Diagnostic testing in fecal incontinence
- 57 Downloads
Fecal incontinence is a common problem that disproportionately affects women and the elderly and has a significant impact on the quality of life. Incontinence is often multifactorial. Anorectal manometry, anal endosonography, magnetic resonance imaging, pudendal nerve latency, and electromyography provide morphologic and physiologic assessments of the internal and external anal sphincters, rectal motor and sensory function, rectal compliance, and rectoanal reflexes. This information, in concert, provides clues to the pathophysiology of fecal incontinence and may help to guide medical, surgical, or biofeedback therapy. These tests have also been used to assess the effectiveness of the therapeutic modalities. No data are available on the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic testing in fecal incontinence. Newer techniques, including electrophysiologic testing and morphologic imaging of the anorectum, are being pursued.
KeywordsPelvic Floor Fecal Incontinence Anal Sphincter External Anal Sphincter Internal Anal Sphincter
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References and Recommended Reading
- 1.Rao SSC: Practice guidelines: Diagnosis and management of fecal incontinence. American College of Gastroenterology, 2003. Am J Gastroenterol, in press. This paper is a comprehensive outline of the current practice guidelines for diagnostic testing and medical management of fecal incontinence, as recommended by the American College of Gastroenterology.Google Scholar
- 5.Diamant NE, Kamm MA, Wald A, et al.: AGA technical review on anorectal testing techniques. Gastroenterology 1999, 116:735–760. A critical review of the various manometric, radiologic, and imaging techniques. Recommendations for evaluation of patients, endorsed by the American Gastroenterological Association Clinical Practice and Practice Economics Committee, are also provided.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Rao SSC, Azpiroz F, Diamant N, et al.: Minimum standards of anorectal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2002, 14:553–559. This paper represents the first effort to establish minimum standards for anorectal manometry testing. It is based on the review of the pertinent literature, its relevance to clinical practice, and the consensus opinion of an international group of experts.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Felt-Bersma RJ, Sloots CE, Poen AC, et al.: Rectal compliance as a routine measurement: extreme volumes have direct clinical impact and normal volumes exclude rectum as a problem. Dis Colon Rectum 2000, 43:1732–1738. This paper describes a large study of incontinent patients and explores the feasibility of rectal compliance measurement and its utility in assessing anorectal problems.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Fox M, Thumshirn M, Menne D, et al.: A simulated stool retention test for the evaluation of anorectal function [abstract]. Z Gastroenterol 2001, 36:716.Google Scholar
- 30.Malouf AJ, Williams AB, Halligan S, et al.: Prospective assessment of accuracy of endoanal MR imaging and endosonography in patients with fecal incontinence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000, 175:741–745. This study suggests that anal endosonography and endoanal MRI are equivalent in diagnosing external anal sphincter injury, but that MRI is inferior for diagnosing internal anal sphincter injury.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.Thomas C, Lefaucheur JP, Galula G, et al.: Respective value of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency and anal sphincter electromyography in neurogenic fecal incontinence. Neurophysiol Clin 2002, 32:85–90. These authors found that anal EMG was more closely related to the anal functional status than pudendal nerve terminal motor latency and that it is a useful test in the assessment of neurogenic fecal incontinence.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Wexner SD, Jorge JM: Colorectal physiological tests: use or abuse of technology? Br J Surg 1994, 160:167–174.Google Scholar