Multimodality Imaging for the Assessment of Pericardial Diseases
- 18 Downloads
Purpose of Review
The diagnosis of pericardial syndromes, while occasionally straightforward, includes a wide range of pathologies and is often a well-recognized clinical challenge. The aim of this review is to highlight the key role of the various imaging modalities for the diagnosis and management of the spectrum of pericardial diseases.
Cardiac imaging has become an integral part of the diagnostic process often beginning with echocardiography and supported by advanced imaging modalities including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positive emission tomography. These modalities go beyond the simple identification of the pericardium, to identifying increased pericardial thickness, active pericardial edema and inflammation, and its effect on cardiac hemodynamics.
Multimodality imaging has significantly facilitated the diagnosis and long-term management of patients with pericardial diseases. The role of these imaging modalities in overall prognosis and prevention remains to be investigated.
KeywordsAcute pericarditis Constrictive pericarditis Tamponade Effusive constrictive Transient constrictive Pericardial effusion
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Michael Chetrit, Bo Xu, and Beni R. Verma declare that they have no conflict of interest. Allan L. Klein has received honoraria from Sobi and a research grant from Kiniksa.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance
- 13.Adler Y, Charron P, Imazio M, Badano L, Barón-Esquivias G, Bogaert J, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) endorsed by: the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surg. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(42):2921–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Klein AL, et al. American Society of Echocardiography clinical recommendations for multimodality cardiovascular imaging of patients with pericardial disease: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(9):965–1012.e15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.O’Leary SM et al., Imaging the pericardium: appearances on ECG-gated 64-detector row cardiac computed tomography, Br J Radiol, vol. 83, no. 987. 36 Portland Place, London, W1B 1AT, (2010) pp. 194–205Google Scholar
- 19.Young PM, Glockner JF, Williamson EE, Morris MF, Araoz PA, Julsrud PR, et al. MR imaging findings in 76 consecutive surgically proven cases of pericardial disease with CT and pathologic correlation. Int J Card Imaging. Jun. 2012;28(5):1099–109.Google Scholar
- 20.Zurick AO, Bolen MA, Kwon DH, Tan CD, Popovic ZB, Rajeswaran J, et al. Pericardial delayed hyperenhancement with CMR imaging in patients with constrictive pericarditis undergoing surgical pericardiectomy: a case series with histopathological correlation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(11):1180–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Srichai MB. CMR imaging in constrictive pericarditis: is seeing believing? J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2011;4(11. United States):1192–4.Google Scholar
- 38.Calkins H, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design. Eur. Eur. pacing, arrhythmias, Card. Electrophysiol. J. Work. groups Card. pacing, arrhythmias, Card. Cell Electrophysiol Eur Soc Cardiol. 2012;14(4):528–606.Google Scholar
- 41.Xu Y, Xu Z, Wang Y. Cardiac tamponade due to pneumopericardium. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2014;30(4):924–6.Google Scholar
- 43.Porta-Sánchez A, Sagristà-Sauleda J, Ferreira-González I, Torrents-Fernández A, Roca-Luque I, García-Dorado D. Constrictive pericarditis: etiologic spectrum, patterns of clinical presentation, prognostic factors, and long-term follow-up. Rev Española Cardiol (English Ed). 2015;68(12):1092–100.Google Scholar
- 48.Klein AL, Cohen GI, Pietrolungo JF, White RD, Bailey A, Pearce GL, et al. Differentiation of constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy by Doppler transesophageal echocardiographic measurements of respiratory variations in pulmonary venous flow. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22(7):1935–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 49.von Bibra H, Schober K, Jenni R, Busch R, Sebening H, Blomer H. Diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis by pulsed Doppler echocardiography of the hepatic vein. Am J Cardiol. 1989;63(7):483–8.Google Scholar
- 61.Feng D, Glockner J, Kim K, Martinez M, Syed IS, Araoz P, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging pericardial late gadolinium enhancement and elevated inflammatory markers can predict the reversibility of constrictive pericarditis after antiinflammatory medical therapy: a pilot study. Circulation. 2011;124(17):1830–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 62.Klein AL, Cremer PC. Ephemeral effusive constrictive pathophysiology. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2018;11(4. United States):542–5.Google Scholar
- 63.•• Kim KH, Miranda WR, Sinak LJ, Syed FF, Melduni RM, Espinosa RE, et al. Effusive-constrictive pericarditis after pericardiocentesis: incidence, associated findings, and natural history. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(4):534–41 Insights into effusive constrictive pericardiris from one of the largest series of patients.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 70.Lancellotti P, Nkomo VT, Badano LP, Bergler-Klein J, Bogaert J, Davin L, et al. Expert consensus for multi-modality imaging evaluation of cardiovascular complications of radiotherapy in adults: a report from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;14(8):721–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar