Advertisement

Current Diabetes Reports

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 831–849 | Cite as

Environmental Chemicals and Type 2 Diabetes: An Updated Systematic Review of the Epidemiologic Evidence

  • Chin-Chi KuoEmail author
  • Katherine Moon
  • Kristina A. Thayer
  • Ana Navas-Acien
Diabetes Epidemiology (SH Golden, Section Editor)

Abstract

The burden of diabetes is increasing globally. Identifying novel preventable risk factors is an urgent need. In 2011, the U.S. National Toxicological Program (NTP) conducted a workshop to evaluate the epidemiologic and experimental evidence on the relationship of environmental chemicals with obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome. Although the evidence was insufficient to establish causality, the NTP workshop review identified an overall positive association between some environmental chemicals and diabetes. In the present systematic review, our objective was to summarize the epidemiological research published since the NTP workshop. We identified a total of 29 articles (7 on arsenic, 3 on cadmium, 2 on mercury, 11 on persistent organic pollutants, 3 on phthalates, and 4 on bisphenol A), including 7 prospective studies. Considering consistency, temporality, strength, dose–response relationship, and biological plausibility (confounding), we concluded that the evidence is suggestive but not sufficient for a relationship between arsenic and persistent organic pollutants and is insufficient for mercury, phthalates, and bisphenol A. For cadmium, the epidemiologic evidence does not seem to suggest an association with diabetes. Important research questions include the need for additional prospective studies and the evaluation of the dose–response relationship, the role of joint exposures, and effect modification with other comorbidities and genetic variants.

Keywords

Systematic review Environmental chemicals Diabetes Arsenic Cadmium Mercury Persistent organic pollutants Bisphenol A Phthalates Type 2 diabetes Epidemiology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Supported by grants from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES021367, P30ES03819) and the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (R01HL090863).

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Chin-Chi Kuo declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Katherine Moon declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Kristina A. Thayer declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ana Navas-Acien has received travel/accommodations expenses covered or reimbursed from the ADA for the ADA annual meeting.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization (WHO). Diabetes. In: 2013.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lu Y, et al. National, regional, and global trends in fasting plasma glucose and diabetes prevalence since 1980: systematic analysis of health examination surveys and epidemiological studies with 370 country-years and 2.7 million participants. Lancet. 2011;378:31–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1047–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National diabetes fact sheet: national estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States. In: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.CDC (Editor) Atlanta, GA; 2011.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buse JB, Polonsky KS, Burant CF. Type 2 diabetes mellitus. In: Melmed S, Polonsky KS, Larsen PR, Kronenberg HM, editors. Williams textbook of endocrinology. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2011. p. 1371–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Handelsman Y, Mechanick JI, Blonde L, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for clinical practice for developing a diabetes mellitus comprehensive care plan: executive summary. Endocr Pract. 2011;17:287–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Conditions TNCCfC. TYPE 2 DIABETES, National clinical guideline for management in primary and secondary care (update). In: London: Royal College of Physicians; 2008.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2013. Diabetes Care. 2013;36 Suppl 1:S11–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grandjean P. Exposure to environmental chemicals as a risk factor for diabetes development. In: Bourguignon J-P, Jégou B, Kerdelhué B, et al., editors. Multi-system endocrine disruption. Berlin: Springer; 2011. p. 91–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    • Thayer KA, Heindel JJ, Bucher JR, Gallo MA. Role of environmental chemicals in diabetes and obesity: a National Toxicology Program workshop review. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:779–89. This review article provides a thorough and transparent review of the role of environmental chemicals in diabetes and is the starting point for this review.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    National Toxicology Program (NTP). NTP Workshop: role of environmental chemicals in the development of diabetes and obesity. In: 2011.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    • Maull EA, Ahsan H, Edwards J, et al. Evaluation of the Association between arsenic and diabetes: a National Toxicology Program Workshop Review. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:1658–70. This article provides a thorough review of the role of arsenic in diabetes development from epidemiological and experimental perspectives. It also covered several open research challenges that warrant future research.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    • Taylor KW, Novak RF, Anderson HA, et al. Evaluation of the Association between Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) and Diabetes in Epidemiological Studies: a National Toxicology Program Workshop Review. Environ Health Perspect. 2013. This article provides a comprehensive review of the role of persistent organic pollutants in diabetes development and serves as a reference point for this review. Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Behl M, Rao D, Aagaard K, et al. Evaluation of the association between maternal smoking, childhood obesity, and metabolic disorders: a national toxicology program workshop review. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121:170–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Willi C, Bodenmann P, Ghali WA, et al. Active smoking and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2007;298:2654–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pearson JF, Bachireddy C, Shyamprasad S, et al. Association between fine particulate matter and diabetes prevalence in the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:2196–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rajagopalan S, Brook RD. Air pollution and type 2 diabetes: mechanistic insights. Diabetes. 2012;61:3037–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9. W64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    The 2004 United States Surgeon General's Report: the Health Consequences of Smoking. N S W Pub Health Bull. 2004;15:107.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    National Toxicology Program. Draft OHAT approach for systematic review and evidence integration for literature-based health assessments - February 2013. In: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Editor). 2013.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Navas-Acien A, Nachman KE. Public health responses to arsenic in rice and other foods. JAMA Intern Med. 2013:1–2.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    World Health Organization (WHO). Arsenic. 2012.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    World Health Organization (WHO). Environmental health criteria document 224. arsenic and arsenic compounds. In: The International Programme on Chemical Safety. (IPCS) (Editor). 2001.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Summaries and evaluations. Arsenic in drinking water (group 1). Vol.84. In: Lyon: 2004.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tseng CH, Tai TY, Chong CK, et al. Long-term arsenic exposure and incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a cohort study in arseniasis-hyperendemic villages in Taiwan. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108:847–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rahman M, Tondel M, Ahmad SA, Axelson O. Diabetes mellitus associated with arsenic exposure in Bangladesh. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;148:198–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Coronado-Gonzalez JA, Del Razo LM, Garcia-Vargas G, et al. Inorganic arsenic exposure and type 2 diabetes mellitus in Mexico. Environ Res. 2007;104:383–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Navas-Acien A, Silbergeld EK, Pastor-Barriuso R, Guallar E. Rejoinder: arsenic exposure and prevalence of type 2 diabetes: updated findings from the National Health Nutrition and Examination Survey, 2003–2006. Epidemiology. 2009;20:816–20. discussion e1-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Navas-Acien A, Silbergeld EK, Pastor-Barriuso R, Guallar E. Arsenic exposure and prevalence of type 2 diabetes in US adults. JAMA. 2008;300:814–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Navas-Acien A, Silbergeld EK, Streeter RA, et al. Arsenic exposure and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of the experimental and epidemiological evidence. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:641–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Davey JC, Nomikos AP, Wungjiranirun M, et al. Arsenic as an endocrine disruptor: arsenic disrupts retinoic acid receptor-and thyroid hormone receptor-mediated gene regulation and thyroid hormone-mediated amphibian tail metamorphosis. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:165–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Davey JC, Bodwell JE, Gosse JA, Hamilton JW. Arsenic as an endocrine disruptor: effects of arsenic on estrogen receptor-mediated gene expression in vivo and in cell culture. Toxicol Sci. 2007;98:75–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Douillet C, Currier J, Saunders J, et al. Methylated trivalent arsenicals are potent inhibitors of glucose stimulated insulin secretion by murine pancreatic islets. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2013;267:11–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tseng CH. The potential biological mechanisms of arsenic-induced diabetes mellitus. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004;197:67–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Diaz-Villasenor A, Burns AL, Hiriart M, et al. Arsenic-induced alteration in the expression of genes related to type 2 diabetes mellitus. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2007;225:123–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Druwe IL, Vaillancourt RR. Influence of arsenate and arsenite on signal transduction pathways: an update. Arch Toxicol. 2010;84:585–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bodwell JE, Gosse JA, Nomikos AP, Hamilton JW. Arsenic disruption of steroid receptor gene activation: complex dose–response effects are shared by several steroid receptors. Chem Res Toxicol. 2006;19:1619–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fry RC, Navasumrit P, Valiathan C, et al. Activation of inflammation/NF-kappaB signaling in infants born to arsenic-exposed mothers. PLoS Genet. 2007;3:e207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Smeester L, Rager JE, Bailey KA, et al. Epigenetic changes in individuals with arsenicosis. Chem Res Toxicol. 2011;24:165–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kim Y, Lee BK. Association between urinary arsenic and diabetes mellitus in the Korean general population according to KNHANES 2008. Sci Total Environ. 2011;409:4054–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Islam R, Khan I, Hassan SN, et al. Association between type 2 diabetes and chronic arsenic exposure in drinking water: a cross sectional study in Bangladesh. Environ Health. 2012;11:38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Makris KC, Christophi CA, Paisi M, Ettinger AS. A preliminary assessment of low level arsenic exposure and diabetes mellitus in Cyprus. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gribble MO, Howard BV, Umans JG, et al. Arsenic exposure, diabetes prevalence, and diabetes control in the Strong Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176:865–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    James KA, Marshall JA, Hokanson JE, et al. A case-cohort study examining lifetime exposure to inorganic arsenic in drinking water and diabetes mellitus. Environ Res. 2013;123:33–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kim NH, Mason CC, Nelson RG, et al. Arsenic exposure and incidence of type 2 diabetes in Southwestern American Indians. Am J Epidemiol. 2013.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Li X, Li B, Xi S, et al. Prolonged environmental exposure of arsenic through drinking water on the risk of hypertension and type 2 diabetes. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Swaddiwudhipong W, Mahasakpan P, Limpatanachote P, Krintratun S. Correlations of urinary cadmium with hypertension and diabetes in persons living in cadmium-contaminated villages in northwestern Thailand: a population study. Environ Res. 2010;110:612–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Barregard L, Bergstrom G, Fagerberg B. Cadmium exposure in relation to insulin production, insulin sensitivity and type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional and prospective study in women. Environ Res. 2013;121:104–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Moon SS. Association of lead, mercury and cadmium with diabetes in the Korean population: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2009–2010. Diabet Med. 2013;30:e143–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    • He K, Xun P, Liu K, et al. Mercury exposure in young adulthood and incidence of diabetes later in life: the CARDIA Trace Element Study. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:1584–9. This large prospective study with a long-term follow-up period was conducted in young adults. Furthermore, the authors also evaluated insulin resistance and pancreatic cell function longitudinally to explore potential pathophysiological mechanisms linking mercury exposure to diabetes development.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Del Razo LM, Garcia-Vagras GG, Valenzuela OL, et al. Exposure to arsenic in drinking water is associated with increased prevalence of diabetes: a cross-sectional study in the Zimapan and Lagunera Regions in Mexico. Environ Heal. 2011;10:73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    World Health Organization (WHO). Exposure to cadmium: a major public health concern. In: Switzerland: 2010.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    World Health Organization (WHO). Mercury and health. In: 2012.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chen YW, Yang CY, Huang CF, et al. Heavy metals, islet function and diabetes development. Islets. 2009;1:169–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Chen YW, Huang CF, Yang CY, et al. Inorganic mercury causes pancreatic beta-cell death via the oxidative stress-induced apoptotic and necrotic pathways. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010;243:323–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Edwards JR, Prozialeck WC. Cadmium, diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009;238:289–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Schwartz GG, Il'yasova D, Ivanova A. Urinary cadmium, impaired fasting glucose, and diabetes in the NHANES III. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:468–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Selin NE, Sunderland EM, Knightes CD, Mason RP. Sources of mercury exposure for U.S. seafood consumers: implications for policy. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118:137–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Xun P, He K. Fish consumption and incidence of diabetes: meta-analysis of data from 438,000 individuals in 12 independent prospective cohorts with an average 11-year follow-up. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:930–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Lind L, Lind PM. Can persistent organic pollutants and plastic-associated chemicals cause cardiovascular disease? J Intern Med. 2012;271:537–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Porta M, Puigdomenech E, Ballester F, et al. Monitoring concentrations of persistent organic pollutants in the general population: the international experience. Environ Int. 2008;34:546–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Gasull M, Pumarega J, Tellez-Plaza M, et al. Blood concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and prediabetes and diabetes in the general population of Catalonia. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:7799–810.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    European Commission. Persistent Organic Pollutants. 2012.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    World Health Organization (WHO). Persistent organic pollutants (POPs). In: Children's health and the environment; WHO Training Package for the Health Sector.; 2008.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Henriksen GL, Ketchum NS, Michalek JE, Swaby JA. Serum dioxin and diabetes mellitus in veterans of Operation Ranch Hand. Epidemiology. 1997;8:252–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Tanaka T, Morita A, Kato M, et al. Congener-specific polychlorinated biphenyls and the prevalence of diabetes in the Saku Control Obesity Program (SCOP). Endocr J. 2011;58:589–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Persky V, Piorkowski J, Turyk M, et al. Associations of polychlorinated biphenyl exposure and endogenous hormones with diabetes in post-menopausal women previously employed at a capacitor manufacturing plant. Environ Res. 2011;111:817–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lee DH, Lind PM, Jacobs Jr DR, et al. Polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorine pesticides in plasma predict development of type 2 diabetes in the elderly: the prospective investigation of the vasculature in Uppsala Seniors (PIVUS) study. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1778–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Airaksinen R, Rantakokko P, Eriksson JG, et al. Association between type 2 diabetes and exposure to persistent organic pollutants. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1972–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Silverstone AE, Rosenbaum PF, Weinstock RS, et al. Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) exposure and diabetes: results from the Anniston Community Health Survey. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:727–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Everett CJ, Thompson OM. Associations of dioxins, furans and dioxin-like PCBs with diabetes and pre-diabetes: is the toxic equivalency approach useful? Environ Res. 2012;118:107–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Persky V, Piorkowski J, Turyk M, et al. Polychlorinated biphenyl exposure, diabetes and endogenous hormones: a cross-sectional study in men previously employed at a capacitor manufacturing plant. Environ Health. 2012;11:57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Nakamoto M, Arisawa K, Uemura H, et al. Association between blood levels of PCDDs/PCDFs/dioxin-like PCBs and history of allergic and other diseases in the Japanese population. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Arrebola JP, Pumarega J, Gasull M, et al. Adipose tissue concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and prevalence of type 2 diabetes in adults from Southern Spain. Environ Res. 2013;122:31–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    • Wu H, Bertrand KA, Choi AL, et al. Persistent organic pollutants and type 2 diabetes: a prospective analysis in the nurses' health study and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121:153–61. This study combined two nested case–control studies to evaluate the association between persistent organic pollutants (POPs) exposure and incident diabetes with an 18-year follow-up. The authors also conducted a meta-analysis to summarize recent prospective evidence regarding POPs and incident diabetes.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Kerger BD, Scott PK, Pavuk M, et al. Re-analysis of Ranch Hand study supports reverse causation hypothesis between dioxin and diabetes. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2012;42:669–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ. 1995;310:170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Lee DH, Steffes MW, Sjodin A, et al. Low dose organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls predict obesity, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance among people free of diabetes. PLoS One. 2011;6:e15977.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Turyk M, Anderson H, Knobeloch L, et al. Organochlorine exposure and incidence of diabetes in a cohort of Great Lakes sport fish consumers. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:1076–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Rignell-Hydbom A, Lidfeldt J, Kiviranta H, et al. Exposure to p, p'-DDE: a risk factor for type 2 diabetes. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Wang SL, Tsai PC, Yang CY, Leon GY. Increased risk of diabetes and polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxins: a 24-year follow-up study of the Yucheng cohort. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:1574–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Vasiliu O, Cameron L, Gardiner J, et al. Polybrominated biphenyls, polychlorinated biphenyls, body weight, and incidence of adult-onset diabetes mellitus. Epidemiol. 2006;17:352–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    AFHS. An epidemiologic investigation of health effects in air force personnel following exposure to herbicides: 2002 follow-up examination results May 2002 to March 2005 http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA438835 [accessed 16 September 2012]. 2005.
  84. 84.
    Kang HK, Dalager NA, Needham LL, et al. Health status of Army Chemical Corps Vietnam veterans who sprayed defoliant in Vietnam. Am J Ind Med. 2006;49:875–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Michalek JE, Pavuk M. Diabetes and cancer in veterans of Operation Ranch Hand after adjustment for calendar period, days of spraying, and time spent in Southeast Asia. J Occup Environ Med. 2008;50:330–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Steenland K, Calvert G, Ketchum N, Michalek J. Dioxin and diabetes mellitus: an analysis of the combined NIOSH and Ranch Hand data. Occup Environ Med. 2001;58:641–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    James-Todd T, Stahlhut R, Meeker JD, et al. Urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and diabetes among women in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001–2008. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120:1307–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Hauser R, Meeker JD, Park S, et al. Temporal variability of urinary phthalate metabolite levels in men of reproductive age. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:1734–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Stahlhut RW, van Wijngaarden E, Dye TD, et al. Concentrations of urinary phthalate metabolites are associated with increased waist circumference and insulin resistance in adult U.S. males. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:876–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Casals-Casas C, Feige JN, Desvergne B. Interference of pollutants with PPARs: endocrine disruption meets metabolism. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32 Suppl 6:S53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Hurst CH, Waxman DJ. Activation of PPARalpha and PPARgamma by environmental phthalate monoesters. Toxicol Sci. 2003;74:297–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Hectors TL, Vanparys C, Pereira-Fernandes A, et al. Evaluation of the INS-1 832/13 cell line as a beta-cell based screening system to assess pollutant effects on beta-cell function. PLoS One. 2013;8:e60030.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Bourguignon JP, Giudice LC, et al. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. Endocr Rev. 2009;30:293–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Feige JN, Gelman L, Rossi D, et al. The endocrine disruptor monoethyl-hexyl-phthalate is a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma modulator that promotes adipogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:19152–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Latini G, Scoditti E, Verrotti A, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors as mediators of phthalate-induced effects in the male and female reproductive tract: epidemiological and experimental evidence. PPAR Res. 2008;2008:359267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Lind PM, Zethelius B, Lind L. Circulating levels of phthalate metabolites are associated with prevalent diabetes in the elderly. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1519–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Svensson K, Hernandez-Ramirez RU, Burguete-Garcia A, et al. Phthalate exposure associated with self-reported diabetes among Mexican women. Environ Res. 2011;111:792–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Silva MJ, Barr DB, Reidy JA, et al. Urinary levels of seven phthalate metabolites in the U.S. population from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2000. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:331–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Parlett LE, Calafat AM, Swan SH. Women's exposure to phthalates in relation to use of personal care products. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2013;23:197–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Hoppin JA, Brock JW, Davis BJ, Baird DD. Reproducibility of urinary phthalate metabolites in first morning urine samples. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:515–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN). French National Assembly supports BPA Ban Bill hastens implementation. In: USDA Foreign Agricultural Service; 2012.Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Joint food and agriculture organization of the united nations and world health organization (FAO/WHO). Joint food and agriculture organization of the united nations and world health organization (FAO/WHO) expert meeting to review toxicological and health aspects of bisphenol a: Final report, including report of stakeholder meeting on bisphenol A, 1–5 November 2010. In: Ottawa, Canada. 2011.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Vandenberg LN, Maffini MV, Sonnenschein C, et al. Bisphenol-A and the great divide: a review of controversies in the field of endocrine disruption. Endocr Rev. 2009;30:75–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Vandenberg LN, Chahoud I, Heindel JJ, et al. Urinary, circulating, and tissue biomonitoring studies indicate widespread exposure to bisphenol A. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118:1055–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Calafat AM, Ye X, Wong LY, et al. Exposure of the U.S. population to bisphenol A and 4-tertiary-octylphenol: 2003–2004. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:39–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Lakind JS, Naiman DQ. Daily intake of bisphenol A and potential sources of exposure: 2005–2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2011;21:272–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Calafat AM, Weuve J, Ye X, et al. Exposure to bisphenol A and other phenols in neonatal intensive care unit premature infants. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117:639–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Biedermann S, Tschudin P, Grob K. Transfer of bisphenol A from thermal printer paper to the skin. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;398:571–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Hugo ER, Brandebourg TD, Woo JG, et al. Bisphenol A at environmentally relevant doses inhibits adiponectin release from human adipose tissue explants and adipocytes. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:1642–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Alonso-Magdalena P, Morimoto S, Ripoll C, et al. The estrogenic effect of bisphenol A disrupts pancreatic beta-cell function in vivo and induces insulin resistance. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:106–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Ning G, Bi Y, Wang T, et al. Relationship of urinary bisphenol A concentration to risk for prevalent type 2 diabetes in Chinese adults: a cross-sectional analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:368–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Shankar A, Teppala S. Relationship between urinary bisphenol A levels and diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:3822–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Silver MK, O'Neill MS, Sowers MR, Park SK. Urinary bisphenol A and type-2 diabetes in U.S. adults: data from NHANES 2003–2008. PLoS One. 2011;6:e26868.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Kim K, Park H. Association between urinary concentrations of bisphenol A and type 2 diabetes in Korean adults: a population-based cross-sectional study. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2013;216:467–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Lang IA, Galloway TS, Scarlett A, et al. Association of urinary bisphenol A concentration with medical disorders and laboratory abnormalities in adults. JAMA. 2008;300:1303–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Wang T, Li M, Chen B, et al. Urinary bisphenol A (BPA) concentration associates with obesity and insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:E223–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Magliano DJ, Lyons JG. Bisphenol A and diabetes, insulin resistance, cardiovascular disease and obesity: controversy in a (plastic) cup? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:502–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Braun JM, Kalkbrenner AE, Calafat AM, et al. Variability and predictors of urinary bisphenol A concentrations during pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119:131–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Braun JM, Smith KW, Williams PL, et al. Variability of urinary phthalate metabolite and Bisphenol A concentrations before and during pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 2012.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Mahalingaiah S, Meeker JD, Pearson KR, et al. Temporal variability and predictors of urinary bisphenol A concentrations in men and women. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116:173–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Ye X, Zhou X, Hennings R, et al. Potential external contamination with bisphenol A and other ubiquitous organic environmental chemicals during biomonitoring analysis: an elusive laboratory challenge. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121:283–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chin-Chi Kuo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Katherine Moon
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kristina A. Thayer
    • 4
  • Ana Navas-Acien
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EpidemiologyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Health SciencesJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical ResearchJohns Hopkins Medical InstitutionsBaltimoreUSA
  4. 4.Office of Health Assessment and Translation, Division of the National Toxicology ProgramNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human ServicesResearch Triangle ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations