Advertisement

Intracranial Hemorrhage and Novel Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation: What Have We Learned?

  • Graeme J. HankeyEmail author
New Therapies for Cardiovascular Disease (KW Mahaffey, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on New Therapies for Cardiovascular Disease

Abstract

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) affects 0.2-0.5 % of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients taking a novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) each year. About two thirds of ICHs are intracerebral and one quarter subdural. The 30-day case fatality of NOAC-associated ICH was similar to that of warfarin-associated ICH in two trials. Consistent predictors of ICH are increasing age, a history of prior stroke or TIA, and concomitant use of an antiplatelet drug. Compared to warfarin, the NOACs significantly reduce the risk of ICH by half (risk ratio = 0.44; 95 % CI: 0.37 to 0.51). Compared to aspirin, apixaban has a similar risk of ICH (risk ratio = 0.84; 95 % CI, 0.38 to 1.87). Current treatments for NOAC-associated ICH include nonactivated and activated prothrombin complex concentrate, which reverse the anticoagulant effects of the NOACs, but their effects on bleeding and patient outcome are not known. Future treatments for NOAC-associated ICH promise to include specific antidotes to dabigatran (e.g., aDabi-Fab, PER977) and factor Xa inhibitors (e.g., r-Antidote PRT064445, PER977).

Keywords

Intracranial hemorrhage Novel oral anticoagulants Atrial fibrillation 

Notes

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

Conflict of Interest

Graeme J. Hankey has received honoraria for serving on the Executive Committees of the AMADEUS trial (Sanofi-Aventis), ROCKET-AF trial (Johnson & Johnson), and the BOREALIS trial (Sanofi Aventis); for serving on the Stroke outcome adjudication committee of the RE-LY trial and AVERROES trial, for speaking on educational programs about stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation for the heart.org, and for speaking at scientific symposia and consulting on advisory boards sponsored by Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Pfizer Australia.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Fang MC, Go AS, Chang Y, Hylek EM, Henault LE, Jensvold NG, et al. Death and disability from warfarin-associated intracranial and extracranial hemorrhages. Am J Med. 2007;120:700–5.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1139–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, Pan G, Singer D, Hacke W, et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:883–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJV, Lopes RD, Hylek EH, Hanna M, et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:981–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Connolly SJ, Eikelboom J, Joyner C, Diener HC, Hart R, Golitsyn S, et al. Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:806–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flaker GC, Eikelboom JW, Shestakovska O, Connolly SJ, Kaatz S, Budaj A, et al. Bleeding during treatment with aspirin versus apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation unsuitable for warfarin: the apixaban versus acetylsalicylic acid to prevent stroke in atrial fibrillation patients who have failed or are unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist treatment (AVERROES) trial. Stroke. 2012;43:3291–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ogawa S, Shinohara Y, Kanmuri K. Safety and efficacy of the oral direct factor xa inhibitor apixaban in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. -The ARISTOTLE-J study. Circ J. 2011;75:1852–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hori M, Matsumoto M, Tanahashi N, Momomura S, Uchiyama S, Goto S, et al. Rivaroxaban vs. warfarin in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation – the J-ROCKET AF study. Circ J. 2012;76:2104–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, Murphy SA, Wiviott SD, Halperin JL, et al. Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:2093–2104. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310907.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, Hoffman EB, Deenadayalu N, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2013. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62343-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.•
    Connolly SJ, Wallentin L, Ezekowitz MD, et al. The long-term multicenter observational study of dabigatran treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) study. Circulation. 2013;128:237–43. Longer-term follow-up study of rates of ICH among patients assigned dabigatran in the RE-LY trial who continued to take dabigatran for a further 2.3 years (median) after the last RE-LY trial visit.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.•
    Larsen TB, Rasmussen LH, Skjøth F, et al. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate and warfarin in “real-world” patients with atrial fibrillation: a prospective nationwide cohort study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:2264–73. Recent prospective nationwide cohort study in Denmark showing that in “everyday clinical practice” the rates of ICH with dabigatran (both doses) were lower than the rates of ICH with warfarin. The findings support the external validity (generalisabilty) in “the real world: of the results observed in the large phase III clinical trials of NOACs vs warfarin.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Southworth MR, Reichman ME, Unger EF. Dabigatran and postmarketing reports of bleeding. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1272–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Al-Shahi Salman R, Labovitz DL, Stapf C. Spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage. BMJ. 2009;339:b2586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.••
    Hart RG, Diener HC, Yang S, Connolly SJ, Wallentin L, Reilly PA, et al. Intracranial hemorrhage in atrial fibrillation patients during anticoagulation with warfarin or dabigatran: the RE-LY trial. Stroke. 2012;43:1511–7. A detailed analysis of ICH in the RE-LY trial cohort showing that the clinical spectrum of ICH was similar for patients given warfarin and dabigatran, the absolute rates of ICH at all sites and both fatal and traumatic ICHs were lower with dabigatran than with warfarin, and the most important modifiable independent risk factor for ICH was concomitant aspirin use.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.•
    Hankey GJ, Stevens SR, Piccini JP, Lokhnygina Y, Mahaffey KW, Halperin JL, et al. Predictors of intracranial hemorrhage among anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from the rivaroxaban once-daily oral direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and embolism trial in atrial fibrillation (ROCKET AF). Stroke. 2012;43:A152. A detailed analysis of the rate, predictors, and outcome of ICH among the cohort of AF patients allocated rivaroxaban or warfarin in the ROCKET-AF trial.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lauer A, Pfeilschifter W, Schaffer CB, Lo EH, Foerch C. Intracerebral haemorrhage associated with antithrombotic treatment: translational insights from experimental studies. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:394–405.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhou W, Schwarting S, Illanes S, et al. Hemostatic therapy in experimental intracerebral hemorrhage associated with the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. Stroke. 2011;42:3594–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhou W, Zorn M, Nawroth P, Bütehorn U, Perzborn E, Heitmeier S, et al. Hemostatic therapy in experimental intracerebral hemorrhage associated with rivaroxaban. Stroke. 2013;44:771–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pfeilschifter W, Bohmann F, Baumgarten P, et al. Thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator under dabigatran anticoagulation in experimental stroke. Ann Neurol. 2012;71:624–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sun L, Zhou W, Ploen R, Zorn M, Veltkamp R. Anticoagulation with dabigatran does not increase secondary intracerebral haemorrhage after thrombolysis in experimental cerebral ischaemia. Thromb Haemost. 2013;110:153–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bohmann F, Mirceska A, Pfeilschifter J, et al. No influence of dabigatran anticoagulation on hemorrhagic transformation in an experimental model of ischemic stroke. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40804.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gliem M, Hermsen D, van Rooijen N, Hartung HP, Jander S. Secondary intracerebral hemorrhage due to early initiation of oral anticoagulation after ischemic stroke: an experimental study in mice. Stroke. 2012;43:3352–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hylek EM, Singer DE. Risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage in outpatients taking warfarin. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:897–902.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sjoblom L, Hardemark HG, Lindgren A, Norrving B, Fahlen M, Samuelsson M, et al. Management and prognostic features of intracerebral hemorrhage during anticoagulant therapy: a Swedish multicenter study. Stroke. 2001;32:2567–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hylek EM, Evans-Molina C, Shea C, Henault LE, Regan S. Major hemorrhage and tolerability of warfarin in the first year of therapy among elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2007;115:2689–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Poli D, Antonucci E, Grifoni E, Abbate R, Gensini GF, Prisco D. Bleeding risk during oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients older than 80 years. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:999–1002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Poli D, Antonucci E, Testa S, Tosetto A, Ageno W, Palareti G, et al. Bleeding risk in very old patients on vitamin K antagonist treatment: results of a prospective collaborative study on elderly patients followed by Italian Centres for Anticoagulation. Circulation. 2011;124:824–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chatterjee S, Sardar P, Biondi-Zoccai G, Kumbhani DJ. New oral anticoagulants and the risk of intracranial hemorrhage: traditional and Bayesian meta-analysis and mixed treatment comparison of randomized trials of new oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation. JAMA Neurol. 2013. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.4021.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fletcher J. What is heterogeneity and is it important? BMJ. 2007;334:94–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from http://handbook.cochrane.org/ (accessed 27 Nov 2013).
  32. 32.
    Sandercock P. The authors say: ‘the data are not so robust because of heterogeneity’ - so, how should I deal with this systematic review? Meta-analysis and the clinician. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011;31:615–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Song F, Loke YK,Walsh T, Glenny AM, Eastwood AJ, Altman DG. Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews. BMJ. 2009;338:b1147. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1147.
  34. 34.
    Donegan S, Williamson P, Gamble C, Tudur-Smith C. Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological quality. PLoS One. 2010;5(11):e11054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011054.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rosenberg RD, Aird WC. Vascular-bed–specific hemostasis and hypercoagulable states. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1555–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fleck RA, Rao LV, Rapaport SI, Varki N. Localization of human tissue factor antigen by immunostaining with monospecific, polyclonal anti-human tissue factor antibody. Thromb Res. 1990;59:421–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mackman N. The role of tissue factor and factor VIIa in hemostasis. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1447–52.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dale B, Eikelboom JW, Weitz JI, Young E, Paikin JS, Coppens M, et al. Dabigatran attenuates thrombin generation to a lesser extent than warfarin: could this explain their differential effects on intracranial hemorrhage and myocardial infarction? J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2013;35:295–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Haas S. Rivaroxaban – an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor: lessons from a broad clinical study programme. Eur J Haematol. 2009;82:339–49.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Keep RF, Hua Y, Xi G. Intracerebral haemorrhage: mechanisms of injury and therapeutic targets. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:720–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Morgenstern LB, Hemphill 3rd JC, Anderson C, Becker K, Broderick JP, Connolly Jr ES, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2010;41:2108–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Al-Shahi Salman R. Haemostatic drug therapies for acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;4, CD005951.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Anderson CS, Heeley E, Huang Y, Wang J, Stapf C, Delcourt C, et al. Rapid blood-pressure lowering in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2355–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gregson BA, Broderick JP, Auer LM, Batjer H, Chen XC, Juvela S, et al. Individual patient data subgroup meta-analysis of surgery for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke. 2012;43:1496–504.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Rowan EN, Murray GD, Gholkar A, Mitchell PM, et al. Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial lobar intracerebral haematomas (STICH II): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2013;382:397–408.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Eerenberg ES, Kamphuisen PW, Sijpkens MK, et al. Reversal of rivaroxaban and dabigatran by prothrombin complex concentrate: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy subjects. Circulation. 2011;124:1573–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dinkelaar J, Molenaar PJ, Ninivaggi M, de Laat B, Brinkman HJ, Leyte A. In vitro assessment, using thrombin generation, of the applicability of prothrombin complex concentrate as an antidote for Rivaroxaban. J Thromb Haemost. 2013;11:1111–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Marlu R, Hodaj E, Paris A, et al. Effect of non-specific reversal agents on anticoagulant activity of dabigatran and rivaroxaban: a randomised crossover ex vivo study in healthy volunteers. Thromb Haemost. 2012;108:217–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Fukuda T, Honda Y, Kamisato C, Morishima Y, Shibano T. Reversal of anticoagulant effects of edoxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor, with haemostatic agents. Thromb Haemost. 2012;107:253–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Godier A, Miclot A, Le Bonniec B, Durand M, Fischer AM, Emmerich J, et al. Evaluation of prothrombin complex concentrate and recombinant activated factor VII to reverse rivaroxaban in a rabbit model. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(1):94–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Martin AC, Le Bonniec B, Fischer AM, Marchand-Leroux C, Gaussem P, Samama CM, et al. Evaluation of recombinant activated factor VII, prothrombin complex concentrate, and fibrinogen concentrate to reverse apixaban in a rabbit model of bleeding and thrombosis. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(4):4228–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.•
    Schiele F, van Ryn J, Canada K, Newsome C, Sepulveda E, Park J, et al. A specific antidote for dabigatran: functional and structural characterization. Blood. 2013;121:3554–62. This study presents promising data for the effectiveness of a monoclonal antibody against dabigatran (aDabi-Fab) in rapidly reversing the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran, as measured by the thrombin time and aPTT, in a rat model.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Glund S, Stangier J, Schmohl M, De Smet M, Gansser D, Lang B, et al. A specific antidote for dabigatran: immediate, complete and sustained reversal of dabigatran induced anticoagulation in healthy male volunteers. Oral presentation number 17765 at 0930am on Monday November 18, 2013 at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions (Room C140), Dallas, Texas, USA.Google Scholar
  54. 54.•
    Lu G, DeGuzman FR, Hollenbach SJ, Karbarz MJ, Abe K, Lee G, et al. A specific antidote for reversal of anticoagulation by direct and indirect inhibitors of coagulation factor Xa. Nat Med. 2013;19:446–51. This study presents promising data for the effectiveness of a recombinant antidote to the factor Xa inhibitors (PRT064445), showing it rapidly reversed the anticoagulant effects of the Xa inhibitors and reduced Xa-mediated blood loss in animal models.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Portola Pharmaceuticals. Phase 2 Healthy Volunteer Study to Evaluate the Ability of PRT064445 to Reverse the Effects of Several Blood Thinner Drugs on Laboratory Tests. 2012. Clinical Trials Identifier, NCT01758432. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01758432 [accessed Dec 2013].
  56. 56.
    Laulicht B, Bakhru S, Jiang X, et al. Antidote for new oral anticoagulants: mechanism of action and binding specificity of PER977. Presented at the XXIV Congress of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Amsterdam, June 29–July 4, 2013. abstract.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Laulicht B, Bakhru S, Lee C, Baker C, Jiang X, Mathiowitz E, et al. Small molecule antidote for anticoagulants. Circulation 126.21_MeetingAbstracts (2012):A11395-A11395.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rybinnik I, Mullen MT, Messe S, Kasner SE, Cucchiara B. Treatment of acute stroke in patients on dabigatran: a survey of US Stroke Specialists. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;22:1312–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Medicine and PharmacologyThe University of Western AustraliaNedlandsAustralia
  2. 2.Department of NeurologySir Charles Gairdner HospitalNedlands, PerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations