Review of Innovations in Digital Health Technology to Promote Weight Control

Obesity (J McCaffery, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Obesity


Advances in technology have contributed to the obesity epidemic and worsened health by reducing opportunities for physical activity and by the proliferation of inexpensive calorie-dense foods. However, much of the same technology can be used to counter these troublesome trends by fostering the development and maintenance of healthy eating and physical activity habits. In contrast to intensive face-to-face treatments, technology-based interventions also have the potential to reach large numbers of individuals at low cost. The purpose of this review is to discuss studies in which digital technology has been used for behavioral weight control, report on advances in consumer technology that are widely adopted but insufficiently tested, and explore potential future directions for both. Web-based, mobile (eg, smartphone), virtual reality, and gaming technologies are the focus of discussion. The best evidence exists to support the use of digital technology for self-monitoring of weight-related behaviors and outcomes. However, studies are underway that will provide additional, important information regarding how best to apply digital technology for behavioral weight control.


Obesity Technology Diet Physical activity Digital health mHealth eHealth Weight control 



Dr. Thomas is supported by NIDDK R01 DK095779, NHLBI R41 HL114046, and a grant from Weight Watchers International, Inc. Dr. Bond is supported by NINDS R01 NS077925, NIDDK R03 DK095740, and NIDDK K01 DK083438, and a grant from Weight Watchers International, Inc.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

J. Graham Thomas is paid by Weight Watchers International, Inc. to give expert feedback on their weight loss intervention systems. He is also is paid by MEI Research to give expert feedback on their electronic systems for measuring and intervening on health behaviors, and to advise MEI Research on research methods & design and grant preparation. Dale S. Bond declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.


Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Freeman C, Louçã F. As time goes by: from the industrial revolutions to the information revolution. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parker JC, Thorson E. Health communication in the new media landscape. New York: Springer Publishing; 2009.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hill JO, Peters JC. Environmental contributions to the obesity epidemic. Science. 1998;280:1371–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007;116:1081–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence of regular physical activity among adults—United States, 2001 and 2005. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56:1209–12.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ford ES, Kohl HW, Mokdad AH, Ajani UA. Sedentary behavior, physical activity, and the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults. Obes Res. 2005;13:608–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malik VS, Willett WC, Hu FB. Global obesity: trends, risk factors and policy implications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9:13–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among us adults, 1999–2010. JAMA. 2012;307:491–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Withrow D, Alter DA. The economic burden of obesity worldwide: a systematic review of the direct costs of obesity. Obes Rev. 2011;12:131–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang YC, McPherson K, Marsh T, Gortmaker SL, Brown M. Health and economic burden of the projected obesity trends in the USA and the UK. Lancet. 2011;378:815–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simon GE, Von Korff M, Saunders K, et al. Association between obesity and psychiatric disorders in the US adult population. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63:824–30.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Butryn ML, Webb V, Wadden TA. Behavioral treatment of obesity. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2011;34:841–59.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsai AG, Wadden TA, Volger S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a primary care intervention to treat obesity. Int J Obes. 2013;37 Suppl 1:S31–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee JS, Sheer JL, Lopez N, Rosenbaum S. Coverage of obesity treatment: a state-by-state analysis of Medicaid and state insurance laws. Public Health Rep. 2010;125:596–604.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Topol EJ, Topol EJ. The creative destruction of medicine: how the digital revolution will create better health care. New York: Basic Books; 2012.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tufano JT, Karras BT. Mobile eHealth interventions for obesity: a timely opportunity to leverage convergence trends. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7:e58.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Duggan M, Smith A. Cell Internet Use 2013. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; Sept 16, 2013. Available at:, Accessed September 30, 2013.
  18. 18.
    File T. Computer and Internet Use in the United States. Current Population Survey Reports, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C. 2013;20–568.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith A. Smartphone Ownership—2013 Update. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; June 5, 2013. Available at: Accessed September 30, 2013.
  20. 20.
    Zickuhr K. Tablet Ownership 2013. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C. June 10, 2013. Available at: Accessed September 30, 2013.
  21. 21.
    Global System for Mobile Communications Association. The Mobile Economy 2013. Global System for Mobile Communications Association, London, UK. 2013. Available at: Accessed September 30, 2013.
  22. 22.
    Kellogg D. Among Mobile Phone Users, Hispanics, Asians are Most-Likely Smartphone Owners in the U.S.” Nielsen News, Online + Mobile. 2011. Available at: Accessed September 30, 2013.
  23. 23.
    Calzada PJ, Anderson-Worts P. The obesity epidemic: are minority individuals equally affected? Prim Care. 2009;36:307–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fox S, Duggan Maeve, D. Health Online 2013. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; January 15, 2013. Available at:, Accessed September 30, 2013.
  25. 25.
    Fox S, Duggan Maeve, D. Mobile Health 2012. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; November 8, 2012. Available at: Accessed September 30, 2013.
  26. 26.
    Fox S, Duggan Maeve, D. Tracking for Health. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; January 28, 2013. Available at: Accessed September 30, 2013.
  27. 27.
    Fox S. Pew Internet: Health. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; July 1, 2013. Available at: Accessed September 30, 2013.
  28. 28.
    Zickuhr K, Smith S. Digital Differences. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C.; April, 2012. Available at: Accessed September 30, 2013.
  29. 29.
    Tate DF, Wing RR, Winett RA. Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. JAMA. 2001;285:1172–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.•
    Burke LE, Wang J, Sevick MA. Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111:92–102. This review highlights the importance of self-monitoring for weight control, and contains a discussion of the role of self-monitoring technology. The review also provides recommendations for the design of future studies to best enhance our understanding of why and how self-monitoring is effective for weight control.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wing RR, Crane MM, Thomas JG, Kumar R, Weinberg B. Improving weight loss outcomes of community interventions by incorporating behavioral strategies. Am J Public Health. 2010;100:2513–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tate DF, Jackvony EH, Wing RR. A randomized trial comparing human e-mail counseling, computer-automated tailored counseling, and no counseling in an Internet weight loss program. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1620–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Arem H, Irwin M. A review of web-based weight loss interventions in adults. Obes Rev. 2011;12:e236–43.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Neve M, Morgan PJ, Jones PR, Collins CE. Effectiveness of web-based interventions in achieving weight loss and weight loss maintenance in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2010;11:306–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Winett RA, Tate DF, Anderson ES, Wojcik JR, Winett SG. Long-term weight gain prevention: a theoretically based Internet approach. Prev Med. 2005;41:629–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Svetkey LP, Stevens VJ, Brantley PJ, et al. Comparison of strategies for sustaining weight loss: the weight loss maintenance randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299:1139–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Krukowski RA, Harvey-Berino J, Ashikaga T, Thomas CS, Micco N. Internet-based weight control: the relationship between web features and weight loss. Telemed J E Health. 2008;14:775–82.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bennett GG, Herring SJ, Puleo E, Stein EK, Emmons KM, Gillman MW. Web-based weight loss in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Obesity. 2010;18:308–13.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Webber KH, Tate DF, Ward DS, Bowling JM. Motivation and its relationship to adherence to self-monitoring and weight loss in a 16-week Internet behavioral weight loss intervention. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010;42:161–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tsai AG, Wadden TA. Systematic review: an evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:56–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Marcus BH, Bock BC, Pinto BM, Forsyth LH, Roberts MB, Traficante RM. Efficacy of an individualized motivationally-tailored physical activity intervention. Ann Behav Med. 1998;20:174–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kreuter MW, Bull FC, Clark EM, Oswald DL. Understanding how people process health information: a comparison of tailored and nontailored weight-loss materials. Health Psychol. 1999;18:487–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.•
    Patrick K, Raab F, Adams MA, et al. A text message-based intervention for weight loss: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11:e1. This randomized controlled trial demonstrated that widely available text messaging technology can be used to produce weight loss. It also highlights the advantages of treatment tailoring and interactivity. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shapiro JR, Koro T, Doran N, et al. Text4Diet: a randomized controlled study using text messaging for weight loss behaviors. Prev Med. 2012;55:412–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Burke LE, Styn MA, Sereika SM, et al. Using mHealth technology to enhance self-monitoring for weight loss: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43:20–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Burke LE, Conroy MB, Sereika SM, et al. The effect of electronic self-monitoring on weight loss and dietary intake: a randomized behavioral weight loss trial. Obesity. 2011;19:338–44.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Burke LE, Styn MA, Glanz K, et al. SMART trial: a randomized clinical trial of self-monitoring in behavioral weight management-design and baseline findings. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30:540–51.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Acharya SD, Elci OU, Sereika SM, Styn MA, Burke LE. Using a personal digital assistant for self-monitoring influences diet quality in comparison to a standard paper record among overweight/obese adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111:583–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Spring B, Schneider K, McFadden HG, et al. Multiple behavior changes in diet and activity: a randomized controlled trial using mobile technology. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:789–96.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Thomas JG, Wing RR. Health-E-Call, a smartphone-assisted behavioral obesity treatment: pilot study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2013;1:e3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.••
    Pellegrini CA, Duncan JM, Moller AC, et al. A smartphone-supported weight loss program: design of the ENGAGED randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1041. This randomized controlled trial is one of the first to use smartphone technology as a primary means of delivering behavioral weight loss treatment. The design also incorporates innovative uses of the technology for competition and peer support. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Klinkner W. The New Lose It! Lose It! Blog, Boston, MA; October, 2012. Available at: Accessed September 30, 2013.
  53. 53.•
    Breton E, Fuemmeler B, Abroms L. Weight loss—there is an app for that! But does it adhere to evidence-informed practices. Transl Behav Med. 2011;1:523–9. This study is important because it illustrates the lack of empirically validated weight loss strategies in commercial smartphone apps for weight loss, which have been downloaded millions of times. The findings of this paper suggest that partnerships between developers of commercial smartphone applications and academic researchers could be advantageous for producing the most sophisticated and effective weight loss applications. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Bacigalupo R, Cudd P, Littlewood C, Bissell P, Hawley MS, Buckley WH. Interventions employing mobile technology for overweight and obesity: an early systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev. 2013;14:279–91.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Omre AH. Bluetooth low energy: wireless connectivity for medical monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4:457–63.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Gorini A, Gaggioli A, Vigna C, Riva G. A second life for eHealth: prospects for the use of 3-D virtual worlds in clinical psychology. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10:e21.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sullivan DK, Goetz JR, Gibson CA, et al. Improving weight maintenance using virtual reality (Second Life). J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013;45:264–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yee N, Bailenson J. The Proteus Effect: the effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Hum Commun Res. 2007;33:271–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Fox J, Bailenson JN. Virtual self-modeling: the effects of vicarious reinforcement and identification on exercise behaviors. Media Psychol. 2009;12:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Entertain Software Association. 2013 sales, demographic and usage data: essential facts about the computer and video game industry Entertain Software Association, Washington, D.C.; 2013. Available at: Accessed September 30, 2013.
  61. 61.
    Rizzo AS, Lange B, Suma EA, Bolas M. Virtual reality and interactive digital game technology: new tools to address obesity and diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011;5:256–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lee W, Chae YM, Kim S, Ho SH, Choi I. Evaluation of a mobile phone-based diet game for weight control. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16:270–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wing RR, Pinto AM, Crane MM, Kumar R, Weinberg BM, Gorin AA. A statewide intervention reduces BMI in adults: Shape Up Rhode Island results. Obesity. 2009;17:991–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Butryn ML, Phelan S, Hill JO, Wing RR. Consistent self-monitoring of weight: a key component of successful weight loss maintenance. Obesity. 2007;15:3091–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Klonoff DC, Buckingham B, Christiansen JS, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:2968–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Klonoff DC. Continuous glucose monitoring: roadmap for 21st century diabetes therapy. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1231–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Rodbard HW, Jellinger PS, Davidson JA, et al. Statement by an American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology consensus panel on type 2 diabetes mellitus: an algorithm for glycemic control. Endocr Pract. 2009;15:540–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Mulvaney S, Ritterband L, Bosslet L. Mobile intervention design in diabetes: review and recommendations. Curr Diab Rep. 2011;11:486–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Tran J, Tran R, White JR. Smartphone-based glucose monitors and applications in the management of diabetes: an overview of 10 salient “apps” and a novel smartphone-connected blood glucose monitor. Clin Diabetes. 2012;30:173–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Napolitano MA, Hayes S, Bennett GG, Ives AK, Foster GD. Using Facebook and text messaging to deliver a weight loss program to college students. Obesity. 2013;21:25–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown UniversityThe Miriam Hospital Weight Control and Diabetes Research CenterProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations