Current Diabetes Reports

, Volume 3, Issue 6, pp 475–479 | Cite as

The International Consensus and practical guidelines on the management and prevention of the diabetic foot

  • Nicolaas C. Schaper
  • Jan Apelqvist
  • Karel Bakker


Diabetic foot ulcers pose a great burden on both the patient and the health care system. A multifactorial approach is necessary in diagnosing and treating these patients, with the input of many different specialists. These different view points and approaches were the basis for the International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot, resulting in a worldwide network of professionals involved in the management of diabetic patients with foot problems. Moreover, several consensus texts were produced and the project resulted in many (local) national initiatives. These activities, which are a continuous process and which are embedded in the International Diabetes Federation, are described in the article.


Editorial Board International Consensus Consensus Document Practical Guideline International Working Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot, ed: International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot. Maastricht, Netherlands: The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot; 1999. This booklet gives an overview on the socioeconomic factors, diagnosis, and treatment based on the input of many different specialists worldwide.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Apelqvist J, Larsson J: What is the most effective way to reduce amputations in the diabetic foot? Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2000, 16(suppl 1):S75-S83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brod M: Quality of life issues in patients with diabetes and lower extremity ulcers: patients and care givers. Qual Life Res 1998, 7:365–372.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Apelqvist J, Ragnarson-Tennvall G, Larsson J, Persson U: Longterm costs for foot ulcers in diabetic patients in a multidisciplinary setting. Foot Ankle Int 1995, 16:388–394.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramsey SD, Newton K, Blough D, et al.: Incidence, outcomes, and cost of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999, 22:382–387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ollendorf DA, Kotsanos JG, Wishner WJ, et al.: Potential economic benefits of lower-extremity amputation prevention strategies in diabetes. Diabetes Care 1998, 21:1240–1245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boulton AJ: The diabetic foot: a global view. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2000, 16(suppl 1):S2-S5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reiber GE, Vileikyte L, Boyko EJ, et al.: Causal pathways for incident lower-extremity ulcers in patients with diabetes from two settings. Diabetes Care 1999, 22:157–162. In treating patients, an understanding of the pathogenesis as described in this article is necessary.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jeffcoate WJ, Harding KG: Diabetic foot ulcers. Lancet 2003, 361:1545–1551. A recent article giving a clear and succinct overview of diabetic foot ulcers.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mason J, O'Keeffe C, Hutchinson A, et al.: A systematic review of foot ulcer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. II: treatment. Diabet Med 1999, 16:889–909.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Edmonds ME, Blundell MP, Morris ME, et al.: Improved survival of the diabetic foot: the role of a specialized foot clinic. Q J Med 1986, 60:763–771.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dargis V, Pantelejeva O, Jonushaite A, et al.: Benefits of a multidisciplinary approach in the management of recurrent diabetic foot ulceration in Lithuania: a prospective study. Diabetes Care 1999, 22:1428–1431.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holstein P, Ellitsgaard N, Olsen BB, Ellitsgaard V: Decreasing incidence of major amputations in people with diabetes. Diabetologia 2000, 43:844–847.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chaturvedi N, Stevens LK, Fuller JH, et al.: Risk factors, ethnic differences and mortality associated with lower-extremity gangrene and amputation in diabetes. The WHO Multinational Study of Vascular Disease in Diabetes. Diabetologia 2001, 44(suppl 2):S65-S71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Larsson J, Apelqvist J: Towards less amputations in diabetic patients. Incidence, causes, cost, treatment, and prevention: a review. Acta Orthop Scand 1995, 66:181–192.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van Houtum WH, Lavery LA: Methodological issues affect variability in reported incidence of lower extremity amputations due to diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1977, 38:177–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frykberg RG, Piaggesi A, Donaghue VM, et al.: Difference in treatment of foot ulcerations in Boston, USA and Pisa, Italy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1997, 35:21–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Apelqvist J, Bakker K, van Houtum WH, et al.: International consensus and practical guidelines on the management and the prevention of the diabetic foot. International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2000, 16(suppl 1):S84-S92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peters EJ, Lavery LA: Effectiveness of the diabetic foot risk classification system of the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Diabetes Care 2001, 24:1442–1447.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Current Science Inc 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolaas C. Schaper
    • 1
  • Jan Apelqvist
  • Karel Bakker
  1. 1.Department of EndocrinologyUniversity Hospital MaastrichtMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations