Advertisement

Current Diabetes Reports

, 11:503 | Cite as

Building a Pipeline of Training for Behavioral Diabetes Researchers and Clinicians: A Call for National Dialogue

  • Mary de GrootEmail author
  • Lawrence Fisher
Psychosocial Aspects (Korey Hood, Section Editor)

Abstract

In the context of a diabetes epidemic and health care workforce crisis in the United States, a national dialogue is needed to identify the pathways and mechanisms for training a cohort of behavioral diabetes researchers and clinicians. Over the past 40 years, the field of behavioral diabetes in the United States has emerged from a coalition of individual clinicians and researchers to a specialty field. At present, additional strategies are needed to expand the workforce to keep pace with the increasing prevalence of diabetes and the changing demographic trends. We review the training resources currently available and outline the challenges to trainees at all stages of career development. Recommendations include the following: establishing a Task Force for Behavioral Diabetes Training and Professional Development charged with the creation of a national database of researchers and the development of a training model for this interdisciplinary field; creating a national, collaborative training network; and increasing the number of funding mechanisms for all professionals in behavioral diabetes.

Keywords

Diabetes Behavioral research Professional development 

Clinical Trial Acronyms

DCCT

Diabetes Complications and Control Trial

DPP

Diabetes Prevention Program

TRIAD

Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes

Notes

Disclosure

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Institute of Medicine. Retooling for an aging America: building the health care workforce. Washington, D.C., National Academies Press; 2008. http://nap.edu/catalog/12089.html. Downloaded on 6/22/11.
  2. 2.
    U.S. department of commerce, economics and statistics administration, U.S. Census 2010. Population distribution and change: 2000–2010. A brief report. http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-01.pdf. Downloaded 7/14/11.
  3. 3.
    American Psychological Association Commission on ethnic minority recruitment, retention and training in psychology task force and the office of ethnic minority affairs, APA public interest directorate. A portrait of success and challenge: the progress report: 1997–2005. Downloaded 6/17/2011.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flegal K, Carroll M, Ogden C, Curtin L. Prevalence and trends in obesity among U.S. adults, 1999–2008. JAMA;303:235–41.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang E, Basu A, O'Grady M, Capretta J. Projecting the future diabetes population size and related costs for the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:2225–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schroeder SA. We can do better—improving the health of the American people. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1221–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bell RA, Mayer-Davis EJ, Beyer JW, D’Agostino RB, Lawrence JM, Linder B, et al. Diabetes in non-Hispanic white youth: prevalence, incidence and clinical characteristics: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Diabetes Care. 2009;32 Suppl 2:S102–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dabelea D, Mayer-Davis EJ, Imperatore G. The value of national registries: SEARCH for diabetes in youth study. Curr Diabetes Rep. 2010;10:362–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Signorello LB, Schlundt DG, Cohen SS, et al. Comparing diabetes prevalence between African Americans and whites of similar socioeconomic status. Am J Publ Health. 2007;97:2260–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Belar C, Deardorff WW. Clinical health psychology in medical settings: a practitioner’s guidebook. 2nd ed. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2008.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Greydanus DE, Hofmann AD. Psychological factors in diabetes mellitus. A review of the literature with emphasis on adolescence. Am J Dis Child. 1979;133:1061–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Koski ML, Ahas A, Kumento A. A psychosomatic follow-up study of childhood diabetics. Acta Paedopsychiatr. 1976;42:12–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johnson SB, Rosenbloom AL. Behavioral aspects of diabetes mellitus in childhood and adolescence. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 1982;5:357–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dunn SM, Turtle JR. The myth of the diabetic personality. Diabetes Care. 1981;4:640–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jacobson AM, Hauser ST, Wertlieb D, Wolfsdorf JI, Orleans J, Vieyra M. Psychological adjustment of children with recently diagnosed diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1986;9(4):323–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jacobson AM, Hauser ST, Cole C, Willett JB, Wolfsdorf JI, Dvorak R, et al. Social relationships among young adults with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: 10 year follow-up of an onset cohort. Diabet Med. 1997;14:73–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Coyne JC, Anderson BA. The “psychosomatic family” reconsidered II. Recalling a defective model and looking ahead. J Marital Fam Ther. 1989;15(2):139–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1989.tb00793.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick L, Julian D, Cryer P, Lee JH, Richards FE, et al. Intensive versus standard blood glucose awareness training (BGAT) with insulin-dependent diabetes: mechanisms and ancillary effects. Psychosom Med. 1991;53(4):453–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wysocki T, Harris MA, Buckloh LM, Mertlich D, Lochrie AS, Mauras N, et al. Randomized trial of behavioral family systems therapy for diabetes: maintenance of effects on diabetes outcomes in adolescents. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(3):555–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Murillo H, Reece A, Snyderman R, Sung NS. Meeting the challenges facing clinical research: solutions proposed by leaders of medical specialty and clinical research societies. Acad Med. 2006;81:107–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reynolds CF, Pilkonis PA, Kupfer DJ, Dunn L, Pincus HA. Training future generations of mental health researchers: devising strategies for tough times. Acad Psychiatr. 2007;31:152–9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.31.2.152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Institute of Medicine: Research training in psychiatry residency: strategies for reform. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kupfer DJ, Hyman SE, Schatzberg AF, Pincus HA, Reynolds CF. Recruiting and retaining future generations of physician scientists in mental health. Arch Gen Psychiatr. 2002;59:657–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ley TJ, Rosenberg LE. The physician-scientist career pipeline in 2005: build it and they will come. JAMA. 2005;294(11):1343–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    • Kupfer DJ, Schatzberg AF, Grochocinski VJ, Dunn LO, Kelley KA, O’Hara RM. The Career Development Institute for psychiatry: an innovative, longitudinal program for physician-scientists. Acad Psychiatr. 2009;33:313–18. This paper describes an innovative career development approach for training psychiatry residents in mental health research using a multicenter collaborative approach. This program serves as an example of innovative training strategies that capitalize on expertise in a focused research field that spans multiple institutions.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    • Bartels SJ, Lebowitz BD, Reynolds CF, Bruce ML, Halpain M, Faison WE, Kirwin PD. Programs for developing the pipeline of early-career geriatric mental health researchers: outcomes and implications for other fields. Acad Med. 2010;85:26–35. This paper reports findings from the 2007 Summit on Challenges in Recruitment, Retention, and Career Development in Geriatric Mental Health Research. The process and recommendations described in this paper could serve as a useful model for behavioral diabetes research in addressing similar challenges. PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reynolds HY. In choosing a research health career, mentoring is essential. Lung. 2008;186:1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    American Psychological Association. CE programs online course: patients with diabetes: What psychologists need to know. October 2009: http://www.apa.org/education/ce/1370025.aspx. Downloaded 8/1/2011.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisUSA
  2. 2.University of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  3. 3.Diabetes Translational Research CenterIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations