endourol. 1999;13(3):181–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Attwell AR, Brauer BC, Chen YK, Yen RD, Fukami N, Shah RJ. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with per oral pancreatoscopy for calcific chronic pancreatitis using endoscope and catheter-based pancreatoscopes: a 10-year single-center experience. Pancreas. 2014;43(2):268–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dite P, Ruzicka M, Zboril V, Novotny I. A prospective, randomized trial comparing endoscopic and surgical therapy for chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2003;35(7):553–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Cahen DL, Gouma DJ, Nio Y, et al. Endoscopic versus surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(7):676–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cahen DL, Gouma DJ, Laramee P, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic vs surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(5):1690–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bellin MD, Abu-El-Haija M, Morgan K, et al. A multicenter study of total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT): POST (Prospective Observational Study of TPIAT). Pancreatology. 2018;18(3):286–90.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sutherland DE, Radosevich DM, Bellin MD, et al. Total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation for chronic pancreatitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(4):409–24 discussion 424–406.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dunderdale J, McAuliffe JC, McNeal SF, et al. Should pancreatectomy with islet cell autotransplantation in patients with chronic alcoholic pancreatitis be abandoned? J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(4):591–6 discussion 596–598.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Gastroenterology & HepatologyOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations