Current Cardiology Reports

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 180–189

Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: Not Only a Bystander

  • Philippe Unger
  • Julien Magne
  • Chantal Dedobbeleer
  • Patrizio Lancellotti
Valvular Heart Disease (V Nkomo, Section Editor)

Abstract

Ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common complication of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction related to chronic coronary artery disease. This complex multifactorial disease involves global and regional LV remodeling, as well as dysfunction and distortion of the components of the mitral valve including the chordae, the annulus, and the leaflets. Its occurrence is associated with a poor prognosis. The suboptimal results obtained with the most commonly used surgical strategy, involving mitral valve annuloplasty with coronary bypass grafting, emphasize the need to develop alternative surgical techniques targeting the causal mechanisms of the disease. A comprehensive preoperative assessment of mitral valve configuration and LV geometry and function and an accurate quantification of MR severity at rest and during exercise may contribute to improve risk stratification and to tailor the surgical strategy according to the individual characteristics of the patient.

Keywords

Valve Mitral regurgitation Ischemia Left ventricular dysfunction 

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Levine RA, Schwammenthal E. Ischemic mitral regurgitation on the threshold of a solution. From paradoxes to unifying concepts. Circulation. 2005;112:745–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Magne J, Sénéchal M, Dumesnil JG, Pibarot P. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: a complex multifaceted disease. Cardiology. 2009;112:244–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bursi F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Jacobsen SJ, Roger VL. Mitral regurgitation after myocardial infarction: a review. Am J Med. 2006;119:103–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DePasquale NP, Burch GE. Papillary muscle dysfunction in coronary (ischemic) heart disease. Annu Rev Med. 1971;22:327–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Godley R, Wann L, Rogers E, et al. Incomplete mitral leaflet closure in patients with papillary muscle dysfunction. Circulation. 1981;63:565–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaul S, Spotnitz W, Glasheen W, Touchstone D. Mechanism of ischemic mitral regurgitation: an experimental evaluation. Circulation. 1991;84:2167–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dent JM, Spotnitz WD, Nolan SP, et al. Mechanism of mitral leaflet excursion. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:H2100–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery—the “French correction”. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;86:323–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yiu SF, Enriquez-Sarano M, Tribouilloy C, et al. Determinants of the degree of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with systolic left ventricular dysfunction: a quantitative clinical study. Circulation. 2000;102:1400–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Agricola E, Oppizzi M, Maisano F, et al. Echocardiographic classification of chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation caused by restricted motion according to tethering pattern. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2004;5:326–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Soleimani M, Khazalpour M, Cheng G, et al.: Moderate mitral regurgitation accelerates left ventricular remodeling after posterolateral myocardial infarction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 (in press).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    •• Chaput M, Handschumacher MD, Guerrero JL, et al.: Mitral leaflet adaptation to ventricular remodeling. Prospective changes in a model of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2009;120[suppl 1]:S99–103. This is an animal study reporting that mitral leaflet area increases over time as the left ventricle remodels, but this adaptation fails to compensate adequately for tethering to prevent MR.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pierard LA, Lancellotti P. The role of ischemic mitral regurgitation in the pathogenesis of acute pulmonary edema. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1627–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lancellotti P, Gerard PL, Pierard LA. Long-term outcome of patients with heart failure and dynamic functional mitral regurgitation. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1528–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pierard LA, Lancellotti P. Stress testing in valve disease. Heart. 2007;93:766–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lapu-Bula R, Robert A, Van CD, et al. Contribution of exercise-induced mitral regurgitation to exercise stroke volume and exercise capacity in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Circulation. 2002;106:1342–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McCully RB, Enriquez-Sarano M, Tajik AJ, Seward JB. Overestimation of severity of ischemic/functional mitral regurgitation by color Doppler jet area. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:790–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E, et al. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16:777–802.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lancellotti P, Moura L, Pierard LA, et al. European Association of Echocardiography recommendations for the assessment of valvular regurgitation. Part 2: mitral and tricuspid regurgitation (native valve disease). Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11:307–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Enriquez-Sarano M, Miller FA, Hayes SN, et al. Effective mitral regurgitation orifice area: clinical use and pitfalls of the proximal isovelocity surface area method. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:703–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lesniak-Sobelga A, Olszowska M, Pienazek P, et al. Vena contracta width as a simple method of assessing mitral valve regurgitation. Comparison with Doppler quantitative methods. J Heart Valve Dis. 2004;13:608–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2006;114:e84–e231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grigioni F, Basmadjian A, Enriquez-Sarano M. Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: impact on outcome and Implications of quantitative measurements. Circulation. 1999;100:I-378.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nesta F, Otsuji Y, Handschumacher MD, et al. Leaflet concavity: a rapid visual clue to the presence and mechanism of functional mitral regurgitation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16:1301–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Picano E, Pibarot P, Lancellotti P, et al. The emerging role of exercise testing and stress echocardiography in valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:2251–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lancellotti P, Troisfontaines P, Toussaint AC, Pierard LA. Prognostic importance of exercise-induced changes in mitral regurgitation in patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 2003;108:1713–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lamas G, Mitchell G, Flaker G, et al. Clinical significance of mitral regurgitation after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1997;96:827–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grigioni F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Zehr KJ, et al. Ischemic mitral regurgitation. Long-term outcome and prognostic implications with quantitative Doppler assessment. Circulation. 2001;103:1759–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ellis SG, Whitlow PL, Raymond RE, Schneider JP. Impact of mitral regurgitation on long-term survival after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:315–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Grigioni F, Detaint D, Avierinos JF, et al. Contribution of ischemic mitral regurgitation to congestive heart failure after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:260–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rossi A, Dini FL, Faggiano P, et al. Independent prognostic value of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with heart failure. A quantitative analysis of 1256 patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Heart. 2011;97:1675–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Grossi EA, Crooke GA, DiGiorgi PL, et al. Impact of moderate functional mitral insufficiency in patients undergoing surgical revascularization. Circulation. 2006;114:I573–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: the Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:230–68.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rosario L, Stevenson L, Solomon S, et al. The mechanism of decrease in dynamic mitral regurgitation during heart failure treatment: importance of reduction in the regurgitant orifice size. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1819–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Levine A, Muller C, Levine TB. Effects of high-dose lisinopril-isosorbide dinitrate on severe mitral regurgitation and heart failure remodeling. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:1299–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lowes BD, Gill EA, Abraham WT, et al. Effects of carvedilol on left ventricular mass, chamber geometry, and mitral regurgitation in chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:1201–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Capomolla S, Febo O, Gnemmi M, et al. Beta-blockade therapy in chronic heart failure: diastolic function and mitral regurgitation improvement by carvedilol. Am Heart J. 2000;139:596–608.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    St John SM, Pfeffer MA, Moye L, et al. Cardiovascular death and left ventricular remodeling two years after myocardial infarction: baseline predictors and impact of long-term use of captopril: information from the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) trial. Circulation. 1997;96:3294–9.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sutton MG, Plappert T, Hilpisch KE, et al. Sustained reverse left ventricular structural remodeling with cardiac resynchronization at one year is a function of etiology: quantitative Doppler echocardiographic evidence from the Multicenter InSync Randomized Clinical Evaluation (MIRACLE). Circulation. 2006;113:266–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    John Sutton MG, Plappert T, Abraham WT, et al. Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular size and function in chronic heart failure. Circulation. 2003;107:1985–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Breithardt OA, Sinha AM, Schwammenthal E, et al. Acute effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on functional mitral regurgitation in advanced systolic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:765–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kanzaki H, Bazaz R, Schwartzman D, et al. A mechanism for immediate reduction in mitral regurgitation after cardiac resynchronization therapy: insights from mechanical activation strain mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1619–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ypenburg C, Lancellotti P, Tops LF, et al. Acute effects of initiation and withdrawal of cardiac resynchronization therapy on papillary muscle dyssynchrony and mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:2071–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Diaz-Infante E, Mont L, Leal J, Garcia-Bolao I, et al. Predictors of lack of response to resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95:1436–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ypenburg C, Schalij MJ, Bleeker GB, et al. Impact of viability and scar tissue on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischaemic heart failure patients. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:33–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bleeker GB, Kaandorp TA, Lamb HJ, et al. Effect of posterolateral scar tissue on clinical and echocardiographic improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2006;113:969–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Brandt RR, Reiner C, Arnold R, et al. Contractile response and mitral regurgitation after temporary interruption of long-term cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:187–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lancellotti P, Melon P, Sakalihasan N, et al. Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on functional mitral regurgitation in heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:1462–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Madaric J, Vanderheyden M, Van Laethem C, et al. Early and late effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on exercise-induced mitral regurgitation: relationship with left ventricular dyssynchrony, remodelling and cardiopulmonary performance. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2134–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pierard LA, Lancellotti P. When and how does cardiac resynchronization therapy reduce dynamic mitral regurgitation? Eur Heart J. 2007;28:2055–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    D’Andrea A, Caso P, Cuomo S, et al. Effect of dynamic myocardial dyssynchrony on mitral regurgitation during supine bicycle exercise stress echocardiography in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and ‘narrow’ QRS. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:1004–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pierard LA. Left ventricular dyssynchrony and functional mitral regurgitation: two dynamic conditions. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:924–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Tenenbaum A, Leor J, Motro M, et al. Improved posterobasal segment function after thrombolysis is associated with decreased incidence of significant mitral regurgitation in a first inferior myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:1558–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Le Feuvre C, Metzger JP, Lachurie ML, et al. Treatment of severe mitral regurgitation caused by ischemic papillary muscle dysfunction: indications for coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J. 1992;123:860–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Shawl FA, Forman MB, Punja S, Goldbaum TS. Emergent coronary angioplasty in the treatment of acute ischemic mitral regurgitation: long-term results in five cases. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;14:986–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kang DH, Sun BJ, Kim DH, et al. Percutaneous versus surgical revascularization in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2011;124(Suppl):S156–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hamner CE, Sundt III TM. Trends in the surgical management of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2003;5:116–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bax JJ, Braun J, Somer ST, Klautz R, et al. Restrictive annuloplasty and coronary revascularization in ischemic mitral regurgitation results in reverse left ventricular remodeling. Circulation. 2004;110:II103–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Braun J, Bax JJ, Versteegh MI, et al. Preoperative left ventricular dimensions predict reverse remodeling following restrictive mitral annuloplasty in ischemic mitral regurgitation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;27:847–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Mihaljevic T, Lam BK, Rajeswaran J, et al. Impact of mitral valve annuloplasty combined with revascularization in patients with functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2191–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jones RH. Adding mitral valve annuloplasty to surgical revascularization does not benefit patients with functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2202–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Diodato MD, Moon MR, Pasque MK, et al. Repair of ischemic mitral regurgitation does not increase mortality or improve long-term survival in patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization: a propensity analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:794–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ryden T, Bech-Hanssen O, Brandrup-Wognsen G, et al. The importance of grade 2 ischemic mitral regurgitation in coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;20:276–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Aklog L, Filsoufi F, Flores KQ, et al. Does coronary artery bypass grafting alone correct moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation? Circulation. 2001;104:I68–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Lam BK, Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, et al. Importance of moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:462–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Penicka M, Linkova H, Lang O, et al. Predictors of improvement of unrepaired moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing elective isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation. 2009;120:1474–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Prifti E, Bonacchi M, Frati G, et al. Should mild-to-moderate and moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation be corrected in patients with impaired left ventricular function undergoing simultaneous coronary revascularization? J Card Surg. 2001;16:473–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wong DR, Agnihotri AK, Hung JW, et al. Long-term survival after surgical revascularization for moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:570–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kang DH, Kim MJ, Kang SJ, et al. Mitral valve repair versus revascularization alone in the treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2006;114:I499–503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lancellotti P, Donal E, Cosyns B, et al. Effects of surgery on ischaemic mitral regurgitation: a prospective multicenter registry (SIMRAM registry). Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008;9:26–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Green GR, Dagum P, Glasson JR, et al. Restricted posterior leaflet motion after mitral ring annuloplasty. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:2100–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Magne J, Pibarot P, Dagenais F, Hachicha Z, Dumesnil JG, Sénéchal M. Preoperative posterior leaflet angle accurately predicts outcome after restrictive mitral valve annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2007;115:782–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Zhu F, Otsuji Y, Yotsumoto G, et al. Mechanism of persistent ischemic mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty. Importance of augmented posterior mitral leaflet tethering. Circulation. 2005;112:I-396–401.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Hung J, Papakostas L, Tahta SA, et al. Mechanism of recurrent ischemic mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty: continued LV remodeling as a moving target. Circulation. 2004;110:II85–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Serri K, Bouchard D, Demers P, et al. Is a good perioperative echocardiographic result predictive of durability in ischemic mitral valve repair? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:565–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Kongsaerepong V, Shiota M, Gillinov AM, et al. Echocardiographic predictors of successful versus unsuccessful mitral valve repair in ischemic mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:504–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Calafiore AM, Gallina S, Di Mauro M. Mitral valve procedure in dilated cardiomyopathy: repair or replacement? Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:1146–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Lee AP, Acker M, Kubo SH, et al. Mechanisms of recurrent functional mitral regurgitation after mitral valve repair in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: importance of distal anterior leaflet tethering. Circulation. 2009;119:2606–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    •• Gelsomino S, van Garsse L, Lucà F, et al.: Impact of preoperative anterior leaflet tethering on the recurrence of ischemic mitral regurgitation and the lack of left ventricular reverse remodeling after restrictive annuloplasty. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011. [Epub ahead of print]. This is a large series showing that the measurement of anterior leaflet angle may predict MR recurrence and the lack of LV reverse remodeling following undersized mitral valve annuloplasty.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Roshanali F, Mandegar MH, Yousefnia MA, et al. A prospective study of predicting factors in ischemic mitral regurgitation recurrence after ring annuloplasty. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:745–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    McGee EC, Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, et al. Recurrent mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;128:916–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Gelsomino S, Lorusso R, De Cicco G, et al. Five-year echocardiographic results of combined undersized mitral ring annuloplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting for chronic ischaemic mitral regurgitation. Eur Heart J. 2007;29:231–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Magne J, Sénéchal M, Mathieu P, et al. Restrictive annuloplasty for ischemic mitral regurgitation may induce functional mitral stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1692–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Daimon M, Fukuda S, Adams DH, et al. Mitral valve repair with Carpentier-McCarthy-Adams IMR ETlogix annuloplasty ring for ischemic mitral regurgitation: early echocardiographic results from a multicenter study. Circulation. 2006;114(suppl):I-588–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Borger MA, Murphy PM, Alam A, et al. Initial results of the chordal-cutting operation for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:1483–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    de Varennes B, Chaturvedi R, Sidhu S, et al. Initial results of posterior leaflet extension for severe type IIIb ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2009;119:2837–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    • Langer F, Kunihara T, Hell K, et al.: Ring+String. Successful repair technique for ischemic mitral regurgitation with severe leaflet tethering. Circulation. 2009;120[suppl 1]:S85–91. This is a surgical series showing that in patients with ischemic MR and high degree of preoperative mitral valve deformation, the addition of STRING to RING attenuates the risk of repair failure.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    • Jensen H, Jensen MO, Smerup MH, et al.: Impact of papillary muscle relocation as adjunct procedure to mitral ring annuloplasty in functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2009;120[suppl 1]:S92–8. This is an animal study showing that adding PM relocation to downsized ring annuloplasty reduced lateral leaflet tethering and, in turn, may decrease the rate of persistent and/or recurrent MR following surgery.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Reece BT, Tribble CG, Ellman PI, et al. Mitral repair is superior to replacement when associated with coronary artery disease. Ann Surg. 2004;239:671–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Al-Radi OO, Austin PC, Tu JV, et al. Mitral repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1260–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Thourani VH, Weintraub WS, Guyton RA, et al. Outcomes and long-term survival for patients undergoing mitral valve repair versus replacement. Effect of age and concomittant artery bypass grafting. Circulation. 2003;108:298–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Vassileva CM, Boley T, Markwell S, et al. Meta-analysis of short-term and long-term survival following repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39:295–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Cohn L, Rizzo R, Adams D, et al. The effect of pathophysiology on the surgical treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation: operative and late risks of repair versus replacement. Eur J Cardiothor Surg. 1995;9:568–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Gillinov AM, Wierup PN, Blackstone EH, et al. Is repair preferable to replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:1125–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Magne J, Girerd N, Sénéchal M, et al. Mitral repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Comparison of short-term and long-term survival. Circulation. 2009;120([suppl 1]):S104–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    •• Chan V, Ruel M, Mesana TG: Mitral valve replacement is a viable alternative to mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation: a case-matched study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:1358–66. This is a recent series reporting that MVR provides better freedom from mild-to-moderate postoperative MR than MVA with a low incidence of valve-related complications. Furthermore, MVR was associated with similar postoperative LV function.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Grossi EA, Goldberg JD, LaPietra A, et al. Ischemic mitral valve reconstruction and replacement: comparison of long-term survival and complications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:1107–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Feldman T, Foster E, Glower DD, et al. Percutaneous repair or surgery for mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1395–406.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Schofer J, Siminiak T, Haude M, et al. Percutaneous mitral annuloplasty for functional mitral regurgitation. Results of the CARILLON Mitral Annuloplasty Device European Union Study. Circulation. 2009;120:326–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe Unger
    • 1
  • Julien Magne
    • 2
  • Chantal Dedobbeleer
    • 1
  • Patrizio Lancellotti
    • 2
  1. 1.Cardiology Department, Erasme HospitalUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Cardiology DepartmentUniversity of LiègeLiègeBelgium

Personalised recommendations