Advertisement

Current Diabetes Reports

, 17:6 | Cite as

Transitioning the Adult with Type 2 Diabetes From the Acute to Chronic Care Setting: Strategies to Support Pragmatic Implementation Success

  • Michelle MageeEmail author
  • Joan K. Bardsley
  • Amisha Wallia
  • Kelly M. Smith
Health Care Delivery Systems and Implementation in Diabetes (ME McDonnell and AR Sadhu, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Health Care Delivery Systems and Implementation in Diabetes

Abstract

Scientific evidence is available to guide the how to of medications management when patients with diabetes are hospitalized or present to the Emergency Department. However, few clinical trials in the diabetes field have addressed the execution, coupled with established implementation effectiveness evaluation frameworks to help inform and assess implementation practices to support the transition in care. These deficiencies may be overcome by (1) applying the principles of implementation and delivery systems science; (2) engaging the principles of human factors (HF) throughout the design, development, and evaluation planning activities; and (3) utilizing mixed methods to design the intervention, workflow processes, and evaluate the intervention for sustainability within existing care delivery models. This article provides a discussion of implementation science and human factors science including an overview of commonly used frameworks which can be applied to structure design and implementation of sustainable and generalizable interventions.

Keywords

Implementation effectiveness Implementation science Human factors Diabetes education Implementation frameworks Diabetes management 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Michelle Magee reports grants from the National Institutes of Health (R34 Diabetes To Go Inpatient). Kelly M. Smith reports grants from the National Institutes of Health (1-R34-DK-109503-01 and UL1TR001409).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Amisha Wallia reports grants from Merck and Eli Lilly.

Michelle Magee, Joan K. Bardsley, and Kelly M. Smith declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article references studies performed by the authors which involves human subjects. All such, studies were approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board and the informed consent process conducted as appropriate.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Narayan KM, Boyle JP, Geiss LS, et al. Impact of recent increase in incidence on future diabetes burden: US 2005-2050. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:2114–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang ES, Basu A, O’Grady M. Projecting the future diabetes populations size and related costs for the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:2225–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    • Magee MF, Khan NH, Desale S, et al. Diabetes to Go: knowledge- and competency-based hospital survival skills diabetes education program improves post-discharge medication adherence. Diabetes Educ. 2014;40:344–50. doi: 10.1177/0145721714523684. This article provides the evidence of a successful implementation framework for diabetes education. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    •• Rodriguez K, Meneghini L, Seley JJ et al. Patient education in inpatient management of diabetes. American Diabetes Association 2016. The standards of care include the latest evidence for management of diabetes. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maynard G, Lee J, Phillips G, et al. Improved inpatient use of basal insulin, reduced hypoglycemia, and improved glycemic control: effect of structured subcutaneous insulin orders and an insulin management algorithm. J Hospital Med. 2009;4:3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Umpierrez GE, Smiley D, Zisman A, et al. Randomized study of basal-bolus insulin therapy in the inpatient management of patients with type 2 diabetes (RABBIT 2 trial). Diabetes Care. 2007;30:2181–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Donihi AC, Di NarDiNardo MM, DeVita MA, et al. Use of a standardized protocol to decrease medication errors and adverse events related to sliding scale insulin. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15:89–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Umpierrez GE, Reyes D, Smiley D, et al. Hospital discharge algorithm based on admission HbA1c for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:2934–9. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0479.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Babu A, Mehta A, Guerrero P, et al. Safe and simple emergency department discharge therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and severe hyperglycemia. Endocr Pract. 2009;15:696–704.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Magee MF, Nassar CM, Mete M, et al. The Synergy to Control Emergency Department Hyperglycemia Program for type 2 diabetes: STEP-Diabetes. Endocr Pract. 2015;21:1227–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Munoz C, Villanueva G, Fogg L, et al. Impact of a subcutaneous insulin protocol in the emergency department: RushEmergency Department Hyperglycemia Intervention (REDHI). J Emerg Med. 2011;40:493–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.03.017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bernard JB, Munoz C, Harper J, et al. Treatment of inpatient hyperglycemia beginning in the emergency department: a randomized trial using insulins aspart and detemir compared with usual care. J Hosp Med. 2011;6:279–84. doi: 10.1002/jhm.866.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Magee MF, Nassar CM, Mete M, White K, Youssef GA, Dubin JS. The synergy to enable glycemic control following emergency department discharge program for adults with type 2 diabetes: step-diabetes. Endocrine Pract : Off J Am College Endocrinol Am Assoc Clin Endocrinol. 2015;21:1227–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Diabetes Care in the Hospital. American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care for Diabetes -2016. Diabetes Care. 2016; 39 (Supplement 1): S99-S104. doi:  10.2337/dc16-S016.
  15. 15.
    Rodrigues A, Magee M, Ramos P, et al. Best practices for interdisciplinary care management by hospital glycemic teams: results of a Society of Hospital Medicine survey among 19 US hospitals. Diabetes Spectrum. 2014;27:197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Glasgow RE. What does it mean to be pragmatic? pragmatic methods, measures, and models to facilitate research translation. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40:257–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ellrodt G, Cook DJ, Lee J, et al. Evidence-based disease management. JAMA. 1997;278:1687–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Epstein RS, Sherwood LM. From outcomes research to disease management: a guide for the perplexed. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:832–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Kaplan RM. If diabetes is a public health problem, why not treat it as one? a population-based approach to chronic illness. Ann Behav Med. 1999;21(Spring):159–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. JAMA. 2002;288:1909–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Transitions of Care Measures. NTOCC Measures Working Group, 2008. Accessed 5-24-16 at http://www.ntocc.org/Portals/0/PDF/Resources/TransitionsOfCare_Measures.pdf.
  22. 22.
    Health Indicators Warehouse. Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information System. http://www.healthindicators.gov/Resources/DataSources/HEDIS_56/Profile.
  23. 23.
    Frohlich KL, Potvin L. The inequality paradox: the population approach and vulnerable populations. Am J Publ Hlth. 2008;98:216–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    The TRIAD Study Group. Health systems, patients factors and quality of care for diabetes: a synthesis of findings from the TRIAD study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:940–7. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1802.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Russell MA, Phipps MG, Olson CL, et al. Rates of postpartum glucose testing after gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:1456–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ferrara A, Hedderson M, Albright CL, et al. A pregnancy and postpartum lifestyle intervention in women with GDM reduces diabetes risk factors: a feasibility randomized control trial. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1519–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ehrlich SF, Hedderson MM, Quesenberry Jr CP, et al. Post-partum weight loss and glucose metabolism in women with gestational diabetes: the DEBI Study. Diabet Med. 2014;31:862–7. doi: 10.1111/dme.12425.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ferrara A, Hedderson MM, Albright CL, et al. A pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial of diabetes prevention strategies for women with gestational diabetes: design and rationale of the Gestational Diabetes’ Effects on Moms (GEM) study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ferrara A, Hedderson MM, Albright CL, et al. Reduced postpartum weight retention with a DPP-derived lifestyle intervention: The Gestational Diabetes’ Effects on Moms (GEM) cluster randomized trial [abstract]Ferrara A, Hedderson MM, Albright CL et al. Diabetes. 2014;63.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ferrara A, Peng T, Kim C. Trends in postpartum diabetes screening and subsequent diabetes and impaired fasting glucose among women with histories of gestational diabetes mellitus. a report from the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:269–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Committee on an Evidence Framework for Obesity Prevention Decision Making, Institute of Medicine. Bridging the Evidence Gap in Obesity Prevention: A Framework to Inform Decision Making. National Academies Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Coleman EA, Parry C, Chalmers S, et al. The care transitions intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Int Med. 2006;166:1822–8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.17.1822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Voss R, Gardner R, Baier R, et al. The care transitions intervention: translating from efficacy to effectiveness. Arch Int Med. 2011;171:1232–7. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Clay-Williams R, Nosrati H, Cunningham FC, et al. Do large-scale hospital- and system-wide interventions improve patient outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:369. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-369.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:344–9. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T84-4S0MXBS-6/2/9bb4898e5439f9b306852ecb8472cf8e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kottke TE, Solberg LI, Nelson AF, et al. Optimizing practice through research: a new perspective to solve an old problem. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6:459–62. doi: 10.1370/afm.862.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Feldstein AC, Glasgow RE. A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34:228–43. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18468362. Accessed January 25, 2015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pronovost PJ, Berenholtz SM, Needham DM. Translating evidence into practice: a model for large scale knowledge translation. BMJ. 2008;337(oct06_1):a1714. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1714.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
  40. 40.
    Pronovost PJ, Goeschel CA, Marsteller JA, et al. Framework for patient safety research and improvement. Circulation. 2009;119:330–7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.729848.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Stellefson M, Chaney B, Barry AE. Web 2.0 chronic disease self-management for older adults: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e35. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2439.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dzewaltowski DA, Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, et al. RE-AIM: evidence-based standards and a Web resource to improve translation of research into practice. Ann Behav Med. 2004;28:75–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1322–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Glasgow RE, McKay HG, Piette JD, et al. The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Educ Couns. 2001;44:119–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Illuri V, Khorzad R, Derby T et al. A failure mode effects and criticality analysis identifies variability in inpatient diabetes education comprehension as a high risk failure in transitions of care. American Diabetes Association 75th Scientific Session; 2015; Boston, MA: Conference Abstract.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nagpal K, Vats A, Ahmed K, et al. A systematic quantitative assessment of risks associated with poor communication in surgical care. Arch Surg. 2010;145:582–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Stamatis DH. Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. 2nd ed. Milwaukee, Wisc.: ASQ Quality Press; 2003. xxxi, 455 p. p.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    •• Russ AL, Fairbanks RJ, Karsh BT, et al. The science of human factors: separating fact from fiction. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:802–8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001450. This reference provides the evidence and utilization of human factors design. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Catchpole K. Spreading human factors expertise in healthcare: untangling the knots in people and systems. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22:793–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gosbee J, Gosbee LL. Using human factors engineering to improve patient safety: Joint Commission Resources, Inc.; 2005.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Karsh BT, Holden RJ, Alper SJ, et al. A human factors engineering paradigm for patient safety: designing to support the performance of the healthcare professional. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15 Suppl 1:i59–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Baum F, MacDougall C, Smith D. Participatory action research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:854–7. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.028662.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Arthur HM, Wright DM, Smith KM. Women and heart disease: the treatment may end but the suffering continues. Can J Nurs Res. 2001;33:17–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Realpe A, Wallace LM. 2010.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Gilson L, Hanson K, Sheikh K, et al. Building the field of health policy and systems research: social science matters. PLoS Med. 2011;8:e1001079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001079.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation. Available at: www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/dmany/fig1.htm. Accessed: 2/20/2016.
  57. 57.
    American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2013.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP).: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). 2014. Available at: http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov/HCUPnet.jsp. Accessed: 5-23-2016.
  59. 59.
    Axon RN, Williams MV. Hospital readmission as an accountability measure. JAMA. 2011;305:504–5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Stone J, Hoffman GJ. Medicare hospital readmissions: Issues, policy options and PPACA. Congressional Research Service. 2010 http://www.hospitalmedicine.org/AM/pdf/advocacy/CRS_Readmissions_Report.pdf. Accessed 23 Jan 2015.
  61. 61.
    Epstein AM. Revisiting readmissions changing the incentives for shared accountability. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1457–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0901006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Project RED (Re-Engineered Discharge). http://www.bu.edu/fammed/projectred/ Accessed 23 Jan 2015.
  63. 63.
    Hansen LO, Greenwald JL, Budnitz T, et al. Project BOOST: effectiveness of a multihospital effort to reduce rehospitalizations. J Hospital Med. 2013;8:421–7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Moore C, Wisnivesky J, Williams S, et al. Medical errors related to discontinuity of care from an inpatient to an outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:646–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Montejano L, Vo L, McMorrow D. Transitions of care for people with type 2 diabetes: utilization of antihyhperglycemic agents per-and post-hospitalization. Diabetes Ther. 2016;7:91–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Rubin DJ. Hospital readmission of patients with diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2015;15:584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Rubin DJ, Donnell-Jackson K, Jhingan R, et al. Early readmission among patients with diabetes: a qualitative assessment of contributing factors. J Diabetes Complications. 2014;28:869–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.06.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    http://www.ntocc.org/Portals/0/PDF/Resources/TransitionsOfCare_Measures.pdf. Definition and Framework for Measuring Care Coordination. National Quality Forum report. May 2006. Available at http://www.qualityforum.org/projects/ongoing/carecoordination/.
  69. 69.
    Coleman, ErA. Commissioned Paper: Transitional Care Performance Measurement. Performance Measurement Report, Institute of Medicine, 2006. Appendix I, 250–276.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Position Statement: Improving the Quality of Transitional Care for Persons with Complex Care Needs. American Geriatrics Society. May 2002. Available at http://www.americangeriatrics.org/products/positionpapers/complex_care.shtml.
  71. 71.
    One Patient, Many Places: Managing Health Care Transitions. HMO Care Management Work Group. February 2004. Available at http://www.ahip.org/content/default.aspx?bc=38%7C65%7C69.
  72. 72.
    McElroy LM, Khorzad R, Nannicelli AP, et al. Failure mode and effects analysis: a comparison of two common risk prioritisation methods. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:329–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Prabhakaran S, Khorzad R, Brown A, et al. Academic-community hospital comparison of vulnerabilities in door-to-needle process for acute ischemic stroke. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015;8(6 Suppl 3):S148–54. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002085.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Illuri V, Khorzad R, Derby T et al. Risk assessment of the diabetes discharge process reveals industry and systems levels failures. Research Letter Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Magee MF, Smith KM, et al. NIH R34 ongoing “Diabetes To Go Inpatient” Study (1-R34-DK-109503-01). https://www.medstarhealth.org/mhri/2016/03/22/nih-funds-medstar-program-diabetes-to-go-to-educate-from-the-bedside/#q={}. Accessed October 11, 2016.
  76. 76.
    Lewis VR, Benda N, Nassar C, et al. Successful patient diabetes education in the emergency department. Diabetes Educ. 2015;41:343–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelle Magee
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Joan K. Bardsley
    • 2
    • 5
  • Amisha Wallia
    • 4
  • Kelly M. Smith
    • 2
  1. 1.MedStar Diabetes InstituteWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.MedStar Health Research InstituteHyattsvilleUSA
  3. 3.Georgetown University School of Medicine and Healthcare SciencesWashingtonUSA
  4. 4.Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoUSA
  5. 5.MedStar Health Corporate NursingHyattsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations