Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Addition to Antiplatelet Therapy for Secondary Prevention after Acute Coronary Syndromes: a Review
- 161 Downloads
Purpose of Review
As the management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) continues to evolve, many old practices proved to be of a little benefit and other approaches established the new pillars of modern medicine. Treating ACS patients with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for a year by combining aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel, ticagrelor, or prasugrel) has resulted in better outcomes and is currently the standard of therapy. However, owing to the persistent activation of the coagulation cascade, patients may continue to experience recurrent ischemia and high mortality rates despite compliance with the dual antiplatelet therapy. Research is underway to establish new treatment modalities for secondary prevention post-ACS, including the use of the novel direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).
Multiple trials have been conducted to evaluate the use of DOACs for the secondary prevention after ACS. Recent emerging data showed that the addition of rivaroxaban in a very low dose of 2.5 mg twice daily to the regular DAPT regimen after ACS is beneficial in the reduction of major cardiovascular events, including recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) and strokes. On the other hand, other DOACs, including apixaban, did not show similar efficacy and did not improve the cardiovascular outcomes.
Patients who experience an ACS continue to suffer long-term consequences and thromboembolic complications. Many studies have shown that after the initial ACS event, patients remain in a hypercoagulable state and are more prone to recurrent ischemic attacks including stroke, recurrent MI, or unstable angina (UA). With the objective of seeking better outcomes, it is imperative to explore more aggressive anticoagulation strategies in ACS patients. In this article, we discuss the progress that was made and the limitations we face regarding the role of different anticoagulants in this setting.
KeywordsAcute coronary events Myocardial infarction Unstable angina Secondary prevention Anticoagulation Direct oral anticoagulants Antiplatelet therapy Vitamin K antagonist Factor Xa inhibitor Factor II inhibitor Direct thrombin inhibitor PAR-1 Rivaroxaban Apixaban Warfarin Vorapaxar
Acute coronary syndrome
Dual antiplatelet therapy
Direct oral anticoagulants
- F1 + 2
Prothrombin fragment 1 + 2
Food and Drug Administration
Major adverse cardiac events
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Stable ischemic heart disease
Vitamin K antagonists
Von Willebrand Factor
All individuals listed as authors have contributed to the design, performance, and analysis of the review.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Peter Khalil and Ghazal Kabbach declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 3.Eisen A, Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Eagle KA, Goto S, Guo J, et al. Angina and future cardiovascular events in stable patients with coronary artery disease: insights from the reduction of atherothrombosis for continued health (REACH) registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(10).Google Scholar
- 6.Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR Jr, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(24):e139–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, et al. 2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI focused update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(10):1235–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, Brindis RG, Fihn SD, Fleisher LA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention, 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 2012 ACC/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-st-elevation acute coronary syndromes, and 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 2016, 134;(10):e123–55.Google Scholar
- 9.O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE Jr, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82(1):E1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017, 2017;70(12):–1082.Google Scholar
- 18.Stefanadis C, Antoniou CK, Tsiachris D, Pietri P. Coronary atherosclerotic vulnerable plaque: current perspectives. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(3).Google Scholar
- 22.Estevez B, Du X. New concepts and mechanisms of platelet activation signaling. Physiology (Bethesda). 2017;32(2):162–77.Google Scholar
- 27.van Es RF, Jonker JJ, Verheugt FW, Deckers JW, Grobbee DE. Antithrombotics in the secondary prevention of events in coronary thrombosis-2 research G. Aspirin and coumadin after acute coronary syndromes (the ASPECT-2 study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9327):109–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Fiore LD, Ezekowitz MD, Brophy MT, Lu D, Sacco J, Peduzzi P, et al. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Trial comparing combined warfarin and aspirin with aspirin alone in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: primary results of the CHAMP study. Circulation. 2002;105(5):557–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Andrell P, Yu W, Gersbach P, Gillberg L, Pehrsson K, Hardy I, et al. Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation on angina symptoms and quality of life in patients with refractory angina pectoris--results from the European Angina Registry Link Study (EARL). Heart. 2010;96(14):1132–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.•• Gibson CM, Mega JL, Burton P, Goto S, Verheugt F, Bode C, et al. Rationale and design of the Anti-Xa therapy to lower cardiovascular events in addition to standard therapy in subjects with acute coronary syndrome-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 51 (ATLAS-ACS 2 TIMI 51) trial: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in subjects with acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J. 2011;161(5):815–21 e6 This pivotal trial showed that Rivaroxaban in addition to DAPT post-ACS has great efficacy in reducing cardiovascular events. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Ohman EM, Roe MT, Steg PG, James SK, Povsic TJ, White J, et al. Clinically significant bleeding with low-dose rivaroxaban versus aspirin, in addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in acute coronary syndromes (GEMINI-ACS-1): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10081):1799–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.Committee AS, Investigators, Alexander JH, Becker RC, Bhatt DL, Cools F, et al. Apixaban, an oral, direct, selective factor Xa inhibitor, in combination with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome: results of the Apixaban for Prevention of Acute Ischemic and Safety Events (APPRAISE) trial. Circulation. 2009;119(22):2877–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Steg PG, Mehta SR, Jukema JW, Lip GY, Gibson CM, Kovar F, et al. RUBY-1: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the safety and tolerability of the novel oral factor Xa inhibitor darexaban (YM150) following acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(20):2541–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.Janssen. U.S. FDA Approves XARELTO® (rivaroxaban) to reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events in patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD) 2018 [Available from: https://www.janssen.com/us-fda-approves-xareltor-rivaroxaban-reduce-risk-major-cardiovascular-events-patients-chronic
- 49.• Chiarito M, Cao D, Cannata F, Godino C, Lodigiani C, Ferrante G, et al. Direct oral anticoagulants in addition to antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(3):234–41 This systematic review and meta-analysis study summarizes the results of six trials that included more than 29,000 patients post-ACS and studied the efficacy of adding DOACs in addition to DAPT for the secondary prevention. CrossRefGoogle Scholar