“East Asian Paradox”: Challenge for the Current Antiplatelet Strategy of “One-Guideline-Fits-All Races” in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Global Cardiovascular Health (SC Smith, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Global Cardiovascular Health

Abstract

Clinical experiences have suggested that East Asians show the higher risk of warfarin-related intracranial hemorrhage compared with Westerners. Therefore, different target of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) in East Asians (1.6–2.6) has been proposed and adapted in clinical practice. In terms with antiplatelet therapy, recent evidence has supported the concept of “therapeutic level of platelet reactivity” to balance clinical efficacy and safety in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or those with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In line with the warfarin experiences, multiple clinical and pharmacodynamic data from East Asians have shown their different therapeutic level of platelet reactivity following PCI or ACS (“East Asian Paradox”). Furthermore, like most cardiovascular drugs, P2Y12 receptor blockers have marked interethnic differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The currently performed clinical trials evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of potent P2Y12 inhibitors mostly don’t include enough number of East Asians to draw reliable conclusions. Therefore, dedicated research and guideline(s) for East Asians are required before we can apply Western recommendations for potent P2Y12 inhibitors in East Asian population. It is a time to consider the paradigm shift from “one-guideline-fits-all races” to “race-tailored antiplatelet therapy” in treating ACS patients.

Keywords

Race Warfarin P2Y12 inhibitor Acute coronary syndrome Thrombogenicity East Asian Paradox Antiplatelet strategy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was partly supported by grants from Institute of the Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Young-Hoon Jeong has received honoraria for lectures from Sanofi-Aventis, Daiichi Sankyo/Lilly, AstraZeneca, Haemonetics, and Otsuka; and research grants or support from Han-mi Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Otsuka, Accumetrics, and Haemonetics.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Executive Summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2550–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.•
    Tantry US, Bonello L, Aradi D, et al. Consensus and update on the definition of on-treatment platelet reactivity to ADP associated with ischemia and bleeding. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:2261–73. Good review for the recent evidence of “therapeutic level of platelet reactivity” during P2Y 12 receptor inhibitors. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahn SG, Lee SH, Yoon JH, et al. Different prognostic significance of high on-treatment platelet reactivity as assessed by the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay after coronary stenting in patients with and without acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:259–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Park DW, Ahn JM, Song HG, et al. Differential prognostic impact of high on-treatment platelet reactivity among patients with acute coronary syndromes vs stable coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J. 2013;165:34–42.e1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shen AY, Yao JF, Brar SS, Jorgensen MB, Chen W. Racial/ethnic differences in the risk of intracranial hemorrhage among patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:309–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ma C. Current antithrombotic treatment in East Asia: some perspectives on anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. Thromb Haemost. 2012;107:1014–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ogawa S, Aizawa Y, Atarashi H, Inoue H, Okumura K, Kamakura S. Guidelines for pharmacotherapy of atrial fibrillation. Circ J. 2008;72(Suppl IV):1639–58.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yamaguchi T. Optimal intensity of warfarin therapy for secondary prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Japanese Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation-Embolism Secondary Prevention Cooperative Study Group. Stroke. 2000;31:817–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.•
    Scott SA, Sangkuhl K, Stein CM, et al. Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guidelines for CYP2C19 genotype and clopidogrel therapy: 2013 update. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;94:317–23. Good review for updated pharmacogenetic information of clopidogrel treatment.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jeong YH, Abadilla KA, Tantry US, et al. Influence of CYP2C19*2 and *3 loss-of-function alleles on the pharmacodynamic effects of standard- and high-dose clopidogrel in East Asians undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the results of the ACCEL-DOUBLE-2 N3 study. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11:1194–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim IS, Jeong YH, Tantry US, et al. Relation between the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay and light transmittance aggregometry in East Asian patients after high-dose clopidogrel loading. Am Heart J. 2013;166:95–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jeong YH. Accelerated inhibition on platelet aggregation, inflammation and myonecrosis by adjunctive cilostazol loading in patients with acute coronary syndrome: the results of the ACCEL-LOADING-ACS multicenter randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:E455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang HZ, Kim MH, Jeong YH. Predictive values of post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity assessed by different platelet function tests on ischemic events in East Asian patients treated with PCI. Platelets. 2013. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ko YG, Suh JW, Kim BH, et al. Comparison of 2 point-of-care platelet function tests, VerifyNow Assay and Multiple Electrode Platelet Aggregometry, for predicting early clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J. 2011;161:383–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suh JW, Lee SP, Park KW, et al. Multicenter randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of cilostazol on ischemic vascular complications after drug-eluting stent implantation for coronary heart disease: results of the CILON-T (influence of CILostazol-based triple antiplatelet therapy ON ischemic complication after drug-eluting stenT implantation) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:280–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Park KW, Jeon KH, Kang SH, et al. Clinical outcomes of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in Koreans receiving elective percutaneous coronary intervention (from results of the CROSS VERIFY study). Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:1556–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jin HY, Yang TH, Kim DI, et al. High post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity assessed by a point-of-care assay predicts long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary coronary stenting. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:1877–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goto S, Toda E. Antiplatelet therapy after coronary intervention in Asia and Japan: the Asian perspective of antiplatelet intervention. Hamostaseologie. 2009;29:321–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.•
    Mak KH, Bhatt DL, Shao M, et al. Ethnic variation in adverse cardiovascular outcomes and bleeding complications in the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance (CHARISMA) study. Am Heart J. 2009;157:658–65. Important clinical data showing different clinical efficacy and safety across the races in high-risk patients during aspirin monotherapy or dual antiplatelet therapy.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Park DW, Yun SC, Lee SW. Stent thrombosis, clinical events, and influence of prolonged clopidogrel use after placement of drug-eluting stent data from an observational cohort study of drug-eluting vs bare-metal stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;1:494–503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kimura T, Morimoto T, Nakagawa Y, et al. J-Cypher Registry Investigators antiplatelet therapy and stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Circulation. 2009;119:987–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Daemen J, Wenaweser P, Tsuchida K, et al. Early and late coronary stent thrombosis of sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: data from a large two-institutional cohort study. Lancet. 2007;369:667–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.•
    Kumar RS, Douglas PS, Peterson ED, et al. Effect of race and ethnicity on outcomes with drug-eluting and bare metal stents: results in 423,965 patients in the linked National Cardiovascular Data Registry and centers for Medicare & Medicaid services payer databases. Circulation. 2013;127:1395–403. Important large scale clinical data to compare clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention between the races.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tsukahara K, Kimura K, Morita S, et al. Impact of high-responsiveness to dual antiplatelet therapy on bleeding complications in patients receiving drug-eluting stents. Circ J. 2010;74:679–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jeong YH. Correlation between platelet reactivity and type of post-discharge bleeding events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the ACCEL-BLEED study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:B221.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cuisset T, Loosveld M, Morange PE, et al. CYP2C19*2 and *17 Alleles have a significant impact on platelet response and bleeding risk in patients treated with prasugrel after acute coronary syndrome. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:1280–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jerjes-Sanchez C. Venous and arterial thrombosis. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:3–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Danesh J, Lewington S, Thompson SG, et al. Fibrinogen Studies Collaboration. Plasma fibrinogen level and the risk of major cardiovascular diseases and nonvascular mortality: an individual participant meta-analysis. JAMA. 2005;294:1799–809.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ye Z, Liu EH, Higgins JP, et al. Seven haemostatic gene polymorphisms in coronary disease: meta-analysis of 66,155 cases and 91,307 controls. Lancet. 2006;367:651–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gorog DA. Prognostic value of plasma fibrinolysis activation markers in cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2701–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, Lowe G, et al. Emerging Risk Factors Collaboration. C-reactive protein concentration and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and mortality: an individual participant meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:132–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ketch TR, Turner SJ, Sacrinty MT, et al. Derived fibrinogen compared with C-reactive protein and brain natriuretic peptide for predicting events after myocardial infarction and coronary stenting. Am Heart J. 2008;156:234–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ang L, Thani KB, Ilapakurti M, Lee MS, Palakodeti V, Mahmud E. Elevated plasma fibrinogen rather than residual platelet reactivity after clopidogrel pre-treatment is associated with an increased ischemic risk during elective percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:23–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Park DW, Lee SW, Yun SC, et al. A point-of-care platelet function assay and C-reactive protein for prediction of major cardiovascular events after drug-eluting stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2630–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Müller K, Aichele S, Herkommer M, et al. Impact of inflammatory markers on platelet inhibition and cardiovascular outcome including stent thrombosis in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 2010;213:256–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schoos MM, Kelbæk H, Kofoed KF, et al. Usefulness of preprocedure high-sensitivity C-reactive protein to predict death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis according to stent type in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction randomized to bare metal or drug-eluting stenting during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107:1597–603.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.•
    Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, et al. ATLAS ACS 2–TIMI 51 Investigators. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:9–19. Large scale clinical data to show the benefit of new oral Xa inhibitor in addition to dual antiplatelet therapy on thrombotic events in acute coronary syndrome patients.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    White RH, Keenan CR. Effects of race and ethnicity on the incidence of venous thromboembolism. Thromb Res. 2009;123 Suppl 4:S11–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.•
    Zakai NA, McClure LA. Racial differences in venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9:1877–82. Good review that suggests the clinical data and potential mechanisms in terms with the different risk of venous thromboembolism across the races.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Collins SD, Torguson R, Gaglia Jr MA, et al. Does black ethnicity influence the development of stent thrombosis in the drug-eluting stent era? Circulation. 2010;122:1085–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lutsey PL, Cushman M, Steffen LM, et al. Plasma hemostatic factors and endothelial markers in four racial/ethnic groups: the MESA study. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:2629–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Iso H, Cui R, Date C, Kikuchi S, Tamakoshi A. JACC Study Group. C-reactive protein levels and risk of mortality from cardiovascular disease in Japanese: the JACC Study. Atherosclerosis. 2009;207:291–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kelley-Hedgepeth A, Lloyd-Jones DM, Colvin A, et al. SWAN Investigators. Ethnic differences in C-reactive protein concentrations. Clin Chem. 2008;54:1027–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Albert MA, Glynn RJ, Buring J, Ridker PM. C-reactive protein levels among women of various ethnic groups living in the United States (from the Women's Health Study). Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:1238–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.••
    Gorog DA, Yamamoto J, Saraf S, et al. First direct comparison of platelet reactivity and thrombolytic status between Japanese and Western volunteers: possible relationship to the “Japanese paradox”. Int J Cardiol. 2011;152:43–8. The first study to directly compare the level of thrombotic status and fibrinolytic activity between East Asians and Westerners.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Faber DR, de Groot PG, Visseren FL. Role of adipose tissue in haemostasis, coagulation and fibrinolysis. Obes Rev. 2009;10:554–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jeong YH, Park Y, Kim IS. Standard- vs high-dose clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2011;305:2520.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jeong YH, Bliden KP, Park Y, Tantry US, Gurbel PA. Pharmacogenetic guidance for antiplatelet treatment. Lancet. 2012;380:725.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kim K, Johnson JA, Derendorf H. Differences in drug pharmacokinetics between East Asians and Caucasians and the role of genetic polymorphisms. J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;44:1083–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.•
    Small DS, Kothare P, Yuen E, et al. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of prasugrel in healthy Chinese, Japanese, and Korean subjects compared with healthy Caucasian subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;66:127–35. Comprehensive study comparing the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data during prasugrel treatment between East Asians and Caucasians.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Li H, Butler K, Yang L, Yang Z, Teng R. Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of single and multiple doses of ticagrelor in healthy Chinese subjects: an open-label, sequential, two-cohort, single-center study. Clin Drug Investig. 2012;32:87–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Teng R. Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and pharmacogenetic profile of the oral antiplatelet agent ticagrelor. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012;51:305–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, et al. TRITON-TIMI 38 Investigators. Prasugrel vs clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2001–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, et al. PLATO Investigators. Ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1045–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Roe MT, Armstrong PW, Fox KA, et al. TRILOGY ACS Investigators. Prasugrel vs clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes without revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1297–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Bonello L, Mancini J, Pansieri M, et al. Relationship between post-treatment platelet reactivity and ischemic and bleeding events at 1-year follow-up in patients receiving prasugrel. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10:1999–2005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Jin HY, Yang TH. Randomized comparisons of the platelet inhibitory effect of clopidogrel and two doses of prasugrel in patients receiving antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation. Daejeon, Korea: Korean Society of Cardiology. 2012.Google Scholar
  58. 58.••
    Saito S, Isshiki T, Ogawa H, Kimura T, Yokoi H, Nakamura M. PRASugrel compared to clopidogrel For Japanese PatIenTs with ACS undergoing PCI (PRASFIT-ACS) study. Presented at Late Breaking Clinical Trials Session at the 77th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Japanese Circulation Society; March 16, 2012, the Pacifico: Yokohama. The first study to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of low-dose prasugrel vs standard-dose clopidogrel in East Asians with acute coronary syndrome. Google Scholar
  59. 59.••
    PHILO Trial. A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, international, multicenter, Phase 3 study to assess the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel on top of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid in Asian/Japanese patients with non-ST or ST-elevation ACS for whom PCI is planned. Available from: http://www.astrazenecaclinicaltrials.com/_mshost800325/content/clinical-trials/resources/pdf/D5130C00027. Accessed 19 Nov 2013. The first study to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of guideline-recommended ticagrelor vs standard-dose clopidogrel in East Asians with acute coronary syndrome.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal MedicineGyeongsang National University Hospital and Gyeongsang National University School of MedicineJinjuKorea

Personalised recommendations