Advertisement

Treating the Most Vulnerable and Costly in Diabetes

  • David V. Wagner
  • Maggie Stoeckel
  • Megan E. Tudor
  • Michael A. HarrisEmail author
Psychosocial Aspects (KK Hood and S Jaser, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Psychosocial Aspects

Abstract

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is associated with negative health outcomes and high costs for patients, families, and communities. Interventions developed to effectively reduce DKA and related costs should target the multiple risk factors associated with DKA and adherence difficulties. Certain demographic, psychological, and family factors are associated with increased risk for adherence problems and DKA. Individuals with a combination of risk factors (e.g., mental health problems, low socioeconomic status, high family conflict) may be particularly vulnerable to DKA. Although several different interventions have demonstrated promise in improving adherence and/or decreasing the risk of DKA, the generalizability of treatment results to those individuals most vulnerable to DKA is limited. Approaches which include multiple evidence-based components of care, are flexible in treatment delivery (e.g., home- and community-based, utilize technology), and target the multiple risk factors across relevant systems (e.g., individual, family, school, medical) are warranted to effectively reduce DKA in vulnerable populations.

Keywords

DKA Type 1 diabetes Treatment Vulnerable Risk factor Cost 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Michael A. Harris developed the NICH model and wrote the manuscript. David V. Wagner, Maggie Stoeckel, and Megan E. Tudor reviewed the literature and wrote the manuscript. Michael Harris takes responsibility for the contents of this article.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

David V. Wagner, Maggie Stoeckel, Megan E. Tudor, and Michael A. Harris declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Edge JA, Ford-Adams ME, Dunger DB. Causes of death in children with insulin dependent diabetes 1990–96. Arch Dis Child. 1999;81:318–23.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kennan HT, Foster CM, Bratton SL. Social factors associated with prolonged hospitalization among diabetic children. Pediatrics. 2002;109:40–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes statistics report: estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States, 2014. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2014. p. 2014.Google Scholar
  4. 4.•
    Tieder JS, McLeod L, Keren R, Luan X, Localio R, Mahant S, et al. Variation in resource use and readmission for diabetic ketoacidosis in children’s hospitals. Pediatrics. 2013;132:229–36. This reference is important in that it characterizes the significant financial resources devoted to hospitalizations for repeat DKA in youth.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Javor KA, Kotsanos JG, McDonald RC, Baron AD, Kesterson JG, Tierney WM. Diabetic ketoacidosis charges relative to medical charges of adult patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:349–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Databases and related tools from the healthcare cost and utilization project (HCUP) [article online]. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control. Available from www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs.
  7. 7.
    Delamater AM. Improving patient adherence. Clin Diabetes. 2006;24:71–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kurtz SMS. Adherence to diabetes regimens: empirical status and clinical applications. Diabetes Educ. 1990;16:50–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kitabchi AE, Umpierrez GE, Miles JM, Fisher JN. Hyperglycemic crises in adult patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1335–43.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harris MA, Hood KK, Weissberg-Benchell J. Teens with diabetes: a clinician’s guide. Alexandria: American Diabetes Association; 2014.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gill G, Nayak AU, Wilkins J, Hankey J, Raffeeq P, Varughese GI, et al. Challenges of emerging adulthood-transition from paediatric to adult diabetes. World J Diabetes. 2014;15:630–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Charron-Prochownik D, Kovacs M, Obrosky DS, Stiffler L. Biomedical and psychosocial predictors of early rehospitalization among children with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a longitudinal study. Diabetes Med. 1994;11:372–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Randall L, Begovic J, Hudson M, Smiley D, Peng L, Pitre N, et al. Recurrent diabetic ketoacidosis in inner-city minority patients: behavioral, socioeconomic, and psychosocial factors. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1891–6.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    La Greca AM, Swales T, Klemp S, Madigan S, Skler J. Adolescents with diabetes: gender differences in psychosocial and glycemic control. Children’s Health Care. 1995;24:61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anderson RJ, Grigsby AB, Freedland KE, de Groot M, McGill JB, Clouse RE, et al. Anxiety and poor glycemic control: a meta-analytic review of the literature. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2002;32:235–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Piette JD, Richardson C, Valenstein M. Addressing the needs of patients with multiple chronic illnesses: the case of diabetes and depression. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10:152–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lustman PJ, Clouse RE. Depression in diabetic patients: the relationship between mood and glycemic control. J Diabetes Complicat. 2005;19:113–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kitabchi AE, Nyenwe EA. Hyperglycemic crises in diabetes mellitus: diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2006;35:725–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harris MA, Spiro K, Heywood M, Wagner D, Hoehn D, Hatten A, et al. Piloting intensive behavioral health for youth with type 1 diabetes: avoiding avoidable hospitalizations [Abstract]. Diabetes. 2013;73:827-P.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moussavi S, Chatterji S, Verdes E, Tandon A, Patel V, Ustun B. Depression, chronic diseases, and decrements in health: results from the World Health Surveys. Lancet. 2007;370:851–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lancaster BM, Gadaire DM, Holman K, LeBlanc LA. Association between diabetes treatment adherence and parent–child agreement regarding treatment responsibilities. Fam Syst Health. 2015. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000092.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hilliard ME, Wu YP, Rausch J, Dolan LM, Hood KK. Predictors of deteriorations in diabetes management and control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52:28–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cohen DM, Lumley MA, Naar-King S, Partridge T, Cakan N. Child behavior problems and family functioning as predictors of adherence and glycemic control in economically disadvantaged children with type 1 diabetes: a prospective study. J Pediatr Psychol. 2004;29:171–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jacobson AM, Hauser ST, Lavori P, Willett JB, Cole CF, Wolfsdorf JI, et al. Family environment and glycemic control: a four-year prospective study of children and adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Psychosom Med. 1994;56:401–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hoey H. Psychosocial factors are associated with metabolic control in adolescents: research from the Hvidoere Study Group on Childhood Diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2009;10:9–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.••
    Hood KK, Rohan JM, Peterson CM, Drotar D. Interventions with adherence-promoting components in pediatric type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1658–64. This review of adherence-promoting literature highlights the importance of multicomponent interventions.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tsiouli E, Alexopoulos EC, Stefanaki C, Darviri C, Chrousos GP. Effects of diabetes-related family stress on glycemic control in young patients with type 1 diabetes. Can Fam Physician. 2013;59:143–9.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hoey H, Aanstoot HJ, Chiareli F, et al. Good metabolic control is associated with better quality of life in 2,101 adolescent with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:1923–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cameron FJ, Skinner TC, de Beaufort CE, et al. Are family factors universally related to metabolic outcomes in adolescents with type 1 diabetes? Diabet Med. 2008;25:463–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Swift EE, Chen R, Hershberger A, Holmes CS. Demographic risk factors, mediator, and moderators in youths’ diabetes metabolic control. Ann Behav Med. 2006;32:355–65.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Geffken GR, Lewis C, Johnson SB, Silverstein JH, Rosenbloom AL, Monaco L. Residential treatment for youngsters with difficult-to-manage insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 1997;10:517–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Golden MP, Herrold AJ, Orr DP. An approach to prevention of recurrent diabetic ketoacidosis in the pediatric population. J Pediatr. 1985;107:195–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bloomgarden ZT, Karmally W, Metzger MJ, Brothers M, Nechemias C, Bookman J, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of diabetic patient education: improved knowledge without improved metabolic status. Diabetes Care. 1987;10:263–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Giordano B, Rosenbloom AL, Heller D, Weber FT, Gonzalez R, Grgic A. Regional services for children and youth with diabetes. Pediatrics. 1977;60:492–8.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Grey M, Boland EA, Davidson M, Li J, Tamborlane WV. Coping skills training for youth with diabetes mellitus has long-lasting effects on metabolic control and quality of life. J Pediatr. 2000;137:107–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.••
    Stanger C, Ryan SR, Delhey LM, Thrailkill K, Li Z, Li Z, et al. A multicomponent motivational intervention to improve adherence among adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: a pilot study. J Pediatr Psychol. 2013;38:629–37. This is another reference supporting the significance of multicomponent approaches to improving adherence in type 1 diabetes.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wysocki T, Greco P, Harris MA, Bubb J, White NH. Behavior therapy for families of adolescents with diabetes: maintenance of treatment effects. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:441–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wysocki T, Harris MA, Buckloh LM, et al. Effects of behavioral family systems therapy for diabetes on adolescents’ family relationships, treatment adherence and metabolic control. J Pediatr Psychol. 2006;31:928–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ellis DA, Frey MA, Naar-King S, Templin T, Cunningham P, Cakan N. Use of multisystemic therapy to improve regimen adherence among adolescents with type 1 diabetes in chronic poor metabolic control: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1604–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ellis D, Naar-King S, Templin T, Frey M, Cunningham P, Sheidow A, et al. Multisystemic therapy for adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: reduced diabetic ketoacidosis admissions and related costs over 24 months. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:1746–7.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Harris MA, Spiro K, Heywood M, et al. Novel interventions in children’s health care (NICH): innovative treatment for youth with complex medical conditions. Clin Pract Pediatr Psychol. 2013;1:137–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.••
    Harris MA, Wagner DV, Heywood M, Hoehn D, Bahia H, Spiro K. Youth repeatedly hospitalized for DKA: proof of concept for Novel Interventions in Children’s Healthcare (NICH). Diabetes Care. 2014;37:e125–6. This reference describes an example of a treatment approach specifically tailored to the needs of youth at risk for repeat DKA.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Harris MA, Spiro K, Heywood M, Hatten A, Hoehn D, Wagner D. Intensive behavioral health for youth repeatedly hospitalized for DKA: NICH work. [Abstract]. Diabetes. 2013;2013:73.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shea S, Weinstock RS, Starren J, Teresi J, Palmas W, Field L, et al. A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13:40–51.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Malasanos TH, Burlingame JB, Youngblade L, Patel BD, Muir AB. Improved access to subspecialist diabetes care by telemedicine: cost savings and care measures in the first two years of the FITE diabetes project. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11:74–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Franklin VL, Waller A, Pagliari C, Greene SA. A randomized controlled trial of Sweet Talk, a text-messaging system to support young people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2006;23:1332–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Harris MA, Freeman KA, Duke D C, Hirschfield B, Boston B. Can you hear (and see) me now?: Skype-based intervention for teens with poorly controlled diabetes [Abstract]. Diabetes 2012;72:345-OR.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Grey M, Whittemore R, Jeon S, Murphy K, Faulkner MS, Delamater A. Internet psycho education programs improve outcomes in youth with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:2475–82.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jaser SS, Yates H, Dumser S, Whittemore R. Risky business: risk behaviors in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2011;37:756–64.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Borus JS, Laffel L. Adherence challenges in the management of type 1 diabetes in adolescents: prevention and intervention. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010;22:405–11.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • David V. Wagner
    • 1
  • Maggie Stoeckel
    • 1
  • Megan E. Tudor
    • 2
  • Michael A. Harris
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Oregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Stony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA
  3. 3.Harold Schnitzer Diabetes Health CenterPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations