Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography After Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) enables direct assessment of the degree and adequacy of microvascular perfusion as well as the presence of wall motion abnormalities. MCE has the following benefits in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI): 1) rapid and definite diagnosis of acute MI; 2) identification of patients who may benefit from prompt reperfusion therapy; 3) assessment of the efficacy of mechanical or pharmacologic intervention for an open infarct-related artery; 4) estimation of MI size early after reperfusion and residual myocardial viability; 5) identification of being at high risk for post-MI complications and left ventricular remodeling; and 6) assessment of myocardial viability and ischemia prior to hospital discharge. Therefore, MCE is an ideal tool for correct triaging of patients to revascularization and has both prognostic and therapeutic implications in patients with acute MI.
KeywordsEchocardiography Contrast agent Acute myocardial infarction Microcirculation Perfusion Reperfusion Contractile function Coronary intervention Thrombolysis Cardioprotection
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
- 5.Myocardial KS, Echocardiography C. A wondrous journey! J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2010;3:212–8.Google Scholar
- 9.Wei K. Utility contrast echocardiography in the emergency department. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2010;3:197–203.Google Scholar
- 11.• Wyrick JJ, Kalvaitis S, McConnell KJ, et al. Cost-efficiency of myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain of suspected cardiac origin and a nondiagnostic electrocardiogram. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102:649–52. By excluding cardiac causes in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and a nondiagnostic ECG, MCE can prevent unnecessary admissions and downstream resource utilization, making it a cost-efficient tool in the evaluation of these patients.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Ito H, Okamura A, Iwakura K, et al. Myocardial perfusion patterns related to thrombolysis in myocardial infarction perfusion grades after coronary angioplasty in patients with acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1996;9:1993–9.Google Scholar
- 24.Okamura A, Ito H, Iwakura K, et al. Clinical implications of distal embolization during coronary interventional procedures in patients with acute myocardial infarction: quantitative study with Doppler guidewire. J Am Coll Cardiol: Cardiovasculat Intervention. 2008;1:268–76.Google Scholar
- 27.• Galiuto L, Garramone B, Scarà A, et al. The extent of microvascular damage during myocardial contrast echocardiography is superior to other known indexes of post-infarct reperfusion in predicting left ventricular remodeling. Results of the Multicenter AMICI Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:552–9. Among patients with TIMI grade 3 flow, the extent of microvascular damage, detected and quantitated by MCE, is the most powerful independent predictor of LV remodeling after ST-segment elevation MI compared with persistent ST-segment elevation and myocardial blush grade.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Iwakura K, Okamura A, Koyama Y, et al. Visualization of myocardial hemorrhage with real-time three-dimensional myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Echocardiogr. doi:10.1007/s12574-011-0087-8.
- 36.De Luca G, Dudek D, Sardella G, et al. Adjunctive manual thrombectomy improves myocardial perfusion and mortality in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:3002–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.• Iwakura K, Ito H, Okamura A, et al. Comparison of two- versus three-dimensional myocardial contrast echocardiography for assessing subendocardial perfusion abnormality after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1502–10. 2D MCE may miss small size of subendocardial defects because of limited echo planes. 3D MCE provides better assessment of myocardial perfusion abnormality.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.• Dwivedi G, Janardhanan R, Hayat SA, et al. Prognostic value of myocardial viability detected by myocardial contrast echocardiography early after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:327–34. The extent of residual myocardial viability estimated as contrast defect score a mean of 7 days after acute MI by MCE is a powerful independent predictor of hard cardiac events in patients.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Wei K, Mulvagh SL, Carson L, et al. The safety of Definity and Optison for ultrasound image enhancement: a retrospective analysis of 78,383 administered contrast doses. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;11:1202–6.Google Scholar
- 45.• Kusnetzky LL, Khalid A, Khumri TM, et al. Acute mortality in hospitalized patients undergoing echocardiography with and without an ultrasound contrast agent. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1704–6. There is no increased mortality risk associated with ultrasonic contrast-enhanced examinations, despite evidence for higher clinical acuity and more comorbid conditions in patients undergoing contrast studies.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar