Current Diabetes Reports

, 16:18 | Cite as

An Update on the Use of Animal Models in Diabetic Nephropathy Research

Open Access
Microvascular Complications—Nephropathy (AP Maxwell, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Microvascular Complications—Nephropathy

Abstract

In the current review, we discuss limitations and recent advances in animal models of diabetic nephropathy (DN). As in human disease, genetic factors may determine disease severity with the murine FVB and DBA/2J strains being more susceptible to DN than C57BL/6J mice. On the black and tan, brachyuric (BTBR) background, leptin deficient (ob/ob) mice develop many of the pathological features of human DN. Hypertension synergises with hyperglycemia to promote nephropathy in rodents. Moderately hypertensive endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS−/−) deficient diabetic mice develop hyaline arteriosclerosis and nodular glomerulosclerosis and induction of renin-dependent hypertension in diabetic Cyp1a1mRen2 rats mimics moderately severe human DN. In addition, diabetic eNOS−/− mice and Cyp1a1mRen2 rats recapitulate many of the molecular pathways activated in the human diabetic kidney. However, no model exhibits all the features of human DN; therefore, researchers should consider biochemical, pathological, and transcriptomic data in selecting the most appropriate model to study their molecules and pathways of interest.

Keywords

Diabetic nephropathy Animal models Hypertension Transcriptomics Regression 

Introduction

Although there are tentative signs that the incidence of end-stage kidney disease due to diabetes is stabilizing, diabetic nephropathy (DN) remains the most common cause of end-stage renal disease in the western world [1]. Improvements in the management of hyperglycemia and hypertension have reduced the proportion of patients with diabetes reaching end-stage kidney disease [2]; however, additional therapies are required to target those with progressive renal disease. Unfortunately, the results of recent clinical trials in DN have been largely disappointing [3, 4, 5], and no new therapies that specifically target progression of nephropathy have been successfully translated into clinical practice in recent years [6].

Role of Animal Models in Diabetic Nephropathy

One of the roadblocks in developing novel therapies for DN has been the lack of reliable preclinical models. For many diseases, rodent models have been useful in dissecting the pathogenesis of disease and for testing novel therapies. Indeed, the availability of genetically modified animals facilitates mechanistic studies that cannot be performed in humans. For example, by introducing genetic modifications, specific cell types can be fluorescently tagged to track the fate of the cells over time or to facilitate isolation of cells from whole organs, and this may enhance our knowledge of disease pathogenesis. In addition, targeted knockout or overexpression of genes can incisively determine the role of specific molecules in disease and whether such agents represent novel therapeutic candidates. However, the utility of animal models in DN research has been constrained by the fact that most models fail to recapitulate important functional, structural, and molecular pathological features of advanced human diabetic kidney disease [7, 8]. This may account for the fact that many therapies which have been found to be of benefit in preclinical models have not proved effective in clinical trials.

In order to rationalize the development of novel preclinical models of DN, the nephropathy subcommittee of the Diabetic Complications Consortium (DiaComp) has published criteria that can be used to validate animal models of DN [9]. These are based on the clinical and pathological features of human DN and include the following: (i) a decline in renal function of more than 50 % over the lifespan of the animal; (ii) a greater than 10-fold increase in albuminuria; and (iii) key pathologic features of human disease including advanced mesangial matrix expansion (+/−nodules), thickening of the glomerular basement membrane, arteriolar hyalinosis, and tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Unfortunately, no currently available model meets all of these criteria [7].

Animal Models of Diabetes

A number of animal models of both type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes are widely available to researchers (Table 1). Type 1 diabetes may be induced in rodents by administration of streptozotocin, which is toxic to β-cells, resulting in absolute insulin deficiency. Streptozotocin may have toxic effects on other organs including the kidney, although these may be minimized by administering smaller doses over five consecutive days. Genetic models of type 1 diabetes are also available, including Akita [10] and OVE26 [11] mice, in which mutations in the insulin and calmodulin genes, respectively, result in toxic accumulation of a defective protein specifically in pancreatic β-cells.
Table 1

Summary of commonly utilized animal models of diabetic kidney disease with brief description

Genetic modification and strain

Description

Ref.

Models of diabetes

  

 DBA/2J mice

T1DM, STZ injection induces diabetes on a strain susceptible for nephropathy

[18•]

 Ove26 on FVB mice

T1DM, mutation in the calmodulin gene results in toxic accumulation of defective proteins in beta-cells (nephropathy can be further exacerbated by uninephrectomy)

[11, 20, 43]

 Akita (Ins2+/C96Y) on C57BL6 mice

T1DM, mutation in the insulin gene results in misfolding and toxic accumulation of insulin

[10]

 db/db mice (C57BLKS/FVB)

T2DM, inactivating mutation in the leptin receptor leading to hyperphagia and obesity

[19]

 ob/ob on BTBR mice

T2DM, leptin deficiency on a black and tan, brachyuric strain that is naturally insulin resistant

[21••]

 MKR on FVB mice

T2DM, dysfunctional insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) in the skeletal muscle results in nonobese insulin resistance. Nephropathy may be exacerbated by uninephrectomy or high-fat diet

[15]

 fa/fa on Zucker rat

T2DM, hyperphagic and obese, due to missense mutation in the gene coding the leptin receptor

[14]

 OLETF rat

T2DM, hyperphagia and obese, in part due to a spontaneous mutation in cholecystokinin receptor-1

[25]

 Goto Kakizaki rat

T2DM, polygenic, nonobese model with deficient insulin production and insulin resistance. Nephropathy may be exacerbated by diet-induced hypertension

[46]

Specific genetic modifications to accelerate nephropathy

 

 ApoE−/− on C57BL6 mice

T1DM, STZ-induced diabetes combined with hyperlipidemia due to lack of apolipoprotein E

[56]

 eNOS−/− on C57BL6 or db/db mice

Vascular dysfunction and hypertension induced by eNOS deficiency accelerate renal injury in either STZ-induced diabetes (T1DM) or when backcrossed to db/db mice (T2DM)

[52, 53]

 TTRhRen on FVB mice

T1DM, hypertension induced by human renin overproduction combined with diabetes induced by STZ injection or OVE26 mutation

[48]

 Cyp1a1mRen2 on Fisher rat

T1DM, severe hypertension induced by renin overproduction synergises with STZ-induced diabetes

[47]

Refer to the text for a detailed description and characterization of the models

STZ streptozotocin, MKR MCK-KR-hIGF-IR mice, OLETF rat Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty rat, TTRhRen transgenic mice expressing active human renin in the liver

Models of type 2 diabetes typically utilize genetically obese rodents, which are either leptin deficient (e.g., ob/ob mice [12]) or have inactivating mutations in the leptin receptor (e.g., db/db mice [13], Zucker rats [14]). These animals exhibit hyperphagy, obesity, and insulin resistance and develop relative insulin deficiency and hyperglycemia in the first 8 weeks of life. The degree of hyperglycemia is dependent on the nature of the mutation and on the background strain of the animal. Typically, hyperglycemia is less severe in ob/ob mice and in leptin receptor-deficient mice on the C57BL/6J background, whereas db/db mice on the C57BLKS background develop fulminant diabetes and require exogenous insulin administration in order to maintain well-being beyond 24 weeks of age. Administration of a high-fat diet is useful for investigating mechanisms of insulin resistance; however, the animals rarely become overtly hyperglycemic. Furthermore, the high-fat diet per se may promote renal injury, and the animals do not exhibit classical features of human DN. An alternative nonobese model of type 2 diabetes employs MKR mice in which the insulin receptor is dysfunctional specifically in skeletal muscle, resulting in insulin resistance, marked hyperglycemia, and hyperlipidemia [15].

Choice of Rodent Species and Strain

Mice breed rapidly, are relatively cheap to house, and have long been amenable to genetic manipulation, and hence, they are the most widely used species in preclinical research; however, they tend to be resistant to the development of DN. In patients with diabetes, multiple genetic factors influence the risk of developing nephropathy [16], some of which are now being elucidated by genome-wide association studies [17]. Similarly in mice, the susceptibility to nephropathy is influenced by the particular strain of mouse employed [7, 9]. The C57BL/6J mouse is the most common strain used in preclinical research, and hence, many genetic modifications are performed on this background. Unfortunately, this strain is relatively resistant to the development of DN [18•]; therefore, a lengthy and expensive breeding program may be required to backcross genetic mutations onto a more susceptible strain such FVB and DBA/2J mice. For example, when the leptin receptor mutation found in db/db mice is crossed to the FVB background, the resultant mice are more susceptible to nephropathy than equally obese and hyperglycemic C57BL/6J mice [19]. In addition, OVE26 mice on the FVB background exhibit nodular glomerulosclerosis and a greater than 10-fold increase in albuminuria by 6 months of age [20]. Diabetic DBA/2J mice develop more marked albuminuria than C57BL/6J mice, and additionally, they exhibit some pathological features of human disease, such as nodular glomerulosclerosis and arteriolar hyalinosis [18•].

More recently, it has been shown that the relatively uncommon black and tan, brachyuric (BTBR) mouse may be a potentially useful strain for modeling DN. BTBR mice are naturally insulin-resistant, and when the ob/ob mutation is placed on this strain, the mice exhibit sustained hyperglycemia from an early age, in contrast to ob/ob mice on the C57BL/6J background. Furthermore, ob/ob BTBR mice develop some pathological features of human DN including arteriolar hyalinosis, mesangial expansion, mesangiolysis, focal nodular glomerulosclerosis, and a reduction in podocyte number [21••]. Unfortunately, ob/ob BTBR mice are difficult to breed and they have high mortality rates beyond 24 weeks of age, which limits their use in modeling more advanced nephropathy.

In all of these strains of mice, the increase in albuminuria is equivalent to modestly elevated levels in humans (typically ∼10-fold) and they do not develop a progressive decline in renal function. Furthermore, they exhibit at most mild tubulointerstitial fibrosis, which is important as this is the best pathological determinant of progressive DN in humans [22].

Prior to the advent of genetic modification of mice in the 1980s, the rat was the most commonly studied model organism as there are a number of advantages in using rats rather than mice to model disease [23]. Their greater size facilitates repeated blood sampling, monitoring of renal physiology, and access to sufficient renal tissue for analysis. Furthermore, rats are more susceptible than mice to many cardiovascular diseases including hypertension, and for many traits, the genetics and pathophysiology in rats has proven more relevant to human disease. Models of type 1 diabetes (streptozotocin-induced) and type 2 diabetes (Zucker, Goto Kakizaki [24], and Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty (OLETF [25]) rats have been employed; however, these models typically do not develop features of advanced human DN. Recent advances have enabled targeted gene knockout in rats [26]; however, it will be several years before the high-throughput murine gene knockout programs can be recapitulated in rats and in the interim researchers will have to incur the additional cost of generating custom-made transgenic rodents.

Large animal species, such as pigs and dogs, have also been utilized to model DN. Following induction of type 1 diabetes by administration of alloxan, dogs develop glomerular lesions within 2 years [27] and this process may be accelerated by performing uninephrectomy [28]. Similarly, pigs have been used to model the early glomerular lesions of human DN and test therapeutic agents [29]. However, in these large animal models, there is no evidence of more advanced features of human DN, such as tubulointerstitial fibrosis or a decline in renal function. As the large animal models have few major advantages compared with rodent models, given the greater husbandry costs and prolonged study duration, it is likely that rodents will remain the preeminent species in preclinical DN research.

Model organisms such as Drosophila and zebrafish afford several advantages over rodents such as high fecundity, short lifespan, low breeding costs, ease of genetic manipulation, and relative ease of in vivo imaging of deep tissues. For these reasons, they have long been used to study fundamental processes such as development, apoptosis, and regeneration. Zebrafish can be rendered diabetic by repeated doses of streptozotocin [30] and have been used to study diabetes complications [31]. Drosophila possess nephrocytes, which exhibit features of both podocytes including slit diaphragms [32••], and proximal tubular cells including cubilin-mediated transport [33]. Administration of a high sucrose diet to Drosophila promotes nephrocyte dysfunction and induces changes in gene expression that mimic human DN [34]. However, the primitive renal cells in both zebrafish and Drosophila are clearly functionally very different to humans, and therefore, these models are most likely to be used in genetic or drug screens and the results will need replicated in mammalian preclinical models.

Role of Hemodynamic Factors

The importance of hemodynamic factors in the pathogenesis of DN has long been recognized [35]. Patients with advanced DN invariably have hypertension and tight control of blood pressure is at least as important as glycemic control in slowing disease progression [36]. Hypertension may not simply be a consequence of nephropathy but may promote the development of kidney disease in diabetic patients. Subtle abnormalities in blood pressure, such as loss of nocturnal dipping, precede the onset of albuminuria [37] and inheritance of genetic variants that confer risk of hypertension promotes nephropathy in patients with diabetes [38]. In fact, hypertension may be an absolute requirement for progression of DN, as illustrated by two remarkable case reports. In both cases, the patients had long-standing diabetes and coexisting unilateral renal artery stenosis; they exhibited no evidence of nephropathy in the kidney downstream of the arterial stenosis, despite severe nephropathy in the contralateral kidney [39, 40].

Researchers have attempted to replicate these hemodynamic factors in rodent models in a number of ways. In seminal studies in the 1980s, a high protein diet was found to increase glomerular pressure and injury in diabetic rats [41], and the role of ACE inhibitors in slowing progression of DN was first proposed [42]. It is worth noting that these studies focusing on hemodynamic factors are among the few to have been successfully translated into clinical practice. An alternative method of applying hemodynamic stress that can be readily applied in most rodent models of DN is uninephrectomy. For example, unilateral nephrectomy in diabetic OVE26 mice accelerates many features of DN including albuminuria, inflammatory cell infiltration, fibrosis, and changes in gene expression [43]. However, caution should be applied to the results from these studies as the abnormal glomerular hemodynamics induced by uninephrectomy may not be representative of the pathophysiology of human DN.

It has been consistently demonstrated in rodent models that the combination of diabetes and genetic hypertension results in more severe albuminuria, glomerulosclerosis, and tubulointerstitial fibrosis than diabetes alone [44, 45, 46, 47•]. Given the importance of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in human DN, several researchers have employed transgenic rodents in which the RAAS is overactivated to induce hypertension and accelerated DN. TTRhRen mice develop renin-dependent hypertension through constitutive expression of the human pro-renin cDNA, and when these mice are back-crossed to OVE26 mice, they develop significant albuminuria, mesangial expansion, tubulointerstitial fibrosis, and a decline in renal function by 20 weeks [48]. Similar results have been observed in diabetic mRen2 rats, which constitutively express murine renin cDNA [45]; however, this model is confounded by the development of malignant-phase hypertension [49]. This problem may be overcome by using Cyp1a1mRen2 rats in which the murine mRen2 cDNA is under the control of the Cyp1a1 promoter so that the timing and severity of hypertension may be controlled by adjusting the concentration of indole-3-carbinol in the diet [47•]. Concurrent induction of hyperglycaemia and renin-dependent hypertension in Cyp1a1mRen2 rats results in a 500-fold increase in albuminuria and moderate glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis, all features of moderately advanced human DN. However, none of these models exhibit all of the classical features of DN such as arteriolar hyalinosis.

Monogenic Manipulations to Accelerate Nephropathy

To accelerate the development of nephropathy, researchers have employed mice in which specific genes have been targeted for knockout based on the known pathophysiology of human DN. For example, functional deficiency of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) has been observed in patients with DN [50], and eNOS knockout (eNOS−/−) mice exhibit two of the key pathogenic mechanisms implicated in human DN: endothelial dysfunction and hypertension [51]. Induction of diabetes in eNOS−/− mice by administration of streptozotocin [52] or by crossing to leptin-receptor deficient db/db mice [53] reproduces many features typical of human DN including the following: early onset albuminuria, decreased GFR, arteriolar hyalinosis, mesangial expansion, mesangiolysis, and nodular glomerulosclerosis. Importantly, these features are observed even in the nephropathy-resistant C57BL6/J strain [52]. However, only minimal tubulointerstitial fibrosis is observed in eNOS−/− diabetic mice [52, 53].

Hypertriglyceridemia is common in patients with diabetes and is associated with the development of nephropathy [54]. Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) is implicated in clearance of triglycerides from the serum and ApoE deficient (ApoE−/−) mice develop marked hyperlipidemia and are widely used as a model of atherosclerosis [55]. Induction of diabetes with streptozotocin results in more severe renal injury in ApoE−/− mice than wild-type controls, and this may in part due to hyperlipidemia, but also to accumulation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) [56]. The importance of AGEs in promoting nephropathy has also been demonstrated in mice that overexpress the receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) specifically in endothelial cells. When these mice were crossed with genetically diabetic mice, the RAGE-overexpressing mice develop more severe albuminuria and glomerulosclerosis compared with wild-type counterparts but do not develop tubulointerstitial disease or renal failure [57]. While therapies that target AGE were successful in these models, they have not as yet translated into clinical practice. These studies may provide a salutary lesson: when a novel therapy is tested in animals which have been genetically modified to promote overactivity of the target pathway, the therapy is very likely to be effective; however, this is not informative of the likely benefit in human disease.

Use of Transcriptomic Profiling to Compare Pathways Activated in Human and Experimental DN

Our understanding of the molecular pathways activated in the kidneys of patients with DN have been aided by technological advances including the ability to separate the glomerular and tubulointerstitial compartments by laser capture microscopy, isolate RNA from archived formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue, and systematically assess gene expression using microarrays or RNA sequencing [58]. Much of this information has been made freely available to the nephrology community through Web-based interfaces such as Nephromine (www.nephromine.org). In parallel, advances in proteomics have enabled identification of specific peptides that are excreted in altered amounts in patients with DN [59] or a global urinary peptidomic signature that is characteristic of DN [60]. Researchers are now employing similar transcriptomic and peptidomic techniques to determine which animal models best replicate the molecular pathophysiology of human disease [8, 61••, 62].

The glomerular transcriptome in three murine models of DN (streptozotocin-induced diabetes on the DBA/2 background, db/db mice, and eNOS−/− db/db mice) has been systematically compared with that from humans with type 2 diabetes and biopsy-proven early DN [61••]. The transcriptomic changes in the murine models typically resembled the pattern observed in patients with microalbuminuria rather than overt nephropathy. The human DN transcriptome was more similar to eNOS−/− db/db mice than the other animal models tested, supporting biochemical and pathological data that suggest that the eNOS−/− mouse may be a more representative model of human disease [52, 53]. For many pathways that are differentially expressed in the glomerulus in human DN, a similar pattern of expression was observed in a just one of murine models, implying that choice of model will depend on the specific pathway a researcher wishes to study.

In the Cyp1a1mRen2 rat model up to 50 % of differentially expressed genes in the tubulointerstitium in human DN were also dysregulated in the renal cortex of hyperglycemic and hypertensive rats [47•]. Importantly, the majority of the changes in gene expression were in the same direction in the rats as in humans, in contrast to the discordant patterns that emerged when the renal transcriptome in murine models was compared with that from patients with overt proteinuria.

A major implication of the results from these -omic studies is that researchers must consider a number of issues in selecting the best animal model for their investigation (Fig. 1). Firstly, they must be clear regarding the relevant stage of human DN that they wish to replicate, with standard murine models reflecting the pathophysiology of early, but not late DN. Additional relevant injurious stimuli, such as hypertension, may be required to model progressive disease. Secondly, they may employ transcriptomic data to select the model which best recapitulates the activation status of their specific therapeutic target pathway. More rational selection of the most appropriate animal model may render research more efficient and improve the likelihood that the results will translate into clinical practice.
Fig. 1

Schemata for discovery of novel therapeutic agents. 1, High-throughput, nonbiased “-omic” approaches have identified hundreds of molecules that are associated with the development of human diabetic nephropathy. 2, Whether these molecules could be targeted to slow progression of nephropathy may be determined using the most appropriate animal model for the specific research question. 3, Genetically modified rodents may offer mechanistic insight and suggest whether development of a therapy is warranted. 4, Pharmaceutical agents may be tested for efficacy and potential side effects. 5, Therapies that are successful in robust animal studies may be taken forward into clinical trials. 6, Samples and data from these trials may be “biobanked” to provide further mechanistic insight toward refining therapies

Modeling Regression of DN

It is now recognized that DN does not always progress inexorably toward end-stage kidney disease, but that regression may also occur. Albuminuria may regress in up to 50 % of patients, particularly in those with optimal blood glucose and blood pressure control [63]. More remarkably, regression of established glomerulosclerosis and tubulointerstitial fibrosis has been observed in patients with moderately advanced DN who achieve sustained normoglycaemia after receiving a pancreas transplant [64, 65]. However, the pathways that promote regression remain poorly understood, in part because serial biopsies are rarely performed in patients who are responding to treatment.

To identify the pathways that promote regression, a number of rodent models have been employed. In BTBR ob/ob mice, administration of recombinant leptin for 8 weeks to reverse the genetic leptin deficiency promoted weight loss and improved glycemia control. This was accompanied by regression of albuminuria and glomerulosclerosis; however, there was no change in the severity of tubulointerstitial fibrosis [66••]. Importantly, leptin therapy, but not ACE inhibition, restored the mean number of podocytes in each glomerulus, implying that therapies other than renin-angiotensin system blockade are likely to be required to promote nephron regeneration in patients with DN.

In the Cyp1a1mRen2 rat, after 28 weeks of hyperglycaemia and hypertension, a reduction in albuminuria was observed following optimization of glycemic control by implanting insulin pellets subcutaneously and normalizing blood pressure through removal of indole-3-carbinol from the diet [67]. After 8 weeks of tight glycemic and blood pressure control, the expression of genes encoding extracellular matrix components reverted toward control levels, suggesting that tight control was sufficient to switch off new scar production. However, there was no change in the severity of glomerulosclerosis or tubulointerstitial fibrosis, implying that addition therapies may be required to accelerate degradation of established scar.

Conclusion

In summary, animal models have been of limited utility in understanding the pathogenesis of DN, in part because no model exhibits all of the key features of human disease. Targeting additional genes for knockout either in isolation or in combination with known nephropathy susceptibility genes such as eNOS may refine existing models, although it is important to acknowledge that complete loss of gene expression is rarely observed in human disease. When reporting the phenotype of novel models, in addition to describing the functional and pathological findings, the transcriptomic changes in the kidney should be assessed for relevance to human disease. Going forward, it is likely that researchers will use transcriptomic data freely available on platforms such as Nephromine to select the animal model that best recapitulates the activation status of their pathway of interest in human disease. By rationalizing the selection of the most appropriate animal model for any given therapy, we may improve the likelihood that encouraging preclinical findings are successfully translated into clinical practice.

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Boris Betz and Bryan R. Conway declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Saran R, Li Y, Robinson B, Ayanian J, Balkrishnan R, Bragg-Gresham J, et al. US renal data system 2014 annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the united states. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;65(6 Suppl 1):A7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Finne P, Reunanen A, Stenman S, Groop PH, Gronhagen-Riska C. Incidence of end-stage renal disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. JAMA. 2005;294(14):1782–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parving HH, Brenner BM, McMurray JJ, de Zeeuw D, Haffner SM, Solomon SD, et al. Cardiorenal end points in a trial of aliskiren for type 2 diabetes. New Eng J Med. 2012;367(23):2204–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Zeeuw D, Akizawa T, Audhya P, Bakris GL, Chin M, Christ-Schmidt H, et al. Bardoxolone methyl in type 2 diabetes and stage 4 chronic kidney disease. New Eng J Med. 2013;369(26):2492–503.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fried LF, Emanuele N, Zhang JH, Brophy M, Conner TA, Duckworth W, et al. Combined angiotensin inhibition for the treatment of diabetic nephropathy. New Eng J Med. 2013;369(20):1892–903.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fernandez-Fernandez B, Ortiz A, Gomez-Guerrero C, Egido J. Therapeutic approaches to diabetic nephropathy—beyond the RAS. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014;10(6):325–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brosius 3rd FC, Alpers CE, Bottinger EP, Breyer MD, Coffman TM, Gurley SB, et al. Mouse models of diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(12):2503–12.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brosius 3rd FC, Alpers CE. New targets for treatment of diabetic nephropathy: what we have learned from animal models. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2013;22(1):17–25.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Breyer MD, Bottinger E, Brosius 3rd FC, Coffman TM, Harris RC, Heilig CW, et al. Mouse models of diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(1):27–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang J, Takeuchi T, Tanaka S, Kubo SK, Kayo T, Lu D, et al. A mutation in the insulin 2 gene induces diabetes with severe pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction in the Mody mouse. J Clin Invest. 1999;103(1):27–37.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Epstein PN, Overbeek PA, Means AR. Calmodulin-induced early-onset diabetes in transgenic mice. Cell. 1989;58(6):1067–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chua Jr SC, Chung WK, Wu-Peng XS, Zhang Y, Liu SM, Tartaglia L, et al. Phenotypes of mouse diabetes and rat fatty due to mutations in the OB (leptin) receptor. Science. 1996;271(5251):994–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen H, Charlat O, Tartaglia LA, Woolf EA, Weng X, Ellis SJ, et al. Evidence that the diabetes gene encodes the leptin receptor: identification of a mutation in the leptin receptor gene in db/db mice. Cell. 1996;84(3):491–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zucker LM, Antoniades HN. Insulin and obesity in the Zucker genetically obese rat "fatty". Endocrinology. 1972;90(5):1320–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mallipattu SK, Gallagher EJ, LeRoith D, Liu R, Mehrotra A, Horne SJ, et al. Diabetic nephropathy in a nonobese mouse model of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Physiol. 2014;306(9):F1008–17.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Freedman BI, Bostrom M, Daeihagh P, Bowden DW. Genetic factors in diabetic nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrology : CJASN. 2007;2(6):1306–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sandholm N, Salem RM, McKnight AJ, Brennan EP, Forsblom C, Isakova T, et al. New susceptibility loci associated with kidney disease in type 1 diabetes. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(9):e1002921.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.•
    Qi Z, Fujita H, Jin J, Davis LS, Wang Y, Fogo AB, et al. Characterization of susceptibility of inbred mouse strains to diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes. 2005;54(9):2628–37. This very useful paper describes the physiological and pathological features observed when diabetes is induced in several common strains of mice. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chua Jr S, Li Y, Liu SM, Liu R, Chan KT, Martino J, et al. A susceptibility gene for kidney disease in an obese mouse model of type II diabetes maps to chromosome 8. Kidney Int. 2010;78(5):453–62.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yuzawa Y, Niki I, Kosugi T, Maruyama S, Yoshida F, Takeda M, et al. Overexpression of calmodulin in pancreatic beta cells induces diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19(9):1701–11.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.••
    Hudkins KL, Pichaiwong W, Wietecha T, Kowalewska J, Banas MC, Spencer MW, et al. BTBR Ob/Ob mutant mice model progressive diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(9):1533–42. This paper describes for the first time the use of leptin deficient on the BTBR strain of mouse to model many of the features of human DN. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gilbert RE, Cooper ME. The tubulointerstitium in progressive diabetic kidney disease: more than an aftermath of glomerular injury? Kidney Int. 1999;56(5):1627–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aitman TJ, Critser JK, Cuppen E, Dominiczak A, Fernandez-Suarez XM, Flint J, et al. Progress and prospects in rat genetics: a community view. Nat Genet. 2008;40(5):516–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yagihashi S, Goto Y, Kakizaki M, Kaseda N. Thickening of glomerular basement membrane in spontaneously diabetic rats. Diabetologia. 1978;15(4):309–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kawano K, Hirashima T, Mori S, Natori T. OLETF (Otsuka Long-Evans Tokushima Fatty) rat: a new NIDDM rat strain. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1994;24(Suppl):S317–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Geurts AM, Cost GJ, Freyvert Y, Zeitler B, Miller JC, Choi VM, et al. Knockout rats via embryo microinjection of zinc-finger nucleases. Science. 2009;325(5939):433.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kern TS, Engerman RL. Arrest of glomerulopathy in diabetic dogs by improved glycaemic control. Diabetologia. 1990;33(9):522–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Steffes MW, Buchwald H, Wigness BD, Groppoli TJ, Rupp WM, Rohde TD, et al. Diabetic nephropathy in the uninephrectomized dog: microscopic lesions after one year. Kidney Int. 1982;21(5):721–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Maile LA, Busby WH, Gollahon KA, Flowers W, Garbacik N, Garbacik S, et al. Blocking ligand occupancy of the alphaVbeta3 integrin inhibits the development of nephropathy in diabetic pigs. Endocrinology. 2014;155(12):4665–75.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Intine RV, Olsen AS, Sarras Jr MP. A zebrafish model of diabetes mellitus and metabolic memory. J Vis Exp : JoVE. 2013;72:e50232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Olsen AS, Sarras Jr MP, Leontovich A, Intine RV. Heritable transmission of diabetic metabolic memory in zebrafish correlates with DNA hypomethylation and aberrant gene expression. Diabetes. 2012;61(2):485–91.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.••
    Weavers H, Prieto-Sanchez S, Grawe F, Garcia-Lopez A, Artero R, Wilsch-Brauninger M, et al. The insect nephrocyte is a podocyte-like cell with a filtration slit diaphragm. Nature. 2009;457(7227):322–6. This paper demonstrates that specialised cells in Drosophila called nephrocytes exhibit features similar to human podocytes including slit diaphragms, and inhibition of signalling pathways known to be important in human podocytes results in disrupts the nephrocyte slit diaphragm. The tractability of Drosophila to genetic modification affords a opportunity to study podocyte signalling very efficiently.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang F, Zhao Y, Chao Y, Muir K, Han Z. Cubilin and amnionless mediate protein reabsorption in Drosophila nephrocytes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(2):209–16.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Na J, Sweetwyne MT, Park AS, Susztak K, Cagan RL. Diet-Induced Podocyte Dysfunction in Drosophila and Mammals. Cell Report. 2015;12(4):636–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cooper ME. Pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment of diabetic nephropathy. Lancet. 1998;352(9123):213–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mogensen CE. Combined high blood pressure and glucose in type 2 diabetes: double jeopardy. British trial shows clear effects of treatment, especially blood pressure reduction. Brit Med J. 1998;317(7160):693–4.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lurbe E, Redon J, Kesani A, Pascual JM, Tacons J, Alvarez V, et al. Increase in nocturnal blood pressure and progression to microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes. New Eng J Med. 2002;347(11):797–805.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Roglic G, Colhoun HM, Stevens LK, Lemkes HH, Manes C, Fuller JH. Parental history of hypertension and parental history of diabetes and microvascular complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: the EURODIAB IDDM Complications Study. Diabet Med. 1998;15(5):418–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Berkman J, Rifkin H. Unilateral nodular diabetic glomerulosclerosis (Kimmelstiel-Wilson): report of a case. Metab Clin Exp. 1973;22(5):715–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Beroniade VC, Lefebvre R, Falardeau P. Unilateral nodular diabetic glomerulosclerosis: recurrence of an experiment of nature. Am J Nephrol. 1987;7(1):55–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zatz R, Meyer TW, Rennke HG, Brenner BM. Predominance of hemodynamic rather than metabolic factors in the pathogenesis of diabetic glomerulopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;82(17):5963–7.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zatz R, Dunn BR, Meyer TW, Anderson S, Rennke HG, Brenner BM. Prevention of diabetic glomerulopathy by pharmacological amelioration of glomerular capillary hypertension. J Clin Invest. 1986;77(6):1925–30.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zheng S, Huang Y, Yang L, Chen T, Xu J, Epstein PN. Uninephrectomy of diabetic OVE26 mice greatly accelerates albuminuria, fibrosis, inflammatory cell infiltration and changes in gene expression. Nephron Exp Nephrol. 2011;119(1):e21–32.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cooper ME, Allen TJ, Macmillan P, Bach L, Jerums G, Doyle AE. Genetic hypertension accelerates nephropathy in the streptozotocin diabetic rat. Am J Hypertens. 1988;1(1):5–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kelly DJ, Wilkinson-Berka JL, Allen TJ, Cooper ME, Skinner SL. A new model of diabetic nephropathy with progressive renal impairment in the transgenic (mRen-2)27 rat (TGR). Kidney Int. 1998;54(2):343–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Janssen U, Riley SG, Vassiliadou A, Floege J, Phillips AO. Hypertension superimposed on type II diabetes in Goto Kakizaki rats induces progressive nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2003;63(6):2162–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.•
    Conway BR, Rennie J, Bailey MA, Dunbar DR, Manning JR, Bellamy CO, et al. Hyperglycemia and renin-dependent hypertension synergize to model diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23(3):405–11. This study determined that streptozotocin-induced hyperglycaemia alone was insufficient to promote significant nephropathy, but when combined with renin-dependent hypertension there was progressive nephropathy which resembled many of the histological features and transcriptomic changes observed in human diabetic kidney disease. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Thibodeau JF, Holterman CE, Burger D, Read NC, Reudelhuber TL, Kennedy CR. A novel mouse model of advanced diabetic kidney disease. PLoS One. 2014;9(12), e113459.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hartner A, Cordasic N, Klanke B, Wittmann M, Veelken R, Hilgers KF. Renal injury in streptozotocin-diabetic Ren2-transgenic rats is mainly dependent on hypertension, not on diabetes. Am J Physiol. 2007;292(2):F820–7.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Nakagawa T, Johnson RJ. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Contrib Nephrol. 2011;170:93–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nakayama T, Sato W, Kosugi T, Zhang L, Campbell-Thompson M, Yoshimura A, et al. Endothelial injury due to eNOS deficiency accelerates the progression of chronic renal disease in the mouse. Am J Physiol. 2008.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Nakagawa T, Sato W, Glushakova O, Heinig M, Clarke T, Campbell-Thompson M, et al. Diabetic endothelial nitric oxide synthase knockout mice develop advanced diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18(2):539–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zhao HJ, Wang S, Cheng H, Zhang MZ, Takahashi T, Fogo AB, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase deficiency produces accelerated nephropathy in diabetic mice. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(10):2664–9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Jenkins AJ, Lyons TJ, Zheng D, Otvos JD, Lackland DT, McGee D, et al. Lipoproteins in the DCCT/EDIC cohort: associations with diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2003;64(3):817–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Plump AS, Smith JD, Hayek T, Aalto-Setala K, Walsh A, Verstuyft JG, et al. Severe hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice created by homologous recombination in ES cells. Cell. 1992;71(2):343–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lassila M, Seah KK, Allen TJ, Thallas V, Thomas MC, Candido R, et al. Accelerated nephropathy in diabetic apolipoprotein e-knockout mouse: role of advanced glycation end products. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(8):2125–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yamamoto Y, Kato I, Doi T, Yonekura H, Ohashi S, Takeuchi M, et al. Development and prevention of advanced diabetic nephropathy in RAGE-overexpressing mice. J Clin Invest. 2001;108(2):261–8.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lindenmeyer MT, Kretzler M, Boucherot A, Berra S, Yasuda Y, Henger A, et al. Interstitial vascular rarefaction and reduced VEGF-A expression in human diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18(6):1765–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Merchant ML, Perkins BA, Boratyn GM, Ficociello LH, Wilkey DW, Barati MT, et al. Urinary peptidome may predict renal function decline in type 1 diabetes and microalbuminuria. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(9):2065–74.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rossing K, Mischak H, Dakna M, Zurbig P, Novak J, Julian BA, et al. Urinary proteomics in diabetes and CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19(7):1283–90.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.••
    Hodgin JB, Nair V, Zhang H, Randolph A, Harris RC, Nelson RG, et al. Identification of cross-species shared transcriptional networks of diabetic nephropathy in human and mouse glomeruli. Diabetes. 2013;62(1):299–308. This study employed transcriptomic data to determine that when compared with other models diabetic eNOS−/− mice more closely replicated the molecular pathways activated in the glomeruli in human diabetic kidney disease. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Siwy J, Zoja C, Klein J, Benigni A, Mullen W, Mayer B, et al. Evaluation of the Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rat as a model for human disease based on urinary peptidomic profiles. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51334.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Perkins BA, Ficociello LH, Silva KH, Finkelstein DM, Warram JH, Krolewski AS. Regression of microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(23):2285–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Fioretto P, Steffes MW, Sutherland DER, Goetz FC, Mauer M. reversal of lesions of diabetic nephropathy after pancreas transplantations. New Eng J Med. 1998;339:69–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Fioretto P, Sutherland DE, Najafian B, Mauer M. Remodeling of renal interstitial and tubular lesions in pancreas transplant recipients. Kidney Int. 2006;69(5):907–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.••
    Pichaiwong W, Hudkins KL, Wietecha T, Nguyen TQ, Tachaudomdach C, Li W, et al. Reversibility of structural and functional damage in a model of advanced diabetic nephropathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(7):1088–102. Administration of leptin to BTBR ob/ob mice reduced obesity and hyperglycaemia and this model may be used to investigate the mechanisms that promote regression of fibrosis in the human diabetic kidne. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Conway BR, Betz B, Sheldrake TA, Manning JR, Dunbar DR, Dobyns A, et al. Tight blood glycaemic and blood pressure control in experimental diabetic nephropathy reduces extracellular matrix production without regression of fibrosis. Nephrol Carlton Vic. 2014;19(12):802–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Inflammation ResearchUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghScotland
  2. 2.Centre for Cardiovascular Science, Queen’s Medical Research CentreUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghScotland
  3. 3.Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory MedicineJena University HospitalJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations