Current Gastroenterology Reports

, Volume 10, Issue 6, pp 591–596 | Cite as

Optimizing treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases with biologic agents

  • Gert Van Assche
  • Séverine Vermeire
  • Paul Rutgeerts
Article

Abstract

Despite more than a decade of clinical experience in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease with biologic agents, particularly anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibodies, optimal treatment strategies are still debated. Secondary loss of response due to immuno genicity is intrinsic to the use of therapeutic antibodies and has important implications. With the chimeric anti-TNF antibody, infliximab, scheduled maintenance therapy minimizes the risk of loss of response, and there is no clear evidence that concomitant immunosuppressives have added value in this setting. More humanized anti-TNF antibodies have entered clinical practice, opening new perspectives to patients with inflammatory bowel disease, but interventions in the dosing regimen remain necessary for more than one third of patients. Because biologics, like other immune therapies, carry the risk of infections and possibly of some malignancies, selecting the right patient for therapy and assessing disease activity beyond clinical symptoms aids in optimizing the benefit-to-risk ratio of our treatment approach.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Hanauer SB, Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, et al.: Human anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody (adalimumab) in Crohn’s disease: the CLASSIC-I trial. Gastroenterology 2006, 130:323–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hanauer SB, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, et al.: Maintenance infliximab for Crohn’s disease: the ACCENT I randomised trial. Lancet 2002, 359:1541–1549.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schreiber S, Khaliq-Kareemi M, Lawrance IC, et al.: Maintenance therapy with certolizumab pegol for Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:239–250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schreiber S, Rutgeerts P, Fedorak RN, et al.: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of certolizumab pegol (CDP870) for treatment of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2005, 129:807–818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Stoinov S, et al.: Certolizumab pegol for the treatment of Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:228–238.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Colombel J, Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, et al.: Adalimumab for maintenance of clinical response and remission in patients with Crohn’s disease: the CHARM trial. Gastroenterology 2007, 132:52–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sandborn WJ, Hanauer SB, Rutgeerts PJ, et al.: Adalimumab for maintenance treatment of Crohn’s disease: results of the CLASSIC II trial. Gut 2007, 56:1232–1239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rutgeerts P, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, et al.: Infliximab for induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med 2005, 353:2462–2476.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sandborn WJ, Rutgeerts P, Enns R, et al.: Adalimumab induction therapy for Crohn’s disease previously treated with infliximab: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2007, 146:829–838.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Present DH, Rutgeerts P, Targan S, et al.: Infliximab for the treatment of fistulas in patients with Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med 1999, 340:1398–1405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sands BE, Anderson FH, Bernstein CN, et al.: Infliximab maintenance therapy for fistulizing Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med 2004, 350:876–885.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cosnes J, Cattan S, Blain A, et al.: Long-term evolution of disease behavior of Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2002, 8:244–250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Markowitz J, Hyams J, Mack D, et al.: Corticosteroid therapy in the age of infliximab: acute and 1-year outcomes in newly diagnosed children with Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006, 4:1124–1129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    D’Haens G, Baert F, van Assche G, et al.: Early combined immunosuppression or conventional management in patients with newly diagnosed Crohn’s disease: an open randomised trial. Lancet 2008, 371:660–667.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beaugerie L, Seksik P, Nion-Larmurier I, et al.: Predictors of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2006, 130:650–656.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baert F, Noman M, Vermeire S, et al.: Influence of immunogenicity on the long-term efficacy of infliximab in Crohn’s disease. N Engl J Med 2003, 348:601–608.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Farrell RJ, Alsahli M, Jeen YT, et al.: Intravenous hydrocortisone premedication reduces antibodies to infliximab in Crohn’s disease: a randomized controlled trial. Gastroenterology 2003, 124:917–924.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maser EA, Villela R, Silverberg MS, Greenberg GR: Association of trough serum infliximab to clinical outcome after scheduled maintenance treatment for Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006, 4:1248–1254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bartelds GM, Wijbrandts CA, Nurmohamed MT, et al.: Clinical response to adalimumab: relationship to anti-adalimumab antibodies and serum adalimumab concentrations in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2007, 66:921–926.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van Assche G, Magdelaine-Beuzelin C, D’Haens G, et al.: Withdrawal of immunosuppression in Crohn’s disease treated with scheduled infliximab maintenance: a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2008, 134:1861–1868.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    St Clair EW, Wagner CL, Fasanmade AA, et al.: The relationship of serum infliximab concentrations to clinical improvement in rheumatoid arthritis: results from ATTRACT, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2002, 46:1451–1459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rutgeerts P, Feagan BG, Lichtenstein GR, et al.: Comparison of scheduled and episodic treatment strategies of infliximab in Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 2004, 126:402–413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vermeire S, Noman M, Van Assche G, et al.: Effectiveness of concomitant immunosuppressive therapy in suppressing the formation of antibodies to infliximab in Crohn’s disease. Gut 2007, 56:1226–1231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hanauer SB, Wagner CL, Bala M: Incidence and importance of antibody responses to infliximab after maintenance or episodic treatment in Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004, 2:542–553.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schnitzler F, Fidder H, Ferrante M, et al.: Long-term outcome of treatment with infliximab in 440 Crohn’s disease patients: results from a single center cohort [abstract]. Gastroenterology 2007, 132:A–14520.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rutgeerts P, Diamond RH, Bala M, et al.: Scheduled maintenance treatment with infliximab is superior to episodic treatment for the healing of mucosal ulceration associated with Crohn’s disease. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63:433–442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Colombel JF, Solem CA, Sandborn WJ, et al.: Quantitative measurement and visual assessment of ileal Crohn’s disease activity by computed tomography enterography: correlation with endoscopic severity and C reactive protein. Gut 2006, 55:1561–1567.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ochsenkuhn T, Herrmann K, Schoenberg SO, et al.: Crohn disease of the small bowel proximal to the terminal ileum: detection by MR-enteroclysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2004, 39:953–960.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gert Van Assche
    • 1
  • Séverine Vermeire
  • Paul Rutgeerts
  1. 1.Division of GastroenterologyUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations