Advertisement

Current Diabetes Reports

, 18:61 | Cite as

Emerging Approaches in Surveillance of Type 1 Diabetes

  • Sharon Saydah
  • Giuseppina Imperatore
Diabetes Epidemiology (E Selvin and K Foti, Section Editors)
  • 152 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Diabetes Epidemiology

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Surveillance of type 1 diabetes provides an opportunity to address public health needs, inform etiological research, and plan health care services. We present issues in type 1 diabetes surveillance, review previous and current methods, and present new initiatives.

Recent Findings

Few diabetes surveillance systems distinguish between type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Most worldwide efforts have focused on registries and ages < 15 years, resulting in limited information among adults. Recently, surveillance includes use of electronic health information and national health surveys. However, distinguishing by diabetes type remains a challenge.

Summary

Enhancing and improving surveillance of type 1 diabetes across all age groups could include validating questions for use in national health surveys. In addition, validated algorithms for classifying diabetes type in electronic health records could further improve surveillance efforts and close current gaps in our understanding of the epidemiology of type 1 diabetes.

Keywords

Type 1 diabetes Surveillance Registry Health survey Electronic health records 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Sharon Saydah and Giuseppina Imperatore declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report 2017. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2017. 2017.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Atlas, 8th Edition. Available at www.diabetesatlas.org accessed April 21, 2018. 2017.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2018;41(S1).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Orban T, Sosenko JM, Cuthbertson D, Krischer JP, Skyler JS, Jackson R, et al. Pancreatic islet autoantibodies as predictors of type 1 diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(12):2269–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buzzetti R, Zampetti S, Maddaloni E. Adult-onset autoimmune diabetes: current knowledge and implications for management. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017;13(11):674–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    • Dabelea D, Mayer-Davis EJ, Saydah S, Imperatore G, Linder B, Divers J, et al. Prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among children and adolescents from 2001 to 2009. JAMA :J Am Med Assoc. 2014;311(17):1778–86. Reports the most recent trends of prevalence among youth in the USA demonstrating use of registry for surveillance of type 1 diabetes. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zylke JW, DeAngelis CD. Pediatric chronic diseases--stealing childhood. JAMA. 2007;297(24):2765–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    • Mayer-Davis EJ, Lawrence JM, Dabelea D, Divers J, Isom S, Dolan L, et al. Incidence trends of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among youths, 2002–2012. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(15):1419–29. Reports the most recent trends of incidence among youth in the USA demonstrating use of registry for surveillance of type 1 diabetes. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Molbak AG, Christau B, Marner B, Borch-Johnsen K, Nerup J. Incidence of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in age groups over 30 years in Denmark. Diabet Med. 1994;11(7):650–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thunander M, Petersson C, Jonzon K, Fornander J, Ossiansson B, Torn C, et al. Incidence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in adults and children in Kronoberg, Sweden. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008;82(2):247–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    • Vandewalle CL, Coeckelberghs MI, De Leeuw IH, Du Caju MV, Schuit FC, Pipeleers DG, et al. Epidemiology, clinical aspects, and biology of IDDM patients under age 40 years. Comparison of data from Antwerp with complete ascertainment with data from Belgium with 40% ascertainment. The Belgian Diabetes Registry. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(10):1556–61. Discusses use of clinical markers in the daignosis of type 1 diabetes. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vandewalle CL, Falorni A, Lernmark A, Goubert P, Dorchy H, Coucke W, et al. Associations of GAD65- and IA-2- autoantibodies with genetic risk markers in new-onset IDDM patients and their siblings. The Belgian Diabetes Registry. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(10):1547–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    • Menke A, Orchard TJ, Imperatore G, Bullard KM, Mayer-Davis E, Cowie CC. The prevalence of type 1 diabetes in the United States. Epidemiology. 2013;24(5):773–4. Demonstrates the use of national survey to estimate the prevalence of type 1 diabetes based on age of diagnosis and insulin use. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. United States Diabetes Surveillance System Accessed April 21, 2018 https://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/diabetes/diabetesatlas.htmlGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    •• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems: Recommendations from Guidelines Working Group. MMWR. 2001;50(RR 13):1–35. Guidelines from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on evaluating public health surveillance systems. Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDCs Vision for Public Health Surveillance in the 21st Century. MMWR. 2012;61(Suppl):1–44. General review of reasons and uses of public health surveillance. Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    •• Diaz-Valencia PA, Bougneres P, Valleron AJ. Global epidemiology of type 1 diabetes in young adults and adults: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:255. Comprehensive review of type 1 diabetes among young adults highlighting gaps in current knowledge. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    •• Imperatore G, Mayer-Davis E, Orchard TJ, Zhong VW. Chapter 2- prevalence and incidence of type 1 diabetes among children and adults in the United States and comparison with non-U.S. countries. In: Cowie CC, Casagrande SS, Menke A, Cissell MA, Eberhardt MS, Meigs JB, et al., editors. Diabetes in America, 3rd Edition. NIH Pub No. 17-1468: National Institutes of Health; 2017. Comprehensive review of the incidence and prevelance of type 1 diabetes comparing estimates in the U.S. to other countries. Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    • Rogers MAM, Kim C, Banerjee T, Lee JM. Fluctuations in the incidence of type 1 diabetes in the United States from 2001 to 2015: a longitudinal study. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):–199. Demonstrates the feasibility of using electronic health information for surveillance of type 1 diabetes. Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    •• DIAMOND Project Group. Incidence and trends of childhood type 1 diabetes worldwide 1990-1999. Diabetes Med. 2006;23(8):857–66. First worldwide registry study to track the incidence of type 1 daibetes. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    •• Hamman RF, Bell RA, Dabelea D, D'Agostino RB Jr, Dolan L, Imperatore G, et al. The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study: rationale, findings, and future directions. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(12):3336–44. Describes the methods and rationale for the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. A registry study in the USA that includes both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hodgson S, Beale L, Parslow RC, Feltbower RG, Jarup L. Creating a national register of childhood type 1 diabetes using routinely collected hospital data. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012;13(3):235–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Incidence of Insulin Treated Diabetes in Australia, Available at https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/diabetes/incidence-insulin-treated-diabetes-australia-2016/contents/introduction Accessed April 21, 2018. Web report: 2018.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    •• Dabelea D, Pihoker C, Talton JW, D'Agostino RB Jr, Fujimoto W, Klingensmith GJ, et al. Etiological approach to characterization of diabetes type: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(7):1628–33. Highlights the use of diabetes auto antibodies and insulin senstivitiy to classify diabetes type among youth. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thomas NJ, Jones SE, Weedon MN, Shields BM, Oram RA, Hattersley AT. Frequency and phenotype of type 1 diabetes in the first six decades of life: a cross-sectional, genetically stratified survival analysis from UK Biobank. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(2):122–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    • Crume TL, Hamman RF, Isom S, Divers J, Mayer-Davis EJ, Zhong W, et al. The accuracy of provider-diagnosed diabetes type in youth: evidence from the SEARCH study. Diabetes 2013;62(Suppl 1) Reports the high accuracy of provider diagnosis of diabetes type as recorded in the medical record compared to etiologic classification. Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    • Ahlqvist E, Storm P, Karajamaki A, Martinell M, Dorkhan M, Carlsson A, et al. Novel subgroups of adult-onset diabetes and their association with outcomes: a data-driven cluster analysis of six variables. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6:361–9. This article proposes novel method to use available clinical information to classify diabets type among newly diagnosed individuals. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Beysel S, Unsal IO, Kizilgul M, Caliskan M, Ucan B, Cakal E. The effects of metformin in type 1 diabetes mellitus. BMC Endocr Disord. 2018;18(1):1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bellatorre A, Jackson SH, Choi K. Development of the diabetes typology model for discerning type 2 diabetes mellitus with national survey data. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hales CM, Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Freedman DS, Ogden CL. Trends in obesity and severe obesity prevalence in US youth and adults by sex and age, 2007-2008 to 2015-2016. JAMA : J Am Med Assoc. 2018.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liu LL, Lawrence JM, Davis C, Liese AD, Pettitt DJ, Pihoker C, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in youth with diabetes in USA: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study. Pediatr Diabetes. 2010;11(1):4–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    •• Mirza N, Reynolds T, Coletta M, Suda K, Soyiri I, Markle A, et al. Steps to a sustainable public health surveillance enterprisea commentary from the international society for disease surveillance. OJPHI. 2013;5(2):210. Highlights the need for sustainable surveillance systems. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Karvonen M, Viik-Kajander M, Moltchanova E, Libman I, LaPorte R, Tuomilehto J. Incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes worldwide. Diabetes Mondiale (DiaMond) Project Group. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(10):1516–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Patterson CC, Dahlquist GG, Gyurus E, Green A, Soltesz G, Group ES. Incidence trends for childhood type 1 diabetes in Europe during 1989-2003 and predicted new cases 2005-20: a multicentre prospective registration study. Lancet. 2009;373(9680):2027–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Patterson CC, Gyurus E, Rosenbauer J, Cinek O, Neu A, Schober E, et al. Trends in childhood type 1 diabetes incidence in Europe during 1989-2008: evidence of non-uniformity over time in rates of increase. Diabetologia. 2012;55(8):2142–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    •• Svensson J, Cerqueira C, Kjærsgaard P, Lyngsøe L, Hertel NT, Madsen M, et al. Danish Registry of Childhood and Adolescent Diabetes. Clin Epidemiol. 2016;8:679–83. Developed a national registry using electronic health information that also captures etiologic markers. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Akbar T, McGurnaghan S, Palmer CNA, Livingstone SJ, Petrie J, Chalmers J, et al. Cohort profile: Scottish Diabetes Research Network Type 1 Bioresource Study (SDRNT1BIO). Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(3):796–i.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Livingstone SJ, Looker HC, Hothersall EJ, Wild SH, Lindsay RS, Chalmers J, et al. Risk of cardiovascular disease and total mortality in adults with type 1 diabetes: Scottish registry linkage study. PLoS Med. 2012;9(10):e1001321.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Catanzariti L, Faulks K, Moon L, Waters AM, Flack J, Craig ME. Australia’s national trends in the incidence of type 1 diabetes in 0-14-year-olds, 2000-2006. Diabetic medicine : A Journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2009;26(6):596–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Campbell-Stokes PL, Taylor BJ. New Zealand Children’s Diabetes Working G. Prospective incidence study of diabetes mellitus in New Zealand children aged 0 to 14 years. Diabetologia. 2005;48(4):643–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Derraik JG, Reed PW, Jefferies C, Cutfield SW, Hofman PL, Cutfield WS. Increasing incidence and age at diagnosis among children with type 1 diabetes mellitus over a 20-year period in Auckland (New Zealand). PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32640.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Smith TL, Drum ML, Lipton RB. Incidence of childhood type I and non-type 1 diabetes mellitus in a diverse population: the Chicago Childhood Diabetes Registry 1994 to 2003. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab : JPEM. 2007;20(10):1093–107.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lipton R, Keenan H, Onyemere KU, Freels S. Incidence and onset features of diabetes in African-American and Latino children in Chicago, 1985-1994. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2002;18(2):135–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dokheel TM. An epidemic of childhood diabetes in the United States? Evidence from Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Pittsburgh Diabetes Epidemiology Research Group Diabetes care. 1993;16(12):1606–11.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lipman TH. The epidemiology of type I diabetes in children 0-14 yr of age in Philadelphia. Diabetes Care. 1993;16(6):922–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lipman T, Ratcliffe S, Cooper R, Elk L. Population-based survey of the prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in school children in Philadelphia. J Diabetes. 2013;5:456–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vehik K, Hamman RF, Lezotte D, Norris JM, Klingensmith G, Bloch C, et al. Increasing incidence of type 1 diabetes in 0- to 17-year-old Colorado youth. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(3):503–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wagenknecht LE, Roseman JM, Herman WH. Increased incidence of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus following an epidemic of Coxsackievirus B5. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133(10):1024–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Frazer de Llado TE, Gonzalez de Pijem L, Hawk B. Incidence of IDDM in children living in Puerto Rico Puerto Rican IDDM Coalition. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(5):744–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bruno G, Maule M, Biggeri A, Ledda A, Mannu C, Merletti F, et al. More than 20 years of registration of type 1 diabetes in Sardinian children: temporal variations of incidence with age, period of diagnosis, and year of birth. Diabetes. 2013;62(10):3542–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Bruno G, Novelli G, Panero F, Perotto M, Monasterolo F, Bona G, et al. The incidence of type 1 diabetes is increasing in both children and young adults in Northern Italy: 1984-2004 temporal trends. Diabetologia. 2009;52(12):2531–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bruno G, Runzo C, Cavallo-Perin P, Merletti F, Rivetti M, Pinach S, et al. Incidence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in adults aged 30-49 years: the population-based registry in the province of Turin, Italy. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(11):2613–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Berhan Y, Waernbaum I, Lind T, Mollsten A, Dahlquist G. Swedish Childhood Diabetes Study G. Thirty years of prospective nationwide incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes: the accelerating increase by time tends to level off in Sweden. Diabetes. 2011;60(2):577–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Skrivarhaug T, Stene LC, Drivvoll AK, Strom H, Joner G. Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Study G. Incidence of type 1 diabetes in Norway among children aged 0-14 years between 1989 and 2012: has the incidence stopped rising? Results from the Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry. Diabetologia. 2014;57(1):57–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    •• Weng J, Zhou Z, Guo L, Zhu D, Ji L, Luo X, et al. Incidence of type 1 diabetes in China, 2010-13: population based study. BMJ. 2018;360:j5295. http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author). Type 1 diabetes registry study in China that includes all ages and validates many type 1 cases with etiologic markers. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    •• Beck RW, Tamborlane WV, Bergenstal RM, Miller KM, DuBose SN, Hall CA, et al. The T1D exchange clinic registry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(12):4383–9. Novel method to create a type 1 diabetes registry relying on provider idenfitication of cases. Population included in registry not well defined possibily limiting estimates of incidence and prevalence. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Miller KM, Xing D, Tamborlane WV, Bergenstal RM, Beck RW. Challenges and future directions of the T1D Exchange Clinic Network and Registry. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013;7(4):963–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Harjutsalo V, Forsblom C, Groop PH. Time trends in mortality in patients with type 1 diabetes: nationwide population based cohort study. BMJ. 2011;343:d5364.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lammi N, Blomstedt PA, Moltchanova E, Eriksson JG, Tuomilehto J, Karvonen M. Marked temporal increase in the incidence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among young adults in Finland. Diabetologia. 2008;51(5):897–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Gorham ED, Barrett-Connor E, Highfill-McRoy RM, Mohr SB, Garland CF, Garland FC, et al. Incidence of insulin-requiring diabetes in the US military. Diabetologia. 2009;52(10):2087–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bullard KM, Cowie CC, Lessem SE, Saydah SH, Menke A, Geiss LS, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed diabetes in adults by diabetes type—United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(12):359–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lipman TH, Levitt Katz LE, Ratcliffe SJ, Murphy KM, Aguilar A, Rezvani I, et al. Increasing incidence of type 1 diabetes in youth: twenty years of the Philadelphia Pediatric Diabetes Registry. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(6):1597–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Search Study Group. SEARCH for diabetes in youth: a multicenter study of the prevalence, incidence and classification of diabetes mellitus in youth. Control Clin Trials. 2004;25(5):458–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Search for Diabetes in Youth Study Group, Liese AD, D’Agostino RB Jr, Hamman RF, Kilgo PD, Lawrence JM, et al. The burden of diabetes mellitus among US youth: prevalence estimates from the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Pediatrics. 2006;118(4):1510–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Writing Group for the Search for Diabetes in Youth Study Group, Dabelea D, Bell RA, D’Agostino RB Jr, Imperatore G, Johansen JM, et al. Incidence of diabetes in youth in the United States. JAMA : J Am Med Assoc. 2007;297(24):2716–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Burden AC, Hearnshaw JR, Swift PG. Childhood diabetes mellitus: an increasing incidence. Diabetic Medicine : A Journal of the British Diabetic Association. 1989;6(4):334–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Cardwell CR, Carson DJ, Patterson CC. Higher incidence of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus in remote areas: a UK regional small-area analysis. Diabetologia. 2006;49(9):2074–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Borch-Johnsen K, editor The Danish Diabetes Registry. Childhood Diabetes Surveillance Workshop; 2010; Atlanata, Georgia.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wood JR, Miller KM, Maahs DM, Beck RW, Dimeglio LA, Libman IM, et al. Most youth with type 1 diabetes in the T1D exchange clinic registry do not meet American Diabetes Association or International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes Clinical Guidelines. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(7):2035–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    • McVeigh KH, Newton-Dame R, Chan PY, Thorpe LE, Schreibstein L, Tatem KS, et al. Can electronic health records be used for population health surveillance? Validating population health metrics against established survey data. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016;4(1):1267. Proposes methods to validate electronic health records for surveillance. Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    • Klompas M, Cocoros NM, Menchaca JT, Erani D, Hafer E, Herrick B, et al. State and local chronic disease surveillance using electronic health record systems. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(9):1406–12. Compares prevalence estimates from electronic health records to estimates from survey data for diaebtes. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Sharma M, Petersen I, Nazareth I, Coton SJ. An algorithm for identification and classification of individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in a large primary care database. Clin Epidemiol. 2016;8:373–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    •• Lo-Ciganic W, Zgibor JC, Ruppert K, Arena VC, Stone RA. Identifying type 1 and type 2 diabetic cases using administrative data: a tree-structured model. Journal of diabetes science and technology. 2011;5(3):486–93. One of the first studies to use electronic health records to identify type 1 and type 2 diabetes cases using a multi-step process. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Bobo WV, Cooper WO, Stein CM, Olfson M, Mounsey J, Daugherty J, et al. Positive predictive value of a case definition for diabetes mellitus using automated administrative health data in children and youth exposed to antipsychotic drugs or control medications: a Tennessee Medicaid study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:128.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    •• Klompas M, Eggleston E, McVetta J, Lazarus R, Li L, Platt R. Automated detection and classification of type 1 versus type 2 diabetes using electronic health record data. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(4):914–21. Presents measures of accuracy and methods for identifying type 1 versus type 2 cases in electronic health records. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Vanderloo SE, Johnson JA, Reimer K, McCrea P, Nuernberger K, Krueger H, et al. Validation of classification algorithms for childhood diabetes identified from administrative data. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012;13(3):229–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Zhong VW, Obeid JS, Craig JB, Pfaff ER, Thomas J, Jaacks LM, et al. An efficient approach for surveillance of childhood diabetes by type derived from electronic health record data: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23(6):1060–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Lawrence JM, Black MH, Zhang JL, Slezak JM, Takhar HS, Koebnick C, et al. Validation of pediatric diabetes case identification approaches for diagnosed cases using information in the electronic health records of a large integrated managed health care organization. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(1):27–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Zhong VW, Pfaff ER, Beavers DP, Thomas J, Jaacks LM, Bowlby DA, et al. Use of administrative and electronic health record data for development of automated algorithms for childhood diabetes case ascertainment and type classification: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Pediatr Diabetes. 2014;15(8):573–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Boyle JP, Engelgau MM, Thompson TJ, Goldschmid MG, Beckles GL, Timberlake DS, et al. Estimating prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in a population of African Americans with diabetes mellitus. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;149(1):55–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Groseclose SL, Buckeridge DL. Public health surveillance systems: recent advances in their use and evaluation. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017;38:57–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Tkachenko N, Chotvijit S, Gupta N, Bradley E, Gilks C, Guo W, et al. Google trends can improve surveillance of type 2 diabetes. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):4993.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Diabetes TranslationAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations