Adverse Remodeling and Reverse Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction

  • Ankeet S. Bhatt
  • Andrew P. Ambrosy
  • Eric J. Velazquez
Myocardial Disease (A Abbate, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Myocardial Disease

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review it to summarize the current literature on remodeling after myocardial infarction, inclusive of pathophysiological considerations, imaging modalities, treatment strategies, and future directions.

Recent Findings

As patients continue to live longer after myocardial infarction (MI), the prevalence of post-MI heart failure continues to rise. Changes in the left ventricle (LV) after MI involve complex interactions between cellular and extracellular components, under neurohormonal regulation. Treatments to prevent adverse LV remodeling and promote reverse remodeling in the post-MI setting include early revascularization, pharmacotherapy aimed at neurohormonal blockade, and device-based therapies that address ventricular dyssynchrony.

Summary

Despite varying definitions of adverse LV remodeling examined across multiple imaging modalities, the presence of an enlarged LV cavity and/or reduced ejection fraction is consistently associated with poor clinical outcomes. Advances in our knowledge of the neurohormonal regulation of adverse cardiac remodeling have been instrumental in generating therapies aimed at arresting adverse remodeling and promoting reserve remodeling. Further investigation into other specific mechanisms of adverse LV remodeling and pathways to disrupt these mechanisms is ongoing and may provide incremental benefit to current evidence-based therapies.

Keywords

Remodeling Myocardial infarction Left ventricle Heart failure Ischemic cardiomyopathy 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Eric J. Velazquez reports grants from NHLBI, personal fees from Abiomed, grants from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and Bay Laboratories, grants and personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Expert Exchange, personal fees from Merck & Co., grants and personal fees from Novartis Pharmaceutical Corp, and grants from Pfizer.

Ankeet S. Bhatt and Andrew P. Ambrosy declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Funding

This manuscript was prepared without additional external funding.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Heidenreich PA, Albert NM, Allen LA, Bluemke DA, Butler J, Fonarow GC, et al. Forecasting the impact of heart failure in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Heart Fail. 2013;6(3):606–19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, Cushman M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2016 update. A Report From the American Heart Association. 2015.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tennant R, Wiggers CJ. The effect of coronary occlusion on myocardial contraction. Am J Physiol Leg Content 1935;112(2):351–361.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E. Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. Experimental observations and clinical implications. Circulation. 1990;81(4):1161–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cleutjens JP, Kandala JC, Guarda E, Guntaka RV, Weber KT. Regulation of collagen degradation in the rat myocardium after infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1995;27(6):1281–92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Warren SE, Royal HD, Markis JE, Grossman W, McKay RG. Time course of left ventricular dilation after myocardial infarction: influence of infarct-related artery and success of coronary thrombolysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;11(1):12–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anversa P, Beghi C, Kikkawa Y, Olivetti G. Myocardial response to infarction in the rat. Morphometric measurement of infarct size and myocyte cellular hypertrophy. Am J Pathol. 1985;118(3):484–92.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pfeffer JM, Pfeffer MA, Fletcher PJ, Braunwald E. Progressive ventricular remodeling in rat with myocardial infarction. Am J Phys. 1991;260(5 Pt 2):H1406–14.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McKay RG, Pfeffer MA, Pasternak RC, Markis JE, Come PC, Nakao S, et al. Left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction: a corollary to infarct expansion. Circulation. 1986;74(4):693–702.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Benjamin MM, Smith RL, Grayburn PA. Ischemic and functional mitral regurgitation in heart failure: natural history and treatment. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014;16(8):517.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Webb CS, Bonnema DD, Ahmed SH, Leonardi AH, McClure CD, Clark LL, et al. Specific temporal profile of matrix metalloproteinase release occurs in patients after myocardial infarction: relation to left ventricular remodeling. Circulation. 2006;114(10):1020–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen K, Chen J, Li D, Zhang X, Mehta JL. Angiotensin II regulation of collagen type I expression in cardiac fibroblasts: modulation by PPAR-gamma ligand pioglitazone. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex : 1979). 2004;44(5):655–61.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sackner-Bernstein JD. The myocardial matrix and the development and progression of ventricular remodeling. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2000;2(2):112–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Böhm M, Ettelbrück S, Flesch M, van Gilst WH, Knorr A, Maack C, et al. β-Adrenergic signal transduction following carvedilol treatment in hypertensive cardiac hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Res. 1998;40(1):146–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Olivetti G, Capasso JM, Meggs LG, Sonnenblick EH, Anversa P. Cellular basis of chronic ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction in rats. Circ Res. 1991;68(3):856–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Olivetti G, Abbi R, Quaini F, Kajstura J, Cheng W, Nitahara JA, et al. Apoptosis in the failing human heart. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(16):1131–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Osadchii OE, Norton GR, McKechnie R, Deftereos D, Woodiwiss AJ. Cardiac dilatation and pump dysfunction without intrinsic myocardial systolic failure following chronic beta-adrenoreceptor activation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;292(4):H1898–905.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lindpaintner K, Lu W, Neidermajer N, Schieffer B, Just H, Ganten D, et al. Selective activation of cardiac angiotensinogen gene expression in post-infarction ventricular remodeling in the rat. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1993;25(2):133–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sigusch HH, Campbell SE, Weber KT. Angiotensin II-induced myocardial fibrosis in rats: role of nitric oxide, prostaglandins and bradykinin. Cardiovasc Res. 1996;31(4):546–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mączewski M, Borys M, Kacprzak P, Gdowski T, Kowalewski M, Wojciechowski D. Late ventricular remodeling in non-reperfused acute myocardial infarction in humans is predicted by angiotensin II type 1 receptor density on blood platelets. Int J Cardiol. 2008;127(1):57–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oishi Y, Ozono R, Yoshizumi M, Akishita M, Horiuchi M, Oshima T. AT2 receptor mediates the cardioprotective effects of AT1 receptor antagonist in post-myocardial infarction remodeling. Life Sci. 2006;80(1):82–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Crea F, Falk V, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(23):2909–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction—executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(3):671–719.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, Brandt PW, Whitlock RM, Wild CJ. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1987;76(1):44–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Migrino RQ, Young JB, Ellis SG, White HD, Lundergan CF, Miller DP, et al. End-systolic volume index at 90 to 180 minutes into reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction is a strong predictor of early and late mortality. The global utilization of streptokinase and t-PA for occluded coronary arteries (GUSTO)-I angiographic Investigators. Circulation. 1997;96(1):116–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bolognese L, Neskovic AN, Parodi G, Cerisano G, Buonamici P, Santoro GM, et al. Left ventricular remodeling after primary coronary angioplasty: patterns of left ventricular dilation and long-term prognostic implications. Circulation. 2002;106(18):2351–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lee TH, Hamilton MA, Stevenson LW, Moriguchi JD, Fonarow GC, Child JS, et al. Impact of left ventricular cavity size on survival in advanced heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72(9):672–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Solomon SD, Skali H, Anavekar NS, Bourgoun M, Barvik S, Ghali JK, et al. Changes in ventricular size and function in patients treated with valsartan, captopril, or both after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2005;111(25):3411–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Verma A, Meris A, Skali H, Ghali JK, Arnold JM, Bourgoun M, et al. Prognostic implications of left ventricular mass and geometry following myocardial infarction: the VALIANT (VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarcTion) Echocardiographic Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1(5):582–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    St John Sutton M, Pfeffer MA, Plappert T, Rouleau JL, Moye LA, Dagenais GR, et al. Quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements are major predictors of adverse cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction. The protective effects of captopril. Circulation 1994;89(1):68–75.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wong M, Staszewsky L, Latini R, Barlera S, Glazer R, Aknay N, et al. Severity of left ventricular remodeling defines outcomes and response to therapy in heart failure: Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT) echocardiographic data. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(11):2022–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hoffmann R, von Bardeleben S, Kasprzak JD, Borges AC, ten Cate F, Firschke C, et al. Analysis of regional left ventricular function by cineventriculography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography: a multicenter comparison of methods. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(1):121–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    • Fieno DS, Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lomasney JW, Klocke FJ, Judd RM. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36(6):1985–91. This study highlights the potential benefits of CMR in assessing ventricular remodeling. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, Harris K, Chen EL, Simonetti O, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation. 1999;100(19):1992–2002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tarantini G, Razzolini R, Cacciavillani L, Bilato C, Sarais C, Corbetti F, et al. Influence of transmurality, infarct size, and severe microvascular obstruction on left ventricular remodeling and function after primary coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98(8):1033–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brown N, Melville M, Gray D, Young T, Munro J, Skene AM, et al. Quality of life four years after acute myocardial infarction: short form 36 scores compared with a normal population. Heart. 1999;81(4):352–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pettersen KI, Kvan E, Rollag A, Stavem K, Reikvam A. Health-related quality of life after myocardial infarction is associated with level of left ventricular ejection fraction. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2008;8:28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Touchstone DA, Beller GA, Nygaard TW, Tedesco C, Kaul S. Effects of successful intravenous reperfusion therapy on regional myocardial function and geometry in humans: a tomographic assessment using two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;13(7):1506–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Marino P, Zanolla L, Zardini P. Effect of streptokinase on left ventricular modeling and function after myocardial infarction: the GISSI (Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell’Infarto Miocardico) Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14(5):1149–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Simes RJ, Topol EJ, Holmes DR Jr, White HD, Rutsch WR, Vahanian A, et al. Link between the angiographic substudy and mortality outcomes in a large randomized trial of myocardial reperfusion. Importance of early and complete infarct artery reperfusion. GUSTO-I Investigators. Circulation. 1995;91(7):1923–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ross AM, Coyne KS, Moreyra E, Reiner JS, Greenhouse SW, Walker PL, et al. Extended mortality benefit of early postinfarction reperfusion. GUSTO-I Angiographic Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries Trial. Circulation. 1998;97(16):1549–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mehta RH, Harjai KJ, Cox D, Stone GW, Brodie B, Boura J, et al. Clinical and angiographic correlates and outcomes of suboptimal coronary flow inpatients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(10):1739–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    GISSI-3: effects of lisinopril and transdermal glyceryl trinitrate singly and together on 6-week mortality and ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’infarto Miocardico. Lancet (Lond Engl). 1994;343(8906):1115–22.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    ISIS-4: a randomised factorial trial assessing early oral captopril, oral mononitrate, and intravenous magnesium sulphate in 58,050 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. ISIS-4 (Fourth International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Lancet (Lond Engl). 1995;345(8951):669–85.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pfeffer MA, Braunwald E, Moye LA, Basta L, Brown EJ Jr, Cuddy TE, et al. Effect of captopril on mortality and morbidity in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. Results of the survival and ventricular enlargement trial. The SAVE Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1992;327(10):669–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Effect of ramipril on mortality and morbidity of survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical evidence of heart failure. The Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) Study Investigators. Lancet (Lond Engl). 1993;342(8875):821–8.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Pfeffer MA, Lamas GA, Vaughan DE, Parisi AF, Braunwald E. Effect of captopril on progressive ventricular dilatation after anterior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(2):80–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hamon M, Filippi-Codaccioni E. The OPTIMMAL trial: losartan or captopril after acute myocardial infarction. Lancet (Lond Engl). 2002;360(9348):1886–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ, Rouleau JL, Kober L, Maggioni AP, et al. Valsartan, captopril, or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(20):1893–906.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Effect of metoprolol CR/XL in chronic heart failure: Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF). Lancet (Lond, Engl). 1999;353(9169):2001–7.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II): a randomised trial. Lancet. 353(9146):9–13.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Dargie HJ. Effect of carvedilol on outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction: the CAPRICORN randomised trial. Lancet (Lond Engl). 2001;357(9266):1385–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Doughty RN, Whalley GA, Walsh HA, Gamble GD, Lopez-Sendon J, Sharpe N. Effects of carvedilol on left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction: the CAPRICORN Echo Substudy. Circulation. 2004;109(2):201–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Bristow MR, Gilbert EM, Abraham WT, Adams KF, Fowler MB, Hershberger RE, et al. Carvedilol produces dose-related improvements in left ventricular function and survival in subjects with chronic heart failure. MOCHA Investigators Circ. 1996;94(11):2807–16.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hu K, Gaudron P, Ertl G. Long-term effects of beta-adrenergic blocking agent treatment on hemodynamic function and left ventricular remodeling in rats with experimental myocardial infarction: importance of timing of treatment and infarct size. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31(3):692–700.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Pitt B, Remme W, Zannad F, Neaton J, Martinez F, Roniker B, et al. Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(14):1309–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Iraqi W, Rossignol P, Angioi M, Fay R, Nuee J, Ketelslegers JM, et al. Extracellular cardiac matrix biomarkers in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure: insights from the Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (EPHESUS) study. Circulation. 2009;119(18):2471–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bristow MR, Saxon LA, Boehmer J, Krueger S, Kass DA, De Marco T, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(21):2140–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS, Klein H, Brown MW, Daubert JP, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(14):1329–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Cleland JG, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L, et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(15):1539–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Higgins SL, Hummel JD, Niazi IK, Giudici MC, Worley SJ, Saxon LA, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy for the treatment of heart failure in patients with intraventricular conduction delay and malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(8):1454–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Linde C, Abraham WT, Gold MR, St John Sutton M, Ghio S, Daubert C. Randomized trial of cardiac resynchronization in mildly symptomatic heart failure patients and in asymptomatic patients with left ventricular dysfunction and previous heart failure symptoms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(23):1834–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    •• Mathias A, Moss AJ, McNitt S, Zareba W, Goldenberg I, Solomon SD, et al. Clinical implications of complete left-sided reverse remodeling with cardiac resynchronization therapy: a MADIT-CRT Substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(12):1268–76. This study demonstrates the importance in terms of effect on clinical outcomes for patients who display reverse remodeling with CRT therapy. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Chung ES, Leon AR, Tavazzi L, Sun JP, Nihoyannopoulos P, Merlino J, et al. Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial. Circulation. 2008;117(20):2608–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ypenburg C, Schalij MJ, Bleeker GB, Steendijk P, Boersma E, Dibbets-Schneider P, et al. Impact of viability and scar tissue on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischaemic heart failure patients. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(1):33–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Gademan MG, Swenne CA, Verwey HF, van der Laarse A, Maan AC, van de Vooren H, et al. Effect of exercise training on autonomic derangement and neurohumoral activation in chronic heart failure. J Card Fail. 2007;13(4):294–303.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Liu JL, Irvine S, Reid IA, Patel KP, Zucker IH. Chronic exercise reduces sympathetic nerve activity in rabbits with pacing-induced heart failure: a role for angiotensin II. Circulation. 2000;102(15):1854–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Braith RW, Welsch MA, Feigenbaum MS, Kluess HA, Pepine CJ. Neuroendocrine activation in heart failure is modified by endurance exercise training. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(4):1170–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    West RR, Jones DA, Henderson AH. Rehabilitation after myocardial infarction trial (RAMIT): multi-centre randomised controlled trial of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation in patients following acute myocardial infarction. Heart. 2012;98(8):637–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    O’Connor CM, Whellan DJ, Lee KL, Keteyian SJ, Cooper LS, Ellis SJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure: HF-ACTION randomized controlled trial. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2009;301(14):1439–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ambrosy AP, Cerbin LP, DeVore AD, Greene SJ, Kraus WE, O’Connor CM, et al. Aerobic exercise training and general health status in ambulatory heart failure patients with a reduced ejection fraction—findings from the Heart Failure and A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training (HF-ACTION)trial. Am Heart J.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Wisloff U, Stoylen A, Loennechen JP, Bruvold M, Rognmo O, Haram PM, et al. Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients: a randomized study. Circulation. 2007;115(24):3086–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ellingsen Ø, Halle M, Conraads VM, Støylen A, Dalen H, Delagardelle C, et al. High intensity interval training in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction. Circulation. 2017.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Haykowsky MJ, Liang Y, Pechter D, Jones LW, McAlister FA, Clark AM. A meta-analysis of the effect of exercise training on left ventricular remodeling in heart failure patients: the benefit depends on the type of training performed. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(24):2329–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Dubach P, Myers J, Dziekan G, Goebbels U, Reinhart W, Vogt P, et al. Effect of exercise training on myocardial remodeling in patients with reduced left ventricular function after myocardial infarction: application of magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 1997;95(8):2060–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Cung T-T, Morel O, Cayla G, Rioufol G, Garcia-Dorado D, Angoulvant D, et al. Cyclosporine before PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(11):1021–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Chareonthaitawee P, Christian TF, Hirose K, Gibbons RJ, Rumberger JA. Relation of initial infarct size to extent of left ventricular remodeling in the year after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25(3):567–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    McMurray JJV, Packer M, Desai AS, Gong J, Lefkowitz MP, Rizkala AR, et al. Angiotensin–neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(11):993–1004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    von Lueder TG, Wang BH, Kompa AR, Huang L, Webb R, Jordaan P, et al. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 attenuates cardiac remodeling and dysfunction after myocardial infarction by reducing cardiac fibrosis and hypertrophy. Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8(1):71–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    •• Januzzi JL, Butler J, Felker GM, Fombu E, Maisel A, McCague K, et al. Rationale and methods of the prospective study of biomarkers, symptom improvement and ventricular remodeling during entresto therapy for heart failure (PROVE-HF) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(11, Supplement):711. This study is currently still in process but will provide valuable information about the effect of sacubitril-valsartan on cardiac remodeling. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Menasche P, Alfieri O, Janssens S, McKenna W, Reichenspurner H, Trinquart L, et al. The Myoblast Autologous Grafting in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy (MAGIC) trial: first randomized placebo-controlled study of myoblast transplantation. Circulation. 2008;117(9):1189–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Laflamme MA, Chen KY, Naumova AV, Muskheli V, Fugate JA, Dupras SK, et al. Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(9):1015–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Bao L, Meng Q, Li Y, Deng S, Yu Z, Liu Z, et al. C-kit positive cardiac stem cells and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells synergistically enhance angiogenesis and improve cardiac function after myocardial infarction in a paracrine manner. J Card Fail 2017.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Hirt MN, Hansen A, Eschenhagen T. Cardiac tissue engineering: state of the art. Circ Res. 2014;114(2):354–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ankeet S. Bhatt
    • 1
  • Andrew P. Ambrosy
    • 2
    • 3
  • Eric J. Velazquez
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of MedicineDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Division of Cardiology, Department of MedicineDuke University Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Duke Clinical Research InstituteDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations